All true enough. But what IC is whining about above is that none of the other parties can be bothered with this circus and they are leaving Farage to go one to one against and intergalactic trash can. So 46% - which is what garage got I believe when he won his seat - isn't enough for him to keep it.MikeNovack wrote: ↑Fri Jul 10, 2026 9:29 pmThe problem is, with votes counted "first past the [post", it doesn't matter 60% opposed, anybody but him, unless agreed on ONE alternative. If 3-4 opponents splitting the opposed vote 30-40% can be enough to win. Politics as usual makes it difficult/impossible for the opposition parties to agree on a "unity" candidate.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Fri Jul 10, 2026 5:42 pm Canadians yanks and Vikings going on about Ridings aside, everyone actually in Britain knows that Nigel "gas the jews - hiss" Farage is a fraud. He might get 30% of the vote, but 60% will vote anyone but his vile party and he is totally capable of losing an election to a bin even on home territory.
Keep something in mind, folks. 30% support might be too little to take power but plenty to disrupt anybody else from taking power.
O Britannia
- FlashDangerpants
- Posts: 9131
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:54 pm
Re: O Britannia
Re: O Britannia
So are you Tom and Jerries going to close your borders, or continue to ship in tens of millions of turd-worlders and lose your own country?
Are you going to fight for your British heritage or not?
Are you going to fight for your British heritage or not?
-
Will Bouwman
- Posts: 1447
- Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2022 2:17 pm
-
mickthinks
- Posts: 1893
- Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 1:10 am
- Location: Augsburg
Re: O Britannia
lol British Heritage
Stewart Lee understands the issue of heritage and borders:
https://vimeo.com/437542256
Stewart Lee understands the issue of heritage and borders:
https://vimeo.com/437542256
Re: O Britannia
The British ability to stick your heads in the sand and delude yourselves is impressive.
I presume Micky and Will here have already converted, bowed and bent to Islam then? Allahu Akbar?
I presume Micky and Will here have already converted, bowed and bent to Islam then? Allahu Akbar?
-
Will Bouwman
- Posts: 1447
- Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2022 2:17 pm
-
mickthinks
- Posts: 1893
- Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 1:10 am
- Location: Augsburg
Re: O Britannia
Do you think Wizzo gets his misinformation from Grok?
https://www.tiktok.com/@bbcradio4/video ... 5746717974
https://www.tiktok.com/@bbcradio4/video ... 5746717974
- Immanuel Can
- Posts: 29303
- Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 4:42 pm
Re: O Britannia
The "houris," you mean?Will Bouwman wrote: ↑Thu Jul 16, 2026 12:53 pmNot worth the risk. You might be one of the 72 virgins.
Try try not to think of why there has to be 72. And try not to think of why they're "chained," or "restrained" or "guarded," (depending on the interpretation Islamists offer). And try not to think of why they're called "companions," and their specific gender isn't mentioned. And try not to think of why them being "perpetual virgins" is included in the equation.
And then try not to imagine just how "paradisical" Muslim paradise must be for them.
Re: O Britannia
Religious texts are full of nonsense.
Next issue.
Next issue.
- Immanuel Can
- Posts: 29303
- Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 4:42 pm
-
MikeNovack
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2025 1:17 pm
Re: O Britannia
LOL --- ask a Briton? << and no, I am NOT misspelling -- just referring to a long history of invasion --- and we don't know what pre iron age people lived in Britain but obviously they existed, eg: Stonehenge is WAY prior to the iron age Celtic peoples >>
-
Will Bouwman
- Posts: 1447
- Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2022 2:17 pm
Re: O Britannia
Well, if yer gonna paint Kick me on your arse, the singular advantage of the Muslim paradise is that you won't be in it.Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Thu Jul 16, 2026 3:36 pm The "houris" you mean?
Try try not to think of why there has to be 72. And try not to think of why they're "chained," or "restrained" or "guarded," (depending on the interpretation Islamists offer). And try not to think of why they're called "companions," and their specific gender isn't mentioned. And try not to think of why them being "perpetual virgins" is included in the equation.
And then try not to imagine just how "paradisical" Muslim paradise must be for them.
-
MikeNovack
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2025 1:17 pm
Re: O Britannia
And the word in Arabic is ............????Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Thu Jul 16, 2026 3:36 pm And try not to think of why them being "perpetual virgins" is included in the equation.
After all, you Christians read "almah" as "virgin" (as opposed to "young woman", unmarried, so by courtesy considered a virgin, after all "lashan harah" (evil tongue/gossip) is a serious sin).
- Immanuel Can
- Posts: 29303
- Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 4:42 pm
Re: O Britannia
I don't speak Arabic. But here's what Islamists say about themselves.MikeNovack wrote: ↑Fri Jul 17, 2026 12:03 amAnd the word in Arabic is ............????Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Thu Jul 16, 2026 3:36 pm And try not to think of why them being "perpetual virgins" is included in the equation.
"The Hadith: Accounts from canonical collections (like Sunan al-Tirmidhi and Sunan Ibn Majah) elaborate on the concept. In these texts, it is detailed that believers in Paradise will be married to companions who are described as eternally virgin, untouched, and made physically perfect." (Sunnah.com)
Re: O Britannia
A Platonic marriage. Is that good or bad? 