Negation of Classical Identity Laws Using Classical Identity Laws.

What is the basis for reason? And mathematics?

Moderators: AMod, iMod

Gary Childress
Posts: 13185
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 3:08 pm
Location: It's my fault

Re: Negation of Classical Identity Laws Using Classical Identity Laws.

Post by Gary Childress »

Telling others not to trust in common sense simply produces chaos and ambiguity, which fuel animosity. What's the good in that?
Skepdick
Posts: 16039
Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2019 11:16 am

Re: Negation of Classical Identity Laws Using Classical Identity Laws.

Post by Skepdick »

Eodnhoj7 wrote: Sat Jul 18, 2026 5:47 pm "Ill-defined" is the negation of a definition by degree of observing its absence
Ex falso quodlibet. Observing absence is different to negation.
Eodnhoj7
Posts: 10874
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2017 3:18 am

Re: Negation of Classical Identity Laws Using Classical Identity Laws.

Post by Eodnhoj7 »

Skepdick wrote: Sun Sep 13, 2026 11:40 am
Eodnhoj7 wrote: Sat Jul 18, 2026 5:47 pm "Ill-defined" is the negation of a definition by degree of observing its absence
Ex falso quodlibet. Observing absence is different to negation.
The negation of X is the absence of X as the negation of a thing results in its absence.

Your own argument refutes it self as absence being different then negation is the negation of each as the other thus resulting in the absence of each as the other.

Basically, claim absence and negation are different you negated their unity and by doing so revealed the absence of unity....thus your functional structure negates itself by proving the dynamics of my text in using it.

You have no grounds.
Post Reply