can men be feminists

Anything to do with gender and the status of women and men.

Moderators: AMod, iMod

Post Reply
User avatar
Satyr
Posts: 598
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 11:55 pm
Location: The Edge
Contact:

Re: can men be feminists

Post by Satyr »

Arising_uk wrote: In the long run the meaning of your words are the response they get. So if you're interested in passing on your ideas rather than just the sound of your own voice its worth being patient until you get the response you wish. That or try saying it another way.
Sweetie, how much can I dumb to down for ya?
Arising_uk wrote:I know why you left, you don't like questions about your thoughts nor have patience with those who have to think about them.
Oh little girl, I know that this is what you tell yourself, but it isn't true.
How long must I answer the same questions for ya?
I too wish to move on, go upwards, and explaining it to a moron is holding me back.
I seek my own kind, dear, and you are not it.
I am wasting my time...no I am using you to speak to a different kind.
Arising_uk wrote:Since when did the word "artificial" need such a boost of 'usefulness' or such a definition? You think theres a problem with it?
No, but you do...like you have a problem with discrimination or inequality or elitism...or respect being linked to fear....or love being linked to self-inebriation, a madness enabling sexual and social interactions.
User avatar
Arising_uk
Posts: 12259
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am

Re: can men be feminists

Post by Arising_uk »

Satyr wrote:Sweetie, how much can I dumb to down for ya? ...
I don't know? Why not try and see, as if its worth anything then it should be explicable fairly simply.
Oh little girl, I know that this is what you tell yourself, but it isn't true. ...
Is that a truth?
How long must I answer the same questions for ya?
I too wish to move on, go upwards, and explaining it to a moron is holding me back.
I seek my own kind, dear, and you are not it.
I am wasting my time...no I am using you to speak to a different kind. ...
Ah! Your acolytes. You "seek my own kind" do you? So the herd appeals then?
No, but you do...like you have a problem with discrimination or inequality or elitism...or respect being linked to fear....or love being linked to self-inebriation, a madness enabling sexual and social interactions.
Do I? Am I the one who fears it so much that I need to proclaim my superiority? Who seeks the acclamation of those he considers lesser than himself? Or is that you are seeking a master who you can serve through fear and satisfy your need to serve?
User avatar
Satyr
Posts: 598
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 11:55 pm
Location: The Edge
Contact:

Re: can men be feminists

Post by Satyr »

Arising_uk wrote:I don't know? Why not try and see, as if its worth anything then it should be explicable fairly simply.
I have a talent for discerning character.

In your case it is easy....like how my absence inspired you to try to dominate from afar by telling another that I had "painted myself into a logical corner".
Since then you've provided on evidence or explanation, except some girlish dribble about how me coming back, despite promising you otherwise, was "logically" unsound.

In short, you are a douche-bag.
Arising_uk wrote:Is that a truth?
Oh sweetie she angle of presenting the paradox that "the truth is there is no truth" or "there is absolutely no absolute" is so old, I am weary of it.
Little hint, little girl, the paradox is created by language, math being one of them, and language is how man expresses or symbolizes the abstractions in his mind.
Arising_uk wrote:Ah! Your acolytes. You "seek my own kind" do you? So the herd appeals then?
See, dear, this is the sort of feminine responses that make you more than appealing.
his too I've explained, but you are too thick to understand....I only hope that you are duplicitous, like the good little woman I know you are.

One more hint, and nothing more:
No two herds are the same....and a pack is not the same as a herd.

You are a cow...a good, nice, docile,m dumb, cow...and your herd is the average, the popular, the common, the mediocre, the all-inclusive universal....ironically the more general who despise generalities.
Arising_uk wrote:Do I? Am I the one who fears it so much that I need to proclaim my superiority?
Should I remain humble before you, woman?
Schopenhauer, Arthur wrote:With people of only moderate ability modesty is mere honesty; but with those who possess great talent it is hypocrisy.
Arising_uk wrote:Who seeks the acclamation of those he considers lesser than himself?
I think I told you this way back when I last left you here to gloat:
Dear woman, you seem to be too thick or too subjective and emotional to understand. Who sought out YOUR acclamation?
Did you have your head up your twat when I wrote down that you are my tool to speak to others?
If I wanted your approval, dear woman, I would do what works on females: flatter you, tell you nice things, paint a comforting pretty picture, keep my real opinions of you to myself, defer to you...you know like your fellow civilized friends do.

