Re: Infanticide
Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2018 10:49 pm
Stated clinically, impartially and without prejudice, the main problem here is the Nick_A mind; it's as tightly sealed as a can of vegetable soup with no noticeable difference in taste, texture or content a hundred years after its expiry date. You don't reason, you only quote your intellectual heroes as THE sacrosanct and sacred source of your self-proclaimed enlightenment. There are no sequiturs of investigation on your part, only complete acceptance like feeding code to a computer never inconvenienced or embarrassed by endless repetitions.Nick_A wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 11:24 pm Dubious wrote
This could be a question worth discussing but you suffer the same affliction of the Greta mind which asserts: "When it doubt blame Trump." So it is up to those not so afflicted to discuss the relative merits of inductive bottom up reasoning with deductive top down reasoning in attempting to appreciate the human condition and human conscious potential within a universal context. Is there more to the question of infanticide than "yo momma sucks?" Who knows? But when in doubt, blame Trump and you will appear intelligent.What you've never noticed once or given any credence to is that secularism by its very nature is intensely analytical and self-critical completely opposite to your insanely stupid eternal values that proceed from the hyperventilations of a diseased brain; such, if successful, cause more misery than revelation. What has no flexibility eventually breaks...a long established truth!
Nothing can be discussed with you except by those who willy-nilly agree with all your anti-secular bigotry. For whatever reason, you managed to hitch your mental apparatus to the four horses of your mental apocalypse - Simone, Einstein, Needleman, Plato. It begs the question, do your views really correlate with theirs or are you simply subrogating their philosophies to suit your own conclusions and delusions! Like smoking and drinking - and I've done plenty of both - that's when philosophy becomes dangerous to one's mental health.
It's within the secular realm that philosophies emerge or get fertilized as consequence of all the heterogeneous forces and discords that exist within it. Secularism can be discordant and go to extremes but it also possesses the means of neutralizing excess in which reason is forced to defend the rational when the latter is infringed. Within secularism the Great Beast is usually countered by another Great Beast that didn't agree with its predecessor ...and so it goes.
Also, an "eternal value" created by humans does not have to be good just because one decides to call it that! As with all values created by humans, many are not good and the worst in that class are your so-called "eternal" ones...those preconditioned by some presumed ultra-human authority likewise created by humans. Such terms become counterfeit when employed to sanction theistic, political or intellectual goals with a credence beyond our normal limits to define.
In effect, your ideology, like a virus, has quarantined itself against any "foreign" influences which attempt to penetrate your pristine assumptions starting with Plato's cave. Your mind works on the assumption that one absolute deserves another; The simple inclusion of "Eternal Values" into a statement will make it immune to further argument; don't blaspheme the sacred! Those infected with such values cannot properly be debated with so why bother discussing any of it! Nothing becomes of nothing as Lear kindly pointed out...or is all that nonsense just a ploy to be noticed with all your attention-seeking posts?
As mentioned, getting into a serious debate with you is truly impossible! Where do all these pieces that don't fit come from! Where did I mention Trump!? What's he got to do with it?? I can't recall having mentioned him for a long time on any subject - sorry if that sounds like a Jeff Sessions statement! - though I'm reasonably certain if I did, it probably wasn't favorable.
As for the "Greta mind", we seldom communicate but I'll state unequivocally, I wouldn't trade her mind for a baker's dozen of yours even if DAM offered herself as incentive into the bargain.