Making the best choice of lifestyle in the face of

[chaz wyman]

You know as well as I that this would depend upon them being African or European.

What? Dinosaurs???



















just kidding.

[PhilosophiaQueen]

No I'm caught up with conveying some kind of meaning rather than just rambling bullshit.
If you don't convey meaning then you cannot build an overall context.
You have nothing to go on.

It you would just actually read the sentences instead of having everything pinpointed to you then you would understand. I even went over it again with my last reply, but still yet you just ignored that. What does this imply? it implies that you don't want to reply to it. If you regret going into this debate since you realized I was right after all, then just say so and leave. If not, then respond properly and pay attention to more than each sentence viewed in an extreme-nitpicky standalone context.

Aestheticism and reacting negatively to messiness. Baggage. Is it actually hard for you to connect these simple dots? Is it?

what about the sense of high-speed collision? are we seeking the best lifystyle for an adrenaline junkie or what? what about the sense of driving safely with kids and with good radio show about adventures in world of mathematics!?

Safe driving and some random radio talk about symbols. Boring.

if people can be freaks then can other animals do the same? do you know any unnatural animal? if it is natural to have brains then why its unnatural to use them to do whatever? do you believe that animals cant destroy their societies? overpopulation, racial competition, mutable societies,..? is the word "freak" a social label like word "normal"? is normal western man a freak in pygmy peoples society?

I would think that freak potential in animals increase as intelligence does, it creates a gap allowing for arbitrary acts. Normally, freak is someone far removed from what's normal, but here I use it more to describe arbitrariness in a more... absolute sense, absolute within a framework of minimalism at least.

so, did we have optimal harmonic society, the golden age, in the stone age? or did the evolution and social changes just happened more slowly than social, cultural, technical and other changes today? dont you sense the high-speeding? enjoy while you can!

In some ways I'm quite glad I don't live in the stone age. Like discussed earlier, we do draw an overall benefit as far as lifespan goes from modern society. The unnaturality shows itself as a positive, unnatural spike (lifespan) so its not all bad. And even in this day and age people can chose to rid themselves of baggage, which gives advantages of both.

[chaz wyman]

No I'm caught up with conveying some kind of meaning rather than just rambling bullshit.
If you don't convey meaning then you cannot build an overall context.
You have nothing to go on.

It you would just actually read the sentences instead of having everything pinpointed to you then you would understand. I even went over it again with my last reply, but still yet you just ignored that. What does this imply? it implies that you don't want to reply to it. If you regret going into this debate since you realized I was right after all, then just say so and leave. If not, then respond properly and pay attention to more than each sentence viewed in an extreme-nitpicky standalone context.

Aestheticism and reacting negatively to messiness. Baggage. Is it actually hard for you to connect these simple dots? Is it?

Hello??? Is there anybody in there?
You said; "If you paid more attention to overall context ...."

A context is the result of a coherent set of statements - not the result of rambling.
And I am telling you there is no CONTEXT.
Your response simply verifies that.

[PhilosophiaQueen]

I'm done with wasting time on nitpickers and their baggage or maybe its just low comprehension who knows.

[chaz wyman]

I'm done with wasting time on nitpickers and their baggage or maybe its just low comprehension who knows.

That is a shame because you you actually accepted that you had not made your point clear and you explained more carefully we had quite an interesting conversation, which cleared up and added to the subject you were talking about.

[Arising_uk]

I'm done with wasting time on nitpickers and their baggage or maybe its just low comprehension who knows.

Or maybe some people just don't like philosophy and its rigours.