For the discussion of all things philosophical.
https://canzookia.com/
Her writing demonstrates otherwise. What does yours tell us?HexHammer wrote:Because you are utterly stupid and can't comprehend very basic things.Lacewing wrote:Your posts on this forum demonstrate otherwise.HexHammer wrote:I know I'm VERY intelligent
Even your childish insults reflect your level of intelligence.HexHammer wrote:Because you are utterly stupid and can't comprehend very basic things.Lacewing wrote:Your posts on this forum demonstrate otherwise.HexHammer wrote:I know I'm VERY intelligent
I dare you to prove your intellect! I know you can't!Lacewing wrote:Even your childish insults reflect your level of intelligence.
How? Does a claim prove anything? ..no ofc not, so how does it prove anything?!?!vegetariantaxidermy wrote:Her writing demonstrates otherwise. What does yours tell us?
No one has to prove anything here. All we have to go by is what people write, and how they write it.HexHammer wrote:How? Does a claim prove anything? ..no ofc not, so how does it prove anything?!?!vegetariantaxidermy wrote:Her writing demonstrates otherwise. What does yours tell us?
If one judges others by the way they write things one might not understand the concept of prevalence.vegetariantaxidermy wrote:No one has to prove anything here. All we have to go by is what people write, and how they write it.HexHammer wrote:How? Does a claim prove anything? ..no ofc not, so how does it prove anything?!?!vegetariantaxidermy wrote:Her writing demonstrates otherwise. What does yours tell us?
Keep working, well done. XDHexHammer wrote:I know you are not very bright, but I know I'm VERY intelligent, exceeding most people in logistics and principle analysis. I've been in the Administration and Quality Department where I found 100 waste hours per sales person with a staff of 150++, reduced several jobs with 90%++ I am really good at what I do, and you are a hapless retard.TSBU wrote:I probably can't make you see how stupid you are, but I enjoy the try. It would be good for you, and for me, if you stop saying stupid things, that's what I want you to "understand", I don't want you to "put you on the defensive", I want you to shut the fuck up.It can discourage stupid people from doing stupid things.
Discussions shouldn't be stooped down like ms Tree (Lacewing) likes to do it, but unfortunately she doesn't respond well to just a tiiny bit ot intellectual conversation.TSBU wrote:Keep working, well done. XD
Well, lets be in a more friendly way. Make love not war etc XD. I love this thread, is there a single no offensive post in it? XDHexHammer wrote:Discussions shouldn't be stooped down like ms Tree (Lacewing) likes to do it, but unfortunately she doesn't respond well to just a tiiny bit ot intellectual conversation.TSBU wrote:Keep working, well done. XD
"If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit".vegetariantaxidermy wrote: It doesn't increase production or profit in any way--in fact it's just the opposite--a pseudo-industry like 'therapists' and 'motivational speakers'. ''This approach enables the graphic depiction for the "shape" of a staffing need, in order to facilitate understanding of the global view for the role and hiring processes.'' What the fuck is that supposed to mean???
You're so full of crap -- and you certainly aren't offering intellectual conversation in this thread or (notably) in this forum. You typically pop in just to mindlessly put someone else down with your childish taunts, and to tell people (unconvincingly) how smart you are because of what you think you cleverly did in the PAST.HexHammer wrote:Discussions shouldn't be stooped down like ms Tree (Lacewing) likes to do it, but unfortunately she doesn't respond well to just a tiiny bit ot intellectual conversation.
Okay....Doc...you have a point...but let me just ask you to consider this...thedoc wrote:Ahh! the socialist ideal, nothing to do, and all day to do it, and still get paid for it.vegetariantaxidermy wrote: What an 'honourable' way to make a living--taking people's jobs off them because you deem them to be 'unproductive'. I think the yank term is 'human resources' (corporate wankers and toss-buckets). How the hell do you determine what are 'waste hours' anyway? Destroying staff morale is not productive.
Pure gold. Thanks for brightening my afternoon!Greta wrote:This thread is Pavlovian:
See in my previous post I wrote:Lacewing wrote:You're so full of crap -- and you certainly aren't offering intellectual conversation in this thread or (notably) in this forum. You typically pop in just to mindlessly put someone else down with your childish taunts, and to tell people (unconvincingly) how smart you are because of what you think you cleverly did in the PAST.HexHammer wrote:Discussions shouldn't be stooped down like ms Tree (Lacewing) likes to do it, but unfortunately she doesn't respond well to just a tiiny bit ot intellectual conversation.
What are you accomplishing in the PRESENT? And what do you actually demonstrate of yourself in this forum? It appears that your ego may be blinding you to "quality control" when it concerns yourself.
I assume ofc that you won't bother, since you can't and already have proven my point.HexHammer wrote:I dare you to prove your intellect! I know you can't!Lacewing wrote:Even your childish insults reflect your level of intelligence.