I've actually made it quite obvious how little i think of you.
But your persistence offers me a reason.
Arising_uk wrote:Or is that you are seeking a master who you can serve through fear and satisfy your need to serve?
Now, now, my little bitch...you can do better than that.
chaz wyman
Posts: 5304
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 7:31 pm

Re: can men be feminists

Post by chaz wyman »

Why don't you too love birds get a room. This is the second thread you guys are ruining with your pathetic bitchfest.
User avatar
Arising_uk
Posts: 12259
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am

Re: can men be feminists

Post by Arising_uk »

I appreciate the sentiment chaz but in the spirit thats twice you can't spell two.
User avatar
Notvacka
Posts: 412
Joined: Sat Jun 26, 2010 2:37 am

Re: can men be feminists

Post by Notvacka »

Satyr wrote:If your motives do not interest you, in other words if you do not interest you and you are only interested in other, then what the hell are you doing pretending to be interested in philosophy?
You misunderstand. I was referring to your motives in the example you gave. The point being that cooperation works as long as everybody involved cooperates, regardless of their motives.
Satyr wrote:Money has no meaning outside human constructs. Nature knows of no money nor wealth passed on from father to son.
You keep using "nature" as a diety, referring to it as if it was a conscious entity with a will. But nature "knows" nothing. Nothing has "meaning" outside human constructs. If "nature" appears to have meaning, it's only because we construct such meaning and ascribe it to nature. Nature encompasses everything and is meaningless.
Satyr wrote:This human inventions gives man the opportunity to purchase a correction to what he genetically lacks. For example an ugly chick may purchase beauty and a weak man may purchase strength. This beauty and strength is only relevant within the human system which supports the contrivances.
What other human beauty could there be, than the beauty preceived by humans? What would you suggest instead of "the human system which support the contrivances"? I'm not sure what absolute frame of reference you believe in, but it seems to me that you have concocted some sort of religion, with "nature" and possibly "evolution" as dieties.
User avatar
Arising_uk
Posts: 12259
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am

Re: can men be feminists

Post by Arising_uk »

Satyr wrote:I have a talent for discerning character. ...
If you say so.
In your case it is easy....like how my absence inspired you to try to dominate from afar by telling another that I had "painted myself into a logical corner".
Since then you've provided on evidence or explanation, except some girlish dribble about how me coming back, despite promising you otherwise, was "logically" unsound. ...
You still on about this? Once again just for you; talking to your acolyte I mentioned that whilst in 'conversation' with you, you commited yourself to leaving this site never to return, when I pointed this out, i.e. a logical deduction, you refused my advice to just change your mind, stuck to your guns and left, not without making a big fuss and fanfare it must be said, remember the countdown?
In short, you are a douche-bag. ...
And you're a weak-willed wanker but it takes all sorts.
Oh sweetie she angle of presenting the paradox that "the truth is there is no truth" or "there is absolutely no absolute" is so old, I am weary of it. ...
You're blind, I was pointing out the irony of your use of the word given what you'd just said.
Little hint, little girl, the paradox is created by language, math being one of them, and language is how man expresses or symbolizes the abstractions in his mind. ...
I know, but the paradox was your use of the word in this context.
]See, dear, this is the sort of feminine responses that make you more than appealing.
his too I've explained, but you are too thick to understand....I only hope that you are duplicitous, like the good little woman I know you are. ...
Of course you do. :roll:
One more hint, and nothing more:
No two herds are the same....and a pack is not the same as a herd. ...
Well, two herds of cows are the same but I agree that herds can be different. I know that a pack and a herd are not the same, I also know how. Can you say the same? On second thoughts don't bother as its bound to be all about dominance and alphas.
You are a cow...a good, nice, docile,m dumb, cow...and your herd is the average, the popular, the common, the mediocre, the all-inclusive universal....ironically the more general who despise generalities. ...
And thats what is most humorous about you as its you who desires the safety of the pack or herd, whereas I don't.
Should I remain humble before you, woman? ...
I don't know? Can you think of anything humble to be humble about?
Schopenhauer, Arthur wrote:With people of only moderate ability modesty is mere honesty; but with those who possess great talent it is hypocrisy.
:lol: The irony doth not escape me that one who apes him and others thinks as such.
I think I told you this way back when I last left you here to gloat:
Dear woman, you seem to be too thick or too subjective and emotional to understand. Who sought out YOUR acclamation? ...
I was talking about your acolytes.
Did you have your head up your twat when I wrote down that you are my tool to speak to others? ...
You think I care? But it works two ways.
If I wanted your approval, dear woman, I would do what works on females: flatter you, tell you nice things, paint a comforting pretty picture, keep my real opinions of you to myself, defer to you...you know like your fellow civilized friends do. ...
What kind of girl do you think I am? But how's that going for you as it appeared to fail with your ex.
I've actually made it quite obvious how little i think of you.
But your persistence offers me a reason. ...
For what?
Now, now, my little bitch...you can do better than that.
Better than what? I was just asking you questions based upon the obvious projection in your words.

