Modern humans bred with Neanderthal. Neanderthal were human. Not my point anyway. Impressive googling though, by the wayIwannaplato wrote: ↑Sat Mar 14, 2026 5:43 amThe people who were there 100,000 years ago were Neanderthals, so whatever identity they forged is long gone. They live on in scattered low % genes from interbreeding with the next group, in England and elsewhere. European Early Modern Humans came in about 40,000 years ago. They were forced out of England by an Ice Age 25,000 years ago. Then the Mesolithic people settled in England after the Ice Age 10,000 years ago. These were then nearly entirely replaced by the Beaker People. So, the Stonehenge builders were 90% replaced in the gene pool, and individuals who were still fully from those people would have been rare and slowly disappearing then.accelafine wrote: ↑Fri Mar 13, 2026 10:37 pm Human habitation goes back hundreds of thousands of years in England. I'm pretty sure that's enough time to forge a distinct identity and character. Doesn't take very long to destroy it though.
This unequal combination, there in England and elsewhere, became the Celts. The Romans came in the early AD and stayed for a few hundred years, changing the culture and religion. Then the Anglo Saxons came, a significantly different culture from the Romanized Celts. In fact, the Welsh - with more of the genes and culture of the Britons before the Anglo Saxons came - don't consider themselves English, often.
You've also got Vikings coming in and out, adding customs, genes and vocabulary -- 8th-11th centuries. Then we've got a huge cultural shift in 1066 when the Normans came. They only affected about 5% of the gene pool, but radically changed the language, making it a mix of Latin and Germanic Languages - the Celtic languages...more or less gone. The Normans changed government, architecture, law and introduced feudalism.
11th to 17th Century, large influx due to religious persecution elsewhere: Jews and Huguenots. They radically affected industry and finance.
The next big shift was Irish immigration, over a million came due to the famine - which was radically worsened (the famine) by English policies. This shift reintroduced Catholicism to England and affected the culture in many other ways.
More Jewish influx from the late 1800s to 1914.
1948: the government decides it needs help from the colonies for labor and gives those living in the colonies the right to come to England. This wasn't quite an intentional invitation to come and stay, despite some noble sounding ways of framing new laws, but then there was another large influx, changing the culture again.
So, the idea that humans have been there for 100s of thousands of years so they have had time to forge an identity is confused. Those there back then are truly gone. And other cultures have been coming in for a long time and significantly changing the culture, to the point where those genetically and culturally connected to earlier waves of immigrants don't even call themselves English, who they see as latecomers and usurpers.
Wizard prangs
- accelafine
- Posts: 5088
- Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2023 10:16 pm
Re: Wizard prangs
-
Iwannaplato
- Posts: 8766
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 10:55 pm
Re: Wizard prangs
Yes, they interbred with modern humans. I said that.accelafine wrote: ↑Sat Mar 14, 2026 6:09 am Modern humans bred with Neanderthal. Neanderthal were human. Not my point anyway. Impressive googling though, by the way![]()
referring the Neanderthals.They live on in scattered low % genes from interbreeding with the next group
So, at what point did the English distinctive identity get forged? It has nearly zero to do with Neanderthal identity, since that got wiped out - despite the genes surviving at a low percentage (all across the world). So, your post was confused. People with culture and genes going back further in time in what became England don't consider themselves English. Which identity there is correctly forged? I thought the point of the history would be clear.
Not Google, but yeah, I sure used help. I was curious. I was pretty sure your post was confused on a few levels, but many of the details of English shifts in identity and culture I had forgotten, especially the exact timing.
- accelafine
- Posts: 5088
- Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2023 10:16 pm
Re: Wizard prangs
I'm not confused.Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Sat Mar 14, 2026 6:20 amYes, they interbred with modern humans. I said that.accelafine wrote: ↑Sat Mar 14, 2026 6:09 am Modern humans bred with Neanderthal. Neanderthal were human. Not my point anyway. Impressive googling though, by the way
referring the Neanderthals.They live on in scattered low % genes from interbreeding with the next group
So, at what point did the English distinctive identity get forged? It has nearly zero to do with Neanderthal identity, since that got wiped out - despite the genes surviving at a low percentage (all across the world). So, your post was confused. People with culture and genes going back further in time in what became England don't consider themselves English. Which identity there is correctly forged? I thought the point of the history would be clear.
