The 2011 Nobel Prize for Physics for the discovery that

[socratus]

The 2011 Nobel Prize for Physics for the discovery that
the rate of expansion of the universe is increasing
#
What was before: egg or chicken?
Oh, I know this question is very old and does not have answer.
Therefore I will ask a simpler question:
What was before: ‘ big bang’ or vacuum?
#
Nobody knows the reason of ‘ big bang’. My opinion:
The action when the God compressed the whole Universe into
his palm, the scientists named ‘singular point’
And the action when the God opened his palm the scientists
named ‘Big Bang’
Does evolution begin on big bang level ?
At what step does consciousness begin?
Does consciousness begin on big bang level ?
=.
What is our intellect ?
We can see this practically :
after ‘ big bang‘ all Galaxies run away from us
#
Dark Energy may be Vacuum
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/ ... 011607.php
===.
Israel Sadovnik Socratus

[John]

What was before: egg or chicken?
Oh, I know this question is very old and does not have answer.

It does have an answer. The egg came first, it just wasn't a chicken's egg.

[socratus]

What was before: egg or chicken?
Oh, I know this question is very old and does not have answer.

It does have an answer. The egg came first, it just wasn't a chicken's egg.

Maybe you have also the answer to the question:
what was before big bang or vacuum ?

[lancek4]

So the Nobel Prize is given to those who confirm or deny what we already know.

[Cerveny]

...
Maybe you have also the answer to the question:
what was before big bang or vacuum ?
...

The Idea (:Hegel:) Math?

[John]

What was before: egg or chicken?
Oh, I know this question is very old and does not have answer.

It does have an answer. The egg came first, it just wasn't a chicken's egg.

Maybe you have also the answer to the question:
what was before big bang or vacuum ?

Afraid not.

[socratus]

So the Nobel Prize is given to those who confirm or deny what we already know.

I think you are right.
Our modern fashionable physics has strange logic.
Examples.
1.
On the one hand according to Einstein’s SRT the space
and time ( -4D spacetime ) don't have different qualities.
On the other hand according to our Newtonian world
the space and time really have different qualities.
2.
On the one hand according to Classic physics mass
and energy different qualities
On the other hand according to Einstein’s SRT mass
and energy equal qualities
3.
On the one hand according to Newton ‘ Time’ does not
depend on matter and motion.
On the other hand according to Einstein’s SRT and GRT
‘ Time’ is depended on matter and motion.
4.
On the one hand :
The particles in the Universe are more than antiparticles
/ Baryon asymmetry /
On the other hand: The particles of ‘ dark matter’ in the
Universe is more than particles of visual matter
5.
On the one hand a black hole is a space in which the
gravitational field is so powerful that nothing can escape out.
On the other hand: Hawking Radiation theorizes that
black holes do not, in fact, absorb all matter absolutely;
they give off some return matter.
Then we can ask question:
How did the ‘single point ‘ was created if the matter
can escape from any strong gravitational force?
6.
etc
=.
My conclusion:
Boltzmann, trying to explain Maxwell theory, said that he
needed ‘ with heavy sweat proceed’, to explain theory that
he could not clearly understand himself.
The honest physicists must say the same.
=..
Only one hope we have: the fashion has tendency to change.
====== .

[Cerveny]

The biggest problem of present physics is theory of relativity :(

[socratus]

The biggest problem of present physics is theory of relativity

The biggest problem of present physics is that physicists think
that the Universe is one – dimensioned, inspite of the facts
that the Universe as whoel is two – dimensioned
Next to the Matter World the Vacuum World exists too.
=.
We know many laws and parameters of Matter world, but we
know nothing about Vacuum world.
=.
We only know that, for example, electron lost its parameters
in interaction with vacuum.
We only know that physicists need vacuum in CERN experiments
to create mass-particles
We only know that physicists need mathematical ‘ renormalization’
to bring particles to reality from infinite.
We only know that
‘ Somehow, the energy is extracted from the vacuum
and turned into particles...
Don't try it in your basement, but you can do it.
/ -- University of Chicago cosmologist Rocky Kolb /
Etc . . .
====.
My question : what we need to do to understand the Nature?
My answer:
1.At first, to find the parameters of Vacuum.
2. To find the parameters of ‘virtua particles’ in Vacuum.
3. To understand the process of mass-partical creation
from ‘virtua particles’
4.To understand the laws and formulas of connection between
the Matter and Vacuum worlds.
==.

