Source of Consciousness
Does evolution begin on big bang level?
Does evolution begin on the quarks level?
In our earthly world there is only one fundamental
particle - electron
Does evolution begin on the electron’s level?
Can an electron evolve?
Does an electron have consciousness ?
Energy is electromagnetic waves (em): E=h*f
Lorentz proved: there isn’t em waves without Electron
It means the source of these em waves must be an Electron
The electron and the em waves they are physical reality
Can evolution of life begin on electron’s level?
=.
Molecular biology & molecular evolution
Cosmology & cosmic evolution
If Universe evolve can electron evolve too ?
Does evolution of life begin on electron level ?
Origin of life is a result of physical laws that govern Universe
Electron takes important part in this work
Question:
Why does the simplest particle - electron have six formulas:
E=h*f e = +ah*c e = -ah*c +E=Mc^2 -E=Mc^2 E= ∞ ?
Nobody knows
Question:
Why does electron obey five ( 5) Laws ?
a) Law of conservation and transformation energy/ mass
b) Maxwell’s equations
c) Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle / Law
d) Pauli Exclusion Principle/ Law
e) Fermi-Dirac statistics
Nobody knows.
=.
#
Quote by Heinrich Hertz on Maxwell's equations:
"One cannot escape the feeling that these mathematical formulae
have an independent existence and an intelligence of their own,
that they are wiser than we are, wiser even than their discoverers,
that we get more out of them than was originally put into them."
==.
Ladies and Gentlemen !
Friends !
Electron is not as simple as we think and, maybe, he is wiser than we are.
==========.
Israel Sadovnik Socratus
========.
Source of Consciousness
A little metaphysics :)
Let us suppose we are able to quiet body's (sense and memory) signals to our brain.
It is the status when the freed brain processes only pure quantum trembling,
status when it touches pure surface (the time of the "now") of the Universe,
status when it touches the future's interface,
status when it can "hear" the "God's breath".
It is the status when one can feel unexplained joy.
It is the pure consciousness
It is the status when the freed brain processes only pure quantum trembling,
status when it touches pure surface (the time of the "now") of the Universe,
status when it touches the future's interface,
status when it can "hear" the "God's breath".
It is the status when one can feel unexplained joy.
It is the pure consciousness
Re: Source of Consciousness
Oh God.socratus wrote:Source of Consciousness
Does evolution begin on big bang level?
Does evolution begin on the quarks level?
In our earthly world there is only one fundamental
particle - electron
Does evolution begin on the electron’s level?
Can an electron evolve?
Does an electron have consciousness ?
Energy is electromagnetic waves (em): E=h*f
Lorentz proved: there isn’t em waves without Electron
It means the source of these em waves must be an Electron
The electron and the em waves they are physical reality
Can evolution of life begin on electron’s level?
=.
Molecular biology & molecular evolution
Cosmology & cosmic evolution
If Universe evolve can electron evolve too ?
Does evolution of life begin on electron level ?
Origin of life is a result of physical laws that govern Universe
Electron takes important part in this work
Question:
Why does the simplest particle - electron have six formulas:
E=h*f e = +ah*c e = -ah*c +E=Mc^2 -E=Mc^2 E= ∞ ?
Nobody knows
Question:
Why does electron obey five ( 5) Laws ?
a) Law of conservation and transformation energy/ mass
b) Maxwell’s equations
c) Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle / Law
d) Pauli Exclusion Principle/ Law
e) Fermi-Dirac statistics
Nobody knows.
=.
#
Quote by Heinrich Hertz on Maxwell's equations:
"One cannot escape the feeling that these mathematical formulae
have an independent existence and an intelligence of their own,
that they are wiser than we are, wiser even than their discoverers,
that we get more out of them than was originally put into them."
==.
Ladies and Gentlemen !
Friends !
Electron is not as simple as we think and, maybe, he is wiser than we are.
==========.
Israel Sadovnik Socratus
========.
Re: Source of Consciousness
But maybe these electrons are World,lancek4 wrote:Oh God.socratus wrote:Source of Consciousness
Does evolution begin on big bang level?