Not Google, but yeah, I sure used help. I was curious. I was pretty sure your post was confused on a few levels, but many of the details of English shifts in identity and culture I had forgotten, especially the exact timing.
-
Iwannaplato
- Posts: 8766
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 10:55 pm
Re: Wizard prangs
Great. So, what about the questions I asked you?
- accelafine
- Posts: 5088
- Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2023 10:16 pm
Re: Wizard prangs
And the Neanderthal weren't even all that long ago. Do you think they were the only kind of humans other than homo sapiens (a very conceited name I might add)? I have no obligation to answer your stupid questions by the way since they had nothing to do with what I wrote plus I wasn't even talking to you.
Corrected version for the man who wants 'to plato'.
Corrected version for the man who wants 'to plato'.
Last edited by accelafine on Sat Mar 14, 2026 9:38 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
Iwannaplato
- Posts: 8766
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 10:55 pm
Re: Wizard prangs
Of course you have no obligation to respond. I didn't say that, nor do I believe that. No, I don't think Neanderthals were the only other kind of humans. Not sure why you are bringing that up, and you don't seem interested in communicating well about how that fits in. It's too bad you can't see the connection to what you wrote.accelafine wrote: ↑Sat Mar 14, 2026 8:06 am And the Neanderthal weren't even all that long ago. Do you think they were the only kind of humans other than homo sapiens (a very conceited name I might add)? I have no obligation to answer your stupid questions by the way since they had othing to do with what I wrote plus I wasn't even talking to you.
Still the same old accelafine. jumping to insults, bringing whatever personal suffering you have in your life and hurling it as bile at strangers.
I will have othing to do with you as you would spell it. Note to any bystanders: accelafine is heartily outraged and victimized when others have mistakes in their writing. I don't care how she(?) spells 'nothing.'
Accelafine is no longer visible to me. Enjoy that bile, A!
- accelafine
- Posts: 5088
- Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2023 10:16 pm
Re: Wizard prangs
Oh my, the 'n' got stuck. Or do you think I actually believe it's spelt that way? Poor butthurt entitled male. Where did I insult you? Does a lack of grovelling qualify as an 'insult'?Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Sat Mar 14, 2026 9:15 amOf course you have no obligation to respond. I didn't say that, nor do I believe that. No, I don't think Neanderthals were the only other kind of humans. Not sure why you are bringing that up, and you don't seem interested in communicating well about how that fits in. It's too bad you can't see the connection to what you wrote.accelafine wrote: ↑Sat Mar 14, 2026 8:06 am And the Neanderthal weren't even all that long ago. Do you think they were the only kind of humans other than homo sapiens (a very conceited name I might add)? I have no obligation to answer your stupid questions by the way since they had othing to do with what I wrote plus I wasn't even talking to you.
Still the same old accelafine. jumping to insults, bringing whatever personal suffering you have in your life and hurling it as bile at strangers.
I will have othing to do with you as you would spell it. Note to any bystanders: accelafine is heartily outraged and victimized when others have mistakes in their writing. I don't care how she(?) spells 'nothing.'
Accelafine is no longer visible to me. Enjoy that bile, A!
-
Iwannaplato
- Posts: 8766
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 10:55 pm
Re: Wizard prangs
Oh, blimmin' heck, I missed whatever accelafine had to say here too.
Re: Wizard prangs
What is it with this thread? I deleted half of it because Flas and Wizard were getting tetchy wth each other. Now you two. The thread is jinxed!
Call me a crazy idealist but I've been really enjoying the forum being so much politer, more constructive and more philosophical dsince the reboot. Therefore I'm going to delete this entire thread and we'll pretend it never happened.
Call me a crazy idealist but I've been really enjoying the forum being so much politer, more constructive and more philosophical dsince the reboot. Therefore I'm going to delete this entire thread and we'll pretend it never happened.