aphilosophy

So what's really going on?

Moderators: AMod, iMod

Typist
Posts: 500
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 11:12 am

Re: aphilosophy

Post by Typist »

chaz wyman wrote:The only way I can prove that I will change when you stop being a stupid moron, is whan you stop being a stupid moron, you moron!!!
He he! Thank you for proving me right with every word you type. Like shooting fish in a barrel. I must be getting lazy in my old age!

I must be a STOOOOOOOOPID MORON!!
User avatar
Arising_uk
Posts: 12259
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am

Re: aphilosophy

Post by Arising_uk »

Ever notice how you avoid all the points other than the ones that confirm your beliefs?
Typist
Posts: 500
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 11:12 am

Re: aphilosophy

Post by Typist »

But what time is it? Why won't you answer the question???
evangelicalhumanist
Posts: 116
Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2010 12:52 am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Re: aphilosophy

Post by evangelicalhumanist »

Typist wrote:But what time is it? Why won't you answer the question???
At time I write this, it is 20:02 and several seconds on August 20, 2011. When you read it, it won't be. Therefore, there is no possible answer to the question in this context.

That happens a lot.
chaz wyman
Posts: 5304
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 7:31 pm

Re: aphilosophy

Post by chaz wyman »

Typist wrote:
chaz wyman wrote:The only way I can prove that I will change when you stop being a stupid moron, is whan you stop being a stupid moron, you moron!!!
He he! Thank you for proving me right with every word you type. Like shooting fish in a barrel. I must be getting lazy in my old age!

I must be a STOOOOOOOOPID MORON!!

So what are the answers to those questions?
chaz wyman
Posts: 5304
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 7:31 pm

Re: aphilosophy

Post by chaz wyman »

evangelicalhumanist wrote:
Typist wrote:But what time is it? Why won't you answer the question???
At time I write this, it is 20:02 and several seconds on August 20, 2011. When you read it, it won't be. Therefore, there is no possible answer to the question in this context.

That happens a lot.
Image
User avatar
Arising_uk
Posts: 12259
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am

Re: aphilosophy

Post by Arising_uk »

Typist wrote:But what time is it? Why won't you answer the question???
09:55, I do. When will you be doing the same?
chaz wyman
Posts: 5304
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 7:31 pm

Re: aphilosophy

Post by chaz wyman »

Arising_uk wrote:
Typist wrote:But what time is it? Why won't you answer the question???
09:55, I do. When will you be doing the same?

Stop feeding the troll
Typist
Posts: 500
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 11:12 am

Re: aphilosophy

Post by Typist »

chaz wyman wrote:Stop feeding the troll
Your theme continues.

First I was a moron, now I'm troll.

What negative name shall you call me next?

The suspense is exciting!!
Typist
Posts: 500
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 11:12 am

Re: aphilosophy

Post by Typist »

09:55, I do.
But that's the time when you posted, not the time now!! You're using tricky tactics to CONTINUE TO DODGE THE QUESTION!!!

Are you afraid to answer the question, is that it?
chaz wyman
Posts: 5304
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 7:31 pm

Re: aphilosophy

Post by chaz wyman »

Typist wrote:
chaz wyman wrote:Stop feeding the troll
Your theme continues.

First I was a moron, now I'm troll.

What negative name shall you call me next?

The suspense is exciting!!
I'll call you anything that is accurate.
Typist
Posts: 500
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 11:12 am

Re: aphilosophy

Post by Typist »

You're gonna call me stuff!!!
User avatar
Arising_uk
Posts: 12259
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am

Re: aphilosophy

Post by Arising_uk »

Typist wrote:Are you afraid to answer the question, is that it?
Which question? As I answer all yours, shame you cannot reciprocate.

You keep asking me the time and I keep telling you, whats the problem?
melonkali
Posts: 19
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 1:00 am

Re: aphilosophy

Post by melonkali »

Typist wrote:You're gonna call me stuff!!!
Is it not still true that one only resorts to argumentum ad hominem when one has no legitimate case or point of debate? And is not the intention of a rude and bellicose argumentum ad hominem attack to discourage your opponent from further discussion. It worked with me in a recent thread where **** and I tangled -- I ended up losing my temper, making a rude remark which I regretted and felt I had to apologize for, then I bowed out of the exchange.

From what I've read in this thread, I believe your assertions have been interesting and well presented. So regardless of whatever further abuse and name calling gets thrown at you, in my opinion you've made a good point in this thread.

And now I'd better go hide before rude and juvenile insults start flying in my direction!

rebecca
User avatar
Arising_uk
Posts: 12259
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am

Re: aphilosophy

Post by Arising_uk »

melonkali wrote:...
From what I've read in this thread, I believe your assertions have been interesting and well presented. So regardless of whatever further abuse and name calling gets thrown at you, in my opinion you've made a good point in this thread ...
Get used to them rebecca as you're going to be hearing the same ones every time and no replies to any questions. Its why one of us started this thread about Typists 'aphilosophy' since he wouldn't, to try and actually get some answers.
Post Reply