Philosophy Now Forum

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 11:45 am

Age wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 11:36 am

Why bother asking her to prove something that happened long ago then?

Once more you have managed to fail, absolutely, in comprehending and understanding, here.

There is a very big difference between 'quoting' and 'responding'.

If you had actually read 'the words', which I actual said, wrote, and used above, here, then you would have noticed the actual very big difference.

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 11:45 am If you're just going to ignore her request, then... why waste her time asking her to prove it?

you have, again, managed to miss 'the point', completely.

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 12:13 pm

Age wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 12:09 pm

Back to your incoherent yapping i see. K.

you are continuing to not be able to counter nor refute what I have actually been saying, and meaning, here.

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 12:13 pm

Age wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 12:09 pm

Back to your incoherent yapping i see. K.

And there he goes quoting me again five minutes after saying he wouldn't. The guy's a compulsive liar.

Age wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 12:25 pm

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 11:45 am

Age wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 11:36 am

Why bother asking her to prove something that happened long ago then?

Once more you have managed to fail, absolutely, in comprehending and understanding, here.

There is a very big difference between 'quoting' and 'responding'.

If you had actually read 'the words', which I actual said, wrote, and used above, here, then you would have noticed the actual very big difference.

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 11:45 am If you're just going to ignore her request, then... why waste her time asking her to prove it?

you have, again, managed to miss 'the point', completely.

This is another one of your obnoxious time-wasting habits. You could just clarify the point here, instead of just telling me I missed the point. "You missed the point completely. The reason I'm asking her to prove it is because...".

Just say what it is.

accelafine wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 12:27 pm

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 12:13 pm

Age wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 12:09 pm

Back to your incoherent yapping i see. K.

And there he goes quoting me again five minutes after saying he wouldn't. The guy's a compulsive liar.

Did he really say he wouldn't?

Age wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 12:23 pm The absolute immaturity of 'this one'

16th

continues.

17th

And, these claims of 'me' 'lying' is what 'this one' ends up resorting to, only.

18th

Obviously because that is all 'this one' is capable of doing, here.

19th

Hey God. What's up? Everything all right with you?

Age wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 12:26 pm

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 12:13 pm

Age wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 12:09 pm

Back to your incoherent yapping i see. K.

you are continuing to not be able to counter nor refute what I have actually been saying, and meaning, here.

Succinctly get to the point and I might read an entire post of yours worth refuting. So far t's just yapping, nothing for me to "refute".

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 12:29 pm

Age wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 12:25 pm

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 11:45 am

Why bother asking her to prove something that happened long ago then?

Once more you have managed to fail, absolutely, in comprehending and understanding, here.

There is a very big difference between 'quoting' and 'responding'.

If you had actually read 'the words', which I actual said, wrote, and used above, here, then you would have noticed the actual very big difference.

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 11:45 am If you're just going to ignore her request, then... why waste her time asking her to prove it?

you have, again, managed to miss 'the point', completely.

This is another one of your obnoxious time-wasting habits. You could just clarify the point here, instead of just telling me I missed the point. "You missed the point completely. The reason I'm asking her to prove it is because...".

I just told you the 'very thing', which you 'missed', in the very sentence prior.

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 12:29 pm Just say what it is.

Again, what you missed, completely, is the, very big, difference between 'quote' and 'respond'.

How could you, seriously, be, still, 'missing this' when I actually said and wrote 'this' in the actual words that you quoted me as saying and writing, and which you are actually responding to, here.

Or, are you serious when you said and claimed that you do not read what I write, here?

Age wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 12:35 pm

You aren't even trying. Why does the difference between quote and respond matter?

The interesting thing about FJ - not much is interesting about him and his conventional views - is that he participates in a forum he does not administer, and administers a forum he does not participate in, doing the bidding of his retarded, postmodern master, reducing the forum, he administers, to a cesspool he does not want to participate in.

In brief.... his choices create a forum he does not want to participate in... and he Chooses to come here, instead, to share his convectional positions.
Are his choices illusory, or is he, once more, a "victim of illusions".....and a slave to cosmic order, compelling him to choose to do what he does?

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 12:29 pm

accelafine wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 12:27 pm

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 12:13 pm

Back to your incoherent yapping i see. K.

And there he goes quoting me again five minutes after saying he wouldn't. The guy's a compulsive liar.

Did he really say he wouldn't?

No.

'This' is just another example of 'this one' lying, or, only 'seeing' and 'hearing' what it wants to see, and hear.

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 12:29 pm

accelafine wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 12:27 pm

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 12:13 pm

Back to your incoherent yapping i see. K.

And there he goes quoting me again five minutes after saying he wouldn't. The guy's a compulsive liar.

Did he really say he wouldn't?

I thought he did.

Age wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 12:44 pm

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 12:29 pm

accelafine wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 12:27 pm

And there he goes quoting me again five minutes after saying he wouldn't. The guy's a compulsive liar.

Did he really say he wouldn't?

No.

'This' is just another example of 'this one' lying, or, only 'seeing' and 'hearing' what it wants to see, and hear.

I'm not an 'it' fuckhead.

Atla wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 12:30 pm

Age wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 12:23 pm The absolute immaturity of 'this one'

16th

continues.

17th

And, these claims of 'me' 'lying' is what 'this one' ends up resorting to, only.

18th

Obviously because that is all 'this one' is capable of doing, here.

19th

Hey God. What's up? Everything all right with you?

The 'immaturity', and 'delusional thinking', would not be believed if it were not being 'provided', here.

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 12:31 pm

Age wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 12:26 pm

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 12:13 pm

Back to your incoherent yapping i see. K.

you are continuing to not be able to counter nor refute what I have actually been saying, and meaning, here.

Succinctly get to the point and I might read an entire post of yours worth refuting. So far t's just yapping, nothing for me to "refute".

Yet 'another excuse'.

I even number 'the points', and 'claims', but 'this one' claims that it is 'not able to just read an entire post'.

Could 'an excuse' get any more 'weaker' and 'useless', here?