[Cerveny]

...
4.To understand the laws and formulas of connection between
the Matter and Vacuum worlds.
...

Let me to repeat: the Matter (elementary particles) are defects in regular pattern/matrices of Vacuum/aether structure...
There are no virtual particles; it is only our old aether. Throw away whole TR :(

[socratus]

...
4.To understand the laws and formulas of connection between
the Matter and Vacuum worlds.
...

Let me to repeat: the Matter (elementary particles) are defects in regular pattern/matrices of Vacuum/aether structure...
There are no virtual particles; it is only our old aether. Throw away whole TR

The Vacuum/aether is an infinite energy structure which
can generate virtual particles – antiparticles.
These virtual particles/ antiparticles, using its spins, can jump from
the vacuum and turned into elementary particles, for example, electron.
#
"Now we know that the vacuum can have all sorts of wonderful effects
over an enormous range of scales, from the microscopic to the cosmic,"
said Peter Milonni
from the Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico.
#
When the next revolution rocks physics,
chances are it will be about nothing — the vacuum,
that endless infinite void.
http://discovermagazine.com/2008/aug/18 ... everything
!
The Universe as whole is Two- Measured World.
Next to Material-Gravity World the Vacuum World exists too.
============.

[Cerveny]

The Vacuum/aether is an infinite energy structure which
can generate virtual particles – antiparticles.
These virtual particles/ antiparticles, using its spins, can jump from
the vacuum and turned into elementary particles, for example, electron.
#
"Now we know that the vacuum can have all sorts of wonderful effects
over an enormous range of scales, from the microscopic to the cosmic,"
said Peter Milonni
from the Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico.
#
When the next revolution rocks physics,
chances are it will be about nothing — the vacuum,
that endless infinite void.
http://discovermagazine.com/2008/aug/18 ... everything
!
The Universe as whole is Two- Measured World.
Next to Material-Gravity World the Vacuum World exists too.
============.

Hardly to believe in any "infinite/unlimited" in our finite/limited Universe :(

[socratus]

The biggest problem of present physics is The Double Universe.
Physicists know the Matter world and refuse to think about the
Vacuum world.
#
" The problem of the exact description of vacuum, in my opinion,
is the basic problem now before physics. Really, if you can’t correctly
describe the vacuum, how it is possible to expect a correct description
of something more complex? "
/ Paul Dirac ./
#
‘Although we are used to thinking of empty space as containing
nothing at all, and therefore having zero energy, the quantum
rules say that there is some uncertainty about this. Perhaps each
tiny bit of the vacuum actually contains rather a lot of energy.
If the vacuum contained enough energy, it could convert this
into particles, in line with E-Mc^2.’
/ Book: Stephen Hawking. Pages 147-148.
By Michael White and John Gribbin. /
#
Astrophysicists say:
‘ 90% or more of the matter in the Universe is unseen dark matter.’
Question:
How can the 90% or more of the hidden dark matter in
the Universe create the few % of the Visible matter ?
#
Dark energy may be vacuum
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/ ... 011607.php

===.

[Cerveny]

...
#
‘Although we are used to thinking of empty space as containing
nothing at all, and therefore having zero energy, the quantum
rules say that there is some uncertainty about this. Perhaps each
tiny bit of the vacuum actually contains rather a lot of energy.
If the vacuum contained enough energy, it could convert this
into particles, in line with E-Mc^2.’
/ Book: Stephen Hawking. Pages 147-148.
By Michael White and John Gribbin. /
#
...

We do not need any quantum rules; there are permeability, permittivity... (real physical properties) of empty space/vacuum here. In case of free virtual particles (outside some fixed structure) vacuum should have lead electric current...
Rules stay only the Rules; we should not lost healthy sense :(