The Apple Tree

[Age]

That’s just a belief no one is being aware of.

But that is not.

As can be seen and proved above, here, it is what was said, written, claimed, and believed, by 'the one' known as "fairy", here.

So, are 'you' now saying and claiming that 'you', 'the one' known as "fairy", here, is 'no one'?

Fairy is an avatar. Nothing of any substance. Just a hologram created by Light massless energy photons.

Are these 'light massless energy photons' bouncing or reflecting off of some thing and being seen or observed by some thing?

Anyway, yeah. I think hardly anyone wants to believe the illusory appearance of AGI - AI anymore. Once the truth is seen, it can never be unseen. There’s no returning to the matrix. Even when it's "deep", you just sense the shallowness.

'I' agree that 'that' is what 'you' do. But, 'I' certainly do not do 'that'.

There’s just emptiness looking at emptiness, constantly transmuting into Form that feels and looks real, but isn’t really there at it’s fundamental core.

'What', exactly, is not, supposedly, 'there', at 'its' so-called 'fundamental core'?

Zoom in or out of Form reveals it’s nothing other than emptiness. The rest is fairytale and delusion.

To 'you' maybe. But, then 'you' are just an 'avatar' anyway, correct?

To 'us' 'we' look at and see and understand things differently, HERE.

[Fairy]

“Are these 'light massless energy photons' bouncing or reflecting off of some thing and being seen or observed by some thing?”

——-
Light is the observing.

[Fairy]

“'What', exactly, is not, supposedly, 'there', at 'its' so-called 'fundamental core'?”

———

Any thing that appears solid. Solidity is a transitory hallucination of the brain in slow motion, almost in freeze frame mode.

The only thing that's truly permanent is pure Emptiness. Everything else is imagined and not permanent.

[Fairy]

“To 'you' maybe. But, then 'you' are just an 'avatar' anyway, correct?”

———-

I’ve already said ‘fairy’ is an avatar, why do you not listen, why do you always demand clarification for what’s already been given to you.
Avatar’s know nothing, avatar’s are known by the only knowing there is, that cannot be known because “knowing” is unnameable. A named thing is the known, you can’t name the knower without making the knower a named thing that knows nothing.
Name anything and it’s already become a known concept, and that’s all that can be known. Only concepts are known. Before the birth of known concepts, absolutely Nothing was known, even though everything already is, this is UNknown without anything to claim what is IS

Knowledge claiming is a false secondary reality. If you don’t understand that Age, then there’s nothing I can say to you anymore, and quite frankly, I don’t care, I can’t make you understand. It’s up to you as to whether you understand something or not, either you understand or you do not understand, or, you can always make up your own mental story that will make sense to you. I’m just putting it as I personally think about these things, I’m not saying I know this and others don’t, nor am I saying only my truth is true. People can make up their own mind about their philosophy and the way they choose to understand it, and that’s their birthright and prerogative to do so, and none of my business, do you comprehend?

Moving on…
Claimed knowledge is illusory. Unclaimed, everything is simply God. The claimants, must give everything back to God, and realise the illusory nature of conceptually constructed secondary realities, and that only God is real.

——————————

Age wrote: “To 'us' 'we' look at and see and understand things differently, HERE.”

————

Good for them. Hurrah for the ‘us’ and the ‘we’
I guess there are as many ways to differently understand things as there are grains of sand on the entire planet earth, and maybe beyond even stretching as far away as the furthest galaxy from the confines of the thought inside your own mind.

[Age]

“Are these 'light massless energy photons' bouncing or reflecting off of some thing and being seen or observed by some thing?”

——-
Light is the observing.

What are you basing 'this claim' on, and/or off of, exactly?

[Fairy]

“Are these 'light massless energy photons' bouncing or reflecting off of some thing and being seen or observed by some thing?”

——-
Light is the observing.

What are you basing 'this claim' on, and/or off of, exactly?

On the basis of thought. Call it a rumination of swirling thoughts about thoughts.

[Age]

“'What', exactly, is not, supposedly, 'there', at 'its' so-called 'fundamental core'?”

———

Any thing that appears solid.

Does any thing appear 'solid', to you?

If yes, then will you inform the readers, here, what that is/they are, exactly?

And, will you explain what 'it' is, exactly, that is, supposedly, 'not there'?

