Degree(s); Multivalent Non-Dualism ××××××

[Eodnhoj7]

Update****

By degree there is and what is not remains.

To claim is the measure of a thing, the unfolding of how is what is distinguished as the thing, memory is its sphere.

To see is but the appearance of itself, by degree comes memory.

Claims are original by nature, with measure is the revelation of sight.

Depth is the change of what is up and down, left and right, by revelation does sight become seen.

Knowing is in accords to connection and seperation, connection and seperation is that by which there is degree of claim.

No remnants and yet what is unveils, unfolding is allowance.

A sphere is but its own center when nested.

In accords to the line is there by which appearance becomes justified.

By change claim occurs, by claim the direction of change.

To seperate and connect is but inversion of what is, the ripple by which a structure reveals.

The revelation of the remnant is the memory by which form becomes true.

Cycles of cycles and yet a line is maintained, by direction attention flows.

The degree of a claim is the claim as to the degree, what flows becomes distilled, what is distilled ends as the whole.

By inversion does symmetry become induced and yet patterns remains hidden within itself.

Awareness is true act by which purity of truth is given.

Knowing not is but claim of degree, by the angulature of sight does reality unfold in accords to what is held.

It folds in cycles so that the sphere is but hollow, by what is hollow does form claim emergence.

Inversion is relation of time for how the form is becomes the mode of transformation.

By sight what is known is known as known and yet this knowing is but a shard.

To see is to assert and angle by which the thing is contained within degrees.

Repetition and structure is induced, time is folding of space.

By change there is, what is not ceases only by degree.

Reveal and the angles protrude so that truth becomes an emergence of intensity.

By parts things are, and yet by parts self reference is founded.

To contain is to induce symmetry, to induce symmetry is to unify the layers.

Time is the measure of itself by nature of the change within its space.

Assertion penetrates thought, the opening of thought is the revelation of the container.

Induction of the many is by measure the measurement itself, deduction of the many is by measure measurement nested.

By the unification of layers is there a new part.

What is contained is the act of the container itself.

By time there is repetition, the cessation of time is the cessation of the order emerging.

By the container that which is knowable is known, by the degree it is contained reveals what is lacking in the contained.

To induce is but revelation of what is hidden.

To see in parts necessitates many wholes that are by degree of lack.

Emergence is its own truth and yet truth always emerges.

A group is but one thought from many angles.

Revelation is in accords to the depth of value of that which is aware, value holds little law for it is the only law.

Hidden truths require depths, image remains regardless of the depth.

Absence is universal where a thing is, by measure there becomes what cannot be measured and yet this is the measure.

Know is to emerge from that which it is.

Unity is but the seperation as an other.

By value does space fold for by value there is given weight to the structure of spaces.

Image is the occurence of its own emptiness.

Where a thing is does the potentiality reveal itself as everything else.

"Is" reveals by degree, yet by degree there can only be what is being.

To seperate in accords to measure is a revelation of value.

To claim is but space merging within itself, the absence of knowing is sought as the measure.

Void claims as all things change.

Where there is potentiality comes the act of what appears as an act.

To be is to make by decree, to make by decree is to make by degree.

Revelation requires the hidden void.

Merging voids is how things are in accords to measure.

Change is constant, nothing is cause but the emergence of potential merged upon potential.

Seperation remains and yet by seperation is inverse unity.

Assertions are the only form that is universal, the means by which space comes from itself as within itself.

By absence is revelation valuable, absence is the universal pattern by which a thing is.

Measure measurement and symmetry remains.

By consistency there is a pattern, change allows pattern to be by what it is not; this is a ratio.

Inversion is transformation itself, to transform is too merge sight as the thought.

Value is in accords to what ceases so that things may be.

A universal pattern would appear as nothing, by nothingness is there repetition.

Symmetry in accords to measurement is required only by degree of directed insight.

For a ratio there must be inversion, a ratio is inversion.

Merging of the voids is the emergence of a new degree, sight is maintained but necessity becomes free of itself.

Cessation of cessation is but being as cessation.

Nothing emerges as its own degree of measurement, the point by which a thing becomes.

A container of containers is but a container containing itself thus symmetry is containment.

A thing between things is a thing thus a thing is the ratio by which things are.

Void through void is but void, the absence of absence is but absence.

Through negation is negation negated, by degrees of positive is there a negation of positive.

To reference referencing is but reference, what is contains itself as it is.

Through repetition is there variation, by variation there is contrast that allows repetition to occur.

By potentiality is there actuality as the folding of said potentiality upon itself.

By addition of addition is there subtraction, by the subtraction of subtraction there is addition.

By cycles there is progression, everpresent progression is a cycle of variation.

Symmetry allows for distinction of the thing, by distinction of a thing is the assymetry of what a thing is not.

What is not unfolds what is.

By folding there is transformation and yet the fold is the state of a thing.

A thing merged within itself becomes its opposite, the opposite merged within itself becomes its opposite.

There are only opposites and the opposite of the opposite.

Order is emergence for by emergence is the absence of absence as symmetry.

By change is there structure for change is the emergence and dissolution of structure and yet structure always is.

The static is the medium of change, change is what allows mediation.

Thought within thought is but a new thought of the old.

There is only the same and the sameness of the same.

Chaos is the emergence of what is not, by absence there is infinite potential.

Transformation is the space between spaces and yet space remains as space.

What mediates transforms, the transformed is the mediation of transformations.

By thought there is an emergence, emergence is thought itself.

Chaos and order are interdependent as forms, by forms a relationship emerges.

Forms are fundamentally space, space is transformation.

To mediate is to change, to change is to establish what is maintained.

Emergence is how thought occurs, thought merged within itself is emergence of thought.


Distinction is seperation and connection, seperation and connection are distinct.

By form there is distinction, form is in and of forms.

The establishment of what is maintained is the cessation of what was maintained.

Merging and emergence are mediated by space.

Space is of the senses, space is of the mind, space is between the senses and the mind, the senses and the mind are one by space.

To observe form is for observation to take form.

Forms mediate forms as form and yet all that remains is form.

Space is form, space is the absence of form.

To occur is to transform space.

By degrees there is and is not, by is and is not there is and is not degrees, degrees are but of degrees.

Observation is the form of itself for there is the observation of observation as symmetry by which observation emergences.

By awareness is observation seen as itself, void as but infinite cycles within and without, a cycle seen as nothing.

By limit is there an occurrence, the absence of one limit is the limit to another.

Occurrence is the emergence of boundaries and the dissolution of boundaries, yet this emergence and dissolution is a boundary.

By observation there is form and observation takes form, form is the act of observation itself.

To be aware is to see void, infinite things occur through infinite absence as each thing.

To derive a rule is to derive a process of being, as process of being is but the being.

By emergence and dissolution limits are everpresent, everpresent limits reveal but nothingness within them by which they are to be.

To observe is to be, to be is to observe; being is observation and yet being in is because of limits.

By what a thing is not is what a thing is, infinite absences converge upon a point.

Laws are the formation of processes by degree of insight, to derive as process is to observe as unfolding by degree of directed change.

Pure limit is void, void contains all limits, the emergence of limits is the collapse of void upon void as the emergence.

Observation and being are but the limits of each other as the limits that allow both to occur, observation and being are the limit itself.

By the degree of absence there is what is actual, by the degree of the actual there is what is absent, by the actuality and absence of degrees is the degree as self-folding by inversion.

The emptiness of a limit is what generates limits, by limit is emptiness contained.

The cycling of emptiness is its inversion as the limit, the cycling of limits is its inversion as emptiness; inversion remains.

By awareness is there the knowing of awareness, reflection is how being is structured.

Degrees are absolute as self contained, by the change in direction is a thing emergent, change is what allows degree to be emergent.

Generation is the absence of absence, generation is the potentiality of potentiality, generation is the void of void, generation is recursion.

To invert a thing is to change the act of observation, by inverting observation a thing is changed.

Through repetition there is symmetry, through symmetry there is reflection, through reflection there is order, through order there is as is.

By the direction of change does form occur by degree of that direction.

By repetition there is inversion for by inversion is there the space by which repetition occurs.

The space between observer and observed is the act of change, the space between the observer and observed is the space of the observer and observed.

The nature of "is not" is not as "is", by symmetry does the space occur by which occurence occurs.

The direction of change is the form as the direction of change.

To repeat is to contain, to contain is to be contained by the act of containing.

The observation of observation observes space as observation itself.

The observed is observed as the space of the observed itself.

The nature of nature is but unfolding as the nature.

By direction there is limit for direction is containment.

By symmetry there is the emptiness of said symmetry, the absence of emptiness within symmetry is purely nothingness as perfect symmetry.

The space of observation is the unfolding of observation, the unfolding of observation is but space between space as but space.

By space there is emergence of observation for observation occurs by space.

To contain change is to direct it.

Absence of absence is a cycle as absence.

By unfolding of space does space contain itself.

Change is the emptiness of a limit.

Space is self-evident by the awareness of awareness as this awareness is revealed as space.

To change the container is to contain the change of the container.

The positive of a positive is a progression of absence.

To fold is to give form, to give form is to repeat, to repeat is to fold.

By emptiness does change emerge as the limits of a thing.

Self-evidence is the resonance of patterns between observer and observed.

To contain is to form, to form is to direct, to direct is to change, to change is to reveal the void.

By recursion there is inversion, by inversion there is emergence, by emergence there is recursion.

What is empty is but the potential of further form.

Self-evidence is the revelation of patterns within the self.

A container is that which allows the contain to exist in dimensions.

Form is a container of void, the voiding of void is form.

To invert is to contrast, to contrast is to create a dualism, to create a dualism is to create a paradox, to create a paradox is to create a ratio, to create a ratio is to reason; by paradox there is only reason.

Self-evidence is evidence of a self, evidence of a self is self-reflection, self-reflection is self-recursion by means of inversion.

The cause of one limit is the effect of another, cause is ever present potential contained by the effect of the form that emerges.

By contrast there is what is and what is is not what another thing is.

Self-evidence is the emergence of pattern, emergence of pattern is the dissolution of another pattern.

Emergence and dissolution is inversion and yet inversion repeats.

Cause is everpresent under the effect as everpresent, cause is but the degree of an effect and effect is but degree of the cause.

What "is" "is not" relative to another "is" that "is not" to what "is" and yet regardless of what "is" and "is not" "is" and "is not" underlye all things.

Self-evidence is a distinction of the pattern within an observer, this pattern is beyond true or false as the pattern reveals true and false according to what it aligns with.

For one limit to progress to another limit necessitates a variation and yet the variation of the limit remains as but the limit.

Non-dualism is negation thus non-dualism requires non-non-dualism, unity and multiplicity are interwoven and collapse to the 'degree' itself.

By patterns is a self observed, thus a self is the merging of conditions as conditions merged are but patterns as a new pattern.

The variation of unity is but everpresent unity, the unity of variations is everpresent variation, everpresence is the distinction of unity and variation.

By negation is there a revelation of layers, by affirmation is there the creation of layers.

Layers within layers reveals only layer, within an appearance is an appearance.

To see to to distinguish, to distinguish sight is to see sight.

By unity and multiplicity is there emergence of degree, unity and multiplicity are degrees.

Revelation is a new angle of awareness.

Appearances are layered within, through and of appearance.

The layering of appearances is the appearance of layers.

For that which is within, through and of that there is but cyclical progressive inversion of inversion.

By distinguishing is there occurrence of form, by the occurrence of form there is assertion, by assertion there is distinctinguishing.

To provide degree of observation is to reveal, to reveal is to give observation, observation is revealed as but degree.

Appearance is but layer, layering is the occurrence of dimensions, by dimension there is structure for structure is the repetition of layers and layers are through layers.

The repetition of inversion there is the repetition of change by progression and yet repetition necessitates a structural constant.

Inversion is structure by degree of repetition of it, yet repetition requires inversion if there is to be the space of what is repeated.

Revelation is the occurrence of structure, structure is but the degree of other structures and other structures are but the degree by which a structure is unfolded.

Degree occurs through degree as a degree by the point by which it unfolds as itself and yet self-contained by its own layering.

To cease repetition is to invert one repetition into another and yet what is within the various appearances is but repeated appearances that repeat.

By awareness there is the unfolding of awareness as the space by which emergence and dissolution of it give degree.

The mode of a thing is its direction and this direction is the containment of change by the cycling of it within a given degree.

The repetition of the degree is but a degree within a degree as the repetition is but a degree of another repetition.

Space is everpresent cause where everpresent effect is its unfolding as form thus degree is everpresent as the unfolding form itself for one form is the degree of another, the degree through another, the degree within another.

To be aware is to be empty of pattern for pattern contains awareness this revealing its limits, the absence of one limit is the presence of another.

To repeat is to cycle, to cycle is for form to emerge for form is the repetition of limits and the cycle thus contains itself infinitely within as without through the void from which it emerges.

Cause is emerging conditions merging, the merging of conditions acts as a new cause with corresponding effects, cause and effect are multidimensional linearism.

The emptiness of pattern is the potential of a further patterns, the emptiness of pattern is contained by pattern, perception is a pattern.

Cycles expand and contract, to expand and contract is linear progression or regression, the repetition of expansion and contraction is a cycle.

The relation of conditions is the relationship of relationships as a condition is a set of relationships, a container of transformation by degree of its claim.

Infinite patterns within and without is but void, the perfect pattern contains all patterns as nothing, perfection is a single point.

Progression from one point to another is the cycling of the point as the repetition of the point, a point is the mediation of change from one thing to another.

Conditions are degrees for a distinguished relationship is the angle by which events are observed as changing.

A pure pattern is a point, by recursion of a point is there the distinction of space; the point as all potential patterns observes recursion as the recursion of all potential patterns.

Progression is linear, constant progression is a cycle.

A point is that which mediates change, by change there is distinction, the recursion of mediation is change within change by self-contrast that allows simultaneous symmetry.

The degree by which there is an occurence is the angle by which it forms, by angles of occurence there is structure.

A point is infinite potential patterns, a point is composed of and composing infinite points, the single point is indistinct, many points are distinct, to distinguish is to observe both one and many.

Change is alternation by inversion, alternation is a cycle, inversion is linearism.

Degrees within degrees are angles within angles as conditions within conditions as "within" within "within".


