FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Dec 15, 2024 1:29 pm
It's one of maybe hundreds of threads now where the same person has done the same thing to get an obsequious AI to write something that pleases him (which is the only thing they actually do) and attempted to pass it off as philosophy.
Isn't that what philosophy is? Writing things that please us? The AI slop is no worse than most of the philosophy publications on arXiv and the level of critique/feedback/engagement you get from AI when you prompt it well is a few notches above the "philosophers" who hang out here.
It's a better sounding board than you for sure. Besides, you don't like obsequious. You don't like insolent defiance. Do you even know what you want; or are you just another old fart longing for the good old days? Perhaps you feel some valiable/important tradition is being lost to history? Nostalgia just isn't what it used to be, eh?
Right, because an 'old person' couldn't possibly have a valid opinion. You do realise that the latest generation of adults is vastly stupider than the previous one--thanks to the internet and social media in particular. At what age does a person's opinions and knowledge become invalid?
Young people used to protest against war and genuine injustice. Now they 'protest' for the 'right' of men in frocks to beat women up in sports and invade rape crisis centres/ women's prisons etc., the 'right' of young females/males to get their breasts/penis lopped off (and not have to pay for it), for the 'right' of sadistic psychopaths to torture babies to death. They aren't just stupid they are completely deranged. No wonder AI is insane.
accelafine wrote: ↑Tue Oct 21, 2025 11:55 pm
Young people used to protest against war and genuine injustice. Now they 'protest' for the 'right' of men in frocks to beat women up in sports and invade rape crisis centres/ women's prisons etc., the 'right' of young females/males to get their breasts/penis lopped off (and not have to pay for it), for the 'right' of sadistic psychopaths to torture babies to death. They aren't just stupid they are completely deranged. No wonder AI is insane.
Those are Lefty men.
Your opinion is a Right Wing opinion.
You really are out of touch.
accelafine wrote: ↑Tue Oct 21, 2025 11:55 pm
Young people used to protest against war and genuine injustice. Now they 'protest' for the 'right' of men in frocks to beat women up in sports and invade rape crisis centres/ women's prisons etc., the 'right' of young females/males to get their breasts/penis lopped off (and not have to pay for it), for the 'right' of sadistic psychopaths to torture babies to death. They aren't just stupid they are completely deranged. No wonder AI is insane.
Those are Lefty men.
Your opinion is a Right Wing opinion.
You really are out of touch.
No, they are American, just like you. Two sides of the same bat-shit insane, moronic partisan coin.
accelafine wrote: ↑Tue Oct 21, 2025 11:55 pm
Young people used to protest against war and genuine injustice. Now they 'protest' for the 'right' of men in frocks to beat women up in sports and invade rape crisis centres/ women's prisons etc., the 'right' of young females/males to get their breasts/penis lopped off (and not have to pay for it), for the 'right' of sadistic psychopaths to torture babies to death. They aren't just stupid they are completely deranged. No wonder AI is insane.
Those are Lefty men.
Your opinion is a Right Wing opinion.
You really are out of touch.
No, they are American, just like you. Two sides of the same bat-shit insane, moronic partisan coin.
FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Dec 15, 2024 1:29 pm
It's one of maybe hundreds of threads now where the same person has done the same thing to get an obsequious AI to write something that pleases him (which is the only thing they actually do) and attempted to pass it off as philosophy.
Isn't that what philosophy is? Writing things that please us? The AI slop is no worse than most of the philosophy publications on arXiv and the level of critique/feedback/engagement you get from AI when you prompt it well is a few notches above the "philosophers" who hang out here.
It's a better sounding board than you for sure. Besides, you don't like obsequious. You don't like insolent defiance. Do you even know what you want; or are you just another old fart longing for the good old days? Perhaps you feel some valiable/important tradition is being lost to history? Nostalgia just isn't what it used to be, eh?
Right, because an 'old person' couldn't possibly have a valid opinion. You do realise that the latest generation of adults is vastly stupider than the previous one--thanks to the internet and social media in particular. At what age does a person's opinions and knowledge become invalid?
Young people used to protest against war and genuine injustice. Now they 'protest' for the 'right' of men in frocks to beat women up in sports and invade rape crisis centres/ women's prisons etc., the 'right' of young females/males to get their breasts/penis lopped off (and not have to pay for it), for the 'right' of sadistic psychopaths to torture babies to death. They aren't just stupid they are completely deranged. No wonder AI is insane.
It's my opinion that your opinion is invalid. Whatever your age.
Skepdick wrote: ↑Tue Oct 21, 2025 11:20 am
Isn't that what philosophy is? Writing things that please us? The AI slop is no worse than most of the philosophy publications on arXiv and the level of critique/feedback/engagement you get from AI when you prompt it well is a few notches above the "philosophers" who hang out here.
It's a better sounding board than you for sure. Besides, you don't like obsequious. You don't like insolent defiance. Do you even know what you want; or are you just another old fart longing for the good old days? Perhaps you feel some valiable/important tradition is being lost to history? Nostalgia just isn't what it used to be, eh?
Right, because an 'old person' couldn't possibly have a valid opinion. You do realise that the latest generation of adults is vastly stupider than the previous one--thanks to the internet and social media in particular. At what age does a person's opinions and knowledge become invalid?
Young people used to protest against war and genuine injustice. Now they 'protest' for the 'right' of men in frocks to beat women up in sports and invade rape crisis centres/ women's prisons etc., the 'right' of young females/males to get their breasts/penis lopped off (and not have to pay for it), for the 'right' of sadistic psychopaths to torture babies to death. They aren't just stupid they are completely deranged. No wonder AI is insane.
It's my opinion that your opinion is invalid. Whatever your age.
It's a fact that you speak for no one but yourself. What a stupid little **** you are.
Today after "a long chat" in which he gave his bot orders about what replies to give him, in line with what replies he wanted it to give... VA gloriously achieved his "objective" appraisal of various US presidents that helpfully included nothing but opinions he already held.
Veritas Aequitas wrote: ↑Thu Oct 23, 2025 10:09 am
After a long chat with AI. Brainwashed by WOKEISM AI rated initially rated Obama higher than Trump;
AI Wrote Objectively:
An Objective Employee Appraisal of Trump, Biden, and Obama
....
This is feeble dog droppings. A clear decline in standards. Even VA, who was completely idiotic before he got hold of AI should be reasoning better than this.
