Anti-Racism Case

[Impenitent]

why the innocent SPLC put Turning point USA on their list of hate groups

it isn't their fault that a heavenly good leftist assassin put a bullet in Charlie Kirk

it's coming around

-Imp

[Immanuel Can]

why the innocent SPLC put Turning point USA on their list of hate groups

it isn't their fault that a heavenly good leftist assassin put a bullet in Charlie Kirk

it's coming around

-Imp

Except the dreaded "right" doesn't seem to shoot anybody, or burn any cities, or murder any children, or have any "world forums," or create phony "race riots," or unilaterally crown any senile or incompetent puppet-candidates, or beat up Jussie Smollett. They don't seem to have any media presence, no political parties, no politicians representing things like "white supremacy," no universities and colleges propagandizing for them, and no membership worth speaking of.

No wonder the Left has to work so hard to manufacture "racist" incidents: the right is just not doing their job.

[Gary Childress]

The Southern Policy Law Center, one of the largest and best-known non-profit anti-racism lobbies in the US has just been indicted for funding pro-racism organizations, including the KKK, and the National Socialist movement, and for having sponsored the famous "Unite the Right" Charlottesville March and riots. Shell companies and the banking system were used to defraud donors by channelling millions of dollars to these racist organizations, so that they would produce higher profile "racist incidents."

Why did the SPLC do that? Apparently, to raise their own importance and to increase their own revenue, by presenting an impression that "white supremacy" was a crisis issue, and to reassure the public and other sponsors that they were more necessary than ever...evidently, because there weren't enough real cases of racism that they could use to do the same thing.

The details can be found here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KS0TNiaqU4o

So here's a question. In the name of anti-racism, the public has been trained to develop a high tolerance for unethical activities, so long as those unethical activities are perceived to be "on the right side." Vilifying "privileged" groups, stereotyping, misandry, flag burning, censorship, revisionist 'histories,' canonization of drug dealers, allowing gangs that exploit migrants and traffick women and children, and even violent riots have been countenanced and gone largely unchallenged by both media and the political Left, particularly. Often, these activities have even been valourized and treated as noble civil disobedience or "peaceful protest."

Question: have we lost our way, ethically? Has the belief that we are "on the right side" facillitated our own blindness regarding the ethics of the methods we were employing?

What code should we apply to "right the ship," ethically speaking?

Saturday Night Live needs to do a skit on this.

[accelafine]

Every time I see the name 'Jussie Smollett' I feel a few brain cells die. No one on earth should be called 'Jussie'.

[Gary Childress]

They need to charge the SPLC with conspiracy to stop racism. Otherwise, this case is almost kind of like the DoJ convicting Al Capone on tax evasion. Gosh dang it! I want the real crimes to be punished not some petty "it's the only thing we can get them on" crime. Stopping racism is WRONG!

Go TRUMP!!! Make America Great Again!!!

This is too funny.

[accelafine]

They need to charge the SPLC with conspiracy to stop racism. Otherwise, this case is almost kind of like the DoJ convicting Al Capone on tax evasion. Gosh dang it! I want the real crimes to be punished not some petty "it's the only thing we can get them on" crime. Stopping racism is WRONG!

Go TRUMP!!! Make America Great Again!!!

This is too funny.

Are they 'stopping racism' or is it just another massive grift? What do you REALLY think, Gary Childress?

[Gary Childress]

They need to charge the SPLC with conspiracy to stop racism. Otherwise, this case is almost kind of like the DoJ convicting Al Capone on tax evasion. Gosh dang it! I want the real crimes to be punished not some petty "it's the only thing we can get them on" crime. Stopping racism is WRONG!

Go TRUMP!!! Make America Great Again!!!

This is too funny.

Are they 'stopping racism' or is it just another massive grift? What do you REALLY think, Gary Childress?

I think the Trump administration has discovered the highest form of comic parody ever discovered by mankind! I'm jealous.

[accelafine]

They need to charge the SPLC with conspiracy to stop racism. Otherwise, this case is almost kind of like the DoJ convicting Al Capone on tax evasion. Gosh dang it! I want the real crimes to be punished not some petty "it's the only thing we can get them on" crime. Stopping racism is WRONG!

Go TRUMP!!! Make America Great Again!!!

This is too funny.

Are they 'stopping racism' or is it just another massive grift? What do you REALLY think, Gary Childress?

I think the Trump administration has discovered the highest form of comic parody ever discovered by mankind! I'm jealous.

I have no clue what you are on about, Gary Childress.

[Immanuel Can]

The Southern Policy Law Center, one of the largest and best-known non-profit anti-racism lobbies in the US has just been indicted for funding pro-racism organizations, including the KKK, and the National Socialist movement, and for having sponsored the famous "Unite the Right" Charlottesville March and riots. Shell companies and the banking system were used to defraud donors by channelling millions of dollars to these racist organizations, so that they would produce higher profile "racist incidents."

