Questions to Age

[Age]

Already responded.

Just 'responding' is not necessarily 'answering', 'nor clarifying', at all.

Saying and claiming that 'you responded' never necessarily means absolutely any thing at all, other than, of course, that you have 'just responded', only.

Look, if you do not just want to just answer, and clarify, because you would then just contradict "yourself", then I totally understand why do you not answer, and clarify.

Already responded with clarifications, even now.

*

First clarification:
No. It would be rather presumptuous to place such limitations upon the dreams of those capable of first human flight (which excludes the flight of falling off a cliff).


Second clarification:
To clarify, the limitations that you placed upon the dreams of those capable of first human flight were caused by erroneously assuming that only the articulated aspects of the flyers’ dreams were the totality of their dreams and the sole cause of their pioneering, when in fact such a projection of limitation applies to no human bean, and especially not those mortals whose self-concepts very well may have had an extra ration of the Icarus gene adjusting the frequency of their phenomena reception, which is the gene that tickles everyone’s fancy just a bit when they gaze upwards in emptiness meditation, into the realms where the eagles soar.

Once again 'this one' has completely and utterly missed what is being asked for.

Which, again, is totally understandable.

[Age]

This thread is titled:
Questions to Age

This thread is not titled:
Questions from Age

(neither is it titled, advice from Age)

Here is 'another one' that 'I' have to inform that it was not 'I' who started this thread.

Now, 'I' could just as easily and simply start a thread titled, 'Questions to "walker", and then also say and write, 'This thread is titled, 'Questions to "walker". This thread is not titled, 'Questions from "walker", and neither is this thread titled, "Advice from "walker".

But, 'I' would never do such a thing because of just how stupid 'I' would have to be to do so.

Look "walker" you made a claim. And, the Fact that you are 'trying' your absolutely hardest to deflect away from and to detract from the very points that I have made is showing, and proving, that you can not back up and support your claim. As well as you are absolutely afraid of what 'your claim' actually points to, exactly. Which is why you will not commit to providing any further clarity, here.

Entitled?

Obviously, since this thread is not about you asking questions, it's about you figuring things out without the usual crutch, which is good practice what with the children being trained to consult AI with questions, rather than think.

*

Question for Age:

Age, did you ever see this particular Wizard of Id cartoon?
It's from long ago when there were newspapers, but so far it remains hidden somewhere in the web.

*

Wizard: Sire, this is Sir Edmund Hillary. He was the first to climb the highest mountain in the world.

King: Why did you climb it?

Sir Edmund Hillary: Because it was there.

King: Don’t go to the beach.

Here, 'we' have another example of more attempts at deflection.

[Age]

Age…The truth is not the truth.

Is that statement true or false, Age?

Neither.

Just because statements can be made never means that statements are rational, sensible, and logical. Some sentence are irrational, nonsensical, illogical, and just plain old absurd and/or ridiculous.

[Fairy]

Age…The truth is not the truth.

Is that statement true or false, Age?

Neither.

Just because statements can be made never means that statements are rational, sensible, and logical. Some sentence are irrational, nonsensical, illogical, and just plain old absurd and/or ridiculous.

Are you absolutely certain (Neither) is the right answer to the question?

Does the (Neither) answer require no validation from anyone else as to whether it’s absolutely correct?

[Age]

Age…The truth is not the truth.

Is that statement true or false, Age?

Neither.

Just because statements can be made never means that statements are rational, sensible, and logical. Some sentence are irrational, nonsensical, illogical, and just plain old absurd and/or ridiculous.

Are you absolutely certain (Neither) is the right answer to the question?

When 'you' say and write, 'right answer', here, are referring to the whole of the Universe, Itself, to some of the Universe, or to 'me', only?

See, until something else is provided for 'me' to 'look at', here, to 'me', 'that statement' is neither false nor true. So, until some new information and/or knowledge comes along, at the present 'moment', my, 'neither response, is , to me, the 'right answer'.