Does evolution begin on the quarks level?
In our earthly world there is only one fundamental
particle - electron
Does evolution begin on the electron’s level?
Can an electron evolve?
Does an electron have consciousness ?
Energy is electromagnetic waves (em): E=h*f
Lorentz proved: there isn’t em waves without Electron
It means the source of these em waves must be an Electron
The electron and the em waves they are physical reality
Can evolution of life begin on electron’s level?
=.
Molecular biology & molecular evolution
Cosmology & cosmic evolution
If Universe evolve can electron evolve too ?
Does evolution of life begin on electron level ?
Origin of life is a result of physical laws that govern Universe
Electron takes important part in this work
Question:
Why does the simplest particle - electron have six formulas:
E=h*f e = +ah*c e = -ah*c +E=Mc^2 -E=Mc^2 E= ∞ ?
Nobody knows
Question:
Why does electron obey five ( 5) Laws ?
a) Law of conservation and transformation energy/ mass
b) Maxwell’s equations
c) Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle / Law
d) Pauli Exclusion Principle/ Law
e) Fermi-Dirac statistics
Nobody knows.
=.
#
Quote by Heinrich Hertz on Maxwell's equations:
"One cannot escape the feeling that these mathematical formulae
have an independent existence and an intelligence of their own,
that they are wiser than we are, wiser even than their discoverers,
that we get more out of them than was originally put into them."
==.
Ladies and Gentlemen !
Friends !
Electron is not as simple as we think and, maybe, he is wiser than we are.
==========.
Israel Sadovnik Socratus
========.
where there are five continents:
the art,
knowledge,
wars,
thrones
and the memory of forty centuries.
/ Valery Brusov. /
===.
Re: Source of Consciousness
Comment by Frank Steve
=.
The Electron Conscious?
At first glance this seems to be a rather senseless question. But then IONS founder has been known to ask “Does the Universe Perceive? The first is a micro question that implies the macro nature of the latter.
So here is my reasoning. If electrons of an oxygen atom enter and then mysteriously leave their emergent atomic fields of manifestation in precise femtosecond timing …and then instantly change their enter-exit frequencies when their atoms nucleus combines with two hydrogen atoms to form water … how do they know how … and when to do this instantaneous switch? So the question is really two questions:
1 – Do electrons possess dynamic states of awareness?
2 – If so, are they also conscious … i.e. comparative reasoning?
3 – And if they do possess limited spans of conscious, do they self-control their reactive behaviors?
/ Frank Steve /
=.
The Electron Conscious?
At first glance this seems to be a rather senseless question. But then IONS founder has been known to ask “Does the Universe Perceive? The first is a micro question that implies the macro nature of the latter.
So here is my reasoning. If electrons of an oxygen atom enter and then mysteriously leave their emergent atomic fields of manifestation in precise femtosecond timing …and then instantly change their enter-exit frequencies when their atoms nucleus combines with two hydrogen atoms to form water … how do they know how … and when to do this instantaneous switch? So the question is really two questions:
1 – Do electrons possess dynamic states of awareness?
2 – If so, are they also conscious … i.e. comparative reasoning?
3 – And if they do possess limited spans of conscious, do they self-control their reactive behaviors?
/ Frank Steve /
Re: Source of Consciousness
Comment by awori achoka .
This is interesting...critical events and phenomena,
in the universe are determined by occurrences at the
elemental level, through biochemical processes or changes
in energy states.
These events will occur with or without human intervention
or perception....ie, we don't to have to know for the universe
to exist... and breathe.
So, is the universe aware of our existence?
And does it matter that we exist?
/ awori achoka /
This is interesting...critical events and phenomena,
in the universe are determined by occurrences at the
elemental level, through biochemical processes or changes
in energy states.
These events will occur with or without human intervention
or perception....ie, we don't to have to know for the universe
to exist... and breathe.
So, is the universe aware of our existence?
And does it matter that we exist?
/ awori achoka /
Re: Source of Consciousness
Not By Chance the Existence Began.