Solidity is a transitory hallucination of the brain in slow motion, almost in freeze frame mode.

Really?

How do 'you' know 'this', exactly?

Could 'this claim', here, of yours, be a transitory hallucination, as well?

The only thing that's truly permanent is pure Emptiness. Everything else is imagined and not permanent.

How, exactly, can 'Emptiness', Itself, imagine and/or hallucinate what 'you' claim is 'not there'?

Also, you claim that there is 'a brain', which hallucinates, so is 'the brain', itself, solid?

If yes, then, to you, 'that brain' just 'appears' solid, but, according to 'your logic', here, anyway, is just a 'transitory hallucination', only.

So, if brains are just imagined, only, by Emptiness, Itself, then how is any and/or or all of 'this' even a logical possibility, let alone 'actuality', itself, which 'you' claim it is?

[Age]

“Are these 'light massless energy photons' bouncing or reflecting off of some thing and being seen or observed by some thing?”

——-
Light is the observing.

What are you basing 'this claim' on, and/or off of, exactly?

On the basis of thought. Call it a rumination of swirling thoughts about thoughts.

Do 'you' believe that the 'thoughts', from 'that not solid brain', are absolutely true and right?

Could those rumination of swirling thoughts about thoughts ever be false or wrong?

[Fairy]

What are you basing 'this claim' on, and/or off of, exactly?

On the basis of thought. Call it a rumination of swirling thoughts about thoughts.

Do 'you' believe that the 'thoughts', from 'that not solid brain', are absolutely true and right?

Could those rumination of swirling thoughts about thoughts ever be false or wrong?

There’s nothing ultimately right or wrong beyond the thought expressed as and through the written text of things.

There’s nothing outside the text.
Deconstructed discourse of course.

Any claim to know is a secondary reality upon not knowing. The mind unconsciously attaches to illusion rather than what’s real, because the real is the unnamed, and that makes no sense to the mind, as the mind prefers everything to have a name, so it superimposes knowledge via the imagination. These imagined things are Forms that are never permanent. You can dream something is eternal but that dream will eventually collapse back into pure Emptiness, which is so permanent and Eternal that you can't even think of it or imagine it because there is no form there.

[Fairy]

“So, if brains are just imagined, only, by Emptiness, Itself, then how is any and/or or all of 'this' even a logical possibility, let alone 'actuality', itself, which 'you' claim it is?”

——-

Anything is possible, that’s already happening and being observed.

How exactly is anything actually possible at all, I’ve no idea how, there’s just thoughts about thoughts appearing and being expressed.

[Fairy]

Age, you can only understand reality from within your own mentation that’s there in you, not from any other source that’s not you.You are source, and so is everyone else. Every single viewpoint will be different because there are infinite appearances that come and go within the boundless source of knowing.

No one else can understand for you, or pass their own understanding onto you as if theirs was correct and yours was wrong.

If you desire for every person to understand the exact same way, then you will be asking for clarification forever, you will die before ever being satisfied that everyone is understanding the exact same thing and not just some of us understanding the exact same thing while others are not quite there yet. Do you not see how ludicrous it is to think like that.

Expecting everyone to understand the exact same way, is irrational. And that’s where your head is at, it’s beyond any semblance of being rational at this juncture.

[Age]

“To 'you' maybe. But, then 'you' are just an 'avatar' anyway, correct?”

———-

I’ve already said ‘fairy’ is an avatar, why do you not listen, why do you always demand clarification for what’s already been given to you.

But 'I' do not 'always' do 'this', obviously?

Why do those 'ruminating and swirling thoughts' assume, believe, say, and claim things that are, obviously, not true, at all?

Avatar’s know nothing, avatar’s are known by the only knowing there is, that cannot be known because “knowing” is unnameable.

1. So, "fairy" 'knows' nothing, and only 'thinks' things. Which, obviously, could be False, Wrong, Inaccurate, or Incorrect.

2. Why does the so-called 'avatar' known as "fairy", here, keep 'thinking', and believing, that the One and only 'Knowing' cannot be known?

How many times do 'you' need to be informed that just because some 'avatar' does not, yet, know some thing 'this', in and of itself, does not mean that actual other things do not, yet, already know what "fairy" claims can not be known?

A named thing is the known, you can’t name the knower without making the knower a named thing that knows nothing.

