The Democrat Party Hates America

[Lacewing]

It's what I prefer to read.

Why isn't it what you prefer to write?

If only I could ... but I see potential in you, if you simply surrender to the truth.

What truth is that?

It's certainly what I prefer to read here, and it does appear consistently in some.

Who does it appear consistently in here?

You too can be one of the chosen few.

Chosen by who?

What is the fascination you have (and admire in Trump) for spouting so much bullshit and AVOIDING accountability for doing so?

[Walker]

Endeavour to Persevere
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hRX6hSGeZs4

[Lacewing]

Endeavour to Persevere
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hRX6hSGeZs4

I'm not going to look at links you provide, Walker. Can't you back up what you say in your own words?

[mickthinks]

… undoing all the good will continue to be their mission.

The East Wing, for example. Project much, Walker?

[Walker]

I prefer the multi-media experience.

For you to be attached to what you don't have,
does not require a reaction,
from me.

[Lacewing]

I prefer the multi-media experience.

For you to be attached to what you don't have,
does not require a reaction,
from me.

So, as I pointed out, you are again spouting bullshit and avoiding accountability for doing so. Strange that you're satisfied with that.

I guess it's all you've got.

[Walker]

You've displayed no comprehension
Of what you've gotten
Yet you still want to get
Like a bottomless pit

The Philosophy of Good from Bad includes
Don't throw Good after Bad
Truth is truth
Bad is the reception

[Gary Childress]

Lots to do in a short time.
Poor Democrats. They can't even keep up but in the long run, undoing all the good will continue to be their mission.

Trump is pretty sharp.
He went RINO hunting for his agenda-deniers, and his endorsement bagged a few, the biggest being Senator Cornyn of Texas.

What does this mean?

It means that the long-serving senator paid the price for opposing Trump.
Trump is the leader of their political party.
Trump sees to it that Cornyn is primaried for the right to run on the party ticket.
Cornyn lost the primary, big time.
He lost so bad that it was embarrassing, and the reason he lost was because Trump simply endorsed his opponent.
Cornin had the money and the connections.
Trump had (has) the power of ... The Word.

Well, there is denying it, but the denials sound like the lost howls and confusion of ... De Nile caused by TDS.

Yessir.

We're in another war, one that your man started by firing the first shot when there was relative peace.

[Walker]

Much ignoring is required to make such a statement.

[Walker]

Trump's detractors are missing the point
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/20 ... point.html

To fully understand what’s going on, it’s important to know the fundamental differences between Democrats and Republicans. Democrats need a savior, a politician who will make them feel good, smart, and morally superior. A politician who will provide for their needs and smite their enemies. A superhuman being capable of brushing aside trifles like the Constitution and the rule of law to secure Communist/Islamist policies.

Republicans are inherently wary of politicians, just as they were in 2015 when Trump announced his candidacy. They are, however, willing to be pleasantly surprised. They’re not looking for saviors or good feelz. They’re looking for a leader who will uphold the Constitution and enforce the rule of law. They’re looking for the values embodied in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. They want politicians to keep their promises, employ common sense, and above all, produce—do what they elected them to do.

Comment:
Couldn’t have said it better myself.
Democrats so love their totalitarian saviors that these motives get projected onto others.
If this is also incomprehensible, then the garble is in the reception.

[Gary Childress]

Much ignoring is required to make such a statement.

But the statement is true. Is that correct?

[Walker]

Only by application of purposeful ignoring.

[Gary Childress]

Only by application of purposeful ignoring.

So does that make the statement true or false?

[Walker]

Only by application of purposeful ignoring.

So does that make the statement true or false?

Because the statement is true only through Gary’s application of purposeful ignoring,
Then without Gary’s purposeful ignoring,
The statement is false.

Many do not share Gary’s purposeful ignoring.

Question: What is it Gary purposefully ignores?
Answer: Gary ignores whatever does not fit the narrative of his preconceptions.

Solution to straighten out Gary’s quest:
The Opposite George dynamic, to silence preconceptions, for the dawning of a clear day.

[Gary Childress]

Only by application of purposeful ignoring.

So does that make the statement true or false?

Because the statement is true only through Gary’s application of purposeful ignoring,
Then without Gary’s purposeful ignoring,
The statement is false.

Many do not share Gary’s purposeful ignoring.

Question: What is it Gary purposefully ignores?
Answer: Gary ignores whatever does not fit the narrative of his preconceptions.

Solution to straighten out Gary’s quest:
The Opposite George dynamic, to silence preconceptions, for the dawning of a clear day.

Rain helps the grass grow.