“You only lose what you cling to.”

[Barbara Brooks]

Hegel unfolded real being-for-self, the totality of the development. The Elements as follows: air, fire, water, earth, they the root of individuality, air swayed by force, fire the active changeable being-for-self, water is swayed by lunar and earth the separate individual. Air seemingly harmless is insidious and consuming over anything individual. In light air behaves passive, its transparent fluidity is elastic moves freely and pervades everything. Air stands in this relationship to light as absolutely penetrable and transparent self-governed existence, without any affirmed individualization. Opposed to individuality air is o does not come forward in its activity as it real power to decompose individuals as purely corrosive the enemy of all that is individual. The destruction is invisible, motionless and passive, air enters everywhere thus what is individual breaks up in it.

Being compressible thus different gases can occupy air, for example, take two globes, one is filled with air and the other steam. Now the one filled with steam can be poured out into the one filled with air and can receive as much steam as if there were a void of air. This is air the urge to affirm steam as same as itself. Anyone has power to break up air, it is purely consumed Air is not visible, is motionless but creeps softly along. The enemy of all that is individual enters everywhere without showing itself.

One way to explain compression is by showing the finest apparatus for producing fire; a cylinder is fitted with a piston, a disk and a piece of dry flammable material is placed at the bottom. When the disk forces air into the cylinder, the compressed air gives off a spark which lights the material. Here air is reduced to a point achieves shape.

[Arising_uk]

But now we have Physics BB?

[Barbara Brooks]

What's your problem Arising_uk ?

[Arising_uk]

No problem. Just wondering why you think this stuff hasn't been superseded by explanations from Physics?

[Barbara Brooks]

What?

[Arising_uk]

Did Hegels ideas lead to the invention of the internal combustion engine?

[Barbara Brooks]

No, that would be fire as the inventor. One of the finest showing fire apparatus for producing fire; begins with a cylinder fitted with a piston, a disk and a piece of dry flammable material is placed at the bottom. When the disk forces air into the cylinder, the compressed air gives off a spark that lights the material


What Hegel explains fire as absolute consuming being on its own account and very different from air. Fire materializes and consumes so too destructs. Fire destroys materials things and in destroying them destroys itself and thus fire is a neutrality. It exists when in relation to material things, consumes material things and leaves them tasteless, odorless, indeterminate, and destitute. Fire conditioned like air exists only in an opposition it must have something to consume and without materiality it vanishes. What is consumed by fire is activated and inflamed. Then fire reduces to an indeterminate neutral state, extinguished.

[chaz wyman]

No, that would be fire as the inventor. One of the finest showing fire apparatus for producing fire; begins with a cylinder fitted with a piston, a disk and a piece of dry flammable material is placed at the bottom. When the disk forces air into the cylinder, the compressed air gives off a spark that lights the material


What Hegel explains fire as absolute consuming being on its own account and very different from air. Fire materializes and consumes so too destructs. Fire destroys materials things and in destroying them destroys itself and thus fire is a neutrality. It exists when in relation to material things, consumes material things and leaves them tasteless, odorless, indeterminate, and destitute. Fire conditioned like air exists only in an opposition it must have something to consume and without materiality it vanishes. What is consumed by fire is activated and inflamed. Then fire reduces to an indeterminate neutral state, extinguished.

It is no wonder that Hegel never contributed anything to science.

[Barbara Brooks]

You really are showing your ignorance,

Hegel developed a comprehensive philosophical framework, or "system", of Absolute idealism to account in an integrated and developmental way for the relation of mind and nature, the subject and object of knowledge, and psychology, the state, history, art, religion and philosophy. In particular, he developed the concept that mind or spirit manifested itself in a set of contradictions and oppositions that it ultimately integrated and united, without eliminating either pole or reducing one to the other. Examples of such contradictions include those between nature and freedom, and between immanence and transcendence.

[chaz wyman]

You really are showing your ignorance,

Hegel developed a comprehensive philosophical framework, or "system", of Absolute idealism to account in an integrated and developmental way for the relation of mind and nature, the subject and object of knowledge, and psychology, the state, history, art, religion and philosophy. In particular, he developed the concept that mind or spirit manifested itself in a set of contradictions and oppositions that it ultimately integrated and united, without eliminating either pole or reducing one to the other. Examples of such contradictions include those between nature and freedom, and between immanence and transcendence.

Exactly - not a single contribution to science.
His subversion of Kant left a philosophical Europe confused and bemused. His legacy destroyed any sense that Marx would otherwise have made and represents a massive backwards step for the evolution of the intellect and for philosophical investigations generally.
Your meanderings, signifying nothing, are evident of that confusion and befuddlement.

[Barbara Brooks]

I will not defend a great philosopher to you, it would be like putting pearls before swines.

[chaz wyman]

I will not defend a great philosopher to you, it would be like putting pearls before swines.

You can ignore the truth of what I say as much as you like. I would not have expected anything else from you.
I'll take that as you backing down and accepting that what I said was true, as indeed it was.

[Barbara Brooks]

I would rather be me then you . Your very offensive and mean I often wonder how can you live with yourself?

[Barbara Brooks]

In Hegel’s Metaphysics space and time are put into a peculiar condition are viewed only as a transition of one into another, but each is separate and it is precisely this separating that proclaims our ground and truth.

Space is unbounded, freely extending one in every direction. Only time is what gives actuality and the immediate collapse of sameness. Space and time a mere perception passes hither and thither from one determination to another without any thought that each thing has a specific realm.



A way of understanding space consists of immediately fixing your thoughts on how space relates to your immediate thought and harmonizes them.

The point, the line, and the plane are the only way of describing
Space because of its free spreading offering no resistance. The truth of space can only be point, line, and plane, these makes space specific totality.

The point (sun), line (moon), and plane or surface (planets) these constitute the boundary of space. Nothing affects space even though things exist in it, side-by-side, but existing in complete abstraction and does not interfere with each other.

Motion is time for example, you precede to a place that is your future and leave one that is your past, but at the same time you are already at the place, you are reaching. That motion is inseparably both repulsion and attraction and unity of two moments is the one moment.

Zeno’s arrow in motion is inseparably both repulsion and attraction and unity of these two moments is gravity, that is, one subject to limitations and conditions.

The arrow a mere quantity of physical substance collectively made out of physical objects on one hand motion is what gives being to the arrow, called repulsion, the denial of other.

[MJA]

Hi Barbara,

I find your writing interesting to say the least.
Thanks,

'Space' to me is what unites all of the pieces of the Universe.
But then I find the pieces like you and me that Way too!

As for losing: I lost everything once, and because of that found my true self.
Glory be,
Space and the peace of me,

=