The infinite monkey theorem states that a monkey hitting keys
at random on a typewriter keyboard for an infinite amount of time
will almost surely type a given text, such as the complete works
of William Shakespeare.
The probability of a monkey exactly typing a complete work such
as Shakespeare's Hamlet is so tiny that the chance of it occurring
during a period of time of the order of the age of the universe
is extremely low, but not zero.
. . . . .
If there are as many monkeys as there are particles in the
observable universe . . . . the probability of the monkeys replicating
even a short book is nearly zero.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infinite_monkey_theorem
It means that by chance it is impossible to create
Intellect Existence during 13 - 20 billions of years
after ‘big bang’.
The Intellect Existence needs some intellect beginning.
============..
socratus
The infinite monkey theorem states that a monkey hitting keys
at random on a typewriter keyboard for an infinite amount of time
will almost surely type a given text, such as the complete works
of William Shakespeare.
The probability of a monkey exactly typing a complete work such
as Shakespeare's Hamlet is so tiny that the chance of it occurring
during a period of time of the order of the age of the universe
is extremely low, but not zero.
. . . . .
If there are as many monkeys as there are particles in the
observable universe . . . . the probability of the monkeys replicating
even a short book is nearly zero.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infinite_monkey_theorem
It means that by chance it is impossible to create
Intellect Existence during 13 - 20 billions of years
after ‘big bang’.
The Intellect Existence needs some intellect beginning.
============..
socratus
Re: Source of Consciousness
My conclusion:
=.
We have two opportunities.
One opportunity .
By the Chance it was impossible to create Intellect Existence
during as short time as 13 - 20 billions years after ‘big bang’.
The intelligence could have never appeared By the Chances
according to Theory of Probability (as per the infinite monkey
theorem) because it is not enough time for creating it.
The Evolution (which gave a rise to intelligence ) according
to Theory of Probability By the Chance it is impossible.
It must be some intelligence beginning.
If ‘big bang ’ true theory (and we are materialists ) then we must
find an intellectual beginning inside it.
Now physicists have zoo of elementary particles.
Which of them can take functions of intellectual beginning ?
Can every particle of this zoo have beginning of consciousness?
I think, no.
Why?
Because in our Earthly world there is only one smallest practical
fundamental particle - electron.
Now is possible to ask:
Does evolution begin on the electron’s level?
Does an electron have consciousness ?
Can an electron evolve?
What is an electron?
=.
Second opportunity .
The theory ‘big bang’ is wrong.
And then according to Theory of Probability the Universe has
chance not zero but nearly zero to creat Intellect Existence.
So. Einstein’s question ‘ Does God play dice ? ’ is still open.
====.
Socratus
=======.
=.
We have two opportunities.
One opportunity .
By the Chance it was impossible to create Intellect Existence
during as short time as 13 - 20 billions years after ‘big bang’.
The intelligence could have never appeared By the Chances
according to Theory of Probability (as per the infinite monkey
theorem) because it is not enough time for creating it.
The Evolution (which gave a rise to intelligence ) according
to Theory of Probability By the Chance it is impossible.
It must be some intelligence beginning.
If ‘big bang ’ true theory (and we are materialists ) then we must
find an intellectual beginning inside it.
Now physicists have zoo of elementary particles.
Which of them can take functions of intellectual beginning ?
Can every particle of this zoo have beginning of consciousness?
I think, no.
Why?
Because in our Earthly world there is only one smallest practical
fundamental particle - electron.
Now is possible to ask:
Does evolution begin on the electron’s level?
Does an electron have consciousness ?
Can an electron evolve?
What is an electron?
=.
Second opportunity .
The theory ‘big bang’ is wrong.
And then according to Theory of Probability the Universe has
chance not zero but nearly zero to creat Intellect Existence.
So. Einstein’s question ‘ Does God play dice ? ’ is still open.
====.
Socratus
=======.
Re: Source of Consciousness
Book: What is your dangerous idea?
/ Edited by John Brockman /
Article:
Seeing Darwin in the light of Einstein;
Seeing Einstein in the light of Darwin.
/ by Lee Smolin. /
===.