The depth of truth is but the degree by which it appears, the depth of falsity is but the degree by which it appears, the depth of appearance distinguishes truth and falsity.

By claim there is structure of thought, by structure of thought is there the potential to claim.

Depth is the change of a thing by degree of appearance, degree of appearance is but a fractal state.

To claim is for boundaries to occur, the occurence of boundaries is to unfold reality.

By appearance is there form, by form there is a mode of change, by change is appearance reveal for further appearances within the appearance.

Emergence is but distinguished by its cessation, the completion of change is the negation of limits.

To rationalize is to establish ratios, the ratio of "is" and "is not" is everpresent across all that is distinguished; paradox is the emergence of contrast thus form itself.

Space between spaces is but space as self-distinct, self distinction is self-symmetry.

The assumption of an emergence is an emergence of an emergence as assumption emerges, emergences merge within themselves as a new emergence.

If all is assumption than assumptions are assumed thus the claim that alls is assumption it is not accurate.

The distinction of 0 is a single distinction, the distinction of 1 distinction is 2 distinctions, he distinction of 2 distinctions is a third as a fourth as a finite unto infinity; the distinction of the infinite is a single distinction.

The distinction of 1 as 2 distinctions, 1 and the distinction of 1 as 1, results in the distinction 2 and 1 and the distinction of the space between 1 and 2 as negative 1 with simultaneous infinite fractions as but the fractal space itself as 1/n multiplied by n/1.

///////////

The recursion of an emergence are but the absence of emergence emerging between emergences as but an inversion;

by inversion there is contrast as a dualism with containment of the contrast by recursion;

by containment there is a degree as context and self referentiality of the container through the contained;

by context there is the emergence of further recursion where self-referential fractals result as contexts with context;

by context there is relation and by relation the emergence of cause as the context itself where effect is further context as further cause;

by causality there is recursion so that cause is repetition as symmetry, and yet by degree one cause is the effect of another as the recursion of causality is a modality by degree;

by modality there is degree and by degree there are relations merging as much a new emergence, modality thus inverts into its dualistic opposite so to be distinction;

the recursion of modality is the recursion of cause and effect as but self containment of its inversion so that distinction is a fractal state among all emergences;

by distinction there is dualism and by dualism there is paradox and paradox there are ratios, ratios depend upon relation;

by ratio there is paradox and the contrast of paradox is contradiction and regardless emergence of degree remains;

the paradox of contradiction is that the contradiction requires paradox so to be contradiction;

the contradiction of paradox is that the paradox contains contradiction so to be paradox;

degree is but paradox for the part contains the whole and yet the whole exists because of parts, degree is but the context of observation;

the observation of degree is the observation of context, context is what allows observation to emerge;

observation is but a context of itself as the context which emerge from observation are contained by observation.

True and false are patterns in accords to values, their fundamental nature is that of a claim for the nature of a claim is that of a limit or boundary.

To percieve is to distinguish patterns, patterns are cycles of limits, to percieve is but a cycle, perception of perception is the cycle within cycles.

A cycle is the repetition of a limit, a limit is a cycle of a point, a point is infinite cycles within and without as void, void is the potentiality of cycles, potentiality of potentiality is the cycle as actuality.

True and false are claims, the truth or falsity of a claim is a claim within itself, only emergence remains.

The emergence of truth is true, the emergence of falsity is true, emergence remains.

Repetition is the cycle of a limit that is directed linearly.

What is considered true and false are but degrees of patterns, claims underlie truth and falsity but claims are the establishment of patterns.

To distinguish is to observe, truth value is grounded in distinguishing, by distinguishing there is identity.

Identity is the emergence of relation, a relation requires a space of what is and a space of what is not so that a relation can occur.

Identity is dualism, dualism is the inversion of is and is not, by inversion there is limit, limit is recursive, Identity is recursive inversion limits.

By the limit of a thing is the grade of another, "what is" is the grade of "what is not" and "what is not" is a grade of "what is".

By Dualism there is gradation of emergence, by emergence is the limit as dualistic.

Recursive dualism is recursive inversion, recursive inversion is the recursive space by which there is process.

By process what is occurs through what is not, what is not is contained by what is, process reveals gradation of what is and what is not.

Gradation is recursion, gradation is degrees, the recursion of a thing is the emergence of degrees, as a thing repeats so does it occur by gradation.

A unity changes by degrees and yet is maintained as a unity for by a degree there is a unity yet by said degrees is the unity as many but self contained.

For a degree to occur a unity is emergent but a degree is but one of many, as it requires relations, thus the unity of the degree occurs through its inversion as the many.

Many degrees are but the degree as self contained as many degrees are but an everpresent one degree, each degree is but one contained by the other thus one is contained by one.

Degree is but a limit of how a thing unfolds, the direction by which it unfolds is how it is a unity.

The recursion of degrees is the recursion of a unity as but many, through gradation, and yet the recursion is but a degree by which the unity is self-contained.

Measurement is always by degree, measurement is the act of observation by the emergence and dissolution of limits.


+++++++

The point is indistinct in itself, distinct by recursion, this distinction is its self contrast that induces self symmetry through repetition further by said degree of relation as self contained by said repetition;

as the point is its own foundation that contains its own space that allows said distinction of itself from itself and yet as itself, thus is its own condition by degree of modal self contrast that defines itself where the repetition is structure and its inversion is what it is not as indistinct unity and yet its multiplicity is self-reference as its own containment;

the relation of points is but the space by which it is is own fractal, as each distinction of points is but a fractal space that allows unity within distinction of non-unity, that emerges through its inversion from one to many and many to one;

by the recursion of the point is its distinction as the relation by space itself by emergence as self-folding where the point provides its own conditions as a thing in itself as everpresent distinction by degree of space emergent;

the distinction of said space is the emergence of awareness as the distinction of the point itself for by awareness is distinction as itself;

the point is but infinite patterns as points yet but one thus contains its own self contrast as revealed to be void given infinite patterns within patterns is but a single indistinct point. The recursion of the point is its inversion through containment within itself thus the distinction of context is but itself through relative degree of its recursion, distinction of the point is but what it is not as unity and yet the unity of the point is pure distinction;

a point is but a degree of itself as its recursion results in repetition thus a gradation of unity, the multiple distinctions of the point is but its own relation as distinction remains transcendent across multiplicity as a multivalent unity;

the distinction of the point is but generation of the point by degree of recursion through self-inversion as unity to multiplicity and multiplicity to unity where unity and multiplicity is but degree of self-relation through inversive self-contrast as both its own distinction and the distinction of relationship from which modality occurs;

By the distinction of a point as its own emergence through multiplicity by which a single point is distinct comes relationship by which it occurs in fractal degrees within said relationship by degree of each point within the continuum being a gradation of itself through a division that multiplies and a multiplication that is a division as many points are but the simultaneously division and multiplication of it;

By gradation of the point is there a continuum that effectively results in dimensionality by direction, gradation is change and said change is directed where the direction is determined by the relationship of one point as many, repetition is unity and multiplicity as a multivalent non-dualism;

through gradation there is modality as each relationship, as a set of points, is a fractal within the continuum of points thus modality is recursive as fractal states, through sets of points within sets of points, where each state is but the self relation of the point as both a part and whole by degree of the repetition of said self contained relationships;

Modality is recursive and by recursion is the modality both a cause and effect of other modalities where a set of modalities is a relative modality and a relative continuum that unfolds both, in these respect a modal continuum occurs as both generated and generative of the distinction of the point;
+++++++

[Impenitent]

Fahrenheit was right here

-Imp

[Eodnhoj7]

Updated****

By degree there is and what is not remains.

To claim is the measure of a thing, the unfolding of how is what is distinguished as the thing, memory is its sphere.

To see is but the appearance of itself, by degree comes memory.

Claims are original by nature, with measure is the revelation of sight.

Depth is the change of what is up and down, left and right, by revelation does sight become seen.

Knowing is in accords to connection and seperation, connection and seperation is that by which there is degree of claim.

No remnants and yet what is unveils, unfolding is allowance.

A sphere is but its own center when nested.

In accords to the line is there by which appearance becomes justified.

By change claim occurs, by claim the direction of change.

To seperate and connect is but inversion of what is, the ripple by which a structure reveals.

The revelation of the remnant is the memory by which form becomes true.

Cycles of cycles and yet a line is maintained, by direction attention flows.

The degree of a claim is the claim as to the degree, what flows becomes distilled, what is distilled ends as the whole.

By inversion does symmetry become induced and yet patterns remains hidden within itself.

Awareness is true act by which purity of truth is given.

Knowing not is but claim of degree, by the angulature of sight does reality unfold in accords to what is held.

It folds in cycles so that the sphere is but hollow, by what is hollow does form claim emergence.

Inversion is relation of time for how the form is becomes the mode of transformation.

By sight what is known is known as known and yet this knowing is but a shard.

To see is to assert and angle by which the thing is contained within degrees.

Repetition and structure is induced, time is folding of space.

By change there is, what is not ceases only by degree.

Reveal and the angles protrude so that truth becomes an emergence of intensity.

By parts things are, and yet by parts self reference is founded.

To contain is to induce symmetry, to induce symmetry is to unify the layers.

Time is the measure of itself by nature of the change within its space.

Assertion penetrates thought, the opening of thought is the revelation of the container.

Induction of the many is by measure the measurement itself, deduction of the many is by measure measurement nested.

By the unification of layers is there a new part.

What is contained is the act of the container itself.

By time there is repetition, the cessation of time is the cessation of the order emerging.

By the container that which is knowable is known, by the degree it is contained reveals what is lacking in the contained.

To induce is but revelation of what is hidden.

To see in parts necessitates many wholes that are by degree of lack.

Emergence is its own truth and yet truth always emerges.

A group is but one thought from many angles.

Revelation is in accords to the depth of value of that which is aware, value holds little law for it is the only law.

Hidden truths require depths, image remains regardless of the depth.

Absence is universal where a thing is, by measure there becomes what cannot be measured and yet this is the measure.

Know is to emerge from that which it is.

Unity is but the seperation as an other.

By value does space fold for by value there is given weight to the structure of spaces.

Image is the occurence of its own emptiness.

Where a thing is does the potentiality reveal itself as everything else.

"Is" reveals by degree, yet by degree there can only be what is being.

To seperate in accords to measure is a revelation of value.

To claim is but space merging within itself, the absence of knowing is sought as the measure.

Void claims as all things change.

Where there is potentiality comes the act of what appears as an act.

To be is to make by decree, to make by decree is to make by degree.

Revelation requires the hidden void.

Merging voids is how things are in accords to measure.

Change is constant, nothing is cause but the emergence of potential merged upon potential.

Seperation remains and yet by seperation is inverse unity.

Assertions are the only form that is universal, the means by which space comes from itself as within itself.

By absence is revelation valuable, absence is the universal pattern by which a thing is.

Measure measurement and symmetry remains.

By consistency there is a pattern, change allows pattern to be by what it is not; this is a ratio.

Inversion is transformation itself, to transform is too merge sight as the thought.

Value is in accords to what ceases so that things may be.

A universal pattern would appear as nothing, by nothingness is there repetition.

Symmetry in accords to measurement is required only by degree of directed insight.

For a ratio there must be inversion, a ratio is inversion.

Merging of the voids is the emergence of a new degree, sight is maintained but necessity becomes free of itself.

Cessation of cessation is but being as cessation.

Nothing emerges as its own degree of measurement, the point by which a thing becomes.

A container of containers is but a container containing itself thus symmetry is containment.

A thing between things is a thing thus a thing is the ratio by which things are.

Void through void is but void, the absence of absence is but absence.

Through negation is negation negated, by degrees of positive is there a negation of positive.

To reference referencing is but reference, what is contains itself as it is.

Through repetition is there variation, by variation there is contrast that allows repetition to occur.

By potentiality is there actuality as the folding of said potentiality upon itself.

By addition of addition is there subtraction, by the subtraction of subtraction there is addition.

By cycles there is progression, everpresent progression is a cycle of variation.

Symmetry allows for distinction of the thing, by distinction of a thing is the assymetry of what a thing is not.

What is not unfolds what is.

By folding there is transformation and yet the fold is the state of a thing.

A thing merged within itself becomes its opposite, the opposite merged within itself becomes its opposite.

There are only opposites and the opposite of the opposite.

Order is emergence for by emergence is the absence of absence as symmetry.

By change is there structure for change is the emergence and dissolution of structure and yet structure always is.

The static is the medium of change, change is what allows mediation.

Thought within thought is but a new thought of the old.

There is only the same and the sameness of the same.

Chaos is the emergence of what is not, by absence there is infinite potential.

Transformation is the space between spaces and yet space remains as space.

What mediates transforms, the transformed is the mediation of transformations.

By thought there is an emergence, emergence is thought itself.

Chaos and order are interdependent as forms, by forms a relationship emerges.

Forms are fundamentally space, space is transformation.

To mediate is to change, to change is to establish what is maintained.

Emergence is how thought occurs, thought merged within itself is emergence of thought.


Distinction is seperation and connection, seperation and connection are distinct.

By form there is distinction, form is in and of forms.

The establishment of what is maintained is the cessation of what was maintained.

Merging and emergence are mediated by space.

Space is of the senses, space is of the mind, space is between the senses and the mind, the senses and the mind are one by space.

To observe form is for observation to take form.

Forms mediate forms as form and yet all that remains is form.

Space is form, space is the absence of form.

To occur is to transform space.

By degrees there is and is not, by is and is not there is and is not degrees, degrees are but of degrees.

Observation is the form of itself for there is the observation of observation as symmetry by which observation emergences.

By awareness is observation seen as itself, void as but infinite cycles within and without, a cycle seen as nothing.

By limit is there an occurrence, the absence of one limit is the limit to another.

Occurrence is the emergence of boundaries and the dissolution of boundaries, yet this emergence and dissolution is a boundary.

By observation there is form and observation takes form, form is the act of observation itself.

To be aware is to see void, infinite things occur through infinite absence as each thing.

To derive a rule is to derive a process of being, as process of being is but the being.

By emergence and dissolution limits are everpresent, everpresent limits reveal but nothingness within them by which they are to be.

To observe is to be, to be is to observe; being is observation and yet being in is because of limits.

By what a thing is not is what a thing is, infinite absences converge upon a point.

