Trump as Jesus

[phyllo]

In 2024 Trump presented himself as the "peace candidate" because he started no wars in in his first term. Video compilation :
https://x.com/Acosta/status/2007458365492846664

Trump in the 2024 campaign : "We will expel the warmongers from our government"

Trump on election night 2024 : “I’m not going to start a war, I’m going to stop wars”

Trump inauguration speech : "We will measure our success not only by the battles we win but also by the wars that we end – and perhaps most importantly, the wars we never get into. My proudest legacy will be that of a peacemaker and unifier. That’s what I want to be: a peacemaker and a unifier."

And ironically ... Trump criticizing Obama in 2011 : "Our president will start a war with Iran because he has absolutely no ability to negotiate. He's weak and he's ineffective."

[Walker]

That's why it has to end quickly because Trump only has a short time left as president and then up go the chances for a forever war.

Iran is like Tyler Durdan in the fight club basement. When the owner shows up and starts assaulting him, Durdan just laughs and encourages more punishment, offering no resistance. The owner keeps it up for awhile and then finally recoils in horror, horrified by what he has done to another person, and horrified that it has not worked as a punishment. He retreats. Time heals Durdan’s wounds and he goes on to blow up office buildings as acts of terrorism. Destroying Durdan’s infrastructure completely would require a few generations at least for him to return to fighting shape.

[FlashDangerpants]

I wonder why the world's most boring Christian turned his nose up at this thread about blasphemy?

[Iwannaplato]

I wonder why the world's most boring Christian turned his nose up at this thread about blasphemy?

Because it is about teams, not morals, not values. And, of course, this isn't just our go to Christian, it's a general trend. Figure out what the team is doing. Does it somehow help the other team to do X? if the answer is yes, then you can't do it. You can't notice it.

Team uber alles. That's the zeitgeist.

[phyllo]

Iran is like Tyler Durdan in the fight club basement. When the owner shows up and starts assaulting him, Durdan just laughs and encourages more punishment, offering no resistance. The owner keeps it up for awhile and then finally recoils in horror, horrified by what he has done to another person, and horrified that it has not worked as a punishment. He retreats. Time heals Durdan’s wounds and he goes on to blow up office buildings as acts of terrorism. Destroying Durdan’s infrastructure completely would require a few generations at least for him to return to fighting shape.

And destroying infrastructure isn't terrorism? Sure it is.

[Iwannaplato]

https://www.facebook.com/reel/24662310113466543

[Walker]

Iran is like Tyler Durdan in the fight club basement. When the owner shows up and starts assaulting him, Durdan just laughs and encourages more punishment, offering no resistance. The owner keeps it up for awhile and then finally recoils in horror, horrified by what he has done to another person, and horrified that it has not worked as a punishment. He retreats. Time heals Durdan’s wounds and he goes on to blow up office buildings as acts of terrorism. Destroying Durdan’s infrastructure completely would require a few generations at least for him to return to fighting shape.

And destroying infrastructure isn't terrorism? Sure it is.

You specialize in strawhair-brained inferences.

War is hell. Conflict is life. Terrorism is terrorism.

Infrastructure ain't people but the people will suffer and their government, the government that slaughtered 40,000 civilians in a short time-span to surppress demonstrations against the regime, the government whose purpose as government should be to look after the people, that regime says, who cares. Just like Tyler. Will Trump vomit or keep punching?

[Walker]

Team SPLC, funder of the KKK not for monitoring, but to keep domestic conflict alive.
https://img.patriotpost.us/01KQ7SEFTEAW ... dpr=2&q=50

It's a farm team for anti-American ideologies.

Coach SPLC, team KKK.

[Gary Childress]

Team SPLC, funder of the KKK not for monitoring, but to keep domestic conflict alive.
https://img.patriotpost.us/01KQ7SEFTEAW ... dpr=2&q=50

It's a farm team for anti-American ideologies.

Coach SPLC, team KKK.

