The Nature of Experiential Reality and Unreality; Attention as Proto-Rational
Experience is derived via the void of attention thus revealing effectively void at the core of experience given the attention upon attention reveals void as no-thing is there but rather potentiality of distinction and the distinction of the void as actual potentiality where potential is actual as potential.
The derivation of experience is the distinction of both experience, as experience, and what the experience contains distinctly thus the fundamental nature of attention is the distinctions which exist and then cease to exist.
In this context experience emerges and dissolves from attention, emerges and dissolves from void, thus relegating attention emergent and dissolutive by nature with the attention across the distinctions of experience being a form of recursion as attention repeats.
This attention, placed upon the experience of attention, is the distinction of attention as the distinction of void. What is known as reality is recursive void; recursive void is the distinction of void as void much in the same manner the recursion of a point is the distinction of the point via the point. What is known as experiential reality is grounded in an order of cyclicality at the meta-level of experience.
This repetition of attention reveals experience as contained by the medium through which it occurs and by degree experience is not only cyclical, by the cyclicality of attention, but effectively the cyclicality of experiences within experiences as the experience of X exists within and across differing scales thus revealing a holographic nature.
The nature of what is real and unreal is presupposed upon the distinction of real and unreal as experiential via attention, thus attention is prior and mediative of what is real and unreal thus relegating any such dichotomy as an expression of the emergent/dissolutive distinctions of attention itself.
What is deemed as real is the alignment of experiences, unreal as the absence of alignment, with degree of alignment being the the revelation of each. In these respects what is relegated to the notions of "real" and "unreal" is a pre-dichotomy of the degrees of alignment between distinctions, alignment being the symmetry between distinctions with symmetry being repetition of a distinction across scales. Reality/unreality are the expressions of a proto-rational expression of attention itself thus revealing distinction as effectively layered expressions synonymous to layered limits, forms and images.
The distinction of attention is the foundational primitive, the distinction of void as void is the foundation primitive, as via attention is there experience and via void there is the distinction of being via the existing distinction of void.
In these respects what remains of experiential reality and unreality is a void nature, by degree of attention, empty in itself yet generative of the reality and unreality via itself as distinct as void and attention for by distinction is the pre-foundational nature by which even foundations themselves occur.
Thus relegating any foundational nature to experience, be it abstract intellectualism or concrete physicalism, to be moot point as the foundations asserted, on any given thing, can be contextualize in infinite degrees as any reality or unreality can be asserted to any relative starting point given the non-dual and multivalent nature of the distinctions from which the foundations arise and dissolve within discourses.
What remains of the question of foundations, is less a question of the foundation, and rather an assertion of one distinction over another as foundational and the remaining central point, across the spectrum of actual and potential distinctions of a foundations, is the focal point of attention via that by which said distinctions emerge and dissolve.
In this context foundationalism ceases via the distinction of attention, as while various perspectives and views emerge, one void is not different from another as one attention is not different than another except by the context of experience which contains its.
Dually anti-foundationalism ceases as the negation of existent foundations requires a definitive foundation to negate and the process of negation to be a foundation itself.
What remains is the distinction of attention, invariant, across experiential reality and unreality.
Any definition of attention effectively becomes a tautological loop by degree of the self-referential nature of the definition via the expression of it as "self-evident", relative to the observer, as self-evidence requires and evidence of the self thus relegating a recursion of the notion of self at scale across varying scales of evidence and the permeation of the distinctions of "self" and "evident" as the distinction of an axiomatic definition itself. In this respect attention upon attention maintains the same scale of recursion to any self-evident definition of attention.
The axiomization of attention not only reveals the same cyclical nature, tautology mirroring recursion, but effectively is self-negating as both axiom and non-axiom are emergent distinctions, conditioned by contrast of the other via distinction, thus relegating any act of definition to be less of a relative or absolute state but rather a pattern of experience.