Do you have any information or knowledge, at all, that could or would show and/or prove otherwise?

Does the (Neither) answer require no validation from anyone else as to whether it’s absolutely correct?

Since 'you' were asking 'me', alone, here, 'i' gave 'you' 'my answer', here. Now, at the 'precise moment' of giving 'my answer', and even at the 'current moment' 'my answer' is 'right', 'to me'.

Now, if 'my answer' is the 'absolute correct' one, or not, to some or all others, 'I' am unaware. I could and did only provide 'you' with 'my answer', in relation to 'me', alone, here.

Did 'my answer' require validation from anyone else?

If yes, then who is 'that one' or 'them', exactly?

[Fairy]

When 'you' say and write, 'right answer', here, are referring to the whole of the Universe, Itself, to some of the Universe, or to 'me', only?

I'm referring to 'Age' only, namely, you, or what you call the 'me'

See, until something else is provided for 'me' to 'look at', here, to 'me', 'that statement' is neither false nor true. So, until some new information and/or knowledge comes along, at the present 'moment', my, 'neither response, is , to me, the 'right answer'.

Would new knowledge or information coming to you change your mind? would you change from saying ( Neither) to something else, if new knowledge or information came to you? For example if I was to tell you the statement was true, and not just (Neither true or false) would that make any difference to your own answer which was ( Neither) true or false.

And which do you think would be the correct answer, mine or yours?
Would you need to prove yours to be the correct answer, or need to prove my answer as being false because my answer is different to your answer?

Do you have any information or knowledge, at all, that could or would show and/or prove otherwise?

Does the (Neither) answer require no validation from anyone else as to whether it’s absolutely correct?

Since 'you' were asking 'me', alone, here, 'i' gave 'you' 'my answer', here. Now, at the 'precise moment' of giving 'my answer', and even at the 'current moment' 'my answer' is 'right', 'to me'.

Now, if 'my answer' is the 'absolute correct' one, or not, to some or all others, 'I' am unaware. I could and did only provide 'you' with 'my answer', in relation to 'me', alone, here.

Okay. So what you've done here, is to point out that your answer is correct because you are unaware there could be anything contrary to your correct answer.

Did 'my answer' require validation from anyone else?

Not if you are absolutely certain your answer is the correct one. You answered (Neither) so according to you, that doesn't need any further clarification, new knowledge or information to change that view, because it's already correct according to you.

If yes, then who is 'that one' or 'them', exactly?

That would be someone who had a different answer to your answer. Like for example: if I said the statement was true. That is an answer that is different to what you said which was the statement is neither true nor false.

[Age]

When 'you' say and write, 'right answer', here, are referring to the whole of the Universe, Itself, to some of the Universe, or to 'me', only?

I'm referring to 'Age' only, namely, you, or what you call the 'me'

See, until something else is provided for 'me' to 'look at', here, to 'me', 'that statement' is neither false nor true. So, until some new information and/or knowledge comes along, at the present 'moment', my, 'neither response, is , to me, the 'right answer'.

Would new knowledge or information coming to you change your mind?

Once again,

1. I do not have 'a mind'.

2. There is nothing that has 'a mind'.

3. And, there is only One Mind, which no thing 'has'.

By the way, I would provide a new answer if new information or knowledge led 'me' to a new/er answer.

would you change from saying ( Neither) to something else, if new knowledge or information came to you?

It would, obviously, all depend on what the new knowledge or information is, exactly.

For example if I was to tell you the statement was true, and not just (Neither true or false) would that make any difference to your own answer which was ( Neither) true or false.

Not at all.

However, if I asked you some clarifying questions, then, depending on what you then told me, your responses might then make a difference to my own answer.

And which do you think would be the correct answer, mine or yours?

That would all, obviously, depend on if, and how, you could back up and support your own answer.

Would you need to prove yours to be the correct answer, or need to prove my answer as being false because my answer is different to your answer?

1. I do not, and have no, need to prove my answer.

2. I do not need to prove your answer as being false because your answer is different to my answer, nor for any other reason as well.

