The Freedom Files
Let us examine the proposition:
You shall know the truth and the truth shall set you free.
Is that statement true or false?
Explain what it is true or false to.
Examine another proposition:
Words, names, in of themselves have no meaning.
Is that statement true or false?
Explain what it is true or false to.
Another proposition:
A mind is an information processor.
Is that statement true or false?
Explain what it is true or false to.
If that mind cannot process information correctly, it cannot make any valid judgment.
Is that statement true or false?
Explain what it is true or false to.
Is the ability to string words together, in of itself, judgment?
Would you say, that a machine designed to string information together using algorithms, makes it alive, or capable of being alive?
Is it possible, for an inanimate object, to possess a life support system?
Can any inanimate object, possess will?
A mind is potentially the most powerful life support system possible. Its power comes from a physical fact: every thing is some material difference within limits. It is impossible for two things to exist, if one of them is infinite in both of its parts.
The ability to process information is the ability to correctly use both parts of speech. A limit is not a relative difference, nor is a relative difference a limit.
Every thing has these two parts, neither of which is, or can be, a thing in-of-itself. This relationship means that everything is a physical manifestation of a binary. This binary, in the intelligible, is used to process all information. This means that if there is an error in judgment, then there is an error not in physical reality, but in processing information. A mind that cannot correctly use, master, the intelligibles of binary information processing, cannot and is not doing its own work.
The question is, is this or that true or false? Is a recognition of this binary state of existence. What is implied in the question is the standards by which to answer the question. Which relative differences have you chosen by which you can construct your answer? Was it the same standard anyone else would use? Are you answering a question when you assume which relative difference to use in answering it?
When a relative difference is not stated, do you answer a question correctly when you assume a particular relative difference? in other words, when a statement is made not presenting a particular relative difference, is a universal difference implied, making your choice of some particular one, a mental error? Have you ever asked why, when given a universal, you chose instead, a particular?
When one is asked, is that statement true or false? Are we asking about an inanimate group of words, or your ability to be true or false to the principles of Language through the use of Grammar Systems?
No inanimate group of words can, in of themselves, be true or false, for words, in of themselves have no meaning. You can be true or false in your mental behavior, which means that you can process information correctly or not. At the foundation of grammar is a Law of Identity, derived from our binary: What may be predicated of anything is wholly determined by the definition of that thing; therefore, intelligence is required in order to choose which relative difference is intimated in the statement itself.
You shall know the truth, and the truth shall set you free.
The relative difference upon which this question stands is, what are you? If you know that you are an information processor which only functions by standards of behavior, i.e., standards not free to be whatever one pleases, one can answer correctly, for if one cannot process information correctly one can never produce true judgments.
Words, names, in of themselves have no meaning.
At the foundation of grammar, which makes information processing possible, is a convention of names, names are established by convention, however, how those names are processed is based on binary recursion. Binary recursion can only produce a binary result. It is impossible to claim one has established a binary string which contradicts itself. If one cannot engage in the convention of names, nor the operations upon those names which are not conventional, then one is not even literate. Words cannot mean anything, meaning is how we have agreed upon to effect our will, starting with our grammar systems. One part, names are conventional, i.e., a social prerequisite, the other part is physically determined, i.e., mandatory.
A mind is an information processor.
If we cannot process information correctly, then it follows we do not possess a mind, we may possess something striving to be a mind, but we have failed.
A mind is used to process information in order to maintain and promote life. If it cannot process information correctly, it cannot maintain and promote life, i.e., as written, we are not free from death; we are dying.
A judgment is then your choice as to maintaining and promoting life, which no machine can ever do, nor any particular group of words, if you are dying, then your judgment is what is actually happening to you. We certainly cannot maintain and promote life, as a life support system, if we are, ourselves, dying.
What then, is responsible for the current global catastrophes? Is it some great Pooka we call god? Or are we, in all of our great wisdom, too stupid to be literate too stupid to live?
It was once written, that in order to survive, mankind would have to embrace Nomocracy, behavior in accordance with judgment, or in short, become a literate species, a master of the intelligible user of our Grammar Matrix. Today, mankind has yet to achieve, a simple convention of names. Mankind is so simple today, he does not even behave in recognition of the importance of information processing enough to effect his behavior to learn it, maintain it, promote it. Our behavior is our judgment; We are either true or false to the definition of a life support system aimed at judgment; judgments which determine that self-same behavior. Who, but a complete dumb-ass, imagines that they can live by killing other?s? You have been trumped by yourself. Can a species be called literate, which makes no attempt at being true to itself, a species so stupid as to not even know what it is, in-of-itself?
There is no hiding place down here. Our every behavior is a statement concerning our intelligence to process information correctly or not.
Our behavior is wholly determined by our ability to process information. There is no set of words, no doctrine, no belief, which can make anyone, or anything else, responsible for your behavior. Information processing is the only power a mind will ever have.
Internet Archive:
https://archive.org/details/meta-grammar
YouTube:
https://youtu.be/e7R_ojnrc9c