BBC keeps hassling me

[Maia]

The BBC have sent me yet another email demanding that I fill out a long online form declaring that I don't have a TV, don't watch this, that or the other on my laptop or phone, and have no plans to, otherwise I'll have to buy a licence or risk a £1000 fine. And they might send some people round to check, too.

I really hope that Trump sues this disgusting propaganda machine into oblivion.

[FlashDangerpants]

disgusting propaganda machine

The disgusting propaganda machine is you.

[Maia]

disgusting propaganda machine

The disgusting propaganda machine is you.

Right, because I extort 7 billion pounds a year from the population, and have vast influence over all areas of public life, but no accountability whatsoever, while being riddled with grotesquely overpaid leftist elites and celebrity paedophiles.

Nor was it me, incidentally, who spliced together two parts of Trump's speech to make him sound like he was saying the exact opposite of what he was saying, then broadcast it a few days before the US election.

[FlashDangerpants]

disgusting propaganda machine

The disgusting propaganda machine is you.

Right, because I extort 7 billion pounds a year from the population, and have vast influence over all areas of public life, but no accountability whatsoever, while being riddled with grotesquely overpaid leftist elites and celebrity paedophiles.

Nor was it me, incidentally, who spliced together two parts of Trump's speech to make him sound like he was saying the exact opposite of what he was saying, then broadcast it a few days before the US election.

But recently, when there was a stabbing spree on a terain, you were on this site as quick as you could possibly get here to write about

a psychotic madman is shouting "Allahu Akbar"

And that is all you are here for. You have nothing at all to do with philosophy. Trying to spread hatred of muslims is your only duty. And you only really became a regular here once attofishpi started getting banned for doing the same stuff.

You are a blatant propagandist.

[Walker]

Interesting that they call it a mistake, or an error.

It was a deliberate political lie intended to affect the 2024 election in the USA.

And, it was a repetition of the lie that had been told for so long, so often, without evidence, because there was no evidence of incitement by Trump although much evidence of incitement by those in the crowd, so early on the propaganda media created some evidence for those so eager to believe, and repeated it so often that it became accepted as a rock solid fact.

With their revision of The Truth, the BBC was merely showing why The Lie that so many cling to is now accepted as fact, even though they had to manufacture the evidence.



Was the BBC the model for Orwell's Ministry of Truth,

or,

Was the Ministry of Truth the model for the BBC?
It seems to be a matter of ... chronology.

[mickthinks]

disgusting propaganda machine

The disgusting propaganda machine is you.

This!

[mickthinks]

And, it was a repetition of the lie that had been told for so long, so often,

It’s you! You are the lie that had been told for so long, so often, Walker.

[Walker]

When truth is afoot
The canary in the coal mine sings
And the little mouse
In his little house
Squeaks out his chorus

[Walker]

Those who delved deeply
Never charged President Trump
With insurrection

This is because ...

No evidence of incitement exists, or existed.

So, the BBC created some evidence, to continue the lie.

Shame on you, BBC. Shame on you. Shame on all who support such devious doings.

Bad BBC.

[Phil8659]

I am watching BBC's Coast now.
I replaced all the drives in my ProBox 8 ver 3 with 4tb drives. And I then copied the Educational drive to my Library work station second 12tb drive and play the files on a Windows 11 VB set up for playing video's. You learn a lot of British history on the program.

I play programs on the 3rd monitor while working on the other two. I think I am going with The Book of O, for this demolition piece on trig.

[Walker]

Given their penchants which are not a one-off, can you trust that truth of history to be true?

[Phil8659]

Given their penchants which are not a one-off, can you trust that truth of history to be true?

Shit for brains, what the fuck are you worried about how I respond to a tv program? What the fuck business is it of yours?

First of all, explain to everyone, how you get "true" in grammar. You never gave a fuck about that. So what is your point other than being sure you are a complete jackass?

[mickthinks]

Mick and Walker engaging with Truth—a Brief History

[Phil8659]

Fine example of the missing link. I always make sure to miss them.

Talk about professional detractors.

[Maia]

The disgusting propaganda machine is you.

Right, because I extort 7 billion pounds a year from the population, and have vast influence over all areas of public life, but no accountability whatsoever, while being riddled with grotesquely overpaid leftist elites and celebrity paedophiles.

Nor was it me, incidentally, who spliced together two parts of Trump's speech to make him sound like he was saying the exact opposite of what he was saying, then broadcast it a few days before the US election.

But recently, when there was a stabbing spree on a terain, you were on this site as quick as you could possibly get here to write about

a psychotic madman is shouting "Allahu Akbar"

And that is all you are here for. You have nothing at all to do with philosophy. Trying to spread hatred of muslims is your only duty. And you only really became a regular here once attofishpi started getting banned for doing the same stuff.

You are a blatant propagandist.

That's simply untrue. I've been a member of ILP first, then here, for *thirteen* years. Anyone who's a member of both will tell you that.