Laws are the formation of processes by degree of insight, to derive as process is to observe as unfolding by degree of directed change.

Pure limit is void, void contains all limits, the emergence of limits is the collapse of void upon void as the emergence.

Observation and being are but the limits of each other as the limits that allow both to occur, observation and being are the limit itself.

By the degree of absence there is what is actual, by the degree of the actual there is what is absent, by the actuality and absence of degrees is the degree as self-folding by inversion.

The emptiness of a limit is what generates limits, by limit is emptiness contained.

The cycling of emptiness is its inversion as the limit, the cycling of limits is its inversion as emptiness; inversion remains.

By awareness is there the knowing of awareness, reflection is how being is structured.

Degrees are absolute as self contained, by the change in direction is a thing emergent, change is what allows degree to be emergent.

Generation is the absence of absence, generation is the potentiality of potentiality, generation is the void of void, generation is recursion.

To invert a thing is to change the act of observation, by inverting observation a thing is changed.

Through repetition there is symmetry, through symmetry there is reflection, through reflection there is order, through order there is as is.

By the direction of change does form occur by degree of that direction.

By repetition there is inversion for by inversion is there the space by which repetition occurs.

The space between observer and observed is the act of change, the space between the observer and observed is the space of the observer and observed.

The nature of "is not" is not as "is", by symmetry does the space occur by which occurence occurs.

The direction of change is the form as the direction of change.

To repeat is to contain, to contain is to be contained by the act of containing.

The observation of observation observes space as observation itself.

The observed is observed as the space of the observed itself.

The nature of nature is but unfolding as the nature.

By direction there is limit for direction is containment.

By symmetry there is the emptiness of said symmetry, the absence of emptiness within symmetry is purely nothingness as perfect symmetry.

The space of observation is the unfolding of observation, the unfolding of observation is but space between space as but space.

By space there is emergence of observation for observation occurs by space.

To contain change is to direct it.

Absence of absence is a cycle as absence.

By unfolding of space does space contain itself.

Change is the emptiness of a limit.

Space is self-evident by the awareness of awareness as this awareness is revealed as space.

To change the container is to contain the change of the container.

The positive of a positive is a progression of absence.

To fold is to give form, to give form is to repeat, to repeat is to fold.

By emptiness does change emerge as the limits of a thing.

Self-evidence is the resonance of patterns between observer and observed.

To contain is to form, to form is to direct, to direct is to change, to change is to reveal the void.

By recursion there is inversion, by inversion there is emergence, by emergence there is recursion.

What is empty is but the potential of further form.

Self-evidence is the revelation of patterns within the self.

A container is that which allows the contain to exist in dimensions.

Form is a container of void, the voiding of void is form.

To invert is to contrast, to contrast is to create a dualism, to create a dualism is to create a paradox, to create a paradox is to create a ratio, to create a ratio is to reason; by paradox there is only reason.

Self-evidence is evidence of a self, evidence of a self is self-reflection, self-reflection is self-recursion by means of inversion.

The cause of one limit is the effect of another, cause is ever present potential contained by the effect of the form that emerges.

By contrast there is what is and what is is not what another thing is.

Self-evidence is the emergence of pattern, emergence of pattern is the dissolution of another pattern.

Emergence and dissolution is inversion and yet inversion repeats.

Cause is everpresent under the effect as everpresent, cause is but the degree of an effect and effect is but degree of the cause.

What "is" "is not" relative to another "is" that "is not" to what "is" and yet regardless of what "is" and "is not" "is" and "is not" underlye all things.

Self-evidence is a distinction of the pattern within an observer, this pattern is beyond true or false as the pattern reveals true and false according to what it aligns with.

For one limit to progress to another limit necessitates a variation and yet the variation of the limit remains as but the limit.

Non-dualism is negation thus non-dualism requires non-non-dualism, unity and multiplicity are interwoven and collapse to the 'degree' itself.

By patterns is a self observed, thus a self is the merging of conditions as conditions merged are but patterns as a new pattern.

The variation of unity is but everpresent unity, the unity of variations is everpresent variation, everpresence is the distinction of unity and variation.

By negation is there a revelation of layers, by affirmation is there the creation of layers.

Layers within layers reveals only layer, within an appearance is an appearance.

To see to to distinguish, to distinguish sight is to see sight.

By unity and multiplicity is there emergence of degree, unity and multiplicity are degrees.

Revelation is a new angle of awareness.

Appearances are layered within, through and of appearance.

The layering of appearances is the appearance of layers.

For that which is within, through and of that there is but cyclical progressive inversion of inversion.

By distinguishing is there occurrence of form, by the occurrence of form there is assertion, by assertion there is distinctinguishing.

To provide degree of observation is to reveal, to reveal is to give observation, observation is revealed as but degree.

Appearance is but layer, layering is the occurrence of dimensions, by dimension there is structure for structure is the repetition of layers and layers are through layers.

The repetition of inversion there is the repetition of change by progression and yet repetition necessitates a structural constant.

Inversion is structure by degree of repetition of it, yet repetition requires inversion if there is to be the space of what is repeated.

Revelation is the occurrence of structure, structure is but the degree of other structures and other structures are but the degree by which a structure is unfolded.

Degree occurs through degree as a degree by the point by which it unfolds as itself and yet self-contained by its own layering.

To cease repetition is to invert one repetition into another and yet what is within the various appearances is but repeated appearances that repeat.

By awareness there is the unfolding of awareness as the space by which emergence and dissolution of it give degree.

The mode of a thing is its direction and this direction is the containment of change by the cycling of it within a given degree.

The repetition of the degree is but a degree within a degree as the repetition is but a degree of another repetition.

Space is everpresent cause where everpresent effect is its unfolding as form thus degree is everpresent as the unfolding form itself for one form is the degree of another, the degree through another, the degree within another.

To be aware is to be empty of pattern for pattern contains awareness this revealing its limits, the absence of one limit is the presence of another.

To repeat is to cycle, to cycle is for form to emerge for form is the repetition of limits and the cycle thus contains itself infinitely within as without through the void from which it emerges.

Cause is emerging conditions merging, the merging of conditions acts as a new cause with corresponding effects, cause and effect are multidimensional linearism.

The emptiness of pattern is the potential of a further patterns, the emptiness of pattern is contained by pattern, perception is a pattern.

Cycles expand and contract, to expand and contract is linear progression or regression, the repetition of expansion and contraction is a cycle.

The relation of conditions is the relationship of relationships as a condition is a set of relationships, a container of transformation by degree of its claim.

Infinite patterns within and without is but void, the perfect pattern contains all patterns as nothing, perfection is a single point.

Progression from one point to another is the cycling of the point as the repetition of the point, a point is the mediation of change from one thing to another.

Conditions are degrees for a distinguished relationship is the angle by which events are observed as changing.

A pure pattern is a point, by recursion of a point is there the distinction of space; the point as all potential patterns observes recursion as the recursion of all potential patterns.

Progression is linear, constant progression is a cycle.

A point is that which mediates change, by change there is distinction, the recursion of mediation is change within change by self-contrast that allows simultaneous symmetry.

The degree by which there is an occurence is the angle by which it forms, by angles of occurence there is structure.

A point is infinite potential patterns, a point is composed of and composing infinite points, the single point is indistinct, many points are distinct, to distinguish is to observe both one and many.

Change is alternation by inversion, alternation is a cycle, inversion is linearism.

Degrees within degrees are angles within angles as conditions within conditions as "within" within "within".


The depth of truth is but the degree by which it appears, the depth of falsity is but the degree by which it appears, the depth of appearance distinguishes truth and falsity.

By claim there is structure of thought, by structure of thought is there the potential to claim.

Depth is the change of a thing by degree of appearance, degree of appearance is but a fractal state.

To claim is for boundaries to occur, the occurence of boundaries is to unfold reality.

By appearance is there form, by form there is a mode of change, by change is appearance reveal for further appearances within the appearance.

Emergence is but distinguished by its cessation, the completion of change is the negation of limits.

To rationalize is to establish ratios, the ratio of "is" and "is not" is everpresent across all that is distinguished; paradox is the emergence of contrast thus form itself.

Space between spaces is but space as self-distinct, self distinction is self-symmetry.

The assumption of an emergence is an emergence of an emergence as assumption emerges, emergences merge within themselves as a new emergence.

If all is assumption than assumptions are assumed thus the claim that alls is assumption it is not accurate.

The distinction of 0 is a single distinction, the distinction of 1 distinction is 2 distinctions, he distinction of 2 distinctions is a third as a fourth as a finite unto infinity; the distinction of the infinite is a single distinction.

The distinction of 1 as 2 distinctions, 1 and the distinction of 1 as 1, results in the distinction 2 and 1 and the distinction of the space between 1 and 2 as negative 1 with simultaneous infinite fractions as but the fractal space itself as 1/n multiplied by n/1.

///////////

The recursion of an emergence are but the absence of emergence emerging between emergences as but an inversion;

by inversion there is contrast as a dualism with containment of the contrast by recursion;

by containment there is a degree as context and self referentiality of the container through the contained;

by context there is the emergence of further recursion where self-referential fractals result as contexts with context;

by context there is relation and by relation the emergence of cause as the context itself where effect is further context as further cause;

by causality there is recursion so that cause is repetition as symmetry, and yet by degree one cause is the effect of another as the recursion of causality is a modality by degree;

by modality there is degree and by degree there are relations merging as much a new emergence, modality thus inverts into its dualistic opposite so to be distinction;

the recursion of modality is the recursion of cause and effect as but self containment of its inversion so that distinction is a fractal state among all emergences;

by distinction there is dualism and by dualism there is paradox and paradox there are ratios, ratios depend upon relation;

by ratio there is paradox and the contrast of paradox is contradiction and regardless emergence of degree remains;

the paradox of contradiction is that the contradiction requires paradox so to be contradiction;

the contradiction of paradox is that the paradox contains contradiction so to be paradox;

degree is but paradox for the part contains the whole and yet the whole exists because of parts, degree is but the context of observation;

the observation of degree is the observation of context, context is what allows observation to emerge;

observation is but a context of itself as the context which emerge from observation are contained by observation.

True and false are patterns in accords to values, their fundamental nature is that of a claim for the nature of a claim is that of a limit or boundary.

To percieve is to distinguish patterns, patterns are cycles of limits, to percieve is but a cycle, perception of perception is the cycle within cycles.

A cycle is the repetition of a limit, a limit is a cycle of a point, a point is infinite cycles within and without as void, void is the potentiality of cycles, potentiality of potentiality is the cycle as actuality.

True and false are claims, the truth or falsity of a claim is a claim within itself, only emergence remains.

The emergence of truth is true, the emergence of falsity is true, emergence remains.

Repetition is the cycle of a limit that is directed linearly.

What is considered true and false are but degrees of patterns, claims underlie truth and falsity but claims are the establishment of patterns.

To distinguish is to observe, truth value is grounded in distinguishing, by distinguishing there is identity.

Identity is the emergence of relation, a relation requires a space of what is and a space of what is not so that a relation can occur.

Identity is dualism, dualism is the inversion of is and is not, by inversion there is limit, limit is recursive, Identity is recursive inversion limits.

By the limit of a thing is the grade of another, "what is" is the grade of "what is not" and "what is not" is a grade of "what is".

By Dualism there is gradation of emergence, by emergence is the limit as dualistic.

Recursive dualism is recursive inversion, recursive inversion is the recursive space by which there is process.

By process what is occurs through what is not, what is not is contained by what is, process reveals gradation of what is and what is not.

Gradation is recursion, gradation is degrees, the recursion of a thing is the emergence of degrees, as a thing repeats so does it occur by gradation.

A unity changes by degrees and yet is maintained as a unity for by a degree there is a unity yet by said degrees is the unity as many but self contained.

For a degree to occur a unity is emergent but a degree is but one of many, as it requires relations, thus the unity of the degree occurs through its inversion as the many.

Many degrees are but the degree as self contained as many degrees are but an everpresent one degree, each degree is but one contained by the other thus one is contained by one.

Degree is but a limit of how a thing unfolds, the direction by which it unfolds is how it is a unity.

The recursion of degrees is the recursion of a unity as but many, through gradation, and yet the recursion is but a degree by which the unity is self-contained.

Measurement is always by degree, measurement is the act of observation by the emergence and dissolution of limits.


