you have, once again, appeared to have not read everything that I have written here. I specifically stated:
Anyhow, before I could even begin to start to answer your first question I would have to find out what the thickness of skin had to do with any thing here. And, my answer be a 'no' to the other parts of that question, which would leave all of your other questions and remarks here moot.
SO, my answer, to the parts of your first question that make sense to me, is, and was, 'No'.
Which therefore, again, means that your other questions, and what else, you said and wrote there is moot.
Which all means that I had, already, provided you with a simple answer, to your simple question. Again, I had, already, picked 'one or the other' answer. And, if you really do want, and/or need, an explanation for WHY I had, already, answered 'No', to your simple question, 'Are sensitivity, weakness, fragility and thin-skinned just causes for laughter, mockery and recrimination?' then 'my explanation' is because, to me anyway, those things are NOT causes for laughter, mockery, nor recrimination BECAUSE, to me, there are NO things, which are causes for mockery.