One Like Moses, it’s all Natural

[Phil8659]

One Like Moses, it's all Natural

What is the most significant thing that Moses did, which is echoed throughout the text, from Genesis, the front of the Book to Revelation the back of the Book, which has everything to do with the making of Man?

Moses chiseled Law into stone, and man is being made to tend the Garden of Life, called the Earth.

Be it in the perceptible, or intelligible, information parsing, be it called invention, making, creating, tending, doing our own work, is all about the given, the material we parse, called a verb. A noun is the shape, the container, the limit of the verb. Thus, we are given the verb, and we learn Law, standards of parsing the verb, in order to maintain and promote life. Law is not a heap of words, produced by simple minded sociopaths. Law, as Plato noted, is the discovery of reality put into a grammar system which can prove a product. Law is a standard of behavior, standards of parsing behavior, proven by our Grammar Matrix, or judgment and it?s utility to aid in maintaining and promoting a life where we are the beneficiary of our own labor. Today, sociopaths make sure that you are not. If we have correctly shaped our environment, it will maintain and promote life. Currently it does not.

A sociopath will tell you to respect them, their doctrines, their words, but we are not a respecter of persons, we are a respecter of the perceptible Word of God, provable in the intelligible Word of God. A respecter of Truth, teaches you how to speak like God, Truth. A sick sociopath actually believes that they or some other man can be a god.

In order to do the job we are being made for, we are always applying form, setting limits, to the relative difference. We are given two, and only two parts of speech, in our mind, and by our hand, and as the one so too the other.

By writing law into stone, Moses became the first formal grammarian, the first human Philosopher, of binary recursion, applying limits to the behavior of man, a prophecy written as the Decalogue. Law mankind, in general, still disrespects today.

The mark of the beast, 666, like much of the text is a metaphor, we are the beast, like Moses, who, with our own hand write by the principles that our every behavior is aimed at information parsing for the regulation of our own behavior such that our behavior maintains and promotes life, the job, as written in Genesis, we are being made to do.

And so, when it is intimated, in the Book, that man is the beast who learns to become literate, who learns judgment, it is simple, observable fact, we are learning how to shape our environment in order to maintain and promote life on this planet. However, call it grammar or technology, no savage can be allowed to use that technology to the destruction of the Earth, which means the ratio of savages to potentially civilized individuals has to keep tending toward the civilized, those who understand that all of our behavior is factually an expression of judgment, of our literacy. This is why, a long time ago, I was asked to express this to mankind, to lay it down, put it into the environment, so that it will grow. This means, that my work will help mankind to learn to reason by his own hand for we have always had the ability with our body, but not by our mind.

This means that there is at least one method of measurement for those who claim to believe that there is a God, and that God, is Truth, the ability to parse information in order to maintain and promote life, and this ability takes the whole of our life to learn. As Christ noted, those who respect Truth spend considerable time, alone, in their room, learning how to do their own work, and this is called prayer, prayer is not the idle incantation of rote words, it is not a public display of bowing to false gods. Prayer is the active learning, as a child, how to do the work we are being made to do, with our own hand. We respect the fact that we are made to do a job, and we have been given the perfect method, a perfect form of speech, by which to do it.

All information is processed in binary, or again, there are only two parts of speech, the verb, the material we have to parse, and our standards of behavior by which we parse that material to make our life sustaining products.

There are two parts of speech and these two parts of speech, we learn from the perceptible, are turned into grammar. Grammar, as a thing, is comprised of these two parts, one part, the symbol set, which is the noun, and how we recursively apply these symbols, which is the verb. This two by two, produces exactly four categories of grammar, forming a Grammar Matrix which has long standing historical names: Common Grammar, Arithmetic, Algebra and Geometry.