Why did the SPLC do that? Apparently, to raise their own importance and to increase their own revenue, by presenting an impression that "white supremacy" was a crisis issue, and to reassure the public and other sponsors that they were more necessary than ever...evidently, because there weren't enough real cases of racism that they could use to do the same thing.

The details can be found here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KS0TNiaqU4o

So here's a question. In the name of anti-racism, the public has been trained to develop a high tolerance for unethical activities, so long as those unethical activities are perceived to be "on the right side." Vilifying "privileged" groups, stereotyping, misandry, flag burning, censorship, revisionist 'histories,' canonization of drug dealers, allowing gangs that exploit migrants and traffick women and children, and even violent riots have been countenanced and gone largely unchallenged by both media and the political Left, particularly. Often, these activities have even been valourized and treated as noble civil disobedience or "peaceful protest."

Question: have we lost our way, ethically? Has the belief that we are "on the right side" facillitated our own blindness regarding the ethics of the methods we were employing?

What code should we apply to "right the ship," ethically speaking?

Saturday Night Live needs to do a skit on this.

They really do. But not the one you think they need to do.

[Gary Childress]

The Southern Policy Law Center, one of the largest and best-known non-profit anti-racism lobbies in the US has just been indicted for funding pro-racism organizations, including the KKK, and the National Socialist movement, and for having sponsored the famous "Unite the Right" Charlottesville March and riots. Shell companies and the banking system were used to defraud donors by channelling millions of dollars to these racist organizations, so that they would produce higher profile "racist incidents."

Why did the SPLC do that? Apparently, to raise their own importance and to increase their own revenue, by presenting an impression that "white supremacy" was a crisis issue, and to reassure the public and other sponsors that they were more necessary than ever...evidently, because there weren't enough real cases of racism that they could use to do the same thing.

The details can be found here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KS0TNiaqU4o

So here's a question. In the name of anti-racism, the public has been trained to develop a high tolerance for unethical activities, so long as those unethical activities are perceived to be "on the right side." Vilifying "privileged" groups, stereotyping, misandry, flag burning, censorship, revisionist 'histories,' canonization of drug dealers, allowing gangs that exploit migrants and traffick women and children, and even violent riots have been countenanced and gone largely unchallenged by both media and the political Left, particularly. Often, these activities have even been valourized and treated as noble civil disobedience or "peaceful protest."

Question: have we lost our way, ethically? Has the belief that we are "on the right side" facillitated our own blindness regarding the ethics of the methods we were employing?

What code should we apply to "right the ship," ethically speaking?

Saturday Night Live needs to do a skit on this.

They really do. But not the one you think they need to do.

Really, what do you think I think they need to do?

[Immanuel Can]

Saturday Night Live needs to do a skit on this.

They really do. But not the one you think they need to do.

Really, what do you think I think they need to do?

Point out the unbelievable absurdity of the SPLC fraud, and make it as funny as it is that they were funding racists on donations from people who thought they were fighting racism. It's hilarious, in addition to being fraudulent.

[Gary Childress]

They really do. But not the one you think they need to do.

Really, what do you think I think they need to do?

Point out the unbelievable absurdity of the SPLC fraud, and make it as funny as it is that they were funding racists on donations from people who thought they were fighting racism. It's hilarious, in addition to being fraudulent.

I already did in my Al Capone example I gave above. You didn't find that funny? I thought it was hilarious. The Trump administration has become a parody of itself. Kudos to them.

[Immanuel Can]

Really, what do you think I think they need to do?

Point out the unbelievable absurdity of the SPLC fraud, and make it as funny as it is that they were funding racists on donations from people who thought they were fighting racism. It's hilarious, in addition to being fraudulent.

I already did in my Al Capone example I gave above. You didn't find that funny? I thought it was hilarious.

Actually, I thought it was kind of inept. Just being honest.

[Gary Childress]

Point out the unbelievable absurdity of the SPLC fraud, and make it as funny as it is that they were funding racists on donations from people who thought they were fighting racism. It's hilarious, in addition to being fraudulent.

I already did in my Al Capone example I gave above. You didn't find that funny? I thought it was hilarious.

Actually, I thought it was kind of inept. Just being honest.

Oh well. I tried and failed you. You didn't find it funny. Sorry about that.

[Immanuel Can]

I already did in my Al Capone example I gave above. You didn't find that funny? I thought it was hilarious.

Actually, I thought it was kind of inept. Just being honest.

Oh well. I tried and failed you. You didn't find it funny. Sorry about that.

No probs.