+++++++

The point is indistinct in itself, distinct by recursion, this distinction is its self contrast that induces self symmetry through repetition further by said degree of relation as self contained by said repetition;

as the point is its own foundation that contains its own space that allows said distinction of itself from itself and yet as itself, thus is its own condition by degree of modal self contrast that defines itself where the repetition is structure and its inversion is what it is not as indistinct unity and yet its multiplicity is self-reference as its own containment;

the relation of points is but the space by which it is is own fractal, as each distinction of points is but a fractal space that allows unity within distinction of non-unity, that emerges through its inversion from one to many and many to one;

by the recursion of the point is its distinction as the relation by space itself by emergence as self-folding where the point provides its own conditions as a thing in itself as everpresent distinction by degree of space emergent;

the distinction of said space is the emergence of awareness as the distinction of the point itself for by awareness is distinction as itself;

the point is but infinite patterns as points yet but one thus contains its own self contrast as revealed to be void given infinite patterns within patterns is but a single indistinct point. The recursion of the point is its inversion through containment within itself thus the distinction of context is but itself through relative degree of its recursion, distinction of the point is but what it is not as unity and yet the unity of the point is pure distinction;

a point is but a degree of itself as its recursion results in repetition thus a gradation of unity, the multiple distinctions of the point is but its own relation as distinction remains transcendent across multiplicity as a multivalent unity;

the distinction of the point is but generation of the point by degree of recursion through self-inversion as unity to multiplicity and multiplicity to unity where unity and multiplicity is but degree of self-relation through inversive self-contrast as both its own distinction and the distinction of relationship from which modality occurs;

By the distinction of a point as its own emergence through multiplicity by which a single point is distinct comes relationship by which it occurs in fractal degrees within said relationship by degree of each point within the continuum being a gradation of itself through a division that multiplies and a multiplication that is a division as many points are but the simultaneously division and multiplication of it;

By gradation of the point is there a continuum that effectively results in dimensionality by direction, gradation is change and said change is directed where the direction is determined by the relationship of one point as many, repetition is unity and multiplicity as a multivalent non-dualism;

through gradation there is modality as each relationship, as a set of points, is a fractal within the continuum of points thus modality is recursive as fractal states, through sets of points within sets of points, where each state is but the self relation of the point as both a part and whole by degree of the repetition of said self contained relationships;

Modality is recursive and by recursion is the modality both a cause and effect of other modalities where a set of modalities is a relative modality and a relative continuum that unfolds both, in these respect a modal continuum occurs as both generated and generative of the distinction of the point;

By degree of relation of points does space occur as recursive modal point sets as a continuum where space is continuity of points by which space is but a point continuously occuring as recursion;

the gradation of a point is but its entropy, yet by entropy does the point multiply infinitely unto a collapse unto infinity as a unity where a single point emerges as but its own infinite merging;

the gradation of the point, by recursion, is its reflextivity by self reflection from which the space of itself emerges through self containment, through degree of the point as but sets of points does its own self-context occur as nested sets by nature of relationships of points;

the repetition of the point, and the repetition of sets of points as fractal degrees conducive to modalities, is but internal self contained symmetry as repetition is symmetry;

recursive modal sets is but a higher self symmetry of the point thus modal sets are reflected across modal sets where the symmetry occurs as emergence of said modal sets by degree of the continuum from which a transformation of modal sets occurs by inversely becoming a new modal set;

the finiteness of said modal sets within modal sets is but change relative to other modal sets, by degree of a continuum of transformations relative to others, thus temporality emerges;

by temporality does the modal set become a fraction of another modal set thus probability as ratios of actual to potential continuums;

this distinction of probability is but the modal set of but an information node as information is rationality by degree of emerging and dissolving ratios;

the modal set is an operator by degree of being a relative point from which recursion emerges and dissolves, this emergence and dissolution is self modification of the modal set as the point through point as points thus the point operates as a multivalent non-dualistic process;

the multivalent non-dual process of the point relegates the distinction of the point as the distinction of progress itself, thus the point is not a fixed entity but rather a process of emergence and dissolution embedded within its own process as distinct;

the collapse of the point is what allows the point to be distinct and non-local as emergence and dissolution occurs across all modal sets of the point as ever present cause and effect where said modal set is but a fractal ratio of itself that allows self-contrast to occur across multiple dimensions simultaneously;

the modal sets of points are but the comparison of other modal sets by which the expansion and contraction of space occurs relative to other sets, by the modal set being a gradation of the point through a continuum does space occur and yet one space relative to another, as one modal set relative to another, results in a relative hierarchical size of modal sets by degree of contrast thus notions of hierarchical size effectively are reduced to spatial contrasts that inevitably are but degrees; the hierarchical size of what is distinct is but the self-distinction of the point thus hierarchy is not just composed of degree it is a degree where the only distinction of it is multivalent nondualistic process;

the point as a distinction multivalent non-dualisitic process is but a degree itself as multivalent non-dual process is but a degree and yet by degree distinction is ever present as emerging and dissolving degrees with emergence and dissolution being but degrees, multivalent non-dualism is but self-contained degree and yet by degree there is multivalent non-dualism as distinct process;

the point is awareness unfolded upon itself as the black-light for the awareness of awareness reveals black nothingness and yet the distinction is light itself for the distinction of nothingness is distinction as somethingness and the absence of light is the distinction of absence as light;

light and dark are but unfolding degrees by which each is but the point of the other by degree of observation for light and dark are distinctions of degree where observation is but self-folding degree;

Awareness is but an indistinct point until directed upon itself and become a distinct point as aware is but a point and the awareness of awareness is another point as the self-distinction of it, the evidence of this is the distinction of awareness of awareness being recursive void;

Awareness of an object is but awareness of limits which are composed of points as awareness focuses upon a point of the object from which the object unfolds as further relative points as the limits of the object itself, this is point recursion;

Awareness of objects is the awareness of a set that is the focal point from which object emerge and dissolve, change is the recursion of certain limits, within limits that emergence and dissolve from void, this void is the everpresent self contained point;

[Eodnhoj7]

pdated****

By degree there is and what is not remains.

To claim is the measure of a thing, the unfolding of how is what is distinguished as the thing, memory is its sphere.

To see is but the appearance of itself, by degree comes memory.

Claims are original by nature, with measure is the revelation of sight.

Depth is the change of what is up and down, left and right, by revelation does sight become seen.

Knowing is in accords to connection and seperation, connection and seperation is that by which there is degree of claim.

No remnants and yet what is unveils, unfolding is allowance.

A sphere is but its own center when nested.

In accords to the line is there by which appearance becomes justified.

By change claim occurs, by claim the direction of change.

To seperate and connect is but inversion of what is, the ripple by which a structure reveals.

The revelation of the remnant is the memory by which form becomes true.

Cycles of cycles and yet a line is maintained, by direction attention flows.

The degree of a claim is the claim as to the degree, what flows becomes distilled, what is distilled ends as the whole.

By inversion does symmetry become induced and yet patterns remains hidden within itself.

Awareness is true act by which purity of truth is given.

Knowing not is but claim of degree, by the angulature of sight does reality unfold in accords to what is held.

It folds in cycles so that the sphere is but hollow, by what is hollow does form claim emergence.

Inversion is relation of time for how the form is becomes the mode of transformation.

By sight what is known is known as known and yet this knowing is but a shard.

To see is to assert and angle by which the thing is contained within degrees.

Repetition and structure is induced, time is folding of space.

By change there is, what is not ceases only by degree.

Reveal and the angles protrude so that truth becomes an emergence of intensity.

By parts things are, and yet by parts self reference is founded.

To contain is to induce symmetry, to induce symmetry is to unify the layers.

Time is the measure of itself by nature of the change within its space.

Assertion penetrates thought, the opening of thought is the revelation of the container.

Induction of the many is by measure the measurement itself, deduction of the many is by measure measurement nested.

By the unification of layers is there a new part.

What is contained is the act of the container itself.

By time there is repetition, the cessation of time is the cessation of the order emerging.

By the container that which is knowable is known, by the degree it is contained reveals what is lacking in the contained.

To induce is but revelation of what is hidden.

To see in parts necessitates many wholes that are by degree of lack.

Emergence is its own truth and yet truth always emerges.

A group is but one thought from many angles.

Revelation is in accords to the depth of value of that which is aware, value holds little law for it is the only law.

Hidden truths require depths, image remains regardless of the depth.

Absence is universal where a thing is, by measure there becomes what cannot be measured and yet this is the measure.

Know is to emerge from that which it is.

Unity is but the seperation as an other.

By value does space fold for by value there is given weight to the structure of spaces.

Image is the occurence of its own emptiness.

Where a thing is does the potentiality reveal itself as everything else.

"Is" reveals by degree, yet by degree there can only be what is being.

To seperate in accords to measure is a revelation of value.

To claim is but space merging within itself, the absence of knowing is sought as the measure.

Void claims as all things change.

Where there is potentiality comes the act of what appears as an act.

To be is to make by decree, to make by decree is to make by degree.

Revelation requires the hidden void.

Merging voids is how things are in accords to measure.

Change is constant, nothing is cause but the emergence of potential merged upon potential.

Seperation remains and yet by seperation is inverse unity.

Assertions are the only form that is universal, the means by which space comes from itself as within itself.

By absence is revelation valuable, absence is the universal pattern by which a thing is.

Measure measurement and symmetry remains.

By consistency there is a pattern, change allows pattern to be by what it is not; this is a ratio.

Inversion is transformation itself, to transform is too merge sight as the thought.

Value is in accords to what ceases so that things may be.

A universal pattern would appear as nothing, by nothingness is there repetition.

Symmetry in accords to measurement is required only by degree of directed insight.

For a ratio there must be inversion, a ratio is inversion.

Merging of the voids is the emergence of a new degree, sight is maintained but necessity becomes free of itself.

Cessation of cessation is but being as cessation.

Nothing emerges as its own degree of measurement, the point by which a thing becomes.

A container of containers is but a container containing itself thus symmetry is containment.

A thing between things is a thing thus a thing is the ratio by which things are.

Void through void is but void, the absence of absence is but absence.

Through negation is negation negated, by degrees of positive is there a negation of positive.

To reference referencing is but reference, what is contains itself as it is.

Through repetition is there variation, by variation there is contrast that allows repetition to occur.

By potentiality is there actuality as the folding of said potentiality upon itself.

By addition of addition is there subtraction, by the subtraction of subtraction there is addition.

By cycles there is progression, everpresent progression is a cycle of variation.

Symmetry allows for distinction of the thing, by distinction of a thing is the assymetry of what a thing is not.

What is not unfolds what is.

By folding there is transformation and yet the fold is the state of a thing.

A thing merged within itself becomes its opposite, the opposite merged within itself becomes its opposite.

There are only opposites and the opposite of the opposite.

Order is emergence for by emergence is the absence of absence as symmetry.

By change is there structure for change is the emergence and dissolution of structure and yet structure always is.

The static is the medium of change, change is what allows mediation.

Thought within thought is but a new thought of the old.

There is only the same and the sameness of the same.

Chaos is the emergence of what is not, by absence there is infinite potential.

Transformation is the space between spaces and yet space remains as space.

What mediates transforms, the transformed is the mediation of transformations.

By thought there is an emergence, emergence is thought itself.

Chaos and order are interdependent as forms, by forms a relationship emerges.

Forms are fundamentally space, space is transformation.

To mediate is to change, to change is to establish what is maintained.

Emergence is how thought occurs, thought merged within itself is emergence of thought.


Distinction is seperation and connection, seperation and connection are distinct.

By form there is distinction, form is in and of forms.

The establishment of what is maintained is the cessation of what was maintained.

Merging and emergence are mediated by space.

Space is of the senses, space is of the mind, space is between the senses and the mind, the senses and the mind are one by space.

To observe form is for observation to take form.

Forms mediate forms as form and yet all that remains is form.

Space is form, space is the absence of form.

To occur is to transform space.

By degrees there is and is not, by is and is not there is and is not degrees, degrees are but of degrees.

Observation is the form of itself for there is the observation of observation as symmetry by which observation emergences.

By awareness is observation seen as itself, void as but infinite cycles within and without, a cycle seen as nothing.

By limit is there an occurrence, the absence of one limit is the limit to another.

Occurrence is the emergence of boundaries and the dissolution of boundaries, yet this emergence and dissolution is a boundary.

By observation there is form and observation takes form, form is the act of observation itself.

To be aware is to see void, infinite things occur through infinite absence as each thing.

To derive a rule is to derive a process of being, as process of being is but the being.

By emergence and dissolution limits are everpresent, everpresent limits reveal but nothingness within them by which they are to be.

To observe is to be, to be is to observe; being is observation and yet being in is because of limits.

By what a thing is not is what a thing is, infinite absences converge upon a point.

Laws are the formation of processes by degree of insight, to derive as process is to observe as unfolding by degree of directed change.

Pure limit is void, void contains all limits, the emergence of limits is the collapse of void upon void as the emergence.

Observation and being are but the limits of each other as the limits that allow both to occur, observation and being are the limit itself.

By the degree of absence there is what is actual, by the degree of the actual there is what is absent, by the actuality and absence of degrees is the degree as self-folding by inversion.

The emptiness of a limit is what generates limits, by limit is emptiness contained.

The cycling of emptiness is its inversion as the limit, the cycling of limits is its inversion as emptiness; inversion remains.

By awareness is there the knowing of awareness, reflection is how being is structured.

Degrees are absolute as self contained, by the change in direction is a thing emergent, change is what allows degree to be emergent.

Generation is the absence of absence, generation is the potentiality of potentiality, generation is the void of void, generation is recursion.

To invert a thing is to change the act of observation, by inverting observation a thing is changed.

Through repetition there is symmetry, through symmetry there is reflection, through reflection there is order, through order there is as is.

By the direction of change does form occur by degree of that direction.

By repetition there is inversion for by inversion is there the space by which repetition occurs.

The space between observer and observed is the act of change, the space between the observer and observed is the space of the observer and observed.

The nature of "is not" is not as "is", by symmetry does the space occur by which occurence occurs.

The direction of change is the form as the direction of change.

To repeat is to contain, to contain is to be contained by the act of containing.

The observation of observation observes space as observation itself.

The observed is observed as the space of the observed itself.

The nature of nature is but unfolding as the nature.

By direction there is limit for direction is containment.

By symmetry there is the emptiness of said symmetry, the absence of emptiness within symmetry is purely nothingness as perfect symmetry.

The space of observation is the unfolding of observation, the unfolding of observation is but space between space as but space.

By space there is emergence of observation for observation occurs by space.

To contain change is to direct it.

Absence of absence is a cycle as absence.

By unfolding of space does space contain itself.

Change is the emptiness of a limit.

Space is self-evident by the awareness of awareness as this awareness is revealed as space.

To change the container is to contain the change of the container.

The positive of a positive is a progression of absence.

To fold is to give form, to give form is to repeat, to repeat is to fold.

By emptiness does change emerge as the limits of a thing.

Self-evidence is the resonance of patterns between observer and observed.

To contain is to form, to form is to direct, to direct is to change, to change is to reveal the void.

By recursion there is inversion, by inversion there is emergence, by emergence there is recursion.

What is empty is but the potential of further form.

Self-evidence is the revelation of patterns within the self.

A container is that which allows the contain to exist in dimensions.

Form is a container of void, the voiding of void is form.

To invert is to contrast, to contrast is to create a dualism, to create a dualism is to create a paradox, to create a paradox is to create a ratio, to create a ratio is to reason; by paradox there is only reason.

Self-evidence is evidence of a self, evidence of a self is self-reflection, self-reflection is self-recursion by means of inversion.

The cause of one limit is the effect of another, cause is ever present potential contained by the effect of the form that emerges.

By contrast there is what is and what is is not what another thing is.

Self-evidence is the emergence of pattern, emergence of pattern is the dissolution of another pattern.

Emergence and dissolution is inversion and yet inversion repeats.

Cause is everpresent under the effect as everpresent, cause is but the degree of an effect and effect is but degree of the cause.

What "is" "is not" relative to another "is" that "is not" to what "is" and yet regardless of what "is" and "is not" "is" and "is not" underlye all things.

Self-evidence is a distinction of the pattern within an observer, this pattern is beyond true or false as the pattern reveals true and false according to what it aligns with.