Geometry, sometimes referred to by the sacrilegious as Sacred Geometry, has the simplest symbol set of all members of our Grammar Matrix, it places a one-to-one correspondence between the hand and the two parts of speech. This means that Formal Geometry is wholly metaphorical, always exact, and every judgment is concurrent with the input. Our ability to use this system of grammar therefore, takes the greatest intelligence, and it is the only member of our grammar matrix by which we can ask questions by and it will give us the answers. What we understand of anything, even our Formal Grammar, is contingent on our own intelligence.

So, I was asked, as I said, to express judgment, in a perfect system of grammar, to mankind who can hardly understand it. Our body has always been able to use this grammar, but, sadly, not so our minds. Placing it into the environment, however, will help in the eventual outcome, the making of man who respects Truth, and who lives to tend the Garden of God.

Who, in their right mind, can claim to be a child of God, and yet does not even know how to speak like God? And who, but a fool, actually believes they can learn to speak like God, in a lifetime?

Learning the Word of God is our bread, and we eat our bread daily.

Matthew: Our Father which art in heaven, Hallowed be thy name. Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done in earth, as [it is] in heaven. Give us this day our daily bread. And forgive us our debts, as we forgive our debtors. And lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil: For thine is the kingdom, and the power, and the glory, forever. Amen.


Luke: Our Father which art in heaven, Hallowed be thy name. Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done, as in heaven, so in earth. Give us day by day our daily bread. And forgive us our sins; for we also forgive every one that is indebted to us. And lead us not into temptation; but deliver us from evil.


Now, one can nitpick words, but the Lord?s prayer is correct behavior in a metaphor. We ask for our bread, with our body, mind and soul. It is not just idle words of an idle person standing in a welfare line, but part of our learning process. A daily process of learning, by our own hand, in a perfect system of grammar, as we respect the reason we are being made to tend this Garden of Life. So, if you do not put forth any real effort to learn how to speak, using a perfect system of Grammar, how is it you expect to be recognized as a child of God?

The cornerstone of our existence, is a parallel between mind and hand, therefore, the cornerstone, our Meta-Grammar, is the last to be understood and utilized to its full potential, Formal Geometry, which, as I said, I was asked to express. We have a lifetime job, and a perfect method of doing our own work. What more could anyone ask for?

[Greatest I am]

I like the fact that Moses shows his moral sense before reaching the promised land, and basically tells Yahweh where to shove it.

Moses had had enough of smashing babies heads against stones.

So many forget that all important detail.

[Iwannaplato]

I like the fact that Moses shows his moral sense before reaching the promised land, and basically tells Yahweh where to shove it.

Moses had had enough of smashing babies heads against stones.

So many forget that all important detail.

Well.....
Moses did stand up to God, for example about punishing the Jews for worshipping the Golden Calf.

But the smashing babies is from Psalms can came after the lifetime of Moses.

And worse than that while Moses did argue with God, he later ordered his men who captured women and children of The Midianites, he ordered them to kill women who had lain with male Midianites and male children. His soldiers followed the general practice of the time: not killing the women and children. He could have interpreted God's commands the same way. But he opted to kill more than he had to.

So, he stood up to God when it came to punishing Hebrews. But had no problem with killing children. And the smashing babies head on rocks had nothing to do with Moses.

14 Moses was angry with the officers of the army—the commanders of thousands and commanders of hundreds—who returned from the battle.
15 “Have you allowed all the women to live?” he asked them.
16 “They were the ones who followed Balaam’s advice and enticed the Israelites to be unfaithful to the Lord in the Peor incident, so that a plague struck the Lord’s people.
17 Now kill all the boys. And kill every woman who has slept with a man,
18 but save for yourselves every girl who has never slept with a man.”

He really wasn't averse to violence against children, and seems pro-rape as well.

[Greatest I am]

I like the fact that Moses shows his moral sense before reaching the promised land, and basically tells Yahweh where to shove it.

Moses had had enough of smashing babies heads against stones.

So many forget that all important detail.

Well.....
Moses did stand up to God, for example about punishing the Jews for worshipping the Golden Calf.