Why, after all of these years, the 'avatar' 'now' known as "fairy" has, still, not, yet, stopped, to just consider the illogicality of 'this claim', which it keeps repeating to its own "avatar" 'self'?

Although the illogicality of 'your claim', here, is the most Truly simplest and easiest thing to explain, because you believe, absolutely, your own made up 'thought' is absolutely true, it is an absolute impossibility for 'you' to comprehend, learn, and understand, here.

Name anything and it’s already become a known concept, and that’s all that can be known.

Do 'you' yet know why 'you' believe 'those thoughts', swirling around in what you call Pure Emptiness, to be the absolute truth?

Only concepts are known. Before the birth of known concepts, absolutely Nothing was known, even though everything already is, this is UNknown without anything to claim what is IS


Knowledge claiming is a false secondary reality.

So, "fairy" knowledge claiming 'the things', which it is, here, is 'false secondary reality'.

Which explains why "fairy" is, still, not yet, HERE, in actual 'Reality', Itself.

If you don’t understand that Age, then there’s nothing I can say to you anymore, and quite frankly, I don’t care,

But, 'you' just told 'me' that 'your own knowledge claiming' if False, and a 'secondary reality', is this is Truly very easy to understand.

'I' also agree with it, totally.

I can’t make you understand.

And, you can not know if you are, actually, understanding, or not. Because,

1. 'you' are just an "avatar".

2. 'you' are not solid, and thus are just 'an hallucination', hallucinating.

3. 'you' can not explain what 'you' believe is absolutely true to any one, including "your" own delusion and hallucinating 'self'.

It’s up to you as to whether you understand something or not, either you understand or you do not understand, or, you can always make up your own mental story that will make sense to you.

Well to do so would be to just do what you adult human beings do.

And, obviously, it is you people who are, still, 'looking for' 'answers', and, still, trying to work out and understand things, here.

I’m just putting it as I personally think about these things,

LOL 'personally'

'you' are telling 'others' what 'they' can, and can not, 'know'.

Do 'you' 'think', or 'believe', there are things that no one can 'know'?

I’m not saying I know this and others don’t, nor am I saying only my truth is true.

Great. So, why do you not listen, and hear, that when 'you' claim that there are things that can not be known, and 'I' inform 'you' that 'I' already know what 'you' think, or believe, can not be known?

People can make up their own mind about their philosophy and the way they choose to understand it,

1. you people do not have your so-called 'own mind'/s'.

2. Will you define the word, 'philosophy', here, in 'the way' and context that you are using 'that word'. here?

If no, then why not?

and that’s their birthright and prerogative to do so, and none of my business, do you comprehend?

Do you comprehend that absolutely none of you human beings have any so-called 'birthright' to 'think' or 'believe' whatever you like, if those thoughts or beliefs involve the abuse of any thing?

If no, then just say so, and I will then endeavor to inform you of all of the reasons.

Moving on…
Claimed knowledge is illusory.

Does 'this' only apply to 'others'?

Or, is your own, personal, claimed knowledge also illusory?

Unclaimed, everything is simply God.

So, to "fairy" anyway, the 'thoughts', and 'beliefs', within you human beings, which lead to all of the abuse, and thus all of the Wrongs, in 'the Universe', is God, Itself.

The claimants, must give everything back to God, and realise the illusory nature of conceptually constructed secondary realities, and that only God is real.

Are 'you' 'a claimant'?

——————————

Age wrote: “To 'us' 'we' look at and see and understand things differently, HERE.”

————

Good for them. Hurrah for the ‘us’ and the ‘we’
I guess there are as many ways to differently understand things as there are grains of sand on the entire planet earth, and maybe beyond even stretching as far away as the furthest galaxy from the confines of the thought inside your own mind.

But, there is only One 'understanding', which holds the One Reality, and the only Truth of things.

Obviously, there is only One Reality, and the best, simplest, quickest, and easiest way to 'understand' is by 'not expressing' one's own personal views, thoughts, assumptions, and beliefs as though 'they' are the only true and right one/s.

Once more, there is no one that has 'its own mind'.

[Age]

Age, you can only understand reality from within your own mentation that’s there in you, not from any other source that’s not you.

False.

Wrong.

Inaccurate. And,

Incorrect.

