A Philosophy of Mind

Is the mind the same as the body? What is consciousness? Can machines have it?

Moderators: AMod, iMod

Locked
Barbara Brooks
Posts: 1826
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 4:41 pm

Post by Barbara Brooks »

With careful thought comes truth and with truth comes compassion, this power is in our soul and is most good. What is truth but objective reality, in other words, certainty of being but can’t comprehend or understood, merely the bare reason of self. They are called the mechanical sphere of feeling. This is called the theoretical process and determines logically how to distinguish things. This antithesis of inner and outer is our determinate inner character actual realized individuality being objective.
Barbara Brooks
Posts: 1826
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 4:41 pm

Post by Barbara Brooks »

One must labor to succeed in attaining and finding pleasure second, laboring, for work keeps us in bondage is our chain from which we can not get away from, Only in labor do we succeed in attaining pppppppppppppppppppppppppppp;urpose. Opps
Barbara Brooks
Posts: 1826
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 4:41 pm

Post by Barbara Brooks »

Feeling is a state of tension with the world that stands over against us. We sentient creature are self determinate in such a way our senses excites a particular feeling freely.

Instinctually we are in step with the outside world. Just as everything else, we feel it. Therefore self feeling is an unpleasant need of outside; it is this urge not contingent but necessary. To feel is a privilege
It is this theoretical process that we are free.
Barbara Brooks
Posts: 1826
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 4:41 pm

Post by Barbara Brooks »

The mind has the power to act from within outward is amazing for instance voice which can be wonderful in its utterance of self-feeling. Voice is a spiritual mechanism. True metals sound but do not show a specific quality until it has been struck or stimulated from outside; get voice sounds its own accord, announces our spiritual nature by vibrating inwardly which causes the air in us to vibrate.

Voice is a spiritual mechanism. Metals too do sound but do not show a specific quality until metals are struck. Whereas voice sounds its own accord, announces a spiritual nature vibrating inwardly causing the air in us to vibrate.

Come grasp the spirit of nature approach it in a partly practical and partly theoretical way. Knowledge the acme of scientific procedure will continue to be ignorant analogies passed off as divine knowledge.

Philosophy is of intellect only arrives at the perception of the absolute good and sight imitates it. At lasts the end of the intellectual world, as in the case of sight at the end of the visible.

Let us here try not to grapple with mere opinion. The truth is philosophy is an endeavor most important.
Barbara Brooks
Posts: 1826
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 4:41 pm

Post by Barbara Brooks »

To behold knowledge it is best when sounds sights feelings quit. These senses merely hinder the acquisition of knowledge.

Knowledge is nothing less than the whole realm of truth and in such that sets forth not abstract, but consciousness or consciousness that is more so virtuous.

We sound our own accord; announce our spiritual nature by our own activity. That is what makes our body organism vibrate into voice lies in our power. The unity of outside activities and inner self is what feeling is. The mind is a circle it returns to self, directly shuts out other and in this state is tension with outside conditions.

When a body sounds, it enters into a higher sphere to self-preservation bear witness in the face of force outside. In a conscious awaken state there is immediate reflection into self; it is called sensibility it differentiates self from the outside forces. Self-consciousness gets satisfaction maintaining a genuine self-contentment; a satisfaction within self is a process and transformation.

The very fact that knowledge comes on the scene is a phenomenon; from this point of view can be taken as a pathway pressing forward to truth.

Any kind of knowledge acquired under force does not stay in mind. Knowledge is oneness of thought the higher sense of self-sufficient individuality

Let us not slave in the acquisition of knowledge for that which is rigid and cold is powerless. Rigidity exists as long as it does not lose its hold and internally break down. Like the moon is rigid body representing earth's nucleus and contains the principle of abstract individuality.
Barbara Brooks
Posts: 1826
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 4:41 pm

Post by Barbara Brooks »

Come lift your head into the outside world, you are being carried round in a revolution, troubled indeed and with great difficulty beholding true being; rise and fall, and see, and again fails to see the disorder of the climb are too eager to behold truth the highest part of the mind where pasturage nourished with truth is found.

But when the mind is unable to follow fails to behold truth sinks beneath forgetfulness and wrong, falls and drops to the ground.

Knowledge to the rescue gives way before calculation and measure and weight. In addition, this surely is the rational principle in the soul. The better part of the soul is likely to be that which trusts to measure and calculate.
Barbara Brooks
Posts: 1826
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 4:41 pm

Post by Barbara Brooks »

Forever directed I am towards, of things that are all in order moving towards true being that is what I write about.

