Ad blocker detected: Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Disable your ad blocker to continue using our website.
Objective (Merriam Webster): "expressing or dealing with facts or conditions as perceived without distortion by personal feelings, prejudices, or interpretations"
Commentary:
Just because one has personal feelings and opinions does not mean that facts and conditions must be distorted by personal feelings, or else there would be no such thing as an objective judge, or judgement.
Objective (Merriam Webster): "expressing or dealing with facts or conditions as perceived without distortion by personal feelings, prejudices, or interpretations"
Commentary:
Just because one has personal feelings and opinions does not mean that facts and conditions must be distorted by personal feelings, or else there would be no such thing as an objective judge, or judgement.
Are you saying that Yahweh is not shown to be a genocidal p**** of a God?
You might want to look again for the first time.
On personal opinions. Almost all moral decisions are personal and subjective. Not objective.
That is why you want to have your opinion be the one respected here.
AI Answer:
“Impartial justice is the fair, neutral, and equal application of the law, where decisions are made without bias, prejudice, or favoritism based on factors like race, gender, or political opinion. It ensures that legal proceedings are objective, treating all parties with dignity and basing outcomes solely on evidence and legal principles. It ensures that legal proceedings are objective, treating all parties with dignity and basing outcomes solely on evidence and legal principles.”
AI Answer:
“Impartial justice is the fair, neutral, and equal application of the law, where decisions are made without bias, prejudice, or favoritism based on factors like race, gender, or political opinion. It ensures that legal proceedings are objective, treating all parties with dignity and basing outcomes solely on evidence and legal principles. It ensures that legal proceedings are objective, treating all parties with dignity and basing outcomes solely on evidence and legal principles.”
God’s mercy may in fact be objective judgment that is based on the all of a greater data base than lesser humans (lesser than God) can access, which is why human morality is called subjective, and which would account for AI fears.
Objective (Merriam Webster): "expressing or dealing with facts or conditions as perceived without distortion by personal feelings, prejudices, or interpretations"
Commentary:
Just because one has personal feelings and opinions does not mean that facts and conditions must be distorted by personal feelings, or else there would be no such thing as an objective judge, or judgement.
I knew the definition.
I do not see an argument or example/proof of concept though.
Walker wrote: ↑Mon Mar 16, 2026 3:35 pm
God’s mercy may in fact be objective judgment that is based on the all of a greater data base than lesser humans (lesser than God) can access, which is why human morality is called subjective, and which would account for AI fears.
God's mercy is an imaginary concept. So are all the supernatural Gods.
Any phenomena that exists as other than imagined is natural. Ignorance of processes makes a natural phenomenon, super-natural. Enthusiasm makes it super duper natural. A phenomenon is the inevitable result of interacting elements that comprise a condition. When science can explain everything, that will be the end of extra-ordinary.
Any phenomena that exists as other than imagined is natural. Ignorance of processes makes a natural phenomenon, super-natural. Enthusiasm makes it super duper natural. A phenomenon is the inevitable result of interacting elements that comprise a condition. When science can explain everything, that will be the end of extra-ordinary.
Nicely stated, but I think we will always have gullible and the fools.
I am a dualistic thinker and know there is a good in supernatural thinking, but not much.
Because science cannot explain everything, then what we call supernatural is actually referencing preternatural.
One-word, unpunctuated question to AI:
Preternatural
AI answer:
Blah blah blah, then …
“Key Differences from Supernatural:
- Preternatural refers to events that exceed the regular course of nature but might be produced by hidden, non-human, or angelic forces.
- Supernatural relates to forces entirely outside the physical world or laws of physics, such as miracles or God.”
With that answer, AI separates God from angelic forces. Sneaky.
Because science cannot explain everything, then what we call supernatural is actually referencing preternatural.
One-word, unpunctuated question to AI:
Preternatural
AI answer:
Blah blah blah, then …
“Key Differences from Supernatural:
- Preternatural refers to events that exceed the regular course of nature but might be produced by hidden, non-human, or angelic forces.
- Supernatural relates to forces entirely outside the physical world or laws of physics, such as miracles or God.”
With that answer, AI separates God from angelic forces. Sneaky.
Fantasy is fantasy.
All supernatural entities are fiction. If there is one, it would be a proof of concept for many Gods.
