Forced Vaccination

Discussion of articles that appear in the magazine.

Moderators: AMod, iMod

Walker
Posts: 16381
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 12:00 am

Re: Forced Vaccination

Post by Walker »

Impenitent wrote: Mon Oct 20, 2025 1:06 pm the best way to halt transmission is to remove the clutch...

-Imp
That effectively happens with every disengagement.

*

Double clutching relieves stress on the transmission’s gear-meshing to combine infection (broken gear teeth) resistance with symptom relief (inappropriate rpms). In fact, clutching into neutral, racing the engine, then skipping the second part of the double clutching by easing into gear without using the clutch at all is possible with just the right pressure on the stick (learned on multiple VW bugs). But a triple clutch of transmission prevention, infection prevention, and symptom relief? That’s some fancy doctoring, Joie Chitwood. (There just gots to be a relevant metaphor in there for the tuned receiver, somewhere.)

Mammas who take their little babies in for multiple vaccinations, all at once, when even one causes a bit of sickness, on the ostensible SOP that parents are too irresponsible to return to have the vaccines administered one at a time? Automatic transmission, which is now standard when deferring to the experts who made a Covid-19 vaccination that allows folks to get infected with Covid-19, and then they transfer the guilt to the cookie lady's neighbor.

The actuaries say a few tragedies are worth thousands of inoculated babies, which was unfortunate for my nephew many years ago, whose infancy death was medically determined to be caused by the standard vaccine overload, all at once. Sacrificing humans to save humanity.

Isn't that transmission preferable to saying that all Americans are ignorant morons for driving standard-issue automatic transmissions and listening to medical advice, or must we all wallow in mud?

:wink:
Phil8659
Posts: 2175
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2022 11:50 am
Contact:

Re: Forced Vaccination

Post by Phil8659 »

Philosophy Now wrote: Wed Oct 15, 2025 3:27 pm Naina Krishnamurthy asks if it’s ethical or egregious.

https://philosophynow.org/issues/170/Forced_Vaccination
Why not simply say, good or bad, and then set forth the standard of measure to make the judgment?

What may be predicated of any thing is wholly determined by the definition of that thing.
So, let us start by defining Man. Then let us ask, who rules the body of a man, the mind which resides in, or any self inflated asshole that comes along?
Locked