Seeing Einstein in the light of Darwin suggests that
natural selection could act not only on living things
but on the properties defining the various species
of elementary particles.
/ Page 115 /
We physicists have now to understand Darwin’s lesson:
The only way to understand how one out of a vast number
of choices was made, which favors improbable structure,
is that is the result of evolution by natural selection.
/ Page 117 /
Now the only possible way of accounting for the laws of nature,
and for uniformity in general, is to suppose them results of evolution.
/ Page 117 /
And I believe that once this is achieved, Einstein and Darwin
will be understood as partners in the greatest revolution yet in science, . . .
/ Page 118 /
=====================.
/ Edited by John Brockman /
Article:
Seeing Darwin in the light of Einstein;
Seeing Einstein in the light of Darwin.
/ by Lee Smolin. /
===.
Seeing Einstein in the light of Darwin suggests that
natural selection could act not only on living things
but on the properties defining the various species
of elementary particles.
/ Page 115 /
We physicists have now to understand Darwin’s lesson:
The only way to understand how one out of a vast number
of choices was made, which favors improbable structure,
is that is the result of evolution by natural selection.
/ Page 117 /
Now the only possible way of accounting for the laws of nature,
and for uniformity in general, is to suppose them results of evolution.
/ Page 117 /
And I believe that once this is achieved, Einstein and Darwin
will be understood as partners in the greatest revolution yet in science, . . .
/ Page 118 /
=====================.
Re: Source of Consciousness
1. Einstein’s world (time-space) supposes the determinism (the future already exists, by it)socratus wrote:Book: What is your dangerous idea?
/ Edited by John Brockman /
Article:
Seeing Darwin in the light of Einstein;
Seeing Einstein in the light of Darwin.
/ by Lee Smolin. /
===.
Seeing Einstein in the light of Darwin suggests that
natural selection could act not only on living things
but on the properties defining the various species
of elementary particles.
/ Page 115 /
We physicists have now to understand Darwin’s lesson:
The only way to understand how one out of a vast number
of choices was made, which favors improbable structure,
is that is the result of evolution by natural selection.
/ Page 117 /
Now the only possible way of accounting for the laws of nature,
and for uniformity in general, is to suppose them results of evolution.
/ Page 117 /
And I believe that once this is achieved, Einstein and Darwin
will be understood as partners in the greatest revolution yet in science, . . .
/ Page 118 /
=====================.
2. Einstein’s world (big bang) supposes an extreme field conditions (hardly to believe in the same zoo of el.particles there)
These are some of many obstruct aspects of TR
These are of some reasons why i feel strong distrust to TR
Re: Source of Consciousness
Questions.
1
On which biological level is it possible to use phrase:
Darwinian natural selection, Darwin’s evolution ?
2
On which biological level does consciousness appear ?.
==.
Book ‘ The trouble with Physics’ / by Lee Smolin /
Part 8. The first superstring revolution.
Page 126 – 127.
‘. . . the growing catalog of string theories meant that
we weren’t actually studying a fundamental theory.’ . . .
‘ . . . but the many versions of string theory opened up
the possibility that it was true of essentially all the
properties of the elementary particles and forces. This would
mean that properties of the elementary particles were
environmental and could change in time. If so, it would mean
that physics would be more like biology, in that the
properties of the elementary particles would depend on the
history of our universe. ‘
( These thoughts would lead to a 1992 paper titled ‘ Did the
Universe Evolve?’ and a 1997 book called
‘ The Life of the Cosmos.’ Our story later turns on these ideas.)
Lee Smolin.
http://www.leesmolin.com/
==.
1
On which biological level is it possible to use phrase:
Darwinian natural selection, Darwin’s evolution ?
2
On which biological level does consciousness appear ?.
==.
Book ‘ The trouble with Physics’ / by Lee Smolin /
Part 8. The first superstring revolution.
Page 126 – 127.
‘. . . the growing catalog of string theories meant that
we weren’t actually studying a fundamental theory.’ . . .