Still, chaz is right, what has the bulk of this got to do with the subject or the questions I asked about your words.
User avatar
Satyr
Posts: 598
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 11:55 pm
Location: The Edge
Contact:

Re: can men be feminists

Post by Satyr »

Notvacka wrote:You misunderstand. I was referring to your motives in the example you gave. The point being that cooperation works as long as everybody involved cooperates, regardless of their motives.
You simply wish to enjoy...I want to know why.
Notvacka wrote:You keep using "nature" as a diety, referring to it as if it was a conscious entity with a will. But nature "knows" nothing. Nothing has "meaning" outside human constructs. If "nature" appears to have meaning, it's only because we construct such meaning and ascribe it to nature. Nature encompasses everything and is meaningless.
Have you no artistry in you, boy?
Jesus Christ, you are dull.

No, you are looking for my Achilles heel, and you think I am anthropomorphize nature....I like.

-------------------------------------------
To the girl....
British Princess wrote:You still on about this? Once again just for you; talking to your acolyte I mentioned that whilst in 'conversation' with you, you commited yourself to leaving this site never to return, when I pointed this out, i.e. a logical deduction, you refused my advice to just change your mind, stuck to your guns and left, not without making a big fuss and fanfare it must be said, remember the countdown?
Woman, still no "logical corner" there.

Dimwit, you made the statement before I began posting, ergo you were alluding to my ideas not my presence. You were telling someone that the reason I left was that I had painted myself into a logical corner...now you pretty little bitch, tell us what this corner is. Presumably I was running from your cutting-wit and those brilliant interrogatinos that repeated the same question using different words, so you must recall what it was, no my little bitch?

By the way, lying of changing your mind is not a corner in any logic.
But it is a desperate escape hatch for pretty little British bitches.
British Princess wrote:And thats what is most humorous about you as its you who desires the safety of the pack or herd, whereas I don't.
Ha!!!
:lol:
British Princess wrote:What kind of girl do you think I am? But how's that going for you as it appeared to fail with your ex.
If gossip is what you come here, in your herd - you rebel you - then gossip it will be.
My affairs with my ex all resulted in successes. In fact I also gained something unexpected from the entire thing, with a minimal cost.
Tell me, my bitch, is the only "success" you can imagine the one associated with you social and cultural contrivances...the ones you are "free" from?
Schopenhauer, Arthur wrote:
With people of only moderate ability modesty is mere honesty; but with those who possess great talent it is hypocrisy.
:lol: The irony doth not escape me that one who apes him and others thinks as such.
Sometimes when talking to a bitch, you must save time by cutting and pasting an authority she will be more affected by.