But the smashing babies is from Psalms can came after the lifetime of Moses.

And worse than that while Moses did argue with God, he later ordered his men who captured women and children of The Midianites, he ordered them to kill women who had lain with male Midianites and male children. His soldiers followed the general practice of the time: not killing the women and children. He could have interpreted God's commands the same way. But he opted to kill more than he had to.

So, he stood up to God when it came to punishing Hebrews. But had no problem with killing children. And the smashing babies head on rocks had nothing to do with Moses.

14 Moses was angry with the officers of the army—the commanders of thousands and commanders of hundreds—who returned from the battle.
15 “Have you allowed all the women to live?” he asked them.
16 “They were the ones who followed Balaam’s advice and enticed the Israelites to be unfaithful to the Lord in the Peor incident, so that a plague struck the Lord’s people.
17 Now kill all the boys. And kill every woman who has slept with a man,
18 but save for yourselves every girl who has never slept with a man.”

He really wasn't averse to violence against children, and seems pro-rape as well.

You might want to read the sequence of events for Moses again, but his rejection of the promised land and Yahweh is key.

The senseless murder of children should be seen as evil. Right?

[Iwannaplato]

You might want to read the sequence of events for Moses again, but his rejection of the promised land and Yahweh is key.

The senseless murder of children should be seen as evil. Right?

What an odd question. Of course, I hate the idea of killing children. Can't be justified.
Do you think it is ok to rape the elderly?

I checked the sequence for smashing babies' heads on stones. That specific image comes after Moses' life time.
There are other types of dashing and killing babies and those come before his lifetime: no rocks or stones are mentioned.

There is no record of him dashing babies heads on stones or being asked to do it or even seeing it.

He did in fact order killing of male children, presumably of any age since the idea was to prevent that group from being a threat again.
He did not stand up to God around baby killing, or there's no record of him doing that. There is no record of him complaining about his doing this with the Midianite children and he did this in the later part of his life.

He did not reject the promised land. In fact he wanted to go there and God forbade him.
https://www.gotquestions.org/Moses-promised-land.html

and he clearly wanted to enter it
"And I pleaded with the Lord at that time... Please let me go over and see the good land beyond the Jordan... But the Lord was angry with me... and would not listen to me. And the Lord said to me, 'Enough from you; do not speak to me of this matter again.... for you shall not go over this Jordan.'" He was allowed to view it.

He did stand up to God regarding the treatment of the Jews mainly and in the beginning when he tried to not accept the mission, much of that refusal based on humility.

If you can find parts of the Bible that contradict what I've said by all means share.

[Greatest I am]

You might want to read the sequence of events for Moses again, but his rejection of the promised land and Yahweh is key.

The senseless murder of children should be seen as evil. Right?

What an odd question. Of course, I hate the idea of killing children. Can't be justified.
Do you think it is ok to rape the elderly?

I checked the sequence for smashing babies' heads on stones. That specific image comes after Moses' life time.
There are other types of dashing and killing babies and those come before his lifetime: no rocks or stones are mentioned.

There is no record of him dashing babies heads on stones or being asked to do it or even seeing it.

He did in fact order killing of male children, presumably of any age since the idea was to prevent that group from being a threat again.
He did not stand up to God around baby killing, or there's no record of him doing that. There is no record of him complaining about his doing this with the Midianite children and he did this in the later part of his life.

He did not reject the promised land. In fact he wanted to go there and God forbade him.
https://www.gotquestions.org/Moses-promised-land.html

and he clearly wanted to enter it
"And I pleaded with the Lord at that time... Please let me go over and see the good land beyond the Jordan... But the Lord was angry with me... and would not listen to me. And the Lord said to me, 'Enough from you; do not speak to me of this matter again.... for you shall not go over this Jordan.'" He was allowed to view it.

He did stand up to God regarding the treatment of the Jews mainly and in the beginning when he tried to not accept the mission, much of that refusal based on humility.