‘ . . . but the many versions of string theory opened up
the possibility that it was true of essentially all the
properties of the elementary particles and forces. This would
mean that properties of the elementary particles were
environmental and could change in time. If so, it would mean
that physics would be more like biology, in that the
properties of the elementary particles would depend on the
history of our universe. ‘
( These thoughts would lead to a 1992 paper titled ‘ Did the
Universe Evolve?’ and a 1997 book called
‘ The Life of the Cosmos.’ Our story later turns on these ideas.)
Lee Smolin.
http://www.leesmolin.com/
==.
Re: Source of Consciousness
Try using QM to explain the "conscious *of* " feature.
I say it's doomed from the start, since consciousness
will always lie outside or beyond its object.
/ Kalkidas /
QM and consciousness may have some deep connection, but it
would take some truly funky mathematics to capture the relation.
/ Craig Franck /
=.
1
We have brushes, paints, canvas - they are tools.
The picture is not created by the paint and brush.
It is result of idea, information, consciousness.
The idea of painting is lie outside or beyond its object.
2
We have atoms, complex atoms.
From them were created everything.
The idea (consciousness) of creating cell, molecules
of DNA, body must lie outside or beyond its object too.
3
Where in the Universe we can find the world which
lie outside or beyond the visual material world?
The Universe as whole is Two - Measured World:
one Reference Frame is the Matter World
and another Reference Frame is the Vacuum World.
But today physicists know the Matter world and refuse to think
and understand the Vacuum world because the Vacuum is
Infinite and Eternal continuum.
Why do physicists refuse to take vacuum as a fundament of Universe?
Book : ‘Dreams of a final theory’ by Steven Weinberg. Page 138.
‘ It is true . . . there is such a thing as absolute zero; we cannot
reach temperatures below absolute zero not because we are not
sufficiently clever but because temperatures below absolute zero
simple have no meaning.’
/ Steven Weinberg. The Nobel Prize in Physics 1979 /
4.
We are surrounded by Double Universe.
Quantum Theory says about wave–particle duality.
Our brain works on dualistic basis:
(as a logical consciousness and as an illogical (?) unconsciousness)
There are another kinds of dualities: matter and field,
matter and energy / force, body and mind / consciousness .
We are surrounded by the duality.
=.
Socratus.
I say it's doomed from the start, since consciousness
will always lie outside or beyond its object.
/ Kalkidas /
QM and consciousness may have some deep connection, but it
would take some truly funky mathematics to capture the relation.
/ Craig Franck /
=.
1
We have brushes, paints, canvas - they are tools.
The picture is not created by the paint and brush.
It is result of idea, information, consciousness.
The idea of painting is lie outside or beyond its object.
2
We have atoms, complex atoms.
From them were created everything.
The idea (consciousness) of creating cell, molecules
of DNA, body must lie outside or beyond its object too.
3
Where in the Universe we can find the world which
lie outside or beyond the visual material world?
The Universe as whole is Two - Measured World:
one Reference Frame is the Matter World
and another Reference Frame is the Vacuum World.
But today physicists know the Matter world and refuse to think
and understand the Vacuum world because the Vacuum is
Infinite and Eternal continuum.
Why do physicists refuse to take vacuum as a fundament of Universe?
Book : ‘Dreams of a final theory’ by Steven Weinberg. Page 138.
‘ It is true . . . there is such a thing as absolute zero; we cannot
reach temperatures below absolute zero not because we are not
sufficiently clever but because temperatures below absolute zero
simple have no meaning.’
/ Steven Weinberg. The Nobel Prize in Physics 1979 /
4.
We are surrounded by Double Universe.
Quantum Theory says about wave–particle duality.
Our brain works on dualistic basis:
(as a logical consciousness and as an illogical (?) unconsciousness)
There are another kinds of dualities: matter and field,
matter and energy / force, body and mind / consciousness .
We are surrounded by the duality.
=.
Socratus.
Re: Source of Consciousness
Roger Penrose wrote that
‘ the nature of consciousness suggests a quantum process’.
Many biophysicists try to understand the brain’s work using
Quantum theory.