But who aid that I had no mentors, no teachers, no brothers?
User avatar
Arising_uk
Posts: 12259
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am

Re: can men be feminists

Post by Arising_uk »

Satyr wrote:To the girl ...
To the girls blouse.
Woman, still no "logical corner" there.
Thats coz you're looking in the wrong place. Nice to know you acknowledge my breeding.
Dimwit, you made the statement before I began posting, ergo you were alluding to my ideas not my presence. You were telling someone that the reason I left was that I had painted myself into a logical corner...now you pretty little bitch, tell us what this corner is. Presumably I was running from your cutting-wit and those brilliant interrogatinos that repeated the same question using different words, so you must recall what it was, no my little bitch? ...
Presumably wrong. Of course I made the statement before your post idiot, as I was talking to info about his list of favs, not your thoughts. Remember your weak News Years resolution? Your ceasing of smoking as a sign of your will? Your countdown? Dens of dimwits?
By the way, lying of changing your mind is not a corner in any logic.
But it is a desperate escape hatch for pretty little British bitches.
Not your little princess anymore? But I thought you said you were the liar? If you'd changed your mind at the time you'd not have had my humour at your return.
Ha!!!
:lol:
Now... what was it you said about laughing? :lol:
If gossip is what you come here, in your herd - you rebel you - then gossip it will be.
My affairs with my ex all resulted in successes. In fact I also gained something unexpected from the entire thing, with a minimal cost. Tell me, my bitch, is the only "success" you can imagine the one associated with you social and cultural contrivances...the ones you are "free" from?
I was only repeating your words from the last time you were here.
Sometimes when talking to a bitch, you must save time by cutting and pasting an authority she will be more affected by. ...
:lol: Long past that stage but he was a great read.
But who aid that I had no mentors, no teachers, no brothers?
Who did? I was just laughing that you used a quote like that when your work is obviously derivative of the author.
p.s.
Can I assume you're not a feminist?
User avatar
Satyr
Posts: 598
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 11:55 pm
Location: The Edge
Contact:

Re: can men be feminists

Post by Satyr »

Arising_uk wrote: Presumably wrong. Of course I made the statement before your post idiot, as I was talking to info about his list of favs, not your thoughts.
My little princes, you dance now.
Arising_uk wrote:Remember your weak News Years resolution? Your ceasing of smoking as a sign of your will? Your countdown? Dens of dimwits?
What can I say, little girl, I am weak willed...yet still your better.
Can't resist a barrel full of fish, thrashing about pretending to be dolphins on the open seas.

I sometimes drop bait to see them thrash harder.
Arising_uk wrote:Not your little princess anymore?
oh but you are a girl, sweetie...all woman psychology are you.
The "princes" part was me flattering you. You are more of a wench.
Arising_uk wrote:But I thought you said you were the liar?
I am....
Am I lying now?
Still no logical corner, sweetie.
Arising_uk wrote: If you'd changed your mind at the time you'd not have had my humor at your return.
No, sweetie...it was that vengeful animosity of a little girl, taking advantage of an absence to bite at the shadow of the one she was belittled by.
Your "humor" little girl?

Now, we know that's a lie, do we not?
Arising_uk wrote: Now... what was it you said about laughing? :lol:
When in Rome...or when amongst the rabble, the herd, best you act like they do, but not enough to get lost in the act itself.
Arising_uk wrote:I was only repeating your words from the last time you were here.
Of course, little girl...it was all "innocent".
women usually show their fangs all gilry-like, with those batting eyes and that coy smile...all innocent and shit.

But the words are part of the message is it not, sweetie?
The time and place...the fact that you chose to insert it there out of the blue, so to speak.

Tell me, woman, did she leave me?
Was it because I could not please her?
Tell me about what happened and why? What have you heard around town, darling? Have the girls been gossiping again?
Arising_uk wrote:Who did? I was just laughing that you used a quote like that when your work is obviously derivative of the author.
Funnier still that you did not respond to the author.
Arising_uk wrote:p.s.
Can I assume you're not a feminist?
You can assume anything you wish, little princess.
I may very well be a woman myself.
I might be gay, but resentful about it - self-hating.
I might be a cripple, bitter at the world that left me in this condition.
I might be black or blue....or yella.
Maybe I'm infertile or worse impotent.