If you can find parts of the Bible that contradict what I've said by all means share.

I will let the Jews educate you. Try watching God on Trial.

Regardless, the bottom line is that Yahweh is a genocidal p**** who does not deserve human respect.

[Iwannaplato]

I will let the Jews educate you. Try watching God on Trial.

You know, you made some incorrect statements. I pointed this out. You suggested I check. So, I put some time in. Perhaps I was wrong, I think. Then I see that I wasn't, so I write what I found. In fact nearly everything you said was wrong, except for the distaste for Yahweh. And what is your response?

I will let the Jews educate you. Try watching God on Trial.
Regardless, the bottom line is that Yahweh is a genocidal p**** who does not deserve human respect.

Great, well if you really don't care if your statements are correct, don't waste people's time making them
If you do, and your incorrect assertions are pointed out, be an adult and acknowledge it.
If those statements never mattered to you, you could have left them out and focused on Yahweh, rather than your hallucinations about Moses.
You are the one who needs to be educated, by Jews perhaps on the OT, and by a parent it seems on character.
I know, your mission means it doesn't matter what you do.

[Greatest I am]

I will let the Jews educate you. Try watching God on Trial.

You know, you made some incorrect statements. I pointed this out. You suggested I check. So, I put some time in. Perhaps I was wrong, I think. Then I see that I wasn't, so I write what I found. In fact nearly everything you said was wrong, except for the distaste for Yahweh. And what is your response?

I will let the Jews educate you. Try watching God on Trial.
Regardless, the bottom line is that Yahweh is a genocidal p**** who does not deserve human respect.

Great, well if you really don't care if your statements are correct, don't waste people's time making them
If you do, and your incorrect assertions are pointed out, be an adult and acknowledge it.
If those statements never mattered to you, you could have left them out and focused on Yahweh, rather than your hallucinations about Moses.
You are the one who needs to be educated, by Jews perhaps on the OT, and by a parent it seems on character.
I know, your mission means it doesn't matter what you do.

The evil in Yahweh is the point. Not the f****** sequence of events. After all, it is all a myth.

[Iwannaplato]

The evil in Yahweh is the point. Not the f****** sequence of events. After all, it is all a myth.

I like the fact that Moses shows his moral sense before reaching the promised land, and basically tells Yahweh where to shove it.

Moses had had enough of smashing babies heads against stones.

So many forget that all important detail.

You brought it up. You seemed to think these details important. You talked about the myth and the important detail. I respond that what you wrote is not correct. Do you say, I actually don't care. I thought Moses objected. He should have. My focus on the terrible nature of Yahweh. Great, then I would have known. But no you chide me that I've got it wrong and tell me to check. Then tell me you will let the Jews educate me. So, condescension based on nothing.

If the sequence didn't matter you could have conceded that instead of telling me to check like it did matter.

I mean, seriously. You don't even seem to believe what you write and contradict yourself without noticing.

Don't worry, I'll ignore you from here on out.

[Greatest I am]

The evil in Yahweh is the point. Not the f****** sequence of events. After all, it is all a myth.

I like the fact that Moses shows his moral sense before reaching the promised land, and basically tells Yahweh where to shove it.

Moses had had enough of smashing babies heads against stones.

So many forget that all important detail.

You brought it up. You seemed to think these details important. You talked about the myth and the important detail. I respond that what you wrote is not correct. Do you say, I actually don't care. I thought Moses objected. He should have. My focus on the terrible nature of Yahweh. Great, then I would have known. But no you chide me that I've got it wrong and tell me to check. Then tell me you will let the Jews educate me. So, condescension based on nothing.

If the sequence didn't matter you could have conceded that instead of telling me to check like it did matter.

I mean, seriously. You don't even seem to believe what you write and contradict yourself without noticing.

Don't worry, I'll ignore you from here on out.

The evil in Yahweh is the point.