3. I do not believe either your answer nor my answer is absolutely True, Right, Accurate, nor Correct, so I have no need, nor want, to prove either.

But,

4. If you think or believe that you could prove 'your answer', then I, for One, would love to hear and/or see 'the proof'.

Do you have any information or knowledge, at all, that could or would show and/or prove otherwise?

Does the (Neither) answer require no validation from anyone else as to whether it’s absolutely correct?

Since 'you' were asking 'me', alone, here, 'i' gave 'you' 'my answer', here. Now, at the 'precise moment' of giving 'my answer', and even at the 'current moment' 'my answer' is 'right', 'to me'.

Now, if 'my answer' is the 'absolute correct' one, or not, to some or all others, 'I' am unaware. I could and did only provide 'you' with 'my answer', in relation to 'me', alone, here.

Okay. So what you've done here, is to point out that your answer is correct because you are unaware there could be anything contrary to your correct answer.

Did 'my answer' require validation from anyone else?

Not if you are absolutely certain your answer is the correct one. You answered (Neither) so according to you, that doesn't need any further clarification, new knowledge or information to change that view, because it's already correct according to you.

you might have noticed throughout this forum where I have expressed, a 'few times', that I only 'believe' in one thing only. I do this because if I was to 'believe' things, then I would not be open to anything else that opposes 'that belief'. But I have 'views', instead. As, to me, each and every 'view' is 'just a view', which all of have come from 'past experiences', and because of where all 'views arise from', to me, each and every 'view' are all always open to be changed.

Just because I provide 'views' this never ever means that I am absolutely certain that 'my view or answer' is the 'Correct one'. But, every answer 'i' provide is the 'correct one', to me. at 'that moment'. Again, when I use a 'capital letter' for words then that means that 'that word' is in relation to every one. And, as I pointed out in one of my very first posts, here, every view I express, here, always remain open, to change.

If yes, then who is 'that one' or 'them', exactly?

That would be someone who had a different answer to your answer.

If absolutely any one would like, or require, 'validation', then, once again, all they have to do is just ask for it.

Like for example: if I said the statement was true. That is an answer that is different to what you said which was the statement is neither true nor false.

Are you 'now' saying and claiming that just because you have, and/or gave, a different answer, then 'this', in and of itself, means that 'my answer', automatically, 'requires validation'?

[Ansiktsburk]

Can you, exactly, describe whats right and whats wrong with the conflict in palestisrael?

[Fairy]

Once again,

1. I do not have 'a mind'.

2. There is nothing that has 'a mind'.

3. And, there is only One Mind, which no thing 'has'.

By the way, I would provide a new answer if new information or knowledge led 'me' to a new/er answer.

1. Okay, you don't have a mind, but how do you know you don't have a mind?

2.Okay but where is the mind that nothing has?

3. Okay but if there's only one mind, then anything that mind knows must be absolutely correct, right? and there would be no need to seek validation for being correct, right? there would be no such other minds that could invalidate this one mind and it's knowing power, right?

[Fairy]

That would all, obviously, depend on if, and how, you could back up and support your own answer.

What if my answer was the only absolute answer I could think of, coming from my own source and sense of knowing. Why would I need to prove my own sense of knowing to myself, when I already know it's correct?
And why would I need to seek validation from another for some knowing that is absolutely right and correct for me?
Why would I need to back up and support my own absolute answer, that is already absolutely right and correct for me?

[Age]

Can you, exactly, describe whats right and whats wrong with the conflict in palestisrael?

Are you, here, asking, 'what is right', and, 'what is wrong', with the conflict in what you call "plaestisrael'?

If yes, then what is 'wrong' with every human being conflict, to me, in every part of the earth is that they are not necessary, and all prolonged disagreements and incompatibilities among human beings, or within a human being only helps in causing and creating confusion, harm, damage, and/or disharmony.

At the moment, to me, there is nothing 'right' with conflicts, anywhere.