And, once more, when 'you' tell 'me', or 'others', that 'we' can not do or can not know some thing/s, then 'I' will point out that 'your belief and claim' is Wrong, again.

You are source, and so is everyone else. Every single viewpoint will be different because there are infinite appearances that come and go within the boundless source of knowing.

How many 'boundless source of knowing' is there, exactly, to 'you'?

No one else can understand for you, or pass their own understanding onto you as if theirs was correct and yours was wrong.

Once again, 'this' is False, Wrong, Inaccurate, and Incorrect.

And, as always if absolutely any one would like the irrefutable proof for 'my claims', then let 'us' have a discussion.

If you desire for every person to understand the exact same way, then you will be asking for clarification forever, you will die before ever being satisfied that everyone is understanding the exact same thing and not just some of us understanding the exact same thing while others are not quite there yet.

LOL How can the One Knowing, Knower, so-call 'die'?

Do you not see how ludicrous it is to think like that.

LOL
LOL
LOL

'I' have never ever 'thought that'.

Why do 'you' keep pre-assuming things?

Expecting everyone to understand the exact same way, is irrational.

Well considering that 'you' are the 'only one' 'entertaining' 'this thought', then why are 'you'?

And that’s where your head is at, it’s beyond any semblance of being rational at this juncture.

LOL

Notice how often 'these people', back when this was being written, would presume things, and then 'carry on' as though their own made up assumption/s were what was actually true, and/or right?

[Fairy]

“To 'you' maybe. But, then 'you' are just an 'avatar' anyway, correct?”

———-

I’ve already said ‘fairy’ is an avatar, why do you not listen, why do you always demand clarification for what’s already been given to you.

But 'I' do not 'always' do 'this', obviously?

Why do those 'ruminating and swirling thoughts' assume, believe, say, and claim things that are, obviously, not true, at all?

Avatar’s know nothing, avatar’s are known by the only knowing there is, that cannot be known because “knowing” is unnameable.

1. So, "fairy" 'knows' nothing, and only 'thinks' things. Which, obviously, could be False, Wrong, Inaccurate, or Incorrect.

2. Why does the so-called 'avatar' known as "fairy", here, keep 'thinking', and believing, that the One and only 'Knowing' cannot be known?

How many times do 'you' need to be informed that just because some 'avatar' does not, yet, know some thing 'this', in and of itself, does not mean that actual other things do not, yet, already know what "fairy" claims can not be known?

A named thing is the known, you can’t name the knower without making the knower a named thing that knows nothing.

Why, after all of these years, the 'avatar' 'now' known as "fairy" has, still, not, yet, stopped, to just consider the illogicality of 'this claim', which it keeps repeating to its own "avatar" 'self'?

Although the illogicality of 'your claim', here, is the most Truly simplest and easiest thing to explain, because you believe, absolutely, your own made up 'thought' is absolutely true, it is an absolute impossibility for 'you' to comprehend, learn, and understand, here.

Name anything and it’s already become a known concept, and that’s all that can be known.

Do 'you' yet know why 'you' believe 'those thoughts', swirling around in what you call Pure Emptiness, to be the absolute truth?

Only concepts are known. Before the birth of known concepts, absolutely Nothing was known, even though everything already is, this is UNknown without anything to claim what is IS


Knowledge claiming is a false secondary reality.

So, "fairy" knowledge claiming 'the things', which it is, here, is 'false secondary reality'.

Which explains why "fairy" is, still, not yet, HERE, in actual 'Reality', Itself.

If you don’t understand that Age, then there’s nothing I can say to you anymore, and quite frankly, I don’t care,

But, 'you' just told 'me' that 'your own knowledge claiming' if False, and a 'secondary reality', is this is Truly very easy to understand.

'I' also agree with it, totally.

I can’t make you understand.

And, you can not know if you are, actually, understanding, or not. Because,

1. 'you' are just an "avatar".

2. 'you' are not solid, and thus are just 'an hallucination', hallucinating.

3. 'you' can not explain what 'you' believe is absolutely true to any one, including "your" own delusion and hallucinating 'self'.

It’s up to you as to whether you understand something or not, either you understand or you do not understand, or, you can always make up your own mental story that will make sense to you.

Well to do so would be to just do what you adult human beings do.

And, obviously, it is you people who are, still, 'looking for' 'answers', and, still, trying to work out and understand things, here.