Any one will admit that absolute cannot exist, for then absolute would be no longer absolute and that being is determined by a relation among those identical to their respective spheres. To demonstrate this is very difficult, the perplexity in reference to visible things. The beginning and end are the limits of everything, that case the one, having neither beginning nor end is unlimited. Therefore, irregular form cannot partake either of round shape or straight line. This is because the round is that of which all the extreme points are equal distance from the center, the straight line is that of which are the extending points. To have a portion either of a straight line or of a circular shape would have parts and having no parts will be neither straight nor round.
Barbara Brooks
Posts: 1826
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 4:41 pm

Post by Barbara Brooks »

Socrates tells the story about words. Theuth an inventor many arts, such as arithmetic, calculation, geometry, astronomy, drafts and dice but his greatest discovery was the use of words.

Thamus was the king of the great city of upper Thebes in Egypt. Theuth was called to show his inventions to the king hoping the other Egyptians maybe allowed to benefit from them Thamus excepted all but the use of words Thamus refused them because they are not an aid to him.

Thamus said his people would feed on opinion. Having the show of intelligence but not knowing anything.

” O Theuth, most ingenious, Thamus replies, parent or inventor of an art you not always the best judge of their utility. Pure knowing because pure knowing is the ultimate absolute truth.”

Seek after truth for the sake of knowledge and look coldly upon opinion. Do not our words express more than the truth or our words always falling short of the truth? What do you say?

Absolute truth is my aim and since this endeavor is most important to me, I shall try not grappling at mere opinion. Socrates believed that when modes of music change, so to the fundamental laws of the country change with them. A change of manner like when the young were to be silent before their elders; how they are to show respect to them by standing and making them sit; honor is due to parents; or manners in general. You would agree with me that these things have changed.

Words are not thrown down anyhow, nor opinion. Words are an impression of reality. The same is true of painting once it is painted falls about anywhere among the opinions of those who may like it or may not. Then words, painting, and all the arts have no guardian to protect them they can be battered, abused, cannot be protected.

All great writers require discussions of high speculation and hence come loftiness of words; and for those who know will always know best how to discover the resemblance of truth. In language and the arts God mingles as a go-between that spans the gulf we are all bound. Language is an action both divine and human. The narrator has to learn the differences of minds and have a good theoretical knowledge. You try to ascertain truth without knowledge.
Barbara Brooks
Posts: 1826
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 4:41 pm

Post by Barbara Brooks »

The criterion of knowing is not truth but wisdom, insight, and understanding. Once thought of it is known, just as nothing turns into something.

The faculty of knowledge is skillfully disposed in our mind with a view to render things clear and intelligible.

Kant supposed all knowledge reduces to opinion, and every consciousness has intellect. He was an 18th-century German philosopher from the Prussian city of Königsberg (now Kaliningrad, Russia). Kant compared knowledge to the earth; that if you wanted to describe the meaning. Must first look at, drive out its existence, and lay its parts out one by one.

Spinoza of Portuguese Jewish origin was a Dutch philosopher who wrote the greatest work on Ethics asserted knowledge to be oneness of thought. Descartes’ was a highly influential French philosopher, mathematician, scientist, and writer. Descartes’ has been dubbed the "Father of Modern Philosophy,” thought knowledge the highest of science.

Leibniz along with René Descartes and Baruch Spinoza, were the greatest 17th century rationalists.
Barbara Brooks
Posts: 1826
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 4:41 pm

Post by Barbara Brooks »

Those who are wanting in knowledge are not philosophers also, those who have in their mind no clear pattern are unable to look at the absolute truth or vision of the world of beauty, goodness, and justice are not philosophers.

The nature of the philosopher is love of truth: they will never purposely receive into their mind untruth, which they loathe. They love truth cannot help loving all that belongs to philosophy and
The true lover of learning or lovers of wisdom must as far as possible desire all truth.


Another factor to be considered of the philosophical nature is they are ever longing after the absolute truth both divine and human necessary to truth.

Philosophy, the noblest of all pursuit, is not likely to be much valued by those of the majority is unavoidable, and that this is not to be laid to the charge of philosophy. Truth you remember is the philosophers’ leader, we follow always; failing in this, we are impostors, and have no part or lot in true philosophy.