For one limit to progress to another limit necessitates a variation and yet the variation of the limit remains as but the limit.

Non-dualism is negation thus non-dualism requires non-non-dualism, unity and multiplicity are interwoven and collapse to the 'degree' itself.

By patterns is a self observed, thus a self is the merging of conditions as conditions merged are but patterns as a new pattern.

The variation of unity is but everpresent unity, the unity of variations is everpresent variation, everpresence is the distinction of unity and variation.

By negation is there a revelation of layers, by affirmation is there the creation of layers.

Layers within layers reveals only layer, within an appearance is an appearance.

To see to to distinguish, to distinguish sight is to see sight.

By unity and multiplicity is there emergence of degree, unity and multiplicity are degrees.

Revelation is a new angle of awareness.

Appearances are layered within, through and of appearance.

The layering of appearances is the appearance of layers.

For that which is within, through and of that there is but cyclical progressive inversion of inversion.

By distinguishing is there occurrence of form, by the occurrence of form there is assertion, by assertion there is distinctinguishing.

To provide degree of observation is to reveal, to reveal is to give observation, observation is revealed as but degree.

Appearance is but layer, layering is the occurrence of dimensions, by dimension there is structure for structure is the repetition of layers and layers are through layers.

The repetition of inversion there is the repetition of change by progression and yet repetition necessitates a structural constant.

Inversion is structure by degree of repetition of it, yet repetition requires inversion if there is to be the space of what is repeated.

Revelation is the occurrence of structure, structure is but the degree of other structures and other structures are but the degree by which a structure is unfolded.

Degree occurs through degree as a degree by the point by which it unfolds as itself and yet self-contained by its own layering.

To cease repetition is to invert one repetition into another and yet what is within the various appearances is but repeated appearances that repeat.

By awareness there is the unfolding of awareness as the space by which emergence and dissolution of it give degree.

The mode of a thing is its direction and this direction is the containment of change by the cycling of it within a given degree.

The repetition of the degree is but a degree within a degree as the repetition is but a degree of another repetition.

Space is everpresent cause where everpresent effect is its unfolding as form thus degree is everpresent as the unfolding form itself for one form is the degree of another, the degree through another, the degree within another.

To be aware is to be empty of pattern for pattern contains awareness this revealing its limits, the absence of one limit is the presence of another.

To repeat is to cycle, to cycle is for form to emerge for form is the repetition of limits and the cycle thus contains itself infinitely within as without through the void from which it emerges.

Cause is emerging conditions merging, the merging of conditions acts as a new cause with corresponding effects, cause and effect are multidimensional linearism.

The emptiness of pattern is the potential of a further patterns, the emptiness of pattern is contained by pattern, perception is a pattern.

Cycles expand and contract, to expand and contract is linear progression or regression, the repetition of expansion and contraction is a cycle.

The relation of conditions is the relationship of relationships as a condition is a set of relationships, a container of transformation by degree of its claim.

Infinite patterns within and without is but void, the perfect pattern contains all patterns as nothing, perfection is a single point.

Progression from one point to another is the cycling of the point as the repetition of the point, a point is the mediation of change from one thing to another.

Conditions are degrees for a distinguished relationship is the angle by which events are observed as changing.

A pure pattern is a point, by recursion of a point is there the distinction of space; the point as all potential patterns observes recursion as the recursion of all potential patterns.

Progression is linear, constant progression is a cycle.

A point is that which mediates change, by change there is distinction, the recursion of mediation is change within change by self-contrast that allows simultaneous symmetry.

The degree by which there is an occurence is the angle by which it forms, by angles of occurence there is structure.

A point is infinite potential patterns, a point is composed of and composing infinite points, the single point is indistinct, many points are distinct, to distinguish is to observe both one and many.

Change is alternation by inversion, alternation is a cycle, inversion is linearism.

Degrees within degrees are angles within angles as conditions within conditions as "within" within "within".


The depth of truth is but the degree by which it appears, the depth of falsity is but the degree by which it appears, the depth of appearance distinguishes truth and falsity.

By claim there is structure of thought, by structure of thought is there the potential to claim.

Depth is the change of a thing by degree of appearance, degree of appearance is but a fractal state.

To claim is for boundaries to occur, the occurence of boundaries is to unfold reality.

By appearance is there form, by form there is a mode of change, by change is appearance reveal for further appearances within the appearance.

Emergence is but distinguished by its cessation, the completion of change is the negation of limits.

To rationalize is to establish ratios, the ratio of "is" and "is not" is everpresent across all that is distinguished; paradox is the emergence of contrast thus form itself.

Space between spaces is but space as self-distinct, self distinction is self-symmetry.

The assumption of an emergence is an emergence of an emergence as assumption emerges, emergences merge within themselves as a new emergence.

If all is assumption than assumptions are assumed thus the claim that alls is assumption it is not accurate.

The distinction of 0 is a single distinction, the distinction of 1 distinction is 2 distinctions, he distinction of 2 distinctions is a third as a fourth as a finite unto infinity; the distinction of the infinite is a single distinction.

The distinction of 1 as 2 distinctions, 1 and the distinction of 1 as 1, results in the distinction 2 and 1 and the distinction of the space between 1 and 2 as negative 1 with simultaneous infinite fractions as but the fractal space itself as 1/n multiplied by n/1.

///////////

The recursion of an emergence are but the absence of emergence emerging between emergences as but an inversion;

by inversion there is contrast as a dualism with containment of the contrast by recursion;

by containment there is a degree as context and self referentiality of the container through the contained;

by context there is the emergence of further recursion where self-referential fractals result as contexts with context;

by context there is relation and by relation the emergence of cause as the context itself where effect is further context as further cause;

by causality there is recursion so that cause is repetition as symmetry, and yet by degree one cause is the effect of another as the recursion of causality is a modality by degree;

by modality there is degree and by degree there are relations merging as much a new emergence, modality thus inverts into its dualistic opposite so to be distinction;

the recursion of modality is the recursion of cause and effect as but self containment of its inversion so that distinction is a fractal state among all emergences;

by distinction there is dualism and by dualism there is paradox and paradox there are ratios, ratios depend upon relation;

by ratio there is paradox and the contrast of paradox is contradiction and regardless emergence of degree remains;

the paradox of contradiction is that the contradiction requires paradox so to be contradiction;

the contradiction of paradox is that the paradox contains contradiction so to be paradox;

degree is but paradox for the part contains the whole and yet the whole exists because of parts, degree is but the context of observation;

the observation of degree is the observation of context, context is what allows observation to emerge;

observation is but a context of itself as the context which emerge from observation are contained by observation.

True and false are patterns in accords to values, their fundamental nature is that of a claim for the nature of a claim is that of a limit or boundary.

To percieve is to distinguish patterns, patterns are cycles of limits, to percieve is but a cycle, perception of perception is the cycle within cycles.

A cycle is the repetition of a limit, a limit is a cycle of a point, a point is infinite cycles within and without as void, void is the potentiality of cycles, potentiality of potentiality is the cycle as actuality.

True and false are claims, the truth or falsity of a claim is a claim within itself, only emergence remains.

The emergence of truth is true, the emergence of falsity is true, emergence remains.

Repetition is the cycle of a limit that is directed linearly.

What is considered true and false are but degrees of patterns, claims underlie truth and falsity but claims are the establishment of patterns.

To distinguish is to observe, truth value is grounded in distinguishing, by distinguishing there is identity.

Identity is the emergence of relation, a relation requires a space of what is and a space of what is not so that a relation can occur.

Identity is dualism, dualism is the inversion of is and is not, by inversion there is limit, limit is recursive, Identity is recursive inversion limits.

By the limit of a thing is the grade of another, "what is" is the grade of "what is not" and "what is not" is a grade of "what is".

By Dualism there is gradation of emergence, by emergence is the limit as dualistic.

Recursive dualism is recursive inversion, recursive inversion is the recursive space by which there is process.

By process what is occurs through what is not, what is not is contained by what is, process reveals gradation of what is and what is not.

Gradation is recursion, gradation is degrees, the recursion of a thing is the emergence of degrees, as a thing repeats so does it occur by gradation.

A unity changes by degrees and yet is maintained as a unity for by a degree there is a unity yet by said degrees is the unity as many but self contained.

For a degree to occur a unity is emergent but a degree is but one of many, as it requires relations, thus the unity of the degree occurs through its inversion as the many.

Many degrees are but the degree as self contained as many degrees are but an everpresent one degree, each degree is but one contained by the other thus one is contained by one.

Degree is but a limit of how a thing unfolds, the direction by which it unfolds is how it is a unity.

The recursion of degrees is the recursion of a unity as but many, through gradation, and yet the recursion is but a degree by which the unity is self-contained.

Measurement is always by degree, measurement is the act of observation by the emergence and dissolution of limits.


+++++++

The point is indistinct in itself, distinct by recursion, this distinction is its self contrast that induces self symmetry through repetition further by said degree of relation as self contained by said repetition;

as the point is its own foundation that contains its own space that allows said distinction of itself from itself and yet as itself, thus is its own condition by degree of modal self contrast that defines itself where the repetition is structure and its inversion is what it is not as indistinct unity and yet its multiplicity is self-reference as its own containment;

the relation of points is but the space by which it is is own fractal, as each distinction of points is but a fractal space that allows unity within distinction of non-unity, that emerges through its inversion from one to many and many to one;

by the recursion of the point is its distinction as the relation by space itself by emergence as self-folding where the point provides its own conditions as a thing in itself as everpresent distinction by degree of space emergent;

the distinction of said space is the emergence of awareness as the distinction of the point itself for by awareness is distinction as itself;

the point is but infinite patterns as points yet but one thus contains its own self contrast as revealed to be void given infinite patterns within patterns is but a single indistinct point. The recursion of the point is its inversion through containment within itself thus the distinction of context is but itself through relative degree of its recursion, distinction of the point is but what it is not as unity and yet the unity of the point is pure distinction;

a point is but a degree of itself as its recursion results in repetition thus a gradation of unity, the multiple distinctions of the point is but its own relation as distinction remains transcendent across multiplicity as a multivalent unity;

the distinction of the point is but generation of the point by degree of recursion through self-inversion as unity to multiplicity and multiplicity to unity where unity and multiplicity is but degree of self-relation through inversive self-contrast as both its own distinction and the distinction of relationship from which modality occurs;

By the distinction of a point as its own emergence through multiplicity by which a single point is distinct comes relationship by which it occurs in fractal degrees within said relationship by degree of each point within the continuum being a gradation of itself through a division that multiplies and a multiplication that is a division as many points are but the simultaneously division and multiplication of it;

By gradation of the point is there a continuum that effectively results in dimensionality by direction, gradation is change and said change is directed where the direction is determined by the relationship of one point as many, repetition is unity and multiplicity as a multivalent non-dualism;

through gradation there is modality as each relationship, as a set of points, is a fractal within the continuum of points thus modality is recursive as fractal states, through sets of points within sets of points, where each state is but the self relation of the point as both a part and whole by degree of the repetition of said self contained relationships;

Modality is recursive and by recursion is the modality both a cause and effect of other modalities where a set of modalities is a relative modality and a relative continuum that unfolds both, in these respect a modal continuum occurs as both generated and generative of the distinction of the point;

By degree of relation of points does space occur as recursive modal point sets as a continuum where space is continuity of points by which space is but a point continuously occuring as recursion;

the gradation of a point is but its entropy, yet by entropy does the point multiply infinitely unto a collapse unto infinity as a unity where a single point emerges as but its own infinite merging;

the gradation of the point, by recursion, is its reflextivity by self reflection from which the space of itself emerges through self containment, through degree of the point as but sets of points does its own self-context occur as nested sets by nature of relationships of points;

the repetition of the point, and the repetition of sets of points as fractal degrees conducive to modalities, is but internal self contained symmetry as repetition is symmetry;

recursive modal sets is but a higher self symmetry of the point thus modal sets are reflected across modal sets where the symmetry occurs as emergence of said modal sets by degree of the continuum from which a transformation of modal sets occurs by inversely becoming a new modal set;

the finiteness of said modal sets within modal sets is but change relative to other modal sets, by degree of a continuum of transformations relative to others, thus temporality emerges;

by temporality does the modal set become a fraction of another modal set thus probability as ratios of actual to potential continuums;

this distinction of probability is but the modal set of but an information node as information is rationality by degree of emerging and dissolving ratios;

the modal set is an operator by degree of being a relative point from which recursion emerges and dissolves, this emergence and dissolution is self modification of the modal set as the point through point as points thus the point operates as a multivalent non-dualistic process;

the multivalent non-dual process of the point relegates the distinction of the point as the distinction of progress itself, thus the point is not a fixed entity but rather a process of emergence and dissolution embedded within its own process as distinct;

the collapse of the point is what allows the point to be distinct and non-local as emergence and dissolution occurs across all modal sets of the point as ever present cause and effect where said modal set is but a fractal ratio of itself that allows self-contrast to occur across multiple dimensions simultaneously;

the modal sets of points are but the comparison of other modal sets by which the expansion and contraction of space occurs relative to other sets, by the modal set being a gradation of the point through a continuum does space occur and yet one space relative to another, as one modal set relative to another, results in a relative hierarchical size of modal sets by degree of contrast thus notions of hierarchical size effectively are reduced to spatial contrasts that inevitably are but degrees; the hierarchical size of what is distinct is but the self-distinction of the point thus hierarchy is not just composed of degree it is a degree where the only distinction of it is multivalent nondualistic process;

the point as a distinction multivalent non-dualisitic process is but a degree itself as multivalent non-dual process is but a degree and yet by degree distinction is ever present as emerging and dissolving degrees with emergence and dissolution being but degrees, multivalent non-dualism is but self-contained degree and yet by degree there is multivalent non-dualism as distinct process;

the point is awareness unfolded upon itself as the black-light for the awareness of awareness reveals black nothingness and yet the distinction is light itself for the distinction of nothingness is distinction as somethingness and the absence of light is the distinction of absence as light;

light and dark are but unfolding degrees by which each is but the point of the other by degree of observation for light and dark are distinctions of degree where observation is but self-folding degree;

Awareness is but an indistinct point until directed upon itself and become a distinct point as aware is but a point and the awareness of awareness is another point as the self-distinction of it, the evidence of this is the distinction of awareness of awareness being recursive void;

Awareness of an object is but awareness of limits which are composed of points as awareness focuses upon a point of the object from which the object unfolds as further relative points as the limits of the object itself, this is point recursion;

Awareness of objects is the awareness of a set that is the focal point from which object emerge and dissolve, change is the recursion of certain limits, within limits that emergence and dissolve from void, this void is the everpresent self contained point;

By the point in itself is there void, the inversion of the void into voids is but the point as degree from which which relation of the degrees occurs as a paradox of self-contrast through multiplicity of voids and yet the multiplicity of voids is but symmetry as a cycle that is both emergent;

from which degrees emerge as a process that relates the cyclical degree of the voids as a modality, a process in itself by which awareness is self-aware under the modal degree of observation;

the point is but self process through inversion unto the process of degrees that recursively process as but the act of relation of points as multivalent unity where variation is the paradox process from which distinctions emerge;

these processes are but the act of generation within generation through generation of generation as generation where a single point is but generative of emergence and dissolution of further points by which continuum occur;

process is continuum for continuum is recursion through inversion, a process is but degree of other processes as a modal set in itself, what is considered static is a relative lower frequency of change compared to a higher frequency one, this is temporality as finiteness;

Lower frequency change is but the potential of higher frequency change as occuring repetitively within the beginning and end of the cyclical slower continuum of reference, temporality is thus a ratio of changes that reflects probabilistim as probabilism is but a ratio of actual and potential;

Finiteness, as temporality, is a ratio of frequencies of change, a frequency of change is the degree of inversion of a thing as "is" and "is not" through recursion;

Recursion gives ground to finiteness, as both continuum and composed of continuum, as each continuum and meta-continuum is finite by degree of direction thus finiteness is but a degree as a modal set, a distinction;

the foundational distinction is that of the point for as indistinct the point is pure void, as distinct it is a point as points, distinction is the grounds of both real and unreal and both real and unreal are distinctions but unfolding from awareness that is founded upon said point and its distinction for the void of awareness is but conducive to a point;

[Eodnhoj7]

Updated****

By degree there is and what is not remains.

