Self-Embedding Infinity; Infinity as a Truth Value Variable; Infinity as Scales as Variables; Infinity Finiteness

[Eodnhoj7]

Self-Embedding Infinity; Infinity as a Truth Value Variable; Infinity as Scales as Variables; Infinity Finiteness







I



Distinction A applies to an infinite quantity of things thus A is infinite.



Infinite A is infinity as finite as A.



A leads to A infinitely as B.



B is an infinite quantity of things thus B is infinite.



Infinite B is infinity as finite B.



B leads to B as D.



D is an infinite quantity of things; ........



Infinity contains itself at scale where the scale of one infinity is the relation to it as another thus all infinities are finite by scale.





II





--A is a truth, this truth is infinite as 2n(-)A.



-A is a falsity, this falsity is infinite as 1+2n(-)A



The contrast of --A and -A as -B is infinite.



The containment of --A and -A as --B is infinite.



-(-)B is containment and self-contrast; -(-)A is containment and self contrast.



A is process by degree of "-"; function is form;  B is A and -A thus generative in reduction to said distinctions and complete in synthesis as the unification of a binary.



--A is truth.

-A is falsity.

-(-)B is pre and post truth and falsity.



Distinction cannot be reduce to purely true or false but a process of negation patterns.







III.



1+1=2 and the triangle both apply to an infinite number of things thus are paradoxically indefinite truths, indefinitely distinctions.





IV.



Infinity is finite as a distinction, the finitude of a distinction, containing infinite distinctions, is infinity;



Infinity and finitude are degrees of distinction, are distinctions, and transcended by distinction.

[Fairy]

Yes, the finite and Infinite are identical.

[Impenitent]

irrational numbers are not finite

-Imp

[mickthinks]

irrational numbers have decimal expansions that don’t terminate, but they are finite in the ordinary sense of the term. The square root of 2, for example, is actually quite small.

[Eodnhoj7]

irrational numbers have decimal expansions that don’t terminate, but they are finite in the ordinary sense of the term. The square root of 2, for example, is actually quite small.

The irrational number as one space relative to another space terminates as the limits of the space. An irrational number can be expressed as two line segments forming a third where the ratio of the two results in the finiteness as the composite third.

There is nothing on this forum, that I argue, than cannot be expressed in basic linear spaces.