Logic as Multi-Dimensional Tautological Assertions

[Skepdick]

I would not be as generous as you are, this is given the same logic they claim is true is the same logic that argue to derive truth thus logic is effectively deriving itself as nested assumptions within assumptions.

Logic is self-embedding assumptions.

It is an ourobos of the psyche.

I have no idea what you are trying to say. What are your words embedded in?

[Eodnhoj7]

I would not be as generous as you are, this is given the same logic they claim is true is the same logic that argue to derive truth thus logic is effectively deriving itself as nested assumptions within assumptions.

Logic is self-embedding assumptions.

It is an ourobos of the psyche.

I have no idea what you are trying to say. What are your words embedded in?

Distinctions, and the distinction of assumptions as assumptions from non-assumptions, thus distinction remains invariant.

Do you have any idea of what your skepticism is without the skepticism of your skepticism? Or are you just skeptical when it is convenient to your personal narrative?

[Skepdick]

Distinctions, and the distinction of assumptions as assumptions from non-assumptions, thus distinction remains invariant.

Do you have any idea of what your skepticism is without the skepticism of your skepticism? Or are you just skeptical when it is convenient to your personal narrative?

I have no idea what you are embedding those words in either.

[Eodnhoj7]

Distinctions, and the distinction of assumptions as assumptions from non-assumptions, thus distinction remains invariant.

Do you have any idea of what your skepticism is without the skepticism of your skepticism? Or are you just skeptical when it is convenient to your personal narrative?

I have no idea what you are embedding those words in either.

Apparently you do if you are using the word of embedding.