Philosophy Now Forum

Ladies of the Greek Olympic swimming team prepare one of their colleagues for Accelafine's gender tests

FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2024 5:37 pm Ladies of the Greek Olympic swimming team prepare one of their colleagues for Accelafine's gender tests

Now those are some dangerpants if I've ever seen em.

Here's the real abuse of the Olympics: The athletes are the attractions and have put in unbelievable efforts to get there. They make no direct money from their work. The financial winners are The International Olympic Committee (IOC), The National Olympic Committees, International Sports Federations, Local Organizing Committees, Host countries and cities and Media Outlets (through advertising). Of course some athletes, mainly medal winners, can make money off their participation. But that's a small %, and hey, other people are making money off their sweat and skill.

The 'noble values of the event' make it seems sort of natural that these organizations get to make enornmous profits off the work of others. Yes, I know they do work too, but it's a great scam. Ponzai schemers often do lots of work too.

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2024 4:23 pm

Alexiev wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2024 3:38 pm For anyone actually interested in this issue, here's a New Yorker article (those who merely want to rant need not bother with it).

https://www.newyorker.com/culture/the-w ... ns-leagues

What I find interesting about this boxing thing is, the people who you would normally see coming out insisting gender is incredibly simple are now coming out saying, this boxer shouldn't box women because gender is actually a little complex.

If gender is simple, then these boxers were born with vaginas and they're boxing other people with vaginas - a simplistic understanding of gender means there's no controversy at all, let them box. It's only debatable when we acknowledge gender is more complex than that.

Do you even know what a vagina is you sad little person? Sex isn't complex at all. You are either male or female no matter how ambiguous your genitals might be at birth. Women don't go through male puberty.
Funny how this is only a 'complex issue' when it comes to men in 'women's' sports.
I'm not surprised that you would get your rocks off watching women getting punched in the face by men.

FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2024 5:37 pm Ladies of the Greek Olympic swimming team prepare one of their colleagues for Accelafine's gender tests

The revolting hyopcrisy of the woke showing itself yet again. What did you google search to find 'that', creepy little man?

There is no such thing as 'gender'. The word is 'sex'. Don't be coy.

When have I ever advocated for 'gender' tests? What kind of 'test' would that involve?

You just wanted to post that photo you sleazebag. Do you think a woman is a castrated man? Now get back to whacking off. Apologies for interrupting you. Sorry to disappoint you though, but I'm pretty sure that photo's been 'doctored' for whatever sleazy site you found it on.

A simple cheek swab would have sufficed. Gee, I wonder why those 'women' haven't provided one and avoided all this bother. Hmm. I can't think of any reason why they wouldn't do this. It's so 'baffling'

Oh, That's right. Nothing screams 'woman' like internal testicles and a passport

Photo of 9 year old boy for underpantsflasher

Underpantsflasher's ideal woman:





Clothes maketh the man a woman...

accelafine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2024 8:45 pm

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2024 4:23 pm

Alexiev wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2024 3:38 pm For anyone actually interested in this issue, here's a New Yorker article (those who merely want to rant need not bother with it).

https://www.newyorker.com/culture/the-w ... ns-leagues

What I find interesting about this boxing thing is, the people who you would normally see coming out insisting gender is incredibly simple are now coming out saying, this boxer shouldn't box women because gender is actually a little complex.

If gender is simple, then these boxers were born with vaginas and they're boxing other people with vaginas - a simplistic understanding of gender means there's no controversy at all, let them box. It's only debatable when we acknowledge gender is more complex than that.

Do you even know what a vagina is you sad little person? Sex isn't complex at all. You are either male or female no matter how ambiguous your genitals might be at birth. Women don't go through male puberty.
Funny how this is only a 'complex issue' when it comes to men in 'women's' sports.
I'm not surprised that you would get your rocks off watching women getting punched in the face by men.

You have a complex viewpoint on this. The simple viewpoint is, people born with vaginas are women. If you think there are exceptions to that, then you're aware of edge cases that challenge our intuitive ideas about gender. Gender must be complex, if you think this person born with a vagina is not a woman.

I also think gender is complex, so me and you agree on that: gender is complex.

And all so that misogynistic men (and let's be honest here, that's pretty much all of them) like underpantsflasher and iwanafart can get their rocks off seeing a woman being punched senseless by a man.

accelafine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2024 9:04 pm

Oh god, more straight up lies being spread on this forum? What's your problem?

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2024 9:33 pm

accelafine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2024 8:45 pm

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2024 4:23 pm

What I find interesting about this boxing thing is, the people who you would normally see coming out insisting gender is incredibly simple are now coming out saying, this boxer shouldn't box women because gender is actually a little complex.

If gender is simple, then these boxers were born with vaginas and they're boxing other people with vaginas - a simplistic understanding of gender means there's no controversy at all, let them box. It's only debatable when we acknowledge gender is more complex than that.

Do you even know what a vagina is you sad little person? Sex isn't complex at all. You are either male or female no matter how ambiguous your genitals might be at birth. Women don't go through male puberty.
Funny how this is only a 'complex issue' when it comes to men in 'women's' sports.
I'm not surprised that you would get your rocks off watching women getting punched in the face by men.

You have a complex viewpoint on this. The simple viewpoint is, people born with vaginas are women. If you think there are exceptions to that, then you're aware of edge cases that challenge our intuitive ideas about gender. Gender must be complex, if you think this person born with a vagina is not a woman.

I also think gender is complex, so me and you agree on that: gender is complex.

As you clealy can't read then there's no point in discussing this. Who was 'born with a vagina'? He had ambiguous genitals at birth. It happens sometimes, and was incorrectly reported as 'female'. Chromosome tests aren't done on newborns so mistakes occasionally happen.
Sex isn't complex. Foetal development is. Some newborns have six toes on each foot too, or no nose, or no ears.
Why would you keep arguing about this? What's the point? Do you really want to see a man punching a woman that much? I'm sure you can find some porn sites for that.

accelafine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2024 9:42 pm As you clealy can't read then there's no point in discussing this. Who was 'born with a vagina'? He had ambiguous genitals at birth.

Oh yeah? Ambiguous? What's the evidence for that?