What if....still nothing to do with my views, but what if I were all those things?
You are still a woman trapped in a "man's" form....raised to be a pussy-cat but imagining yourself as modern and open to anything...and I want you to assume away, throwing out those projections, letting that imagination go wild.
User avatar
Arising_uk
Posts: 12259
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am

Re: can men be feminists

Post by Arising_uk »

Satyr wrote:My little princes, you dance now. ...
Ya askin'?
What can I say, little girl, I am weak willed...yet still your better. ...
Not in strength of will apparently.
Can't resist a barrel full of fish, thrashing about pretending to be dolphins on the open seas. ...
See.
I sometimes drop bait to see them thrash harder. ...
Fisher of men are you? :lol:
oh but you are a girl, sweetie...all woman psychology are you.
The "princes" part was me flattering you. You are more of a wench. ...
Having to explain yourself is so unattractive in a man. :roll:
I am....
Am I lying now?
Still no logical corner, sweetie. ...
Only to the blind.
No, sweetie...it was that vengeful animosity of a little girl, taking advantage of an absence to bite at the shadow of the one she was belittled by.
Your "humor" little girl?

Now, we know that's a lie, do we not?
Do we? I'll have to take the avowed liars word for it. Although if it was that'd apparently make me the better fisherman as well.
When in Rome...or when amongst the rabble, the herd, best you act like they do, but not enough to get lost in the act itself. ...
So part sheep then.
Of course, little girl...it was all "innocent".
women usually show their fangs all gilry-like, with those batting eyes and that coy smile...all innocent and shit. ...
Nothing innocent delusional boy. You said it was gossip, I said it was your gossip.
But the words are part of the message is it not, sweetie?
The time and place...the fact that you chose to insert it there out of the blue, so to speak. ...
? I was replying to your words.
Tell me, woman, did she leave me?
Was it because I could not please her?
Tell me about what happened and why? What have you heard around town, darling? Have the girls been gossiping again? ...
You said this women took advantage of the splurge you went on after your dad died. You said she got up the duff and took you to the lawyers for maintaince. All lies?
Funnier still that you did not respond to the author. ...
He's dead.
You can assume anything you wish, little princess.
I may very well be a woman myself.
I might be gay, but resentful about it - self-hating.
I might be a cripple, bitter at the world that left me in this condition.
I might be black or blue....or yella.
Maybe I'm infertile or worse impotent.

What if....still nothing to do with my views, but what if I were all those things?
You are still a woman trapped in a "man's" form....raised to be a pussy-cat but imagining yourself as modern and open to anything...and I want you to assume away, throwing out those projections, letting that imagination go wild.
:lol: You could be all those things if you wish but I doubt your views come from such places. Does it make you feel better to make misassumptions about me?
User avatar
Satyr
Posts: 598
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 11:55 pm
Location: The Edge
Contact:

Re: can men be feminists

Post by Satyr »

Arising_uk wrote:Not in strength of will apparently.
Apparently not.
Arising_uk wrote:See.
I do.
Arising_uk wrote:Fisher of men are you? :lol:
I don't know... :lol
Arising_uk wrote:Having to explain yourself is so unattractive in a man. :roll:
I know... :roll:
Arising_uk wrote:Only to the blind.
Are you a seer?
Arising_uk wrote:Do we? I'll have to take the avowed liars word for it.
You must, as you never know when he is not lying.
Arising_uk wrote:Although if it was that'd apparently make me the better fisherman as well.
I think your brain's qualities are obvious from all those other posts towards all the others - brilliant stuff.
Your defensiveness here, is also fun...well for a while.
Arising_uk wrote:So part sheep then.
More goat.
You are all girl, my sweet.
Arising_uk wrote:Nothing innocent delusional boy.
Ouch, I sense a nerve.
A quick spasm.
Arising_uk wrote:You said it was gossip, I said it was your gossip.
No, sweetie, your conclusions were the gossip.
Little woman, if I say something about myself is this gossip, or is it gossip when you speak of another?
Are you retarded?
Arising_uk wrote:I was replying to your words.
I know...none of it matters. I did not see a thing.
You were...playing, like little girls do.
Arising_uk wrote:You said this women took advantage of the splurge you went on after your dad died.
Did i?
Link to where I said this.
I want to see the word "advantage", where your mind did not insert it tom comfort yourself.
Arising_uk wrote:You said she got up the duff and took you to the lawyers for maintaince. All lies?
Not her maintenance, little girl. Was paying for my boy.
She got no alimony.
Nothing wrong about that.
See, more "gossip" for you to sink those pretty fangs in and draw some blood.

