lancek4 wrote:wow that was great guys. Im glad to be back checking the same non-sense out. So great.
It just so happens, coincidentally, that I wrote a short essay very recently called "a philosophy". and then I came back on this forum and low and behold, someone has a thread about thier thing of aphilsophy. crazy.
So if anyone wishes to get back on a less antagonistic level, maybe I could get some comments on my take.
Here is a link:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/62621120/A-Philosophy
What do you mean by ' Death is understood within as ‘unethical’ arena; death is anti
-human, it works against the efforts of what it is to be human: death is evil."?
And in the following paragraph who is 'we'. Would that be you and the queen?
And how do you justify this howling non sequitur? ;"To assert that something philosophical is novel is to assert the certainty of death, which then provokes the individual against it, and to promote a proper way to live."
This is odd too;"...philosophy cannot teach us how to live without denying another their right to live
–even with our best intension"
No idea what you are trying to get at here!
