😕😕😕😕😕Huh!!!

[Fairy]

Jim Newman Interview.

https://youtu.be/jaHRGC18Bb8

For your viewing entertainment only.

[Gary Childress]

Jim Newman Interview.

https://youtu.be/jaHRGC18Bb8

For your viewing entertainment only.

It's like talking to Bud Abbot, asking him "Who's on first?"

EDIT: Thank you for posting the video, I'm sure it was very enlightening, in one way or another, I suppose.

[Fairy]

Jim Newman Interview.

https://youtu.be/jaHRGC18Bb8

For your viewing entertainment only.

It's like talking to Bud Abbot, asking him "Who's on first?"

EDIT: Thank you for posting the video, I'm sure it was very enlightening, in one way or another, I suppose.

It's for my entertainment only. Know what I mean.

[Gary Childress]

Jim Newman Interview.

https://youtu.be/jaHRGC18Bb8

For your viewing entertainment only.

It's like talking to Bud Abbot, asking him "Who's on first?"

EDIT: Thank you for posting the video, I'm sure it was very enlightening, in one way or another, I suppose.

It's for my entertainment only. Know what I mean.

Of course I don't know what you mean.

[Fairy]

It's like talking to Bud Abbot, asking him "Who's on first?"

EDIT: Thank you for posting the video, I'm sure it was very enlightening, in one way or another, I suppose.

It's for my entertainment only. Know what I mean.

Of course I don't know what you mean.

Great answer.

[Fairy]

Nobody seems to agree what the Truth is, and even if they do, that's not the Truth.

The body is known, and the body that is known knows nothing, because the known cannot know anything.

Do you agree that a body knows nothing, a body cannot know anything?

It's all a bit mental, have you gone mad yet?

[Gary Childress]

Nobody seems to agree what the Truth is, and even if they do, that's not the Truth.

The body is known, and the body that is known knows nothing, because the known cannot know anything.

Do you agree that a body knows nothing, a body cannot know anything?

It's all a bit mental, have you gone mad yet?

No, I haven't gone mad yet. The rest of your post I'm not sure about.

[Fairy]

Nobody seems to agree what the Truth is, and even if they do, that's not the Truth.

The body is known, and the body that is known knows nothing, because the known cannot know anything.

Do you agree that a body knows nothing, a body cannot know anything?

It's all a bit mental, have you gone mad yet?

No, I haven't gone mad yet. The rest of your post I'm not sure about.

I'm mental. I've never seen my mind.

[Gary Childress]

Nobody seems to agree what the Truth is, and even if they do, that's not the Truth.

The body is known, and the body that is known knows nothing, because the known cannot know anything.

Do you agree that a body knows nothing, a body cannot know anything?

It's all a bit mental, have you gone mad yet?

No, I haven't gone mad yet. The rest of your post I'm not sure about.

I'm mental. I've never seen my mind.

I suspect it is true that you haven't seen your mind. What do you mean by "mental"? For example: do you mean you are a mind? Or are you saying you are mentally ill as the term "mental" sometimes is used to refer to? Or does your word "mental" refer to something else I have not mentioned?

[Fairy]

No, I haven't gone mad yet. The rest of your post I'm not sure about.

I'm mental. I've never seen my mind.

I suspect it is true that you haven't seen your mind. What do you mean by "mental"? For example: do you mean you are a mind? Or are you saying you are mentally ill as the term "mental" sometimes is used to refer to? Or does your word "mental" refer to something else I have not mentioned?

I'm saying I haven't seen my mind, and yet I use my mind to think, I think!

I've heard of the word mind. But I've never seen one.

[Gary Childress]

I'm mental. I've never seen my mind.

I suspect it is true that you haven't seen your mind. What do you mean by "mental"? For example: do you mean you are a mind? Or are you saying you are mentally ill as the term "mental" sometimes is used to refer to? Or does your word "mental" refer to something else I have not mentioned?

I'm saying I haven't seen my mind, and yet I use my mind to think, I think!

OK. That seems to fit the statement.

[Fairy]

I suspect it is true that you haven't seen your mind. What do you mean by "mental"? For example: do you mean you are a mind? Or are you saying you are mentally ill as the term "mental" sometimes is used to refer to? Or does your word "mental" refer to something else I have not mentioned?

I'm saying I haven't seen my mind, and yet I use my mind to think, I think!

OK. That seems to fit the statement.

I agree.

[Age]

Nobody seems to agree what the Truth is, and even if they do, that's not the Truth.

you used the word, 'nobody' (in regards to not seems to know the Truth) here, but in you very next paragraph you say and claim 'the body' (knows nothing). Which explains why no 'body' does not just 'seem' to know the Truth but actually never even could know the Truth.

Now, what actually knows the Truth (of things) is some thing different from 'bodies' of grouped together visible 'matter'. And, that thing is 'you', the invisible people within visible 'human bodies' and to be even more specific the One that actually validates and verifies if 'it' is the actual Truth, (of things) or not, is 'I', the One invisible thing within all visible 'bodies' of 'matter' and/or within all visible 'matter', itself.

The body is known, and the body that is known knows nothing, because the known cannot know anything.

Will 'you' please, once and for all, explain to 'the audience', here, how 'you', individually and personally, came to 'the conclusion', and which you believe, absolutely, to be the absolute Truth of things, that is, 'the known can not know any thing'?

Do you agree that a body knows nothing, a body cannot know anything?

Although visible physical matter, itself, may not be able to know things, the thing/s that can and do actually know things, like, for example, the actual Truth of things, can, also, be known.

It's all a bit mental, have you gone mad yet?

