Philosophy Now Forum

Posted: **Thu Jan 02, 2025 1:02 pm**

Young women are where societies begin, and end.

Posted: **Thu Jan 02, 2025 1:16 pm**

Wizard22 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2025 1:01 pm
FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2025 12:54 pmYou wanted a response to your arguments, signified by the phrase "I'll be waiting for the day when you can actually respond to any of my arguments." in philosophy, an argument is an arrangement of premises in support of a conclusion. Your "positions" are not arguments, they are just a bunch of semi-literate screeds. I have responded to those with all the seriousness they merit.
When I mention virginity, your brain automatically goes to Sodomy...why is that? Are you gay?

A young woman's sexual value is like 1000x more valuable than a young man's. Nobody cares about your perverse desires, besides your boyfriend perhaps?

More valuable to you, you creepy old pervert. A young man's 'sexual value' is 1000 times more valuable to a young woman than yours is. You're welcome.

Posted: **Thu Jan 02, 2025 1:22 pm**

Wizard22 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2025 1:01 pm
FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2025 12:54 pmYou wanted a response to your arguments, signified by the phrase "I'll be waiting for the day when you can actually respond to any of my arguments." in philosophy, an argument is an arrangement of premises in support of a conclusion. Your "positions" are not arguments, they are just a bunch of semi-literate screeds. I have responded to those with all the seriousness they merit.
When I mention virginity, your brain automatically goes to Sodomy...why is that? Are you gay?

A young woman's sexual value is like 1000x more valuable than a young man's. Nobody cares about your perverse desires, besides your boyfriend perhaps?

That is also not an argument with premises supporting a conclusion. This wait you claim to be engaged in for me to reply to such an argument is really a you problem right now.

Posted: **Thu Jan 02, 2025 1:24 pm**

A lot of misogynistic homosexuals on this site. Explains a lot. Not surprising.

Posted: **Thu Jan 02, 2025 1:45 pm**

ah c'mon... two halves can't make a whole without a hole!

Posted: **Fri Jan 03, 2025 12:38 am**

Wizard22 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2025 10:06 am I believe that it is very important to protect a Daughter's chastity, innocence, and virtue.

OMG!! These people still exist in the West, only in USA surely..

Wizard22 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2025 10:06 am Are Catholic Churches that don't even confirm the bride's virginity...are they even real churches?!

Because I feel like they're not. I feel like they're not being serious about the whole "LORD Christ, is King" stuff.

Aren't religious people supposed to be serious...at least pretend to be serious about their supposed "Religious Beliefs"???

I believe that it is very important to protect a Daughter's chastity, innocence, and virtue.

Jesus was probably banging Mary Magdeline and many other birds around at the time that heard about his GODly sexual power.

Did you have something from the Bible to support Christ stating VIRGINS only are to be permitted marriage? (*please provide)

btw. I am Catholic, (i think i can still consider myself as one, even tho I disagree with the irony of no permittance of contraception and no to abortions)

Posted: **Fri Jan 03, 2025 5:12 am**

Wizard22 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2025 1:01 pm
FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2025 12:54 pmYou wanted a response to your arguments, signified by the phrase "I'll be waiting for the day when you can actually respond to any of my arguments." in philosophy, an argument is an arrangement of premises in support of a conclusion. Your "positions" are not arguments, they are just a bunch of semi-literate screeds. I have responded to those with all the seriousness they merit.
When I mention virginity, your brain automatically goes to Sodomy...why is that? Are you gay?

A young woman's sexual value is like 1000x more valuable than a young man's.

This is one of those times when and where you are presenting just a conclusion, ONLY.

Do you have ANY actual premises that support 'this conclusion'?

Posted: **Fri Jan 03, 2025 5:16 am**

attofishpi wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2025 12:38 am
Wizard22 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2025 10:06 am I believe that it is very important to protect a Daughter's chastity, innocence, and virtue.
OMG!! These people still exist in the West, only in USA surely..

Wizard22 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2025 10:06 am Are Catholic Churches that don't even confirm the bride's virginity...are they even real churches?!

Because I feel like they're not. I feel like they're not being serious about the whole "LORD Christ, is King" stuff.

Aren't religious people supposed to be serious...at least pretend to be serious about their supposed "Religious Beliefs"???

I believe that it is very important to protect a Daughter's chastity, innocence, and virtue.
Jesus was probably banging Mary Magdeline and many other birds around at the time that heard about his GODly sexual power.

Did you have something from the Bible to support Christ stating VIRGINS only are to be permitted marriage? (*please provide)

btw. I am Catholic, (i think i can still consider myself as one, even tho I disagree with the irony of no permittance of contraception and no to abortions)

Here is another prime example of one letting their own views get in the way of what is actually True.

By the way, as can be clearly seen here, these people, back when this was being written, still, had NOT YET LEARNED what the word 'marriage' was actually meaning and referring to, exactly.

