The Ontology of Good and Evil

[Eodnhoj7]

****Updated

The Ontology of Good and Evil


1. Good and Evil are defined by contrast, without either each ceases.

2. To define Good is to define it by what it is not as Evil, to define Evil is to define what it is not as Good.

3.Good and Evil require negation to maintain presense and yet absolute negation results in the cessation of each by the cessation of the other.

4. Pure negation of Good results in the negation of Evil, thus Evil must negate into Good by grades to occur.

5. Pure negation of Evil results in the negation of Good, thus Good must negate into Evil by grades to occur.

6. The gradation of each is the emergence or the other as the gradation of each is the space by which the other occurs.

7. Good is Good by its gradative nature as a fixed point across a spectrum of structures thus as a fixed point is absolute as constant; Evil is Evil by its gradative nature as a fixed point across a spectrum of structure as a fixed point is is absolute constant.

8. Good and Evil are respectively absolute.

9. Good is Evil by its requirement for Evil; Evil is Good by its requirement for Good.

10.Good and Evil are respectively relative by relational contrast, a contrast that requires opposition thus relation.

11. The negation of this tetrad is the void, as the tetrad, from which Good and Evil respectively emerge thus relagating void as pre-moral, trans-moral and post moral under the context of the contextualization of Good and Evil as emergences.

12. Pure Good is void; Pure Evil is Void.

13. The emergence of each is the recursion of void thus relegating Good and Evil as cyclical.

14. Absolute Good on its own nature has no contrast thus is void; Absolute Evil on its own nature has no contrast thus is void.

15. The distinction of void is the distinction of Good and Evil, indistinct void is paradox by degree of the distinction of 'indistinct void' being a distinction; this paradox is Good and Evil.

16. There are infinite distinctions of the distinction of Good; there are infinite distinctions of the distinction of Evil as there are infinite distinctions of the void of each.

17. Good and Evil as distinctions that direct the emergence and dissolution of further distinctions. What they are and are not is but the assertion of distinctions.

18. Distinction distinct within distinction observes a recursive self-embedding thus by said degree does "you reap as you sow" (as cause and effect, karma) and "the golden rule" (emergent reflexive identity) are revealed by the said inherent reflexivity of the nature of distinction;

19. The void recursion, by which distinction is, observes the generation of distinction from void while dually by degree revealing the generation by the inherent emptiness of distinction itself thus resulting in an unconditional state associated with "unconditional love".

20. The trifold moral structure of distinction, as the "you reap as you sow/cause effect/karma", "the golden rule/reflexive identity", and "unconditional love/emergent distinction" are effectively united under fourth degree as the void of attention itself by which they further emerge and dissolve.

21. The attention of attention reveals the distinction of the void of attention itself which mirrors the same pre/trans/post moral void from which the distinctions of good and evil occur thus relegating the nature of attention as the micro void to the macro cosmic void as void recursion.

22. By attention does distinction unfold and enfold, attention is a distinction of itself; good and evil are distinctions of attention with there unfolding and enfolding mediated by attention thus attention is the foundation of ethics and morality.

23. Attention is void contained with the repetition of distinctions, the repetition of these distinctions are the cycle of the perspective itself, perspective is how further distinctions are maintained, emerge and dissolve.

24. The inherent potential that underlies all change is but the distinction of void at the macro level of existence for by void is potential realized, the void of attention is the void of potentiality;

25. the distinction of void at the micro level and the distinction of void at the macro level are by the means of the distinctions that contain each;

26. the distinction of void is scale invariant, the scale that results is but the distinctions emergent and dissolutive of them;

26. perception is the structure that contains attention, perception is recursion of distinctions, existence is self-aware by the void from which it emerges.

27. What remains is distinction; the foundational distinction is void.

[Greatest I am]

We live in a dualistic reality and all terms will have antonyms.

Is sin good or evil to you?

Many Christians sing of Adam's sin as a happy fault and necessary to God's plan.

If sin is evil, then evil is necessary to maintain reality and is thus something God demands we do.

[Impenitent]

the one without sin does not need to be saved...

-Imp

[Greatest I am]

the one without sin does not need to be saved...

-Imp

Is there such?

If so, give him or her my greatest sympathies, as the will never get Yahweh's wages and reward. Death.

The Bible says that we are all born sinners, which, if the Christians sing right, is a good thing.

What perfectly created soul will, or even can, go against it's sin nature?