Now answer the questions.
Did she leave me? Did she break my heart? Did I luv her?
Did I beg her to come back?
Tell me little girl....tell me more.
Arising_uk wrote:He's dead.
No shit?
:shock:
Still he's smarter than you, even while dead....you terminally brain-dead.
I suspect you were born that way; part of a brain-dead inheritance.
Natural selection can be such a bitch.
Arising_uk wrote::lol: You could be all those things if you wish but I doubt your views come from such places. Does it make you feel better to make misassumptions about me?
:P
:lol:
You backtracking little princess.
My assumptions are based on my observations of you interacting with others, over a specific time period.
They are also based on your womanly tactics here....so feminine.

You all woman.
Be proud.
You are on the vanguard of feminization....effete and proud of it.
You all wo-man...modern..."progressive' is what they call this kind of nihilism.
User avatar
Arising_uk
Posts: 12259
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am

Re: can men be feminists

Post by Arising_uk »

Apparently not.
Very apparently so.
I do.
Good.
I don't know... :lol
You don't know that when you use bait upon fishes that makes you a fisherman?
I know... :roll:
Good.
Are you a seer?
Nah! I leave that to your ilk.
You must, as you never know when he is not lying.
Unless he tells you so but its not that hard to know when someone is lying but you have to be face-to-face.
I think your brain's qualities are obvious from all those other posts towards all the others - brilliant stuff. Your defensiveness here, is also fun...well for a while.
Show me where I'm being defensive?
More goat.
You are all girl, my sweet.
Of course I am mate. So all ruminant then.
Ouch, I sense a nerve.
A quick spasm.
You can get pills for that. Is this more of your insight?
No, sweetie, your conclusions were the gossip.
Little woman, if I say something about myself is this gossip, or is it gossip when you speak of another?
Are you retarded?
Nope but you appear to be as you called what you said gossip.
I know...none of it matters. I did not see a thing.
You were...playing, like little girls do.
And you are doing what?
Did i?
Link to where I said this.
I want to see the word "advantage", where your mind did not insert it tom comfort yourself.
Who's tom? So now you deny that the last time you were here you spoke about this women who took you for a ride? Remember? That was when I was a n***** not a women.
Not her maintenance, little girl. Was paying for my boy.
She got no alimony.
Nothing wrong about that.
See, more "gossip" for you to sink those pretty fangs in and draw some blood.
You're the one who spouted your past upon this site? My apologies I should have realised that she'd not marry you.
Now answer the questions.
Did she leave me? Did she break my heart? Did I luv her?
Did I beg her to come back?
Tell me little girl....tell me more. ...
As if I care.
No shit?
:shock:
Still he's smarter than you, even while dead....you terminally brain-dead.
I suspect you were born that way; part of a brain-dead inheritance.
Natural selection can be such a bitch. ...
It is, look how you've missed winning a darwin award.
:P
:lol:
You backtracking little princess.
My assumptions are based on my observations of you interacting with others, over a specific time period.
They are also based on your womanly tactics here....so feminine.
Are they? Well mine are based upon our conversations.
You all woman.
Be proud.
You are on the vanguard of feminization....effete and proud of it.
You all wo-man...modern..."progressive' is what they call this kind of nihilism.
I am but I think you'll find yours is the nihilist approach to love, life and others.
p.s.
Looks like you agree with the topic title then?
p.p.s
Hmm! 900 odd posts to search through to find your words and if I do then you'll what? Ignore it like the last time I bothered.
User avatar
Satyr
Posts: 598
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 11:55 pm
Location: The Edge
Contact:

Re: can men be feminists

Post by Satyr »

