Virgin Weddings???
Virgin Weddings???
Are Catholic Churches that don't even confirm the bride's virginity...are they even real churches?!
Because I feel like they're not. I feel like they're not being serious about the whole "LORD Christ, is King" stuff.
Aren't religious people supposed to be serious...at least pretend to be serious about their supposed "Religious Beliefs"???
Where are the 'serious' religions? Saudi Arabia and Israel, and that's it?? Despite the Semite 2000 year blood feud, at least they're serious about their beliefs--they have that much going for them at least!
I feel like Western Civilization "religions" are just LARPers, role-players, fakers.
Because I feel like they're not. I feel like they're not being serious about the whole "LORD Christ, is King" stuff.
Aren't religious people supposed to be serious...at least pretend to be serious about their supposed "Religious Beliefs"???
Where are the 'serious' religions? Saudi Arabia and Israel, and that's it?? Despite the Semite 2000 year blood feud, at least they're serious about their beliefs--they have that much going for them at least!
I feel like Western Civilization "religions" are just LARPers, role-players, fakers.
-
Impenitent
- Posts: 5774
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2010 2:04 pm
- FlashDangerpants
- Posts: 8815
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:54 pm
- accelafine
- Posts: 5042
- Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2023 10:16 pm
Re: Virgin Weddings???
Don't knock it. A micropenis earned a man a gold medal at the last olympics and a lot of money.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2025 6:30 amAre you trying to find a girl who knows so little about penises that she doesn't laugh hysterically when confronted with your micronugget?
Re: Virgin Weddings???
Still waiting to find out how the "confirming the bride's virginity" thing works.Wizard22 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 01, 2025 1:09 pm Are Catholic Churches that don't even confirm the bride's virginity...are they even real churches?!
Because I feel like they're not. I feel like they're not being serious about the whole "LORD Christ, is King" stuff.
Aren't religious people supposed to be serious...at least pretend to be serious about their supposed "Religious Beliefs"???
Where are the 'serious' religions? Saudi Arabia and Israel, and that's it?? Despite the Semite 2000 year blood feud, at least they're serious about their beliefs--they have that much going for them at least!
I feel like Western Civilization "religions" are just LARPers, role-players, fakers.
Re: Virgin Weddings???
I believe that it is very important to protect a Daughter's chastity, innocence, and virtue.
It's obvious that Western Civilization has 'liberalized' itself, and no longer believe in these moral-values, but disregard them at your own peril! Furthermore this topic is deeply, deeply complex. I don't know yet how best to really dig into it; there's so many factors to consider. So I'll start with the obvious: Fatherhood and Paternity. Western Civilization is largely Bastardized. The West is dominated by Bastard Fathers, who abandon their children, and Bastard Children, who lack morality, dignity, virtue, and all values previously considered "Holy" for most of European history. It's safe to thereby conclude, that the West is a nation of Bastards.
This reason leads into the next: Feminization of Mankind, the rise of Matriarchy, "Anti-Sexism", and this 'Forth' or 'Fifth' wave of Western "Feminism". Feminists are (as an extension of Marxism and Liberalism), perhaps, largely the reason and cause behind Bastardization, when "No-Fault Divorce" was introduced to the West--Western women could subsequently 'Divorce' their husbands to profitable gains. This is exemplified by Jeff Bezos divorce, and his ex-wife becoming the richest woman in human history. "No Fault Divorce" is purely a Liberal, Protestant, Marxist device. You cannot have 'Divorce and Benefit' added to the Natural male-female relationship, without Calamity ensuing. And the results are now obvious.
Traditional Roman Catholicism...originally Christianity and Christians were semi-Serious about their Wedding Vows: Unto Death do you Part. That means, No Divorcing...and hence, no Bastardization of a society/culture/country/nation. Fathers and Husbands were previously bound, by The Church (Rome), to their moral duties and obligations. This has not been the case in the US, and throughout the West, for now a Century ago. In most previous Centuries, these were critical factors that tied a Nation together, and built a Moral-Strength that were quintessential for countries and nations to prosper. These were the "Strong Men creating Good Times" ingredients.
Now the West is so Bastardized, that even putting this thread and Historical analysis into writing, seems comical to most of you. Most of you (Westerners, Postmodernists) perceive the idea that a young woman should be chaste and virgin before marriage as other-worldly, when in our not-so-distant past, it was the Norm. And furthermore, you could not move 'Up' in society or class, without doing so.
Some wealthy, rich, White Western Protestants still practice these, but they are few and far between. And they are in the most divergent, radical, 'Conservative', Traditionalist Protestant Churches in the United States. But Protestantism as a whole, has no cohesion or identity. It has no Centralization (unlike Roman Catholicism), and so it cannot be depended upon, or even defended, as "Western Culture or Value", which is so desperately needed.
Until such a 'Centralization' (of Moral Consensus) takes place, further 'Feminization' (Emasculation) and Bastardization will take place...
...so let me get to my targeted conclusion, *Ehem*...
...a Nation that cannot defend their Daughter's Chastity / Innocence / Viture, also cannot defend their People / Nation / Borders.
And that is precisely the common issue throughout all Western nations, at the moment, stemming from this lack of (Moral) Strength.
It's obvious that Western Civilization has 'liberalized' itself, and no longer believe in these moral-values, but disregard them at your own peril! Furthermore this topic is deeply, deeply complex. I don't know yet how best to really dig into it; there's so many factors to consider. So I'll start with the obvious: Fatherhood and Paternity. Western Civilization is largely Bastardized. The West is dominated by Bastard Fathers, who abandon their children, and Bastard Children, who lack morality, dignity, virtue, and all values previously considered "Holy" for most of European history. It's safe to thereby conclude, that the West is a nation of Bastards.