[Fairy]

Like for example: if I said the statement was true. That is an answer that is different to what you said which was the statement is neither true nor false.

Are you 'now' saying and claiming that just because you have, and/or gave, a different answer, then 'this', in and of itself, means that 'my answer', automatically, 'requires validation'?

No, I'm not saying that at all.

I'm saying we can give different answers to the same question. But only you can validate the truth in your answer, no one else can. That's what I'm saying okay?

[Age]

Once again,

1. I do not have 'a mind'.

2. There is nothing that has 'a mind'.

3. And, there is only One Mind, which no thing 'has'.

By the way, I would provide a new answer if new information or knowledge led 'me' to a new/er answer.

1. Okay, you don't have a mind, but how do you know you don't have a mind?

Because there is only One Mind, because of what the word 'Mind' means and/or is referring to, (which fits in with the G.U.T.O.E, and, because no one could own 'It'.

2.Okay but where is the mind that nothing has?[/quote]

There is no one place where the Mind is. Besides, of course, within the Universe, Itself.

3. Okay but if there's only one mind, then anything that mind knows must be absolutely correct, right?

Yes.

The Mind 'knows'. Whereas, the brain only 'thinks', (it knows).

and there would be no need to seek validation for being correct, right?

Yes.

When one also knows how to ascertain the 'knowledge/knowing' directly from the One (always open) Mind, then 'validation' happens at the same time.

there would be no such other minds that could invalidate this one mind and it's knowing power, right?

Yes.

[Fairy]

I do not believe either your answer nor my answer is absolutely True, Right, Accurate, nor Correct, so I have no need, nor want, to prove either.

So all our answers to our questions are invalid of absolute truth, rather they are just illusory beliefs, not valid, not true, not right, not accurate, nor correct, nor in need nor want of any proof to the contrary, is that what you are saying, now?

[Age]

That would all, obviously, depend on if, and how, you could back up and support your own answer.

What if my answer was the only absolute answer I could think of, coming from my own source and sense of knowing.

1. 'you' are only 'one' of 'many'. And, it is only through the 'all' where 'absolute answers' can, and do, come from.

2. Because 'you' are only 'one' of 'many', then each and every answer is, to you, is the only 'absolute answer' that 'you' can think of in no way means that 'your only absolute correct answer' is the actual irrefutable Correct answer, at all.

3. What is your own source and sense of knowing, exactly?

4. When, and if, you also come to 'know' how to find the irrefutable answers, in Life, then this is when 'you' will also be able to inform 'the readers', here, of where the source and sense of 'Knowing', Itself, is, exactly, for every one, as One.

Why would I need to prove my own sense of knowing to myself, when I already know it's correct?

No one that I know of, anyway, even thought that you would need to prove you own sense of knowing to 'you'.

If you think or believe that your own, personal, sense of knowing is correct, then what 'you' are, personally, showing, here, is the 'ego', itself, 'at play', and 'at work'.

Now, obviously what you call of 'sense of knowing' would be 'correct' to 'you', alone, and only. So, no one, here anyway, is disputing 'this'.

But, what each of you human beings, individually, perceive is correct, which is in disagreement with 'another' is why there is so confusion, conflict, and disharmony in 'the world'.

And why would I need to seek validation from another for some knowing that is absolutely right and correct for me?

'This' never even came 'a thought' within 'this body'.

And, considering any discussion about 'seeking validation' was brought up by 'you', alone, 'i' really not sure why 'you' would ask such a question as 'the one' 'you' just did, here.

Why would I need to back up and support my own absolute answer, that is already absolutely right and correct for me?

I will, once again, suggest that if some one really would like to make a claim, here, publicly, then it would be best for them if they first obtain and gain the irrefutable proof for their claim.

Also, and by the way, 'you' obviously would not need to back up and support whatever answer you have. However, if you would, really, like 'your answer' to be agreed with and accepted by 'others', then you will, obviously, need to back up and support your answer, to 'them'.