Arising_uk wrote:Agreement at last.
Yes dear.
Arising_uk wrote:Good.
Yes dear.
Arising_uk wrote:You don't know that when you use bait upon fishes that makes you a fisherman?
Yes dear.
Arising_uk wrote:Good.
Yes dear.
Arising_uk wrote:Nah! I leave that to your ilk.
I am truly not of your ilk.
Stopped wanting to be when I realized what your ilk was all about.
Arising_uk wrote:Unless he tells you so but its not that hard to know when someone is lying but you have to be face-to-face.
Are you sure, dear?
Arising_uk wrote:Show me where I'm being defensive?
Nag, nag, nag...sweetie...you are all woman to me.
Arising_uk wrote:Of course I am mate. So all ruminant then.
You are always a woman to me, buy I enjoyed the "mate" to assert your pseudo-masculinity without making it too obvious.
You have the mind of a woman; you use the tactics of a woman; you think like a woman.
What does it matter if you have a itsy-bitsy little weeny between your legs, sweetie? Call it a big clitoris.
Arising_uk wrote:You can get pills for that. Is this more of your insight?
I recommend electroshock, or castration.
It might resolve some of the confusions you are having.
Arising_uk wrote:Nope but you appear to be as you called what you said gossip.
Did I?
Where?
I recall calling what you said gossip...but you girls have a knack of twisting reality on its head.
Arising_uk wrote:And you are doing what?
Playing with little girls.
Boys do that sometimes.
Arising_uk wrote:Who's tom?
Oh now I know you are upset, babycakes...you are focusing on the words and on typos....next syntax and spelling.

Tom's my ex.
Arising_uk wrote:So now you deny that the last time you where here you spoke about this women who took you for a ride? Remember? That was when I was a n***** not a women.
If that is so you should link me to where this occurred.
Sweetie, you are scrambling now, grasping at straws, desperately flinging every psycho-babble crap you were told works.
By the way it's supposed to be "woman" not "women", as your mind was racing to make me hurt you lost contact with your dedication to spelling and syntax.

To be taken for a ride one must be tricked.
Explain where I was tricked?
Arising_uk wrote:You're the one who spouted your past upon this site?
My apologies I should have realized that she'd not marry you.
She didn't...tell me more sweetie.
Go on.
My little gossipy little bitch. All girl, you are.
Arising_uk wrote:As if I care.
Oh but you do darling. Here you are implying shit you have no idea about.
Was it supposed to put me off-balance so that your earlier indiscretion was forgotten?

What "logical corner" sweetie?
All mouth you are, huh, sweetie?
Arising_uk wrote:It is, look how you've missed winning a darwin award.
Is that the only accolade that would impress a pretty princess like you?
Arising_uk wrote:Are they? Well mine are based upon our conversations.
Then we are equals.
You are doing fine, dear.
Arising_uk wrote:I am but I think you'll find yours is the nihilist approach to love, life and others.
Oh sweetie, you have no clue.
That's what makes you adorable and, in time, dull.

You still think love is magical, sweetie?
Is "others" a term you use to describe the myriads you offer your whore's love to?
What's love worth when it is given to everyone, sweetie, or where all "deserve" it?
Is life about deluding yourself, sweetie, or is it only about focusing on the "positives"?

Sweetie, your overturning of reality is how you show your dissatisfaction with the world.
You dream of idealistic alternatives because the world, as it is, is not to your numbed mind's tastes.

This is how you modern girls, you liberal progressives, turn your self-hating, life denouncing, cowardice into a positive spin:

Weakness becomes a strength. The meek shall inherit the earth.
Dependence becomes independence. One finds his "true" Self when he denounces his "smaller" false self.
Ego is bad, humility is good - it is how weaklings make sure all remain polite and civil towards them, even if they might be pretending.
Change becomes immutability. All is one - God, or Humanity, the Ideal Man is the man who serves the whole. A good way to ensure a steady stream of slaves imbued with that work ethic, amongst all the other ethical rules they are infected with.
Reality becomes illusion and delusion becomes reality. The senses evolved to trick the organism rather than aid it.
See that difference? It doesn't matter in this human context, but it does in every other. All is the same, differences are superficial...except when ti comes to plants, herbs, rocks, gases, stars etc.
Follow that "logic" down to its end, it leads to emptiness.
The conservative becomes the progressive. The one proposing a surrender to the natural state of entropy, is deemed the revolutionary; the one proposing a resistance to it, is the conservative.

But the Judeo-Christian mindset permeates your modernistic humanism.
You've simply submitted to a secular version of the same religious crap.