I think it's probably safe to say that someone at the SPLC was (or else thought s/he was) paying informants. Anything else would involve contorting reality to a degree that a sane person should know better. Of course, paying your enemies to keep them as enemies is probably not a good idea, as Netanyahu ought to testify.

[Iwannaplato]

Team SPLC, funder of the KKK not for monitoring, but to keep domestic conflict alive.
https://img.patriotpost.us/01KQ7SEFTEAW ... dpr=2&q=50

It's a farm team for anti-American ideologies.

Coach SPLC, team KKK.

Okay, here is Walker's implicit, gestural argument. Since the SPLC potentially was funding the KKK, as the federal indictment says, then people who seem to be enemies of the SPLC, like Marjorie Taylor Greene, those people are actually friends with the SPLC. She's not who she seems to be. It's a very weak argument, but let's take it at face value. People who have been adversaries of the SPLC are actually working for the SPLC or they're allied with them.

There's just one problem in that, and the problem is, Trump has been an adversary of the SPLC. So by your idiotic, childish logic. Trump has also working with the SPLC.

In fact, they specifically worked together as full on tag team set of adversaries of the SPLC. So the guilt by association or guilt by opposition can just as easily be put on Trump.

If that wasn't your argument - or actually you copying some internet memes - then your post makes no sense. If this is your argument you just indicted Trump for being in cahoots with SPLC.

Or maybe I was just supposed to be upset that some progressive organization was likely dirty. Oh, my God, no. Some large organization was doing bad shit. My whole worldview - which you obviously know little about - is shattered.

It's like dealing with a bot with you. And an old one.

[Walker]

Do you also avert your eyes when you address someone in the third person and go awandering into tangents?

*

The SPLC is a non-government, non- profit, tax-exempt, heavily-funded, self-proclaimed judge of what constitutes Hate, and their judgments can have ramifications, hard ramifications.

For example, according to SPLC, Christian conservate organizations are hate groups because they oppose abortion and child mutilations, and they've probably got some other reasons. Yeah. The woke looked at African clitorectomies performed with broken glass and said, hold my beer.

SPLC has no law enforcement, military, or legal authority and serves as a political propaganda wing by keeping racism alive with their enthusiastic and generous support, and it can sue the pants off anyone.

You’re a bright fella. You should be up on this sort of thing instead of always needing the wrong side of right.

Now really, do you think Jesus, or Trump for that matter given the focus of the thread, would approve of some outfit that called Christians a hate group?

Is the SPLC itself a hate group for hating Christians? Of course it is.

[Iwannaplato]

Now I understand a bit of how we got our wires crossed. You were responding to an earlier post not the one I wrote last nearest your post. You didn't quote any content so I thought you were responding to my then recent post. You probably didn't even see the video with MTG.

https://www.facebook.com/reel/24662310113466543

But you're not responding to my other post either. I didn't say anything about SPLC there. Nor did, in that post, the person I was responding to either. It has nothing to do with the issue you brought up. It had to do with why IC has kept clear of a thread where Trump is painting himself as Jesus-like.

You may well have made an extremely clever rebuttal to something, but it had nothing to with what I wrote or was responding to.

[Gary Childress]

May I suggest that people stop quoting others' posts but excluding the actual content of the post they are replying to? It only causes confusion and it seems to be the same few people who do it every time.

[FlashDangerpants]

As a forlorn troll once wrote...

Wow. This topic has been up for awhile, and nobody will touch it?

That, in itself, speaks volumes.

In this instance, one can't help but notice that the most obsessive Christian, a man who turns every possible conersation to that subject.... has had nothing to say about Donald Trump posting a blasphemous image of himself as Jesus curing the sick.

And then a group of pastors dedicated a giant golden statue of Trump which is sort of biblically uncool, but still nothing from the big Jesus fan...

... some silences really do speak volumes.

[Walker]

Why do you think Trump re-posted that AI picture (or commissioned it)?