The 'thing/s' that know things is invisible, and whether 'it' is 'matter' or not is still open for questioning, and finding out. Now, although 'the thing/s' that knows things is 'invisble' how 'it' exits and what 'it' is made up of and out of, exactly, still needs to be 'looked at' and 'into'. Now, obviously, because 'it' is 'currently' invisible to the physical eyes 'it' may well never be 'seen' in 'this concept', 'it' can still be 'seen' in 'the context' of 'being understood' and 'known'.

And, knowing who and what the 'thing/s' is, exactly, which knows things is, once again, already known, and understood. Which is obviously contrary to what 'some' already believe, absolutely, is the Truth of things.

Now, I have already explained how the, actual, Truth (of things) is obtained, and known to be the absolute irrfutable Truth. If, however, people want to do 'this', or not, is of their completely free choosing.

[Fairy]

Nobody seems to agree what the Truth is, and even if they do, that's not the Truth.

you used the word, 'nobody' (in regards to not seems to know the Truth) here, but in you very next paragraph you say and claim 'the body' (knows nothing). Which explains why no 'body' does not just 'seem' to know the Truth but actually never even could know the Truth.

Now, what actually knows the Truth (of things) is some thing different from 'bodies' of grouped together visible 'matter'. And, that thing is 'you', the invisible people within visible 'human bodies' and to be even more specific the One that actually validates and verifies if 'it' is the actual Truth, (of things) or not, is 'I', the One invisible thing within all visible 'bodies' of 'matter' and/or within all visible 'matter', itself.

The body is known, and the body that is known knows nothing, because the known cannot know anything.

Will 'you' please, once and for all, explain to 'the audience', here, how 'you', individually and personally, came to 'the conclusion', and which you believe, absolutely, to be the absolute Truth of things, that is, 'the known can not know any thing'?

Do you agree that a body knows nothing, a body cannot know anything?

Although visible physical matter, itself, may not be able to know things, the thing/s that can and do actually know things, like, for example, the actual Truth of things, can, also, be known.

It's all a bit mental, have you gone mad yet?

The 'thing/s' that know things is invisible, and whether 'it' is 'matter' or not is still open for questioning, and finding out. Now, although 'the thing/s' that knows things is 'invisble' how 'it' exits and what 'it' is made up of and out of, exactly, still needs to be 'looked at' and 'into'. Now, obviously, because 'it' is 'currently' invisible to the physical eyes 'it' may well never be 'seen' in 'this concept', 'it' can still be 'seen' in 'the context' of 'being understood' and 'known'.

And, knowing who and what the 'thing/s' is, exactly, which knows things is, once again, already known, and understood. Which is obviously contrary to what 'some' already believe, absolutely, is the Truth of things.

Now, I have already explained how the, actual, Truth (of things) is obtained, and known to be the absolute irrfutable Truth. If, however, people want to do 'this', or not, is of their completely free choosing.

I personally know how the actual Truth of things is obtained. I don’t require eternal validation, at this point, because I get the point.I have personally collided with the infinite. For me, infinite existence doesn’t need proof, but proof needs existence. For me, I can exist, but my child cannot exist, unless I exist.

I sometimes use the wrong words to point to what I’m pointing to. Which is pointless and like being a signpost written in Japanese for someone who can only read the English language. That’s when you recognise that trying to understand other minds is going to make for a bloody big frustrating day.

[Age]

Nobody seems to agree what the Truth is, and even if they do, that's not the Truth.

you used the word, 'nobody' (in regards to not seems to know the Truth) here, but in you very next paragraph you say and claim 'the body' (knows nothing). Which explains why no 'body' does not just 'seem' to know the Truth but actually never even could know the Truth.

Now, what actually knows the Truth (of things) is some thing different from 'bodies' of grouped together visible 'matter'. And, that thing is 'you', the invisible people within visible 'human bodies' and to be even more specific the One that actually validates and verifies if 'it' is the actual Truth, (of things) or not, is 'I', the One invisible thing within all visible 'bodies' of 'matter' and/or within all visible 'matter', itself.

The body is known, and the body that is known knows nothing, because the known cannot know anything.

Will 'you' please, once and for all, explain to 'the audience', here, how 'you', individually and personally, came to 'the conclusion', and which you believe, absolutely, to be the absolute Truth of things, that is, 'the known can not know any thing'?

Do you agree that a body knows nothing, a body cannot know anything?

Although visible physical matter, itself, may not be able to know things, the thing/s that can and do actually know things, like, for example, the actual Truth of things, can, also, be known.

It's all a bit mental, have you gone mad yet?

The 'thing/s' that know things is invisible, and whether 'it' is 'matter' or not is still open for questioning, and finding out. Now, although 'the thing/s' that knows things is 'invisble' how 'it' exits and what 'it' is made up of and out of, exactly, still needs to be 'looked at' and 'into'. Now, obviously, because 'it' is 'currently' invisible to the physical eyes 'it' may well never be 'seen' in 'this concept', 'it' can still be 'seen' in 'the context' of 'being understood' and 'known'.

And, knowing who and what the 'thing/s' is, exactly, which knows things is, once again, already known, and understood. Which is obviously contrary to what 'some' already believe, absolutely, is the Truth of things.

Now, I have already explained how the, actual, Truth (of things) is obtained, and known to be the absolute irrfutable Truth. If, however, people want to do 'this', or not, is of their completely free choosing.

I personally know how the actual Truth of things is obtained. I don’t require eternal validation, at this point, because I get the point.I have personally collided with the infinite. For me, infinite existence doesn’t need proof, but proof needs existence. For me, I can exist, but my child cannot exist, unless I exist.

I sometimes use the wrong words to point to what I’m pointing to. Which is pointless and like being a signpost written in Japanese for someone who can only read the English language. That’s when you recognise that trying to understand other minds is going to make for a bloody big frustrating day.

Especially considering the irrefutable Fact that there is only One Mind, and, One Mind only