Philosophy Now Forum

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 12:37 pm

Age wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 12:35 pm

You aren't even trying. Why does the difference between quote and respond matter?

you really are 'much slower', than I first saw, but it is absolutely great that you keep on going, here.

Now, what does the difference between the words and claims, 'quote' and 'respond' is that if one says and claims some thing like, 'I told you not to 'quote' me', when actually they have not used the 'quote' word, but actually used the 'respond' word, then 'that', itself, is what matters.

See, 'the reason' you people, in the days when this was being written, could not very quickly, very simply, and very easily, recognize and see the actual Truth of things, is because you would not just speak and write the actual Truth of things.

accelafine wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 12:45 pm

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 12:29 pm

accelafine wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 12:27 pm

And there he goes quoting me again five minutes after saying he wouldn't. The guy's a compulsive liar.

Did he really say he wouldn't?

I thought he did.

Now, what, exactly, would make you to even begin to think such a thing, as this?

accelafine wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 12:45 pm

Age wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 12:44 pm

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 12:29 pm

Did he really say he wouldn't?

No.

'This' is just another example of 'this one' lying, or, only 'seeing' and 'hearing' what it wants to see, and hear.

I'm not an 'it' fuckhead.

If 'you' are, supposedly, not an 'it', then what are 'you', exactly?

I've told you not to quote me you, you lying arsehole. And even if I had only used the word 'respond' you didn't take any notice of that either. You think you are so fucking clever.

Age wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 12:53 pm

accelafine wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 12:45 pm

Age wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 12:44 pm

No.

'This' is just another example of 'this one' lying, or, only 'seeing' and 'hearing' what it wants to see, and hear.

I'm not an 'it' fuckhead.

If 'you' are, supposedly, not an 'it', then what are 'you', exactly?

A person is not an 'it' you autistic freak.

accelafine wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 1:04 pm

Age wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 12:53 pm

accelafine wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 12:45 pm

I'm not an 'it' fuckhead.

If 'you' are, supposedly, not an 'it', then what are 'you', exactly?

A person is not an 'it' you autistic freak.

Why not?

Do you people think that you are somehow better, or different than, any and every other 'thing'?

accelafine wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 1:02 pm I've told you not to quote me you, you lying arsehole.

Once more, I do not recall you doing so. And, if you actually did, then where and when, exactly?

Also, are you really under some sort of delusion that I am going to not quote you, especially considering the actual words that you say and use, here?

If yes, then I am not going to stop. Especially considering the actual words that you say and use, here.

accelafine wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 1:02 pm And even if I had only used the word 'respond' you didn't take any notice of that either.

Of course not. This is a publicly open forum.

you are starting to sound like how "dictators" start off.

accelafine wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 1:02 pm You think you are so fucking clever.

Actually I admitted to be 'autistic', and 'slow', and 'simple'.

If I recall, correctly, I have also admitted to being probably being the 'slowest', 'simplest', and 'most uneducated' one, here. So, claiming that I think that I am 'clever' in any way is just absurd.

That I might well be more 'particular' and/or more 'specific' than others are, here, does not make 'me' nor anyone 'clever'.

I, again, just 'look at' and 'see' things differently, then you human beings do.

Age wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 12:51 pm

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 12:37 pm

Age wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 12:35 pm

You aren't even trying. Why does the difference between quote and respond matter?

you really are 'much slower', than I first saw, but it is absolutely great that you keep on going, here.

Now, what does the difference between the words and claims, 'quote' and 'respond' is that if one says and claims some thing like, 'I told you not to 'quote' me', when actually they have not used the 'quote' word, but actually used the 'respond' word, then 'that', itself, is what matters.

See, 'the reason' you people, in the days when this was being written, could not very quickly, very simply, and very easily, recognize and see the actual Truth of things, is because you would not just speak and write the actual Truth of things.

So are you saying you're going to respect her wishes and not quote her?

It doesn't seem that way right now, given that you've just quoted again.

Age wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 12:46 pm

Atla wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 12:30 pm

Age wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 12:23 pm The absolute immaturity of 'this one'

16th

continues.

17th

And, these claims of 'me' 'lying' is what 'this one' ends up resorting to, only.

18th

Obviously because that is all 'this one' is capable of doing, here.

19th

Hey God. What's up? Everything all right with you?

The 'immaturity', and 'delusional thinking', would not be believed if it were not being 'provided', here.

God is angry because God never gets laid

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 1:21 pm

Age wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 12:51 pm

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 12:37 pm

You aren't even trying. Why does the difference between quote and respond matter?

you really are 'much slower', than I first saw, but it is absolutely great that you keep on going, here.

Now, what does the difference between the words and claims, 'quote' and 'respond' is that if one says and claims some thing like, 'I told you not to 'quote' me', when actually they have not used the 'quote' word, but actually used the 'respond' word, then 'that', itself, is what matters.

