n-fusion? Yeah so in tune with nature!!!!attofishpi wrote:Many years ago i watched a BBC documentary called 'Prisoners of the Sun' ...at least i think that was its name. Some time ago i tried hunting it down on the web for a friend that was commisioned to write an enviro book, but couldn't find it.
Anyway it makes it very clear how we humans, our population, is so out of sync with nature. Where all life, including us were once harmonious with nature, fossil fuels has allowed our population to explode. Millions and millions years worth of 'sun' energy is being exploited now and pretty soon a vacuum will be all that remains as the population realises it has no way to sustain itself without the use of fossil energy...
For me its time all nations put a price on carbon and every penny of that tax should be pumped into research on renewables and other technologies, such as n-fusion...
A Challenge to Richard Dawkins and the Atheists
-
chaz wyman
- Posts: 5304
- Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 7:31 pm
Re: A Challenge to Richard Dawkins and the Atheists
Re: A Challenge to Richard Dawkins and the Atheists
why pump money into renewables ,,?? when ,,quote ,chaz wyman wrote:n-fusion? Yeah so in tune with nature!!!!attofishpi wrote:Many years ago i watched a BBC documentary called . Millions and millions years worth of 'sun' energy is being exploited now and pretty soon a vacuum will be all that remains as the population realises it has no way to sustain itself without the use of fossil energy...
For me its time all nations put a price on carbon and every penny of that tax should be pumped into research on renewables and other technologies, such as n-fusion...
"population has no way to sustain itself without the use of fossil fuels"
there are lots of ways we can sustain ourselves/ provide our energy requirements without fossil fuels ,
solar energy can convert into lots of things , such as Hydrogen gas ,
or hyrogen and oxygen for fuel cells,
then we can just use it to charge batteries and battery cars are great , they have been for awhile , it just the petrol company's that stop us getting
good cheap electric cars ,
so we will happily run things on sun power , just as soon as the petrol company's have sucked every last cent out of us they can ,,,!!!
- attofishpi
- Posts: 13319
- Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 8:10 am
- Location: Orion Spur
- Contact:
Re: A Challenge to Richard Dawkins and the Atheists
The suns natural!chaz wyman wrote:n-fusion? Yeah so in tune with nature!!!!
- attofishpi
- Posts: 13319
- Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 8:10 am
- Location: Orion Spur
- Contact:
Re: A Challenge to Richard Dawkins and the Atheists
Perhaps i should have stated 'currently'Godfree wrote:why pump money into renewables ,,?? when ,,quote ,
"population has no way to sustain itself without the use of fossil fuels"
Yes there are lots of ways....but time is running out.Godfree wrote:there are lots of ways we can sustain ourselves/ provide our energy requirements without fossil fuels ,
solar energy can convert into lots of things , such as Hydrogen gas ,
or hyrogen and oxygen for fuel cells,
then we can just use it to charge batteries and battery cars are great , they have been for awhile , it just the petrol company's that stop us getting
good cheap electric cars ,
so we will happily run things on sun power , just as soon as the petrol company's have sucked every last cent out of us they can ,,,!!!
-
chaz wyman
- Posts: 5304
- Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 7:31 pm
Re: A Challenge to Richard Dawkins and the Atheists
So is fossil fuels - what is your point?attofishpi wrote:The suns natural!chaz wyman wrote:n-fusion? Yeah so in tune with nature!!!!
I'm looking around and don't see any naturally occurring nuclear reactions in my neighbourhood.
- Arising_uk
- Posts: 12259
- Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am
Re: A Challenge to Richard Dawkins and the Atheists
What do you mean by this?attofishpi wrote:Yes there are lots of ways....but time is running out.
There are vast reserves of hydrocarbons in the world, its that they are currently to expensive to consider ways to extract them compared to what we've currently got.
- attofishpi
- Posts: 13319
- Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 8:10 am
- Location: Orion Spur
- Contact:
Re: A Challenge to Richard Dawkins and the Atheists
That fossil fuel is running out. Alternative energy such as n-fusion will provide 'limitless' reserves energy. The issue is, that the demand for energy is outstripping the possibility that in a timely manner we can switch from fossil fuel to alternatives. Hence the vacuum i was talking about.chaz wyman wrote:So is fossil fuels - what is your point?attofishpi wrote:The suns natural!chaz wyman wrote:n-fusion? Yeah so in tune with nature!!!!
I'm looking around and don't see any naturally occurring nuclear reactions in my neighbourhood.
- attofishpi
- Posts: 13319
- Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 8:10 am
- Location: Orion Spur
- Contact:
Re: A Challenge to Richard Dawkins and the Atheists
With the speed at which fossil fuel is running out it appears we will not have the alternative energy technologies in place in time to avert the poverty and resulting chaos that the energy vacuum will create.Arising_uk wrote:What do you mean by this?attofishpi wrote:Yes there are lots of ways....but time is running out.