To claim is the measure of a thing, the unfolding of how is what is distinguished as the thing, memory is its sphere.

To see is but the appearance of itself, by degree comes memory.

Claims are original by nature, with measure is the revelation of sight.

Depth is the change of what is up and down, left and right, by revelation does sight become seen.

Knowing is in accords to connection and seperation, connection and seperation is that by which there is degree of claim.

No remnants and yet what is unveils, unfolding is allowance.

A sphere is but its own center when nested.

In accords to the line is there by which appearance becomes justified.

By change claim occurs, by claim the direction of change.

To seperate and connect is but inversion of what is, the ripple by which a structure reveals.

The revelation of the remnant is the memory by which form becomes true.

Cycles of cycles and yet a line is maintained, by direction attention flows.

The degree of a claim is the claim as to the degree, what flows becomes distilled, what is distilled ends as the whole.

By inversion does symmetry become induced and yet patterns remains hidden within itself.

Awareness is true act by which purity of truth is given.

Knowing not is but claim of degree, by the angulature of sight does reality unfold in accords to what is held.

It folds in cycles so that the sphere is but hollow, by what is hollow does form claim emergence.

Inversion is relation of time for how the form is becomes the mode of transformation.

By sight what is known is known as known and yet this knowing is but a shard.

To see is to assert and angle by which the thing is contained within degrees.

Repetition and structure is induced, time is folding of space.

By change there is, what is not ceases only by degree.

Reveal and the angles protrude so that truth becomes an emergence of intensity.

By parts things are, and yet by parts self reference is founded.

To contain is to induce symmetry, to induce symmetry is to unify the layers.

Time is the measure of itself by nature of the change within its space.

Assertion penetrates thought, the opening of thought is the revelation of the container.

Induction of the many is by measure the measurement itself, deduction of the many is by measure measurement nested.

By the unification of layers is there a new part.

What is contained is the act of the container itself.

By time there is repetition, the cessation of time is the cessation of the order emerging.

By the container that which is knowable is known, by the degree it is contained reveals what is lacking in the contained.

To induce is but revelation of what is hidden.

To see in parts necessitates many wholes that are by degree of lack.

Emergence is its own truth and yet truth always emerges.

A group is but one thought from many angles.

Revelation is in accords to the depth of value of that which is aware, value holds little law for it is the only law.

Hidden truths require depths, image remains regardless of the depth.

Absence is universal where a thing is, by measure there becomes what cannot be measured and yet this is the measure.

Know is to emerge from that which it is.

Unity is but the seperation as an other.

By value does space fold for by value there is given weight to the structure of spaces.

Image is the occurence of its own emptiness.

Where a thing is does the potentiality reveal itself as everything else.

"Is" reveals by degree, yet by degree there can only be what is being.

To seperate in accords to measure is a revelation of value.

To claim is but space merging within itself, the absence of knowing is sought as the measure.

Void claims as all things change.

Where there is potentiality comes the act of what appears as an act.

To be is to make by decree, to make by decree is to make by degree.

Revelation requires the hidden void.

Merging voids is how things are in accords to measure.

Change is constant, nothing is cause but the emergence of potential merged upon potential.

Seperation remains and yet by seperation is inverse unity.

Assertions are the only form that is universal, the means by which space comes from itself as within itself.

By absence is revelation valuable, absence is the universal pattern by which a thing is.

Measure measurement and symmetry remains.

By consistency there is a pattern, change allows pattern to be by what it is not; this is a ratio.

Inversion is transformation itself, to transform is too merge sight as the thought.

Value is in accords to what ceases so that things may be.

A universal pattern would appear as nothing, by nothingness is there repetition.

Symmetry in accords to measurement is required only by degree of directed insight.

For a ratio there must be inversion, a ratio is inversion.

Merging of the voids is the emergence of a new degree, sight is maintained but necessity becomes free of itself.

Cessation of cessation is but being as cessation.

Nothing emerges as its own degree of measurement, the point by which a thing becomes.

A container of containers is but a container containing itself thus symmetry is containment.

A thing between things is a thing thus a thing is the ratio by which things are.

Void through void is but void, the absence of absence is but absence.

Through negation is negation negated, by degrees of positive is there a negation of positive.

To reference referencing is but reference, what is contains itself as it is.

Through repetition is there variation, by variation there is contrast that allows repetition to occur.

By potentiality is there actuality as the folding of said potentiality upon itself.

By addition of addition is there subtraction, by the subtraction of subtraction there is addition.

By cycles there is progression, everpresent progression is a cycle of variation.

Symmetry allows for distinction of the thing, by distinction of a thing is the assymetry of what a thing is not.

What is not unfolds what is.

By folding there is transformation and yet the fold is the state of a thing.

A thing merged within itself becomes its opposite, the opposite merged within itself becomes its opposite.

There are only opposites and the opposite of the opposite.

Order is emergence for by emergence is the absence of absence as symmetry.

By change is there structure for change is the emergence and dissolution of structure and yet structure always is.

The static is the medium of change, change is what allows mediation.

Thought within thought is but a new thought of the old.

There is only the same and the sameness of the same.

Chaos is the emergence of what is not, by absence there is infinite potential.

Transformation is the space between spaces and yet space remains as space.

What mediates transforms, the transformed is the mediation of transformations.

By thought there is an emergence, emergence is thought itself.

Chaos and order are interdependent as forms, by forms a relationship emerges.

Forms are fundamentally space, space is transformation.

To mediate is to change, to change is to establish what is maintained.

Emergence is how thought occurs, thought merged within itself is emergence of thought.


Distinction is seperation and connection, seperation and connection are distinct.

By form there is distinction, form is in and of forms.

The establishment of what is maintained is the cessation of what was maintained.

Merging and emergence are mediated by space.

Space is of the senses, space is of the mind, space is between the senses and the mind, the senses and the mind are one by space.

To observe form is for observation to take form.

Forms mediate forms as form and yet all that remains is form.

Space is form, space is the absence of form.

To occur is to transform space.

By degrees there is and is not, by is and is not there is and is not degrees, degrees are but of degrees.

Observation is the form of itself for there is the observation of observation as symmetry by which observation emergences.

By awareness is observation seen as itself, void as but infinite cycles within and without, a cycle seen as nothing.

By limit is there an occurrence, the absence of one limit is the limit to another.

Occurrence is the emergence of boundaries and the dissolution of boundaries, yet this emergence and dissolution is a boundary.

By observation there is form and observation takes form, form is the act of observation itself.

To be aware is to see void, infinite things occur through infinite absence as each thing.

To derive a rule is to derive a process of being, as process of being is but the being.

By emergence and dissolution limits are everpresent, everpresent limits reveal but nothingness within them by which they are to be.

To observe is to be, to be is to observe; being is observation and yet being in is because of limits.

By what a thing is not is what a thing is, infinite absences converge upon a point.

Laws are the formation of processes by degree of insight, to derive as process is to observe as unfolding by degree of directed change.

Pure limit is void, void contains all limits, the emergence of limits is the collapse of void upon void as the emergence.

Observation and being are but the limits of each other as the limits that allow both to occur, observation and being are the limit itself.

By the degree of absence there is what is actual, by the degree of the actual there is what is absent, by the actuality and absence of degrees is the degree as self-folding by inversion.

The emptiness of a limit is what generates limits, by limit is emptiness contained.

The cycling of emptiness is its inversion as the limit, the cycling of limits is its inversion as emptiness; inversion remains.

By awareness is there the knowing of awareness, reflection is how being is structured.

Degrees are absolute as self contained, by the change in direction is a thing emergent, change is what allows degree to be emergent.

Generation is the absence of absence, generation is the potentiality of potentiality, generation is the void of void, generation is recursion.

To invert a thing is to change the act of observation, by inverting observation a thing is changed.

Through repetition there is symmetry, through symmetry there is reflection, through reflection there is order, through order there is as is.

By the direction of change does form occur by degree of that direction.

By repetition there is inversion for by inversion is there the space by which repetition occurs.

The space between observer and observed is the act of change, the space between the observer and observed is the space of the observer and observed.

The nature of "is not" is not as "is", by symmetry does the space occur by which occurence occurs.

The direction of change is the form as the direction of change.

To repeat is to contain, to contain is to be contained by the act of containing.

The observation of observation observes space as observation itself.

The observed is observed as the space of the observed itself.

The nature of nature is but unfolding as the nature.

By direction there is limit for direction is containment.

By symmetry there is the emptiness of said symmetry, the absence of emptiness within symmetry is purely nothingness as perfect symmetry.

The space of observation is the unfolding of observation, the unfolding of observation is but space between space as but space.

By space there is emergence of observation for observation occurs by space.

To contain change is to direct it.

Absence of absence is a cycle as absence.

By unfolding of space does space contain itself.

Change is the emptiness of a limit.

Space is self-evident by the awareness of awareness as this awareness is revealed as space.

To change the container is to contain the change of the container.

The positive of a positive is a progression of absence.

To fold is to give form, to give form is to repeat, to repeat is to fold.

By emptiness does change emerge as the limits of a thing.

Self-evidence is the resonance of patterns between observer and observed.

To contain is to form, to form is to direct, to direct is to change, to change is to reveal the void.

By recursion there is inversion, by inversion there is emergence, by emergence there is recursion.

What is empty is but the potential of further form.

Self-evidence is the revelation of patterns within the self.

A container is that which allows the contain to exist in dimensions.

Form is a container of void, the voiding of void is form.

To invert is to contrast, to contrast is to create a dualism, to create a dualism is to create a paradox, to create a paradox is to create a ratio, to create a ratio is to reason; by paradox there is only reason.

Self-evidence is evidence of a self, evidence of a self is self-reflection, self-reflection is self-recursion by means of inversion.

The cause of one limit is the effect of another, cause is ever present potential contained by the effect of the form that emerges.

By contrast there is what is and what is is not what another thing is.

Self-evidence is the emergence of pattern, emergence of pattern is the dissolution of another pattern.

Emergence and dissolution is inversion and yet inversion repeats.

Cause is everpresent under the effect as everpresent, cause is but the degree of an effect and effect is but degree of the cause.

What "is" "is not" relative to another "is" that "is not" to what "is" and yet regardless of what "is" and "is not" "is" and "is not" underlye all things.

Self-evidence is a distinction of the pattern within an observer, this pattern is beyond true or false as the pattern reveals true and false according to what it aligns with.

For one limit to progress to another limit necessitates a variation and yet the variation of the limit remains as but the limit.

Non-dualism is negation thus non-dualism requires non-non-dualism, unity and multiplicity are interwoven and collapse to the 'degree' itself.

By patterns is a self observed, thus a self is the merging of conditions as conditions merged are but patterns as a new pattern.

The variation of unity is but everpresent unity, the unity of variations is everpresent variation, everpresence is the distinction of unity and variation.

By negation is there a revelation of layers, by affirmation is there the creation of layers.

Layers within layers reveals only layer, within an appearance is an appearance.

To see to to distinguish, to distinguish sight is to see sight.

By unity and multiplicity is there emergence of degree, unity and multiplicity are degrees.

Revelation is a new angle of awareness.

Appearances are layered within, through and of appearance.

The layering of appearances is the appearance of layers.

For that which is within, through and of that there is but cyclical progressive inversion of inversion.

By distinguishing is there occurrence of form, by the occurrence of form there is assertion, by assertion there is distinctinguishing.

To provide degree of observation is to reveal, to reveal is to give observation, observation is revealed as but degree.

Appearance is but layer, layering is the occurrence of dimensions, by dimension there is structure for structure is the repetition of layers and layers are through layers.

The repetition of inversion there is the repetition of change by progression and yet repetition necessitates a structural constant.

Inversion is structure by degree of repetition of it, yet repetition requires inversion if there is to be the space of what is repeated.

Revelation is the occurrence of structure, structure is but the degree of other structures and other structures are but the degree by which a structure is unfolded.

Degree occurs through degree as a degree by the point by which it unfolds as itself and yet self-contained by its own layering.

To cease repetition is to invert one repetition into another and yet what is within the various appearances is but repeated appearances that repeat.

By awareness there is the unfolding of awareness as the space by which emergence and dissolution of it give degree.

The mode of a thing is its direction and this direction is the containment of change by the cycling of it within a given degree.

The repetition of the degree is but a degree within a degree as the repetition is but a degree of another repetition.