And I ask:
Is it possible to understand brain’s work without electron?
====.
Book ‘The quantum self ’by Danah Zohar.
#
Physicist and photon are involved in a creative dialogue . . .
/ page 29/
‘. . . there is a vital link between thought processes and
quantum processes, between ourselves and electrons’.
/ page 59/
‘. . . the philosophical and psychological consequences
of such a close bond between the dinamics of the self
and those of the electron’
/ page 60/
Oxford’s Roger Penrose: ‘ Quantum physics . . . quantum
correlations could be playing an operative role over large
regions of the brain’.
/ page 61 /
‘ . . biophysicists . . . discovered that nerve cells in the
human brain are sufficiently sensitive to register the
absorption of a single photon . . .’
/ page 61 /
‘ It was clear in our discussion of the possibility that
electrons might be conscious.
/ page 78 /
‘ . . if electrons are conscious, we then have to say that they
have a mind/ body problem’.
/ page 79 /
‘ Even when disclaimers like ‘very primitive, ‘elementary’
or ‘ proto-‘ are used to discuss the consciousness of electrons . . . .’.
/ page 79 /
‘ . . . the idea that consciousness itself arises out of a
coherent ordering of virtual photon relationships in the
brain’s quantum system.’
/ page 80 /
‘ Our human consciousness, therefore, is not different
in kind from that associated with more elementary life
forms or with elementary matter, but is different in degree
and complexity.’
/ page 86 /
BTW,
‘ . . . when we speak of consciousness we speak of
‘ property’ . .. . . .at least to some degree. . . ..’
‘ . . .many states and degrees of consciousness. ‘
/ page 37 /
/ Book ‘The quantum self ’ by Danah Zohar. /
==========..
‘ the nature of consciousness suggests a quantum process’.
Many biophysicists try to understand the brain’s work using
Quantum theory.
And I ask:
Is it possible to understand brain’s work without electron?
====.
Book ‘The quantum self ’by Danah Zohar.
#
Physicist and photon are involved in a creative dialogue . . .
/ page 29/
‘. . . there is a vital link between thought processes and
quantum processes, between ourselves and electrons’.
/ page 59/
‘. . . the philosophical and psychological consequences
of such a close bond between the dinamics of the self
and those of the electron’
/ page 60/
Oxford’s Roger Penrose: ‘ Quantum physics . . . quantum
correlations could be playing an operative role over large
regions of the brain’.
/ page 61 /
‘ . . biophysicists . . . discovered that nerve cells in the
human brain are sufficiently sensitive to register the
absorption of a single photon . . .’
/ page 61 /
‘ It was clear in our discussion of the possibility that
electrons might be conscious.
/ page 78 /
‘ . . if electrons are conscious, we then have to say that they
have a mind/ body problem’.
/ page 79 /
‘ Even when disclaimers like ‘very primitive, ‘elementary’
or ‘ proto-‘ are used to discuss the consciousness of electrons . . . .’.
/ page 79 /
‘ . . . the idea that consciousness itself arises out of a
coherent ordering of virtual photon relationships in the
brain’s quantum system.’
/ page 80 /
‘ Our human consciousness, therefore, is not different
in kind from that associated with more elementary life
forms or with elementary matter, but is different in degree
and complexity.’
/ page 86 /
BTW,
‘ . . . when we speak of consciousness we speak of
‘ property’ . .. . . .at least to some degree. . . ..’
‘ . . .many states and degrees of consciousness. ‘
/ page 37 /
/ Book ‘The quantum self ’ by Danah Zohar. /
==========..
Re: Source of Consciousness
DNA – Information - Evolution.
Carl Friedrich von Weizsacker in his book:
‘ The unity of Nature ‘ tried to understand the interaction
between information and DNA. He wrote:
‘ Organisms control their own growth by means of the genetic
information stored in the DNA molecules, . . . ‘ / page 281 /
‘ . . . the amount of information contained in the DNA . . . . is
the information corresponding to the concept ‘ genetic constitution’.
/ page 281 /
DNA is indeed the carrier of the genetic constitution.
