MikeNovack wrote: ↑Mon Jun 22, 2026 6:00 pm
Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Mon Jun 22, 2026 3:55 pm
So what they know they are killing is a baby. She's human, she's growing, she's got her own genetics, systems, life, meaning and trajectory. The woman already CHOSE to create her. Now she wants to kill the life she voluntarily (in 99% of recorded cases) created.
And the baby does not belong to the mother to dispose of.
"She's human, she's growing, she's got her own genetics, systems, life, meaning and trajectory." POTENTIALLY has this.
No, actually has it. Biologically, there isn't any doubt.
"The woman already CHOSE to create her." OH?
Yep. Statistically, 99% of the cases are of unforced sex. Less than 1% are of the incest-rape-other varieties.
But let's play along with false statistics, instead. Let's suppose it was 75% and 25%, say. If I conceded you the 25%, would you concede me that 75% of abortions are baby murders? Probably not. You'd want the 100% -- all abortions to be allowed. But if so, all you're doing is leveraging the 1% to try to invent an excuse for the 99%. You're exploiting the victims to excuse more murders. And does that make you a good person, or an actual advocate for the 1%? I think not.
Women do have choice, in 99% of all abortion cases...however, these same women just often use it irresponsibly, and then want to use it even more irresponsibly, by murdering their babies. So much for "choice" arguments.
Meanwhile, the man gets NO choice. If he creates a baby in the same consensual way the woman does, and she decides to murder his child, he can't say one thing about it, according to the law. So where is the men's "choice" argument?
You believe that the overwhelming majority of women who have an abortion WANT to have an abortion?
If they don't, then how did they end up at the clinic? Were they kidnapped and dragged there? Were they transported while asleep, maybe on a magic carpet? No, they walked in the door and asked for it.
Are you denying the reality of their choice?