The true philosopher is always striving after being, that this is our nature, will not rest in appearance but on the dedicated edge not blunted, nor abated only until knowledge of truth has knowledge will philosophy live and grow truly, and then, and not until then, the philosophy will cease from travail.
Barbara Brooks
Posts: 1826
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 4:41 pm

Post by Barbara Brooks »

A true philosopher devotes only the time saved from work and associations to philosophical pursuits. Even those of who are supposed to have a great philosophic mind when they come within sight of the great difficulty of dialectics away they go. They may go and hear a lecture on philosophy but it is not considered by them to be philosophers.

Philosophy is not what people think originates in the sophists who rush in uninvited, and are always abusing philosophy and finding fault of the person instead of the theme and nothing can be more unbecoming than this.

The true philosopher has surely no time to look down upon the dealings of others but like everyone else will suffer from detraction. Philosophy ever directed all in order moving according to reason imitate reverentially as far as the nature allows to become orderly and divine holding converse with this divine order,

There is perfection philosophers must reach and not to fall short of a point of mutual affinities, not until then will the pursuit of philosophy have any value.
Barbara Brooks
Posts: 1826
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 4:41 pm

Post by Barbara Brooks »

Earth is ground for individuality, it contains the Elements, air, fire and water, holds together all these elements, air, fire and water gathers them into unity into a series of events which earth maintains. Earth has the power which kindles these elements into a process, for example, lightning it is familiar to all is discharged by friction among the clouds, yet it is also known that electricity can be dispelled by moisture, whereas lightning originates in quite moist air.

The earth is the ground and everything is in totality of it. The alteration of the seasons and of the day and night and the transition from waking and sleeping is life on the earth. The truth of all things is time a continuous unfolding of things is what makes time.

History of the earth is not earth, nor does earth produce itself. The process is physical geography of the Earth's formation those solid structures that separates the water and the land into continents islands, and into valleys and mountains. It has two parts, the old world and the new world.

The self of earth, physical formation is dormant exposition to all its parts. Earth solid structure does not seem to possess life; its inorganic and purely mechanical formation. In general land is split into two parts, the old world and the new world. The old world the mountain ranges that run, from west to east or southwest or northwest. Whereas the new world mountain ranges run north and south but the rivers flow to the east.

The earth process is the past and fire and water are its principles. Earth owes its shape, stratification and species of rocks to fire, called volcanism. It is the vivifying and fructifying of the earth is the meteorological or atmospheric process. It is the result of successive changes that earth has history; evidence of this is in the earth's constitution its points of revolution. The position of the earth made by the axis with its orbit at the surface of the earth lie buried the plants and animals of a past world, great depth, in huge stratification and in localities where species of animals and plants are now extinct.
RachelAnn
Posts: 190
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 1:32 pm
Location: Troy, NY

Post by RachelAnn »

Hi Babs!!
I watched (on NASA webcam) the Solar Eclipse this morning... they used to execute astrologers who did not predict eclipses right!
What are your thoughts? :)
-RachelAnn-
Barbara Brooks
Posts: 1826
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 4:41 pm

Post by Barbara Brooks »

I am not sure. I only know according to Herodotus, Thales once predicted a solar eclipse that has been determined by modern methods to be on May 28, 585 BC. Diogenes Laërtius quotes the chronicle of Apollodorus as saying that he died at 78 in the 58th Olympiad, and Sosicrates as reporting that Thales was 90 at his death.

Thales studied philosophy in the latter part of his life and in a period of transition amongst the Greeks In Thales’s time, the Greeks were in a transition from patriarchal system of kings into one of law and order. Thales grasped the practical essence of consciousness, on one hand on the other hand, philosophic and speculative. He demonstrated a comprehensive universal significance to political affairs, but not in today’s sense of the word.

Thales occupied himself in many activities, a true innovator. Some say that he left no writings, others say that he wrote "On the Solstice" and "On the Equinox". Neither has survived.
Barbara Brooks
Posts: 1826
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 4:41 pm

Post by Barbara Brooks »

Absolute truth is my aim and since this endeavor here is most important to me, I shall not grapple or pull upon mere opinion. For good nurture and education implant good constitutions, and these good constitutions taking root in a good education improve more and more, and this improvement affects the breed in people as in other animals. They follow as the Damon proverb that friends have all things in common
Socrates said and I quite believe him; that when modes of music changes, the fundamental laws of the country always change with them. Change of manner like when the young were to be silent before their elders; how they are to show respect to them by standing and making them sit; honor is due to parents; or manners in general. You would agree with me that these things have changed.
Locked