Posted: **Fri Jan 03, 2025 7:10 am**

Age wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2025 5:16 am Here is another prime example of one letting their own views get in the way of what is actually True.

By the way, as can be clearly seen here, these people, back when this was being written, still, had NOT YET LEARNED what the word 'marriage' was actually meaning and referring to, exactly.

You're so far into the future right?

So you could possibly be hundreds of thousands of years old..which means, since you clearly are a virgin, that not only could you be the oldest virgin in the universe, but also that under Wizards marriage rules, you would be permitted to marry. (some female form of equivalent wackadoodleness).

Posted: **Fri Jan 03, 2025 9:14 am**

FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2025 1:22 pmThat is also not an argument with premises supporting a conclusion. This wait you claim to be engaged in for me to reply to such an argument is really a you problem right now.

You dodged my arguments in the other thread; so I don't really feel like waiting forever in this thread. So yes I'll jump to the conclusion.

Real arguments (not Ad Homs) are welcome...anytime.

Posted: **Fri Jan 03, 2025 9:15 am**

accelafine wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2025 1:24 pm A lot of misogynistic homosexuals on this site. Explains a lot. Not surprising.

Homosexuals support Traditional Catholic morals and weddings, with chaste brides???

Please explain this to me. How am I gay butt-rumping degenerate...while I support strictly Heterosexual marriages in the only Real-True Church?

Posted: **Fri Jan 03, 2025 9:21 am**

attofishpi wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2025 12:38 amJesus was probably banging Mary Magdeline and many other birds around at the time that heard about his GODly sexual power.

Did you have something from the Bible to support Christ stating VIRGINS only are to be permitted marriage? (*please provide)

btw. I am Catholic, (i think i can still consider myself as one, even tho I disagree with the irony of no permittance of contraception and no to abortions)

The practice of the Catholic Church (virgin marriages), for thousands of years, should stand as testament itself to its importance, role, and function in a strong moral society.

If your daughter wasn't chaste before marriage, then the Church wouldn't marry her. I believe that tradition needs to make a comeback, ASAP.

Posted: **Fri Jan 03, 2025 9:25 am**

Age wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2025 5:12 am
Wizard22 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2025 1:01 pmWhen I mention virginity, your brain automatically goes to Sodomy...why is that? Are you gay?

A young woman's sexual value is like 1000x more valuable than a young man's.
This is one of those times when and where you are presenting just a conclusion, ONLY.

Do you have ANY actual premises that support 'this conclusion'?

It only takes one man to sustain reproduction among 1000 women.

While 1000 men with one woman, may very well die off quickly.

Therefore the sexual value of women/females is much higher than men/males...and this is true throughout the Mammalian specie as a total.

Consult with the price of Bulls versus Cows, or any livestock. Females are worth more than males, by dollar amounts.

Posted: **Fri Jan 03, 2025 9:41 am**

attofishpi wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2025 7:10 am
Age wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2025 5:16 am Here is another prime example of one letting their own views get in the way of what is actually True.

By the way, as can be clearly seen here, these people, back when this was being written, still, had NOT YET LEARNED what the word 'marriage' was actually meaning and referring to, exactly.
You're so far into the future right?

'So far into the future' relative to 'what', exactly?

attofishpi wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2025 7:10 am So you could possibly be hundreds of thousands of years old..

If this is what you, really, want to believe is true, then okay.

attofishpi wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2025 7:10 am which means, since you clearly are a virgin,

On what 'basis', EXACTLY, made you JUMP TO 'this conclusion'?

attofishpi wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2025 7:10 am that not only could you be the oldest virgin in the universe, but also that under Wizards marriage rules, you would be permitted to marry. (some female form of equivalent wackadoodleness).

If you say so.

Posted: **Fri Jan 03, 2025 9:44 am**

Wizard22 wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2025 9:14 am
FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2025 1:22 pmThat is also not an argument with premises supporting a conclusion. This wait you claim to be engaged in for me to reply to such an argument is really a you problem right now.
You dodged my arguments in the other thread; so I don't really feel like waiting forever in this thread. So yes I'll jump to the conclusion.

Real arguments (not Ad Homs) are welcome...anytime.

Is your opening post a so-called 'real argument', or, what you believe is true and/or something else?

Philosophy Now Forum

Virgin Weddings???

Re: Virgin Weddings???

Re: Virgin Weddings???

Re: Virgin Weddings???

Re: Virgin Weddings???

Re: Virgin Weddings???

Re: Virgin Weddings???

Re: Virgin Weddings???

Re: Virgin Weddings???

Re: Virgin Weddings???

Re: Virgin Weddings???

Re: Virgin Weddings???

Re: Virgin Weddings???

Re: Virgin Weddings???

Re: Virgin Weddings???

Re: Virgin Weddings???