See, 'the reason' you people, in the days when this was being written, could not very quickly, very simply, and very easily, recognize and see the actual Truth of things, is because you would not just speak and write the actual Truth of things.

So are you saying you're going to respect her wishes and not quote her?

Not at all.

I am going to keep saying what I have been continually saying. I will respond to any thing I want to, here, in whatever way I so choose to.

When will 'this' be finally understood?

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 1:21 pm It doesn't seem that way right now, given that you've just quoted again.

Will you please inform 'the readers', here, what could have possibly led you to even begin to assume that I would start not quoting, or start not responding to, "accelafine"?

The absolute audacity that some of people, here, have, exactly, would be quite astonishing, if it was not already known why they are 'the way' that they are.

Imagine expecting to continually be allowed to keep talking 'about' you, while at the exact same time expecting you to stop quoting and/or to stop responding to 'their posts 'about' you.

Atla wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 2:55 pm

Age wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 12:46 pm

Atla wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 12:30 pm
16th


17th


18th


19th

Hey God. What's up? Everything all right with you?

The 'immaturity', and 'delusional thinking', would not be believed if it were not being 'provided', here.

God is angry because God never gets laid

If 'this' is what 'you' really are 'seeing', here, then do to is the 'immaturity' and 'delusion thinking' being seen, and 'very clearly' some might add.

Age wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 9:57 pm

I asked you why you're asking accelefine to prove she requested that you stop quoting her if you're just going to ignore her request, and instead of giving me a direct answer, you started ranting about the difference between quoting and replying.

If you're just going to ignore her request, why do you want her to prove it? Don't answer my question with a question, just give an answer. A succinct answer that gets right to the point. "I'm asking her to prove it because ..."

It seems to me that if you're just going to ignore the request anyway, the proof you're requesting is entirely superfluous.

Age wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 9:57 pm

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 1:21 pm

Age wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 12:51 pm

you really are 'much slower', than I first saw, but it is absolutely great that you keep on going, here.

Now, what does the difference between the words and claims, 'quote' and 'respond' is that if one says and claims some thing like, 'I told you not to 'quote' me', when actually they have not used the 'quote' word, but actually used the 'respond' word, then 'that', itself, is what matters.

See, 'the reason' you people, in the days when this was being written, could not very quickly, very simply, and very easily, recognize and see the actual Truth of things, is because you would not just speak and write the actual Truth of things.

So are you saying you're going to respect her wishes and not quote her?

Not at all.

I am going to keep saying what I have been continually saying. I will respond to any thing I want to, here, in whatever way I so choose to.

When will 'this' be finally understood?

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 1:21 pm It doesn't seem that way right now, given that you've just quoted again.

Will you please inform 'the readers', here, what could have possibly led you to even begin to assume that I would start not quoting, or start not responding to, "accelafine"?

The absolute audacity that some of people, here, have, exactly, would be quite astonishing, if it was not already known why they are 'the way' that they are.

Imagine expecting to continually be allowed to keep talking 'about' you, while at the exact same time expecting you to stop quoting and/or to stop responding to 'their posts 'about' you.

Lying little narcissist. 'Continually talk about' you? Who to? And about what? I've already pointed out that I gave up after realising that asking you not to quote me only made you want to do it even more. How 'mature'. You make it impossible to avoid or ignore you when I come on here and see a mile long list of red dot notifications--all from you. I'm pretty sure that gives me the 'right' to mention it without you getting an erection about it. Why don't you fuck off to a site for 'non humans' and leave us 'human beings' alone? You are clearly not socially acceptable or fit for the company of 'human beings'. Take some lessons.

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 10:08 pm

Age wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 9:57 pm

I asked you why you're asking accelefine to prove she requested that you stop quoting her if you're just going to ignore her request, and instead of giving me a direct answer, you started ranting about the difference between quoting and replying.

Once again, because it made a claim, here.

When someone makes a claim, here, I sometimes tend to ask them to prove that their claim is true. So, again, that is why I asked "accelafine" to prove it's claim.

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 10:08 pm If you're just going to ignore her request, why do you want her to prove it?

For the same reason above, here.

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 10:08 pm Don't answer my question with a question, just give an answer.

Already did.

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 10:08 pm A succinct answer that gets right to the point. "I'm asking her to prove it because ..."

Already done.

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 10:08 pm It seems to me that if you're just going to ignore the request anyway, the proof you're requesting is entirely superfluous.

Okay.

But, why would any one, here, even start to begin to assume that I was going to follow such a request as the one being expected, here?

Especially considering what I have been actually saying and writing, in response.

Age wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 10:19 pm

But, why would any one, here, even start to begin to assume that I was going to follow such a request as the one being expected, here?

Because once someone asks you not to do it, it becomes stalking, harassment and bullying. There. Your lesson for the day in being a 'human being'.