Gary's Corner

[Gary Childress]

Maybe you should stop posting in my corner.

Be worthy of the guest.

Do whatever you want Walker. We know your allegiances. It's very easy to see. But you don't care. You didn't listen when people said Trump was the worst of the two viable candidates. Why should we expect anything different from you.

[Walker]

Maybe you should stop posting in my corner.

Be worthy of the guest.

Do whatever you want Walker. We know your allegiances. It's very easy to see. But you don't care. You didn't listen when people said Trump was the worst of the two candidates. Why should we expect anything different from you.

Your opinions are unsubstantiated.

Spouting off opinions does not philosophy make, not even in Gary's corner.

Most unworthy.

[Gary Childress]

Be worthy of the guest.

Do whatever you want Walker. We know your allegiances. It's very easy to see. But you don't care. You didn't listen when people said Trump was the worst of the two candidates. Why should we expect anything different from you.

Your opinions are unsubstantiated.

Spouting off opinions does not philosophy make, not even in Gary's corner.

Which opinion is unsubstantiated, the one that Trump is turning out worse than Harris or the one that you still support Trump?

[Walker]

Your opinions, Gary. They are unsubstantiated.

I would not support an unworthy president.

[phyllo]

That's been answered.

Christians pray for personal strength so that God’s will can be done, with the understood caveat that God’s will is often mysterious to the limited capacity of humans.

Doing great harm preconceives what God want's done.

So, there goes that old habit of second-guessing God, right out the window.

That's the answer.

It's up to you to understand it.

That's not an answer, it's nothing but drivel.

[Gary Childress]

Your opinions, Gary. They are unsubstantiated.

If you say so.

[Gary Childress]

Your opinions, Gary. They are unsubstantiated.

I would not support an unworthy president.

Is Trump "worthy" of support?

[Walker]

That's been answered.

Christians pray for personal strength so that God’s will can be done, with the understood caveat that God’s will is often mysterious to the limited capacity of humans.

Doing great harm preconceives what God want's done.

So, there goes that old habit of second-guessing God, right out the window.

That's the answer.

It's up to you to understand it.

That's not an answer, it's nothing but drivel.

Objectively speaking:

Yes, it is a valid philosophical answer.

No, it is not drivel.

[Walker]

Your opinions, Gary. They are unsubstantiated.

I would not support an unworthy president.

Is Trump "worthy" of support?

Do you think he is, and if not why?

After all, this is your corner.

[Gary Childress]

Your opinions, Gary. They are unsubstantiated.

I would not support an unworthy president.

Is Trump "worthy" of support?

Do you think he is, and if not why?

After all, this is your corner.

No. I don't. Because he seems to be wrecking more damage than doing anything good. Your turn.

[phyllo]

Objectively speaking:

Yes, it is a valid philosophical answer.

No, it is not drivel.

Objectively speaking, it was confused, unclear and vague.

What did it mean? Only you know.

[Walker]

Is Trump "worthy" of support?

Do you think he is, and if not why?

After all, this is your corner.

No. I don't. Because he seems to be wrecking more damage than good. Your turn.

No. I don't. Because he seems to be wrecking more damage than good. Your turn.


Expand that with substantiation.

[Walker]

Objectively speaking:

Yes, it is a valid philosophical answer.

No, it is not drivel.

Objectively speaking, it was confused, unclear and vague.

What did it mean? Only you know.

You are wrong.

[phyllo]

You are wrong.

That sums you up.

You can't hold up your end of a discussion.

You can't focus.

You can't form arguments.

[Walker]

Wrong again.