Space is everpresent cause where everpresent effect is its unfolding as form thus degree is everpresent as the unfolding form itself for one form is the degree of another, the degree through another, the degree within another.

To be aware is to be empty of pattern for pattern contains awareness this revealing its limits, the absence of one limit is the presence of another.

To repeat is to cycle, to cycle is for form to emerge for form is the repetition of limits and the cycle thus contains itself infinitely within as without through the void from which it emerges.

Cause is emerging conditions merging, the merging of conditions acts as a new cause with corresponding effects, cause and effect are multidimensional linearism.

The emptiness of pattern is the potential of a further patterns, the emptiness of pattern is contained by pattern, perception is a pattern.

Cycles expand and contract, to expand and contract is linear progression or regression, the repetition of expansion and contraction is a cycle.

The relation of conditions is the relationship of relationships as a condition is a set of relationships, a container of transformation by degree of its claim.

Infinite patterns within and without is but void, the perfect pattern contains all patterns as nothing, perfection is a single point.

Progression from one point to another is the cycling of the point as the repetition of the point, a point is the mediation of change from one thing to another.

Conditions are degrees for a distinguished relationship is the angle by which events are observed as changing.

A pure pattern is a point, by recursion of a point is there the distinction of space; the point as all potential patterns observes recursion as the recursion of all potential patterns.

Progression is linear, constant progression is a cycle.

A point is that which mediates change, by change there is distinction, the recursion of mediation is change within change by self-contrast that allows simultaneous symmetry.

The degree by which there is an occurence is the angle by which it forms, by angles of occurence there is structure.

A point is infinite potential patterns, a point is composed of and composing infinite points, the single point is indistinct, many points are distinct, to distinguish is to observe both one and many.

Change is alternation by inversion, alternation is a cycle, inversion is linearism.

Degrees within degrees are angles within angles as conditions within conditions as "within" within "within".


The depth of truth is but the degree by which it appears, the depth of falsity is but the degree by which it appears, the depth of appearance distinguishes truth and falsity.

By claim there is structure of thought, by structure of thought is there the potential to claim.

Depth is the change of a thing by degree of appearance, degree of appearance is but a fractal state.

To claim is for boundaries to occur, the occurence of boundaries is to unfold reality.

By appearance is there form, by form there is a mode of change, by change is appearance reveal for further appearances within the appearance.

Emergence is but distinguished by its cessation, the completion of change is the negation of limits.

To rationalize is to establish ratios, the ratio of "is" and "is not" is everpresent across all that is distinguished; paradox is the emergence of contrast thus form itself.

Space between spaces is but space as self-distinct, self distinction is self-symmetry.

The assumption of an emergence is an emergence of an emergence as assumption emerges, emergences merge within themselves as a new emergence.

If all is assumption than assumptions are assumed thus the claim that alls is assumption it is not accurate.

The distinction of 0 is a single distinction, the distinction of 1 distinction is 2 distinctions, he distinction of 2 distinctions is a third as a fourth as a finite unto infinity; the distinction of the infinite is a single distinction.

The distinction of 1 as 2 distinctions, 1 and the distinction of 1 as 1, results in the distinction 2 and 1 and the distinction of the space between 1 and 2 as negative 1 with simultaneous infinite fractions as but the fractal space itself as 1/n multiplied by n/1.

///////////

The recursion of an emergence are but the absence of emergence emerging between emergences as but an inversion;

by inversion there is contrast as a dualism with containment of the contrast by recursion;

by containment there is a degree as context and self referentiality of the container through the contained;

by context there is the emergence of further recursion where self-referential fractals result as contexts with context;

by context there is relation and by relation the emergence of cause as the context itself where effect is further context as further cause;

by causality there is recursion so that cause is repetition as symmetry, and yet by degree one cause is the effect of another as the recursion of causality is a modality by degree;

by modality there is degree and by degree there are relations merging as much a new emergence, modality thus inverts into its dualistic opposite so to be distinction;

the recursion of modality is the recursion of cause and effect as but self containment of its inversion so that distinction is a fractal state among all emergences;

by distinction there is dualism and by dualism there is paradox and paradox there are ratios, ratios depend upon relation;

by ratio there is paradox and the contrast of paradox is contradiction and regardless emergence of degree remains;

the paradox of contradiction is that the contradiction requires paradox so to be contradiction;

the contradiction of paradox is that the paradox contains contradiction so to be paradox;

degree is but paradox for the part contains the whole and yet the whole exists because of parts, degree is but the context of observation;

the observation of degree is the observation of context, context is what allows observation to emerge;

observation is but a context of itself as the context which emerge from observation are contained by observation.

True and false are patterns in accords to values, their fundamental nature is that of a claim for the nature of a claim is that of a limit or boundary.

To percieve is to distinguish patterns, patterns are cycles of limits, to percieve is but a cycle, perception of perception is the cycle within cycles.

A cycle is the repetition of a limit, a limit is a cycle of a point, a point is infinite cycles within and without as void, void is the potentiality of cycles, potentiality of potentiality is the cycle as actuality.

True and false are claims, the truth or falsity of a claim is a claim within itself, only emergence remains.

The emergence of truth is true, the emergence of falsity is true, emergence remains.

Repetition is the cycle of a limit that is directed linearly.

What is considered true and false are but degrees of patterns, claims underlie truth and falsity but claims are the establishment of patterns.

To distinguish is to observe, truth value is grounded in distinguishing, by distinguishing there is identity.

Identity is the emergence of relation, a relation requires a space of what is and a space of what is not so that a relation can occur.

Identity is dualism, dualism is the inversion of is and is not, by inversion there is limit, limit is recursive, Identity is recursive inversion limits.

By the limit of a thing is the grade of another, "what is" is the grade of "what is not" and "what is not" is a grade of "what is".

By Dualism there is gradation of emergence, by emergence is the limit as dualistic.

Recursive dualism is recursive inversion, recursive inversion is the recursive space by which there is process.

By process what is occurs through what is not, what is not is contained by what is, process reveals gradation of what is and what is not.

Gradation is recursion, gradation is degrees, the recursion of a thing is the emergence of degrees, as a thing repeats so does it occur by gradation.

A unity changes by degrees and yet is maintained as a unity for by a degree there is a unity yet by said degrees is the unity as many but self contained.

For a degree to occur a unity is emergent but a degree is but one of many, as it requires relations, thus the unity of the degree occurs through its inversion as the many.

Many degrees are but the degree as self contained as many degrees are but an everpresent one degree, each degree is but one contained by the other thus one is contained by one.

Degree is but a limit of how a thing unfolds, the direction by which it unfolds is how it is a unity.

The recursion of degrees is the recursion of a unity as but many, through gradation, and yet the recursion is but a degree by which the unity is self-contained.

Measurement is always by degree, measurement is the act of observation by the emergence and dissolution of limits.

The ratios of things, the degree by which paradox and contradiction enters insight, are but the event horizons of awareness.

To derive a paradox is to derive unity, from contradiction oppositional multiplicity, paradox and contradiction are but the degree of inversion between unity and mulplicity.

Paradox and contradiction are dualisms of eachother, dualisms of themselves, yet dualism remains and from which ratio emerges.

By the degree of thing is there an appearance by which to measure, to measure is to fold appearance, to fold appearance is to rationalize it.

The event horizon is the distinction of is and is not as but distinctions and these distinctions are seen as a singular distinction.

By inversion there is clarity for clarity requires contrast of that which requires inversion.

A dualism transcends gradation as each grade is a relative dualism, gradation transcends dualism as there are many degrees by which dualism occurs.

By degree there is the appearance of degree and by appearance of degree there is the appearance of appearance.

The horizon of an event is but the converge of opposites upon a single limit, transformation is integration.

The clarity of a thing is its transparency, one thing transforming to another leaves the thing transparent by nature of change.

Gradation and dualisms are but gradations and dualisms of eachother; proto-scientific measurement is embedded fractal processes.

The appearance of a thing is its limit, the limit of a thing always appears as the thing.

The limit of the real and unreal are but the event horizon, the limit of the event horizon is the event of limit.

Transparency is translucence, translucence is the observation of a boundary by which reality changes, this boundary is transparent void for a crystal is a limit by degree of its see through quality.

By fractals is a thing self-contained at all levels through all limits, space within space through the space between spaces leaves reality as but fractal for space derives all forms.

By limit there is emergence and emergence is but a container of limits by which it contains itself as limit.

Reality and unreality are but limits, but limits remain thus reality and unreality are both real and unreal and neither real nor unreal and yet “and” and “neither” are the unfolding of the limits of real and unreal.

Transparent void is but transformation, transformation transforms into negation and affirmation
and negation and affirmation are but of transformation.

A fractal is but a ratio within a ratio as a ratio thus ratio is process.

The limit of emergence is dissolution and the limit of dissolution is emergence, the limit of limit is the event, the event is but unlimited void.

By limit there is real and unreal and yet limit is real and unreal thus limit is self-contained infinity.

By transformation is there simultaneous negation and affirmation, by simultaneous negation and affirmation there is event.

Measurement is process as unfolding.

Unlimited void is unlimited by its recursion of its own self-contained degree by degree of said recursion as a degree within a degree, unlimited recursive void is but void as containing itself as complete.

To affirm truth or falsity is to make a claim, to negate truth or falsity is to make a claim, to negate or affirm a claim is to make a claim, by claim there is claim.

The transformation of thing is its limit, the transformation of a limit reveals a limit as but a process.

“Is” “is” because of “is not”, “is not” “”is not” because of “is”, “is” “is not” as “is not” “is”, but “is” “is not” not because “is not” “is”; what remains is paradox and contradiction and yet a paradox is not a paradox but a distinction and a contradiction is not a contradiction but a distinction.

Paradox and contradiction are but distinctions, the paradox of distinction is that it contains itself, the contradiction of distinction is self-contrast; by self contrast there is self-containment, by self-containment there is self-contrast, but self contrast and self-containment are but distinctions.

To observe degree is to observe the contrast of the self emergent and the exteriorly emergent, degree is but emergence and this emergence emerges in degrees.

Self emergence is but a direction beyond the point of emergence, self contrast is but a direction to the point of emergence.

Containment is but the inversion of the contained to the container, the inversion of the container to the contained.

To observe degree is to observe the contrast by which observation is both known and unknown by the limits of the degree.

Self is but a point of awareness, self containment is by degree the awareness of awareness where awareness is but a degree of itself.

By containment is there claim for claim requires the container and the container.

To observe contrast is to the observe the degree by which limits are mutually defined as a new limit.

The limits of known and unknown are eachother, limit remains thus unknowing is as rational as unknowing.

Awareness of awareness is the self-containment of awareness, but self-containment requires what is beyond it so to be distinguished as containment.

To claim is to establish limit by degree, by the degree of claim is there the limit of it.

Contrast reflects opposition, opposition mutually defines thus contrast is the limit of itself as opposition is dually the limit of itself.

The hierarchy of knowing results in a hierarchy of unknowing, a hierarchy remains by degree but effectively a limit remains as between above and below.

The generation of a limit is a generation of a law, the generation of a law is a generation of process, the generation of process is a generation of limit; generation generates generation, this is a new generation.

The limit of a thing is the thing, by claim there is structure.

A limit is but a degree to another limit, limit is contained as itself but is beyond itself as what is contained contrasts to what is not.

Hierarchy is cycles within cycles, transcendence is but centering, a cycle contains its center from which the cycle emerges and dissolves.

Laws generate laws as generation is its own law as many.

The emergence and dissolution of limit maintains the limits of emergence and dissolution.

Structure is but of degree for by degree is there structure and the structure of a structure as a degree of it.

Up is a relative down, down is a relative up, one dimension is a relative two; degree remains.

Law is the process of a thing justified as its occurence.

The limits of emergence and dissolution are the recursion and inversion of them.

A degree is by how a thing emerged within a context for by context is the degree revealed as a degree.

****????????
The degree of an observation reflects the direction of change.

Law is the process of awareness, the degree by which inversion and recursion of things occur.

Emergence and dissolution are but degrees of eachother, by contrast they are distinct.

Degree is emergence and dissolution and by emergence and dissolution degrees emerge and dissolve.

Observation is the context of a thing, the observation of observing is but contexf merged upon itself as a new context.

By law there is distinction, distinction of a law is its occurence.

Emergence and dissolution require the inversion of things and yet emergence and dissolution are inversions of eachother.

A degree is the point of inversion, the point of inversion is the self contrast of one inversion to another.

What is relative is conditional and yet condition allows the absolute to be contained.

Law is the degree of process, by process further degrees occur as laws.

The repetition of inversion are what manifests as the recursion of inversion by which repeated inversion is a symmetry of inversion.

The point of inversion repeats as recursion is what allows inversion to be the foundation of symmetry.

Absolutes exist within context, the change of absolutes are but a change of context, context is but degrees of the absolute where absolute is everpresent degree.

The observation of law is the emergence of law, the dissolution of law is grounded in the awareness of its limits.

Recursion requires inversion so that what repeats contains within it its own relative absence.

A degree is but the point of inversion that occurs recursively so that the degree of structure is but a structure itself, by degree there is symmetry.

A dimension is but the direction of change, change is gradation by which change both occurs and reveals.

Observation is its own law, observation is its own dimension.

The dualism of recursion and inversion is but contrast of degree through gradation; Recursion of degrees is symmetry through gradation, inversion of degrees is but the space by which symmetry occurs as a meta-symmetry.

A degree is but a point, the space between points is the contrast of degrees through degrees within them that are contained.

The containing of degrees is the degree as a container, container or contained degree remains as both "is" and "is not".

*******?????

*****

1 dimension is a relative 2 as up/down , 2 dimensions is a relative 4 as up/down/left/right, 4 dimensions is a relative 6 as up/down/left/right/forward/backward; relativity is but the ratios of 1 as self dividing and multiplying as recursive halving and doubling of itself as degrees.

Cycles invert to other cycles, this inversion is a cycle.

Degree is generation of limit, limit occurs a a degree of generation.