There are vast reserves of hydrocarbons in the world, its that they are currently to expensive to consider ways to extract them compared to what we've currently got.
- Arising_uk
- Posts: 12259
- Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am
Re: A Challenge to Richard Dawkins and the Atheists
There are trillions of tonnes and cubic feet of untapped fossil fuels.
-
chaz wyman
- Posts: 5304
- Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 7:31 pm
Re: A Challenge to Richard Dawkins and the Atheists
The amount of fossil fuels is far greater than you think, The only limitation if the means to get to those vast resources, and the reliance on just one type- Oil.attofishpi wrote:That fossil fuel is running out. Alternative energy such as n-fusion will provide 'limitless' reserves energy. The issue is, that the demand for energy is outstripping the possibility that in a timely manner we can switch from fossil fuel to alternatives. Hence the vacuum i was talking about.chaz wyman wrote:So is fossil fuels - what is your point?attofishpi wrote: The suns natural!
I'm looking around and don't see any naturally occurring nuclear reactions in my neighbourhood.
The UK is made of coal and there as reserves within reach that could easily last 300 years.
Even if n-fusion is possible, we have no idea about the consequences and problems that making will bring.
-
chaz wyman
- Posts: 5304
- Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 7:31 pm
Re: A Challenge to Richard Dawkins and the Atheists
All alternatives are more expensive and have greater net impacts on the environment.attofishpi wrote:With the speed at which fossil fuel is running out it appears we will not have the alternative energy technologies in place in time to avert the poverty and resulting chaos that the energy vacuum will create.Arising_uk wrote:What do you mean by this?attofishpi wrote:Yes there are lots of ways....but time is running out.
There are vast reserves of hydrocarbons in the world, its that they are currently to expensive to consider ways to extract them compared to what we've currently got.
Re: A Challenge to Richard Dawkins and the Atheists
The technology is there it's just being held back while they make as much from oil as they can ,attofishpi wrote:With the speed at which fossil fuel is running out it appears we will not have the alternative energy technologies in place in time to avert the poverty and resulting chaos that the energy vacuum will create.Arising_uk wrote:What do you mean by this?attofishpi wrote:Yes there are lots of ways....but time is running out.
There are vast reserves of hydrocarbons in the world, its that they are currently to expensive to consider ways to extract them compared to what we've currently got.
they could make electric cars and solar panels cheap ,
but then we would only combine the two ,
and then why do we need them ,
electric cars charged by solar panels , how do they get rich from us doing that ,???????
so we will be polluting the planet with fossil fuels for some time to come ,
because it makes more money for THEM...
- Arising_uk
- Posts: 12259
- Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am
Re: A Challenge to Richard Dawkins and the Atheists
You are "THEM". Your food, clothes and goods exist only because of fossil fuels. We can give-up cars and we'll still be burning and transforming fossil fuels as your technologies are not at present efficient enough to produce the energy output we need. Of course we could just build thousands of nuclear power stations, that'd do the trick but we've not yet found a replacement for plastics, et al, wooden computers anyone?Godfree wrote:...
because it makes more money for THEM...
Re: A Challenge to Richard Dawkins and the Atheists
You say it like a world with less plastic would be a bad thing ,????Arising_uk wrote:You are "THEM". Your food, clothes and goods exist only because of fossil fuels. We can give-up cars and we'll still be burning and transforming fossil fuels as your technologies are not at present efficient enough to produce the energy output we need. Of course we could just build thousands of nuclear power stations, that'd do the trick but we've not yet found a replacement for plastics, et al, wooden computers anyone?Godfree wrote:...
because it makes more money for THEM...
have you seen the whirlpool of plastic in the middle of the Pacific ,
we have many products to replace plastic ,
marajuana , makes a very good plastic ,
corn , better not to use something already used for food ,
coal will still be a source of chemicals for plastics ,
the world will be a better place when we stop burning fossil fuel ,,,!!!
- Arising_uk
- Posts: 12259
- Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am
Re: A Challenge to Richard Dawkins and the Atheists
It'll be a lot more inconvenient.Godfree wrote:You say it like a world with less plastic would be a bad thing ,???? ...
Did I say we should be litter-bugs?have you seen the whirlpool of plastic in the middle of the Pacific , ...
You mean hemp? How good a plastic does it make?we have many products to replace plastic ,
marajuana , makes a very good plastic ,
Coal is a fossil fuel?corn , better not to use something already used for food ,
coal will still be a source of chemicals for plastics ,
the world will be a better place when we stop burning fossil fuel ,,,!!!
I agree that the burning of fossil fuels is environmentally damaging but what do you think we've got that could replace it given our current energy requirements?