If you wish to discuss what you prefer or what feels good, then simply admit that you are not interested in philosophy, babycakes.
The world doesn't give a shit what you, or I, prefer, dear woman, nor does it care about what you would like things to be like or what you think things ought to be like.
User avatar
Arising_uk
Posts: 12259
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am

Re: can men be feminists

Post by Arising_uk »

Satyr wrote:Yes dear.

Yes dear.

Yes dear.
What a doormat you are! :lol:
I am truly not of your ilk.
Didn't say you were?
Are you sure, dear?
Yes.
Nag, nag, nag...sweetie...you are all woman to me.
So when I ask you for a link its nagging when you do it, its what? Insight?
You are always a woman to me.
You have the mind of a woman; you use the tactics of a woman; you think like a woman. ...
How would you know?
What does it matter if you have a itsy-bitsy little weeny between your legs, sweetie?
:roll: Whats up? Penis-envy?
I recommend electroshock, or castration. ...
Experience talking?
Did I?
Where?
I recall calling what you said gossip...but you girls have a knack of twisting reality on its head.
Do I? I have the knack of remembering conversations.
Playing with little girls. Boys do that sometimes.
Given your mindset I'd have thought you'd have thought it the girls who do the playing.
Oh now I know you are upset, babycakes...you are focusing on the words and on typos....next syntax and spelling.

Tom's my ex.
:lol: But you ignore the following question and concentrate upon the joke I note.
If that is so you should link me to where this occurred.
Sweetie, you are scrambling now, grasping at straws, desperately flinging every psycho-babble crap you were told works. ...
:lol: "psycho-babble". If you mean our early conversations I'd agreed that you were babbling your psyche out.
To be taken for a ride one must be tricked.
Explain where I was tricked?
Oo! Lookee semantics, is that worse than syntax?
She didn't...tell me more sweetie.
Go on.
My little gossipy little bitch. All girl, you are.
But you were the one who first raised it? Was it for sympathy a la the dead daddy?
Oh but you do darling. here you are implying shit you have no idea about.
Was it supposed to put me off-balance so that your earlier indiscretion was forgotten?
What "indiscretion" numbnuts?
What "logical corner" sweetie?
All mouth you are, huh, sweetie?
Can't be bothered to explain it to you again.
Is that the only accolade that would impress a pretty princess like you?
:lol: In your case yes! But unfortunately some silly bitch spoilt your chance.
Then we are equals.
You are doing fine, dear.
And the praise of an avowed liar is worth what?
Oh sweetie, you have no clue.
That's what makes you adorable and, in time, dull.

You still think love is magical, sweetie?
Is "others" a term you use to describe the myriads you offer your whore's love to?
What's love worth when it is given to everyone, sweetie, or where all "deserve" it?
Is life about deluding yourself, sweetie, or is it only about focusing on the "positives"?

Sweetie, your overturning of reality is how you show your dissatisfaction with the world.
You dream of idealistic alternatives because the world as it is is not to your numbed tastes.

This is how you modern girls, you liberal progressives, turn your self-hating life denouncing cowardice into a positive:

Weakness becomes a strength. The meek shall inherit the earth.
Dependence becomes independence. One finds his "true" Self when he denounces his "smaller" self.
Change becomes immutability. All is one.
Reality becomes illusion and delusion becomes reality. The senses evolved to trick the organism rather than aid it.
The conservative becomes the progressive. The one proposing a surrender to the natural state of entropy, is deemed the revolutionary; the one proposing a resistance to it, is the conservative.

But the Judeo-Christian mindset permeates your modernistic humanism.
You've simply submitted to a secular version of the same religious crap.

If you wish to discuss what you prefer or what feels good, then simply admit that you are not interested in philosophy, babycakes.
The world doesn't give a shit what you or I prefer, dear woman, nor does it care about what you would like things to be like or what you think things ought to be like.
:lol: And I'm the psychobabbler!! You make it up as you go along. Where have I said I believe any of this? Especially the metaphysics.

Transference remember, bring it up at your next appointment.
p.s.
Can you talk about "the world" given your metaphysic?
Post Reply