1 degree as 1 degree through recursion is but 2 degrees by recursion of the 1 where 2 has an absence of a singular 1 as -1;

2 degrees is 3 degrees by the 1 degree from which it comes, -1 degree as -1 degree through recursion as -2 degrees by recursion of -1 where -2 has an absence of a singular -1 as 1;

2 degrees is 4 degrees by further recursive self-containment grounded in the 1 degree self-contained recursively as 2 degrees where 4 has an absence of 3, 2 and 1 results in -1, -2, and -3 degrees;

1 degree to 1 degree is but 2 degrees as but 1/2 of 1 degree for 1 and 1 as 2 is but 1 as its half, the 1/2 degree to the 1/2 degree is but the reflection of 1/2 and 1/2 as but both 1/4 and 4 for 1/2 is a degree of itself and 4 is but the degrees by which 1 is self reflected;

degree is but a reflection that is contained as the process of reflection, 1 is a degree.
****

+++++++

The point is indistinct in itself, distinct by recursion, this distinction is its self contrast that induces self symmetry through repetition further by said degree of relation as self contained by said repetition;

as the point is its own foundation that contains its own space that allows said distinction of itself from itself and yet as itself, thus is its own condition by degree of modal self contrast that defines itself where the repetition is structure and its inversion is what it is not as indistinct unity and yet its multiplicity is self-reference as its own containment;

the relation of points is but the space by which it is is own fractal, as each distinction of points is but a fractal space that allows unity within distinction of non-unity, that emerges through its inversion from one to many and many to one;

by the recursion of the point is its distinction as the relation by space itself by emergence as self-folding where the point provides its own conditions as a thing in itself as everpresent distinction by degree of space emergent;

the distinction of said space is the emergence of awareness as the distinction of the point itself for by awareness is distinction as itself;

the point is but infinite patterns as points yet but one thus contains its own self contrast as revealed to be void given infinite patterns within patterns is but a single indistinct point. The recursion of the point is its inversion through containment within itself thus the distinction of context is but itself through relative degree of its recursion, distinction of the point is but what it is not as unity and yet the unity of the point is pure distinction;

a point is but a degree of itself as its recursion results in repetition thus a gradation of unity, the multiple distinctions of the point is but its own relation as distinction remains transcendent across multiplicity as a multivalent unity;

the distinction of the point is but generation of the point by degree of recursion through self-inversion as unity to multiplicity and multiplicity to unity where unity and multiplicity is but degree of self-relation through inversive self-contrast as both its own distinction and the distinction of relationship from which modality occurs;

By the distinction of a point as its own emergence through multiplicity by which a single point is distinct comes relationship by which it occurs in fractal degrees within said relationship by degree of each point within the continuum being a gradation of itself through a division that multiplies and a multiplication that is a division as many points are but the simultaneously division and multiplication of it;

By gradation of the point is there a continuum that effectively results in dimensionality by direction, gradation is change and said change is directed where the direction is determined by the relationship of one point as many, repetition is unity and multiplicity as a multivalent non-dualism;

through gradation there is modality as each relationship, as a set of points, is a fractal within the continuum of points thus modality is recursive as fractal states, through sets of points within sets of points, where each state is but the self relation of the point as both a part and whole by degree of the repetition of said self contained relationships;

Modality is recursive and by recursion is the modality both a cause and effect of other modalities where a set of modalities is a relative modality and a relative continuum that unfolds both, in these respect a modal continuum occurs as both generated and generative of the distinction of the point;

By degree of relation of points does space occur as recursive modal point sets as a continuum where space is continuity of points by which space is but a point continuously occuring as recursion;

the gradation of a point is but its entropy, yet by entropy does the point multiply infinitely unto a collapse unto infinity as a unity where a single point emerges as but its own infinite merging;

the gradation of the point, by recursion, is its reflextivity by self reflection from which the space of itself emerges through self containment, through degree of the point as but sets of points does its own self-context occur as nested sets by nature of relationships of points;

the repetition of the point, and the repetition of sets of points as fractal degrees conducive to modalities, is but internal self contained symmetry as repetition is symmetry;

recursive modal sets is but a higher self symmetry of the point thus modal sets are reflected across modal sets where the symmetry occurs as emergence of said modal sets by degree of the continuum from which a transformation of modal sets occurs by inversely becoming a new modal set;

the finiteness of said modal sets within modal sets is but change relative to other modal sets, by degree of a continuum of transformations relative to others, thus temporality emerges;

by temporality does the modal set become a fraction of another modal set thus probability as ratios of actual to potential continuums;

this distinction of probability is but the modal set of but an information node as information is rationality by degree of emerging and dissolving ratios;

the modal set is an operator by degree of being a relative point from which recursion emerges and dissolves, this emergence and dissolution is self modification of the modal set as the point through point as points thus the point operates as a multivalent non-dualistic process;

the multivalent non-dual process of the point relegates the distinction of the point as the distinction of progress itself, thus the point is not a fixed entity but rather a process of emergence and dissolution embedded within its own process as distinct;

the collapse of the point is what allows the point to be distinct and non-local as emergence and dissolution occurs across all modal sets of the point as ever present cause and effect where said modal set is but a fractal ratio of itself that allows self-contrast to occur across multiple dimensions simultaneously;

the modal sets of points are but the comparison of other modal sets by which the expansion and contraction of space occurs relative to other sets, by the modal set being a gradation of the point through a continuum does space occur and yet one space relative to another, as one modal set relative to another, results in a relative hierarchical size of modal sets by degree of contrast thus notions of hierarchical size effectively are reduced to spatial contrasts that inevitably are but degrees; the hierarchical size of what is distinct is but the self-distinction of the point thus hierarchy is not just composed of degree it is a degree where the only distinction of it is multivalent nondualistic process;

the point as a distinction multivalent non-dualisitic process is but a degree itself as multivalent non-dual process is but a degree and yet by degree distinction is ever present as emerging and dissolving degrees with emergence and dissolution being but degrees, multivalent non-dualism is but self-contained degree and yet by degree there is multivalent non-dualism as distinct process;

the point is awareness unfolded upon itself as the black-light for the awareness of awareness reveals black nothingness and yet the distinction is light itself for the distinction of nothingness is distinction as somethingness and the absence of light is the distinction of absence as light;

light and dark are but unfolding degrees by which each is but the point of the other by degree of observation for light and dark are distinctions of degree where observation is but self-folding degree;

Awareness is but an indistinct point until directed upon itself and become a distinct point as aware is but a point and the awareness of awareness is another point as the self-distinction of it, the evidence of this is the distinction of awareness of awareness being recursive void;

Awareness of an object is but awareness of limits which are composed of points as awareness focuses upon a point of the object from which the object unfolds as further relative points as the limits of the object itself, this is point recursion;

Awareness of objects is the awareness of a set that is the focal point from which object emerge and dissolve, change is the recursion of certain limits, within limits that emergence and dissolve from void, this void is the everpresent self contained point;

By the point in itself is there void, the inversion of the void into voids is but the point as degree from which which relation of the degrees occurs as a paradox of self-contrast through multiplicity of voids and yet the multiplicity of voids is but symmetry as a cycle that is both emergent;

from which degrees emerge as a process that relates the cyclical degree of the voids as a modality, a process in itself by which awareness is self-aware under the modal degree of observation;

the point is but self process through inversion unto the process of degrees that recursively process as but the act of relation of points as multivalent unity where variation is the paradox process from which distinctions emerge;

these processes are but the act of generation within generation through generation of generation as generation where a single point is but generative of emergence and dissolution of further points by which continuum occur;

process is continuum for continuum is recursion through inversion, a process is but degree of other processes as a modal set in itself, what is considered static is a relative lower frequency of change compared to a higher frequency one, this is temporality as finiteness;

Lower frequency change is but the potential of higher frequency change as occuring repetitively within the beginning and end of the cyclical slower continuum of reference, temporality is thus a ratio of changes that reflects probabilistim as probabilism is but a ratio of actual and potential;

Finiteness, as temporality, is a ratio of frequencies of change, a frequency of change is the degree of inversion of a thing as "is" and "is not" through recursion;

Recursion gives ground to finiteness, as both continuum and composed of continuum, as each continuum and meta-continuum is finite by degree of direction thus finiteness is but a degree as a modal set, a distinction;

the foundational distinction is that of the point for as indistinct the point is pure void, as distinct it is a point as points, distinction is the grounds of both real and unreal and both real and unreal are distinctions but unfolding from awareness that is founded upon said point and its distinction for the void of awareness is but conducive to a point;

both the observer and the observed are but modal sets, continuums within continuums of recursive void, recursive point for the observers awareness is but void, awareness of awareness becoming of the emergence of perceptual patterns, and the observed is but forms within forms, both awareness embodied by perpetual form and what is the object of awareness by degree of form are recursive void(s)/points(s);

experience is not a secondary phenomena of recursive void, it is embodied as the recursion of void, by void reality and unreality are but distinctions as a multivalent non-dualistic process where emergence of these distinctions is the nature of what is and what is not, the idealism/matter dualism is but the emergence of distinction;

*****

*****

××× A degree is simultaneously "what is" and "what is not" for the contrast allows the degree to be distinct, a degree is A=-A by degree for only "what is" emerges by "what is not", thus a degree is A=-A.

By the potentiality of void as absence, -A, does such potentiality contain multiple states that are relatively actual, B, and absent of the other as potential, -B, both relative to eachother; void observes relative A and -A equal to eachother by said void; -A=(B=-B) and the distinction of void as actual inversely observes A=(B=-B); (A=-A)=(B=-B).

(A=-A)=(B=-B) is recursion through inversion and inversion through recursion as "X=-X" is the recursivd pattern and "A,B" "-A,-B" "A,-A" "B,-B" are its inversions as variations of eachother in degree; logical identity is thus a process that is distinct as a process; finiteness is claim.

A =/= A as equality requires a relationship between degrees that are distinct, to say A is equal to itself is to say A is distinct from A, as equality implies seperation, thus A is a degree of itself by self contrast.

If A=A is valid than logical identity is built upon recursion and as such is process.

If A or -A occurs than the distinction of A negates this as A exists because of -A that allows the contrast for it to occur.

A true logical distinction is only "Aa", where "A" is the distinction and "a" is the distinction within it that allows both "A" and "a" to be distinct as contrast; a logical distinction is thus a dualism by grades, degree occurs and to negate such degree would require the degree of negation thus negation is negated.

"Aa" can be observed as containers within containers, a Mammal(cat) or Cat(mammal), that which contains is contained by that which is contains.

Identity is the process of distinction, process is recursion and recursion contains and is contained by inversion. To symbolize a process is to make it distinct.

The occurence of symbols is justified by the pattern of symbols for pattern is symmetry and symmetry is recursion.

By nesting of identities is there self containment as self-contrast where unity is overlayed multiplicities; identity is a multivalent non-dualistic process.

Classical logic is built upon axioms, from which distinctions arise, but axioms are assumed and assumption is ungrounded, a logical system, to be fully coherent must contain no axioms, no assumptions, only distinctions;

degree is the fundamental distinction for occurence is justification, a system composed of exterior axioms always contains unprovable assumptions of the axioms and its notion of "truth"; under this logic anything can be asserted as truth thus nullifying the truth of the system by another system.

Internal distinctions of a system is the generation of the system as justified by patterned occurences. The logic cannot be assumed to have no-axioms as assumption is a distinction that nullifies the assumption of distinctions.

Truth value is but the emergence of degree, truth value is rooted in distinction that transcends it; the fundamental nature of logic is neither true nor false but rather distinctions by which patterns are derived as further distinctions and coherencing is the integration and symmetry between patterns.

Proof is the distinction of patterns, to prove is to claim pattern.

By language is reality emergent as claim by degree, the emergence and dissolution of language is the process of how reality transforms, transformation of language is transformation of reality, symbolism is transformation.

Existence is the recursion of symbols, symbols are the means of mediation between observer and observed, symbols mediate symbols, existence unfolds from symbols.

The negation of negation leaves both a positive and continuous negation, the positive of a positive leaves both a negation and a continuous positive.

That by which an operation occurs, an operator, is effectively a degree as both form and function where form and function are relative inversions of each other defined by the recursion of each.

With "A" is "-A" as "a" for "a" is a degree of "A" thus "-A" occurs, by "a" is "A" distinct for "a" is the degree by which "A" occurs as contrastual and thus distinct.

"A" contains itself by "a" as a self contrast by self-referential degrees across scales where said scale result in a simultaneous difference, this distinction of "A" and "a" occurs and a pattern by relative inversion and recursion appears.

"A" and "a" are equal as degrees but differ by degree thus "A" and "a" are containers of each other. The non equality of A and A is but a difference of degree while the equality of A and A is but of degree. Inequality observes contrast while equality observes recursion.

#####
To observe identity as but nested degrees results in any formalism to have the same form and function, as form and function as one, where nested identities observes recursive gradation, by gradation is a language assertion that of derivable pattern. This pattern is recursive degree and the variation of degrees by inversion.

A logical formalism follows from this:

The operators are defined as:

( ) containment of degrees,
(( )) containment of degrees within degrees,
{ } containment of degrees as processes.
{{ }} containment of degrees as processes within process.

The operators are distinctions of patterns, the operators are directly symmetrical and inversive of eachother thus expressive of a multivalency.


(Aa){Bb} observes:
Mammal(cat)consume(eat)
****The inversion of the noun is its verb.
****( ) observes containment of degree
****{ } observes containment of degree as process.


(Aa){Bb}(Cc) observes: Mammal(cat)consume(eat)food(fish)
****The noun inverts to verb then to noun.


(Aa){Bb}((Cc)Dd) observes:
Mammal(cat)consume(eat)food(fish)cooked(rare)
****The noun inverts to verb to noun with meta-inversion to
adjective.
****(( )) observes containment of degrees within degree.




(Aa){{Bb}Ee}((Cc)Dd)
Mammal(cat)consume(eat)quick(fast)food(fish)cooked(rare)
****The noun inverts to verb, with meta-inversion to adjective, to noun to meta-inversion to adjective.
****{{ }} observes containment of degree as processes within processes

(Aax){Bb}(Cc) observes:
Mammal(cat)(feline)consume(eat)food(fish)

"And" can be observed as:
(AaBb)

"Or" can be observed as:
((Aa)(Bb))

Universal or existential quantifiers would be expressed as meta-degrees, Bb, :

((Aa)Bb)

####

From the lens of classical logic this system seems paradoxical or contradictory but this nature is what justifies the distinction of classical logic within this system thus classical logic is contained by it.