Foes

[accelafine]

These are the people on my 'foe' list. If they make a comment to me or comment on my threads it will be viewed as harassment. 'Age' is double-foe. The worst of the worst. Take heed.


Age
Alexiev
godelian
Peter Kropotkin

[accelafine]

My foe list is very small. This is due to the fact that to be eligible you need to be completely insane AND a danger to the sanity of others. Fortunately this criteria applies to very few individuals.

[Age]

These are the people on my 'foe' list. If they make a comment to me or comment on my threads it will be viewed as harassment. 'Age' is double-foe. The worst of the worst. Take heed.


Age
Alexiev
godelian
Peter Kropotkin

'This one' is absolutely 'free' to 'view' absolutely any thing any way it likes. But, obviously, how 'this one', personally, 'views' some thing in no way makes 'its view' True, Right, Accurate, nor Correct. Nor even being remotely close to being True, Right, Accurate, nor Correct.

Now, 'I' have absolutely no one on any so-called 'foe list'. I see and view absolutely no one as an enemy nor opponent.

If any one makes a comment, to me or on my threads, then they are 'perfectly free' to, and have an 'absolute right' to.

Knowing how and why every one has the views and beliefs that they do allows me to never 'look at' nor 'see' any one as harassing, nor as a foe.

So, take heed.

[Age]

My foe list is very small. This is due to the fact that to be eligible you need to be completely insane AND a danger to the sanity of others. Fortunately this criteria applies to very few individuals.

It appears that 'this one', actually, likes 'to read' more than it is trying to let on, here.

[accelafine]

'Age' is just a troll.

[Age]

And, 'this one' just hates it when I point out and show its inconsistencies, contradictions, and hypocrisies here.

[accelafine]

'Age' is a troll.

[Skepdick]

My foe list is very small. This is due to the fact that to be eligible you need to be completely insane AND a danger to the sanity of others. Fortunately this criteria applies to very few individuals.

This is perplexing...your criterion applies to philosophy and philosophers in general.

How is your list so short?

[accelafine]

My foe list is very small. This is due to the fact that to be eligible you need to be completely insane AND a danger to the sanity of others. Fortunately this criteria applies to very few individuals.

This is perplexing...your criterion applies to philosophy and philosophers in general.

How is your list so short?

True, but most don't generally and consistently have both apply to them. I might have to add Iambiguous to the list though, due to his ongoing toddler tantrum complete nervous breakdown on the 'quotes' and 'what music..' threads.

[FlashDangerpants]

These are the people on my 'foe' list. If they make a comment to me or comment on my threads it will be viewed as harassment. 'Age' is double-foe. The worst of the worst. Take heed.


Age
Alexiev
godelian
Peter Kropotkin

Please add me to your list. Please don't quote me, I don't want to be harassed with little red notifications about your inane obsessions with transgender wokies and you have nothing beyond that to offer.

[Age]

These are the people on my 'foe' list.

LOL Who cares?

If they make a comment to me or comment on my threads it will be viewed as harassment.

LOL So, 'this one' is 'so, so special' that if 'I', or 'others', just make a comment, only, on 'this one's' publicly expressed views, and words, then 'this one' will then 'view' 'our comments' as so-called 'harassment'.

This was how sensitive, weak, fragile, and so easily offended, or just 'woke', some human beings had become, back in 'those days' when this was being written.

Age' is double-foe. The worst of the worst.

One could wonder here how one could, actually, become a 'double enemy', or a 'double opponent'?

For one who criticizes others, so often, and so much, for the words that they choose and write and use here, some could see, and say, how Truly hypocritical 'this one' can, really, be, at times.

Take heed.

Age
Alexiev
godelian
Peter Kropotkin

And, one could wonder if the words, 'take heed', here, were meant as some sort of 'threat', or not?

[Age]

My foe list is very small. This is due to the fact that to be eligible you need to be completely insane AND a danger to the sanity of others. Fortunately this criteria applies to very few individuals.

Okay.

[Walker]

This was how sensitive, weak, fragile, and so easily offended, or just 'woke', some human beings had become, back in 'those days' when this was being written.

If this is indeed so, then are sensitivity, weakness, fragility and thin-skinned just causes for laughter, mockery and recrimination? If so, for what purpose? Are these tendencies offensive? It seems that strength, durability and thick-skinned would be offensive, e.g. Trump. Is the purpose a knee-jerk, inherent need to change whatever is?

Or, are these tendencies cause for compassion, understanding and forgiveness that share the karma of default respect to not open a closed door without first knocking?

[Age]

This was how sensitive, weak, fragile, and so easily offended, or just 'woke', some human beings had become, back in 'those days' when this was being written.

If this is indeed so, then are sensitivity, weakness, fragility and thin-skinned just causes for laughter, mockery and recrimination? If so, for what purpose? Are these tendencies offensive? It seems that strength, durability and thick-skinned would be offensive, e.g. Trump. Is the purpose a knee-jerk, inherent need to change whatever is?

Or, are these tendencies cause for compassion, understanding and forgiveness that share the karma of default respect to not open a closed door without first knocking?

Again, if you are trying to pass on some sort of message, then I have absolutely no idea nor clue as to what that is, exactly.

Anyhow, before I could even begin to start to answer your first question I would have to find out what the thickness of skin had to do with any thing here. And, my answer be a 'no' to the other parts of that question, which would leave all of your other questions and remarks here moot.

[Walker]

Again, if you are trying to pass on some sort of message, then I have absolutely no idea nor clue as to what that is, exactly.

It's a simple either/or question. Pick one or the other for an answer and explain why. Take a chance. Ride that gator.