This reason leads into the next: Feminization of Mankind, the rise of Matriarchy, "Anti-Sexism", and this 'Forth' or 'Fifth' wave of Western "Feminism". Feminists are (as an extension of Marxism and Liberalism), perhaps, largely the reason and cause behind Bastardization, when "No-Fault Divorce" was introduced to the West--Western women could subsequently 'Divorce' their husbands to profitable gains. This is exemplified by Jeff Bezos divorce, and his ex-wife becoming the richest woman in human history. "No Fault Divorce" is purely a Liberal, Protestant, Marxist device. You cannot have 'Divorce and Benefit' added to the Natural male-female relationship, without Calamity ensuing. And the results are now obvious.
Traditional Roman Catholicism...originally Christianity and Christians were semi-Serious about their Wedding Vows: Unto Death do you Part. That means, No Divorcing...and hence, no Bastardization of a society/culture/country/nation. Fathers and Husbands were previously bound, by The Church (Rome), to their moral duties and obligations. This has not been the case in the US, and throughout the West, for now a Century ago. In most previous Centuries, these were critical factors that tied a Nation together, and built a Moral-Strength that were quintessential for countries and nations to prosper. These were the "Strong Men creating Good Times" ingredients.
Now the West is so Bastardized, that even putting this thread and Historical analysis into writing, seems comical to most of you. Most of you (Westerners, Postmodernists) perceive the idea that a young woman should be chaste and virgin before marriage as other-worldly, when in our not-so-distant past, it was the Norm. And furthermore, you could not move 'Up' in society or class, without doing so.
Some wealthy, rich, White Western Protestants still practice these, but they are few and far between. And they are in the most divergent, radical, 'Conservative', Traditionalist Protestant Churches in the United States. But Protestantism as a whole, has no cohesion or identity. It has no Centralization (unlike Roman Catholicism), and so it cannot be depended upon, or even defended, as "Western Culture or Value", which is so desperately needed.
Until such a 'Centralization' (of Moral Consensus) takes place, further 'Feminization' (Emasculation) and Bastardization will take place...
...so let me get to my targeted conclusion, *Ehem*...
...a Nation that cannot defend their Daughter's Chastity / Innocence / Viture, also cannot defend their People / Nation / Borders.
And that is precisely the common issue throughout all Western nations, at the moment, stemming from this lack of (Moral) Strength.
- FlashDangerpants
- Posts: 8815
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:54 pm
Re: Virgin Weddings???
Like you could tell the difference
-
promethean75
- Posts: 7113
- Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2018 10:29 pm
Re: Virgin Weddings???
Why am i even posting in this thread? Anybody who has willingly brought children into this world after Lenin died is either an imbecile or a scumbag.
No sir, this is no world for raising the childrens.
No sir, this is no world for raising the childrens.
- FlashDangerpants
- Posts: 8815
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:54 pm
Re: Virgin Weddings???
I'm pretty sure you're a virgin from the front but a cum dumpster from the rear
Re: Virgin Weddings???
...about as sophisticated and elegant as the rest of your "Philosophies".FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2025 12:08 pmI'm pretty sure you're a virgin from the front but a cum dumpster from the rear
I'll be waiting for the day when you can actually respond to any of my arguments. Until then, keep your Sodomite fantasies to yourself please.
- FlashDangerpants
- Posts: 8815
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:54 pm
Re: Virgin Weddings???
You would need to make an actual argument for there to be any response. You have never done that.Wizard22 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2025 12:12 pm...about as sophisticated and elegant as the rest of your "Philosophies".FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2025 12:08 pmI'm pretty sure you're a virgin from the front but a cum dumpster from the rear
I'll be waiting for the day when you can actually respond to any of my arguments. Until then, keep your Sodomite fantasies to yourself please.
Re: Virgin Weddings???
Others around here don't seem to have a problem reading and understanding my positions...it's mainly you, and your selective-thinking.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2025 12:13 pmYou would need to make an actual argument for there to be any response. You have never done that.
Confirmation Bias is strong in you. You must live in echo-chambers, only reinforcing your skewed world-view and beliefs huh?
- FlashDangerpants
- Posts: 8815
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:54 pm
Re: Virgin Weddings???
You wanted a response to your arguments, signified by the phrase "I'll be waiting for the day when you can actually respond to any of my arguments." in philosophy, an argument is an arrangement of premises in support of a conclusion. Your "positions" are not arguments, they are just a bunch of semi-literate screeds. I have responded to those with all the seriousness they merit.Wizard22 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2025 12:21 pmOthers around here don't seem to have a problem reading and understanding my positions...it's mainly you, and your selective-thinking.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2025 12:13 pmYou would need to make an actual argument for there to be any response. You have never done that.
Confirmation Bias is strong in you. You must live in echo-chambers, only reinforcing your skewed world-view and beliefs huh?
Re: Virgin Weddings???
When I mention virginity, your brain automatically goes to Sodomy...why is that? Are you gay?FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2025 12:54 pmYou wanted a response to your arguments, signified by the phrase "I'll be waiting for the day when you can actually respond to any of my arguments." in philosophy, an argument is an arrangement of premises in support of a conclusion. Your "positions" are not arguments, they are just a bunch of semi-literate screeds. I have responded to those with all the seriousness they merit.
A young woman's sexual value is like 1000x more valuable than a young man's. Nobody cares about your perverse desires, besides your boyfriend perhaps?