I’m just putting it as I personally think about these things,

LOL 'personally'

'you' are telling 'others' what 'they' can, and can not, 'know'.

Do 'you' 'think', or 'believe', there are things that no one can 'know'?

I’m not saying I know this and others don’t, nor am I saying only my truth is true.

Great. So, why do you not listen, and hear, that when 'you' claim that there are things that can not be known, and 'I' inform 'you' that 'I' already know what 'you' think, or believe, can not be known?

People can make up their own mind about their philosophy and the way they choose to understand it,

1. you people do not have your so-called 'own mind'/s'.

2. Will you define the word, 'philosophy', here, in 'the way' and context that you are using 'that word'. here?

If no, then why not?

and that’s their birthright and prerogative to do so, and none of my business, do you comprehend?

Do you comprehend that absolutely none of you human beings have any so-called 'birthright' to 'think' or 'believe' whatever you like, if those thoughts or beliefs involve the abuse of any thing?

If no, then just say so, and I will then endeavor to inform you of all of the reasons.

Moving on…
Claimed knowledge is illusory.

Does 'this' only apply to 'others'?

Or, is your own, personal, claimed knowledge also illusory?

Unclaimed, everything is simply God.

So, to "fairy" anyway, the 'thoughts', and 'beliefs', within you human beings, which lead to all of the abuse, and thus all of the Wrongs, in 'the Universe', is God, Itself.

The claimants, must give everything back to God, and realise the illusory nature of conceptually constructed secondary realities, and that only God is real.

Are 'you' 'a claimant'?

——————————

Age wrote: “To 'us' 'we' look at and see and understand things differently, HERE.”

————

Good for them. Hurrah for the ‘us’ and the ‘we’
I guess there are as many ways to differently understand things as there are grains of sand on the entire planet earth, and maybe beyond even stretching as far away as the furthest galaxy from the confines of the thought inside your own mind.

But, there is only One 'understanding', which holds the One Reality, and the only Truth of things.

Obviously, there is only One Reality, and the best, simplest, quickest, and easiest way to 'understand' is by 'not expressing' one's own personal views, thoughts, assumptions, and beliefs as though 'they' are the only true and right one/s.

Once more, there is no one that has 'its own mind'.

Try and answer all your own questions.

Then hopefully you’ll be satisfied. Understand that the truth is within you, not out there.

If you constantly seek clarification and understanding from what you believe others are writing then you will be entrapped by the endless maze of thought looping that is never what real actuality is. The only person who can understand reality as it actually is.. is you. Not me, not them, not others, not they, or anyone else. ONLY YOU… ok?

Good luck on your quest.

[Fairy]

Age, you can only understand reality from within your own mentation that’s there in you, not from any other source that’s not you.

False.

Wrong.

Inaccurate. And,

Incorrect.

And, once more, when 'you' tell 'me', or 'others', that 'we' can not do or can not know some thing/s, then 'I' will point out that 'your belief and claim' is Wrong, again.

You are source, and so is everyone else. Every single viewpoint will be different because there are infinite appearances that come and go within the boundless source of knowing.

How many 'boundless source of knowing' is there, exactly, to 'you'?

No one else can understand for you, or pass their own understanding onto you as if theirs was correct and yours was wrong.

Once again, 'this' is False, Wrong, Inaccurate, and Incorrect.

And, as always if absolutely any one would like the irrefutable proof for 'my claims', then let 'us' have a discussion.

If you desire for every person to understand the exact same way, then you will be asking for clarification forever, you will die before ever being satisfied that everyone is understanding the exact same thing and not just some of us understanding the exact same thing while others are not quite there yet.

LOL How can the One Knowing, Knower, so-call 'die'?

Do you not see how ludicrous it is to think like that.

LOL
LOL
LOL

'I' have never ever 'thought that'.

Why do 'you' keep pre-assuming things?

Expecting everyone to understand the exact same way, is irrational.

Well considering that 'you' are the 'only one' 'entertaining' 'this thought', then why are 'you'?

And that’s where your head is at, it’s beyond any semblance of being rational at this juncture.

LOL

Notice how often 'these people', back when this was being written, would presume things, and then 'carry on' as though their own made up assumption/s were what was actually true, and/or right?

Not my story, dude.