Page 13 of 24
Re: There is no 'Matter of Fact' [Analytic].
Posted: Mon Mar 15, 2021 5:22 pm
by Terrapin Station
Skepdick wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 5:20 pm
Terrapin Station wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 5:16 pm
So extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence unless you just so happen to be a charitable guy, haha.
Que?
Why did you write: "Time is not ontological. Time is epistemic."
Re: There is no 'Matter of Fact' [Analytic].
Posted: Mon Mar 15, 2021 5:23 pm
by Skepdick
Terrapin Station wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 5:22 pm
Why did you write: "Time is not ontological. Time is epistemic."
Because I know that to be the case.
I am making a claim about my own epistemology. I hope you don't mind?
Re: There is no 'Matter of Fact' [Analytic].
Posted: Mon Mar 15, 2021 5:27 pm
by Terrapin Station
Skepdick wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 5:23 pm
Terrapin Station wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 5:22 pm
Why did you write: "Time is not ontological. Time is epistemic."
Because I know that to be the case.
I am making a claim about my own epistemology. I hope you don't mind?
So that's a claim. If it's extraordinary, doesn't it require extraordinary evidence?
Re: There is no 'Matter of Fact' [Analytic].
Posted: Mon Mar 15, 2021 5:28 pm
by Skepdick
Terrapin Station wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 5:27 pm
So that's a claim. If it's extraordinary, doesn't it require extraordinary evidence?
I have the extraordinary evidence. Right here. In my own head.
You have a problem with that?
Re: There is no 'Matter of Fact' [Analytic].
Posted: Mon Mar 15, 2021 5:32 pm
by Terrapin Station
Skepdick wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 5:28 pm
Terrapin Station wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 5:27 pm
So that's a claim. If it's extraordinary, doesn't it require extraordinary evidence?
I have the extraordinary evidence. Right here. In my own head.
You have a problem with that?
So it's sufficient to just know it to yourself and not share it?
Re: There is no 'Matter of Fact' [Analytic].
Posted: Mon Mar 15, 2021 5:34 pm
by Skepdick
Terrapin Station wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 5:32 pm
So it's sufficient to just know it to yourself and not share it?
Of course it's sufficient.
Why do you think you get to decide my sufficiencies?
Re: There is no 'Matter of Fact' [Analytic].
Posted: Mon Mar 15, 2021 5:39 pm
by Terrapin Station
Skepdick wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 5:34 pm
Terrapin Station wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 5:32 pm
So it's sufficient to just know it to yourself and not share it?
Of course it's sufficient.
Why do you think you get to decide my sufficiencies?
Cool, so I'll remember that the next time you ask and it should satisfy you.
Re: There is no 'Matter of Fact' [Analytic].
Posted: Mon Mar 15, 2021 5:41 pm
by Skepdick
Terrapin Station wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 5:39 pm
Cool, so I'll remember that the next time you ask and it should satisfy you.
Ah, shame dumbass.
What goes on in my head is none of your business.
What you think goes on outside of your head. That's the business of Philosophy.
If you claim that time is ontological, show us what you paid for when you wasted time/money on that PhD of yours.
Re: There is no 'Matter of Fact' [Analytic].
Posted: Mon Mar 15, 2021 5:43 pm
by Terrapin Station
Skepdick wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 5:41 pm
What you think goes on outside of your head. That's the business of Philosophy.
Right, so according to you, what goes on inside your head isn't the business of philosophy.
Re: There is no 'Matter of Fact' [Analytic].
Posted: Mon Mar 15, 2021 5:44 pm
by Skepdick
Terrapin Station wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 5:43 pm
Right, so according to you, what goes on inside your head isn't the business of philosophy.
Correct. It's my business and my business only.
And if you don't like it... suck a fuck. Dumbass philosophers are not welcome in here.
Re: There is no 'Matter of Fact' [Analytic].
Posted: Mon Mar 15, 2021 5:45 pm
by Terrapin Station
Skepdick wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 5:44 pm
Terrapin Station wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 5:43 pm
Right, so according to you, what goes on inside your head isn't the business of philosophy.
Correct. It's my business and my business only.
And if you don't like it... suck a fuck. Dumbass philosophers are not welcome in here.
lol
Re: There is no 'Matter of Fact' [Analytic].
Posted: Mon Mar 15, 2021 5:47 pm
by Skepdick
Terrapin Station wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 5:45 pm
Skepdick wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 5:44 pm
Terrapin Station wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 5:43 pm
Right, so according to you, what goes on inside your head isn't the business of philosophy.
Correct. It's my business and my business only.
And if you don't like it... suck a fuck. Dumbass philosophers are not welcome in here.
lol
I bet you don't even know why that's funny.
You believe that beliefs are non-causal. Beliefs and actions are different things.
So why do you even care what I believe if my beliefs can't possibly affect you?
Re: There is no 'Matter of Fact' [Analytic].
Posted: Mon Mar 15, 2021 5:53 pm
by Terrapin Station
Skepdick wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 5:47 pm
Terrapin Station wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 5:45 pm
Skepdick wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 5:44 pm
Correct. It's my business and my business only.
And if you don't like it... suck a fuck. Dumbass philosophers are not welcome in here.
lol
I bet you don't even know why that's funny.
You believe that beliefs are non-causal. Beliefs and actions are different things.
So why do you even care what I believe if my beliefs can't possibly affect you?
Right, so apparently you're thinking that it can't be funny for the reasons that I found it funny.
A lot of my attraction to philosophy was the same as something G.E. Moore said was one of his main attractions to philosophy: to figure out why people claim some of the curious things they claim.
It's kind of like freak show curiosity. Or being intrigued by the residents of a mental home. Some of us find that sort of thing entertaining in its own right.
Re: There is no 'Matter of Fact' [Analytic].
Posted: Mon Mar 15, 2021 5:56 pm
by Skepdick
Terrapin Station wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 5:53 pm
Right, so apparently you're thinking that it can't be funny for the reasons that I found it funny.
A lot of my attraction to philosophy was the same as something G.E. Moore said was one of his main attractions to philosophy: to figure out why people claim some of the curious things they claim.
It's kind of like freak show curiosity. Or being intrigued by the residents of a mental home. Some of us find that sort of thing entertaining in its own right.
That sure explains why you have this weird obsession with somebody who doesn't have any interest in claiming anything (me).
Re: There is no 'Matter of Fact' [Analytic].
Posted: Mon Mar 15, 2021 5:58 pm
by Terrapin Station
Skepdick wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 5:56 pm
Terrapin Station wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 5:53 pm
Right, so apparently you're thinking that it can't be funny for the reasons that I found it funny.
A lot of my attraction to philosophy was the same as something G.E. Moore said was one of his main attractions to philosophy: to figure out why people claim some of the curious things they claim.
It's kind of like freak show curiosity. Or being intrigued by the residents of a mental home. Some of us find that sort of thing entertaining in its own right.
That sure explains why you have this weird obsession with somebody who doesn't have any interest in claiming anything (me).
Yeah, that you claim you don't claim anything is part of the curiosity. That's the same as Age more or less. He claims to not believe anything.