/ page 282 /
#
My question.
How does DNA "draw" the shape of a human?
To draw the shape of a child from zygote DNA must know physics,
mathematics, geometry . . . etc.
How is possible to understand that DNA knows all these subjects?
If the child was born intelligent then it means that DNA knows physics,
mathematics, geometry and . . . etc.
#
My question.
Where does DNA fit into the evolution debate?
DNA information is not static information.
DNA information is dealing with ‘ flow of information.’
DNA information is dealing with ‘progressive information.’
DNA information can evolve.
DNA information evolves from zygote to the intelligent child.
#
Our body is a multi-cellular organism made up
of perhaps 100 trillion different cells.
‘ The information content in the nucleus of a single human cell
is comparable to that of a library containing a thousand volumes.’
/ The unity of Nature, page 40. /
Question:
How can 100 trillion different cells (100 trillion libraries with a
thousand volumes in each) create a child ( by the chance )
during 9 months if according to the probability theory
it is impossible?
#
Today scientists think that everything begins from ‘Big Bang’.
And according to ‘big bang’ our Universe exist 13 (+) billion years.
My question :
Is it possible to create a child from cell [ zygote] only in 280 days
according to Probability theory?
If " yes "it will be take time not 280 days but it will be take time
more than our Universe exist and then ,maybe, the pregnancy
woman was before the ‘ big bang’.
If ‘ no’ then the process must have aim.
It means somebody /something must manage this process.
===.
Best wishes.
Israel Sadovnik. Socratus.
========.
Carl Friedrich von Weizsacker in his book:
‘ The unity of Nature ‘ tried to understand the interaction
between information and DNA. He wrote:
‘ Organisms control their own growth by means of the genetic
information stored in the DNA molecules, . . . ‘ / page 281 /
‘ . . . the amount of information contained in the DNA . . . . is
the information corresponding to the concept ‘ genetic constitution’.
/ page 281 /
DNA is indeed the carrier of the genetic constitution.
/ page 282 /
#
My question.
How does DNA "draw" the shape of a human?
To draw the shape of a child from zygote DNA must know physics,
mathematics, geometry . . . etc.
How is possible to understand that DNA knows all these subjects?
If the child was born intelligent then it means that DNA knows physics,
mathematics, geometry and . . . etc.
#
My question.
Where does DNA fit into the evolution debate?
DNA information is not static information.
DNA information is dealing with ‘ flow of information.’
DNA information is dealing with ‘progressive information.’
DNA information can evolve.
DNA information evolves from zygote to the intelligent child.
#
Our body is a multi-cellular organism made up
of perhaps 100 trillion different cells.
‘ The information content in the nucleus of a single human cell
is comparable to that of a library containing a thousand volumes.’
/ The unity of Nature, page 40. /
Question:
How can 100 trillion different cells (100 trillion libraries with a
thousand volumes in each) create a child ( by the chance )
during 9 months if according to the probability theory
it is impossible?
#
Today scientists think that everything begins from ‘Big Bang’.
And according to ‘big bang’ our Universe exist 13 (+) billion years.
My question :
Is it possible to create a child from cell [ zygote] only in 280 days
according to Probability theory?
If " yes "it will be take time not 280 days but it will be take time
more than our Universe exist and then ,maybe, the pregnancy
woman was before the ‘ big bang’.
If ‘ no’ then the process must have aim.
It means somebody /something must manage this process.
===.
Best wishes.
Israel Sadovnik. Socratus.
========.
Re: Source of Consciousness
1
If DNA contains code - instructions - bits, it means that
DNA knows physics, chemistry, mathematics, geometry . . . etc.
2
If the reason of evolution is ' by chance ' ( by the DNA chance )
then before was a pregnant woman who gave life to a child
who invented the ‘ big bang’ theory.
===.
If DNA contains code - instructions - bits, it means that
DNA knows physics, chemistry, mathematics, geometry . . . etc.
2
If the reason of evolution is ' by chance ' ( by the DNA chance )
then before was a pregnant woman who gave life to a child
who invented the ‘ big bang’ theory.
===.