Existence Is Infinite

[daniel j lavender]

Existence is infinite.

This is evident in two ways:

1.) Existence is infinite or unlimited. This simply means existence is not limited to any particular.

This is readily observed and easily confirmed. Existence is not limited to a tree. Existence is not limited to a single house. Existence is not limited to planet Earth. Things other than these are perceived; other trees, other houses, the Moon, Mars, etcetera. Existence is not limited to any particular.


2.) To further illustrate the infinitude of existence I offer the following challenge:

Locate nothing or nonexistence.

Inability to do so is further evidence of the infinitude of existence. Not only is existence not limited to any particular, existence is not limited by nonexistence as nonexistence is not and cannot be.

Existence is infinite, existence is unlimited. Only nothing or nonexistence could actually limit existence however nothing or nonexistence is not and cannot be.

The framework has two strong, functional supports. Existence cannot be restricted to any particular indicating no internal restriction, and nonexistence cannot be substantiated indicating no external restriction.

[Fairy]

Infinity is death.

[Fairy]

To claim existence is infinite is to reframe death not as an end, but as a surrender to the infinite, or the vast, unknown totality of existence. Philosophers and spiritual thinkers suggest that a fear of death stems from a fear of this surrender, but that by living fully in the present, death can become a gentle guidance into the eternal.

If human beings are the only ones aware of infinity and yet they are finite things, then infinity is death.

[Fairy]

Death is Infinity.

[daniel j lavender]

Infinity is death.

Infinity is infinity. Infinite is infinite. Infinite is not limited to death.

[Fairy]

Infinity is death.

Infinity is infinity. Infinite is infinite. Infinite is not limited to death.

Are you saying infinite is not limited to death in the context that death never happens, that nothing ever dies?
And if nothing ever dies then can anything ever live?

[Age]

By omitting the components of time, eternal and eternity, Existence Is Infinite [more] seamlessly integrates and allows any conception relating to them:

Sounds like 'excuses' and not 'actual reasons'.

Infinite, being unlimited, implicitly encompasses various conceptions of time, timelessness, eternal and eternity.

Only to 'the one' that 'encompasses' things 'this way'.

Note it does not deny eternal life, the eternality of existence or the eternality of things but rather it allows more room for variation concerning those concepts.

1. I never ever thought that 'it' does not deny eternal life, nor any of the other so-called 'eternality of ...', here.

2. There is no need for 'it' to allow more room for variation concerning those concepts, as 'those concepts' already have words 'for them'.

So, once more, Existence, like Life, and like the Universe, are infinite, and eternal. Which, again, is an irrefutable Fact, that, obviously, no one could deny, logically.

And, once again, if absolutely any one would like to put 'this claim', of mine, to 'any test', then let 'us' have a Truly open and honest peaceful discussion. There is not a human being, ever, who could refute 'my claim', here.

[Age]

Actually 'i' have said some thing like,

'Emotions are signs, signals, and/or signposts' in regards to what is going on 'around us', and to help direct 'us' in 'which way' is the Right direction, for 'us', in Life. And,

'Absolutely every thing is relative to the observer'.

But, when 'we' are 'in agreement and voluntary accepting' the 'exact same words', then these are the 'Right words' that can, and do, lead 'us' to the Right T.R.A.C.K., in Life. Which is just 'the path' that holds the True, Right, Accurate, and Correct Knowledge, in Life, which is what actually guides 'us' to where 'we' all want to be.

That is, when 'we' really do want to follow our One United Goal, in Life, which is to just live in peace and harmony with every one, as One, then 'we' can, and will, when 'we' find and are ON T.R.A.C.K., or in other words, when 'we' are on, and following, the Right T.R.A.C.K., in Life. Which, again, is found in, and with, the Right words.

This is beautifully explained. I like how you have written this.

It sings to my soul. Thank you Age.

The logic basically is "if everyone agrees" which can be applied to any and everything.

What you just said and wrote, here, could not be any further from what I have, very clearly, pointed out and stated.

Are you, really, 'trying to' claim, here, that any and every thing can be agreed upon by every one?

If yes, then you are far more closed than you had first come across as.

[Age]

Think I’m beginning to prefer the recent Eternal/Eternity Revision (just above): viewtopic.php?p=789448#p789448

It’s more concise yet arguably more versatile.

Infinite, being unlimited, implicitly encompasses various conceptions of time, timelessness, eternal and eternity.

If "yourself" had not realized 'this', earlier, then why were 'you' so slow, here?

Note it does not deny eternal life, the eternality of existence or the eternality of things but rather it allows more room for variation concerning those concepts. This revision also eliminates earlier conceptual entanglement; the terms have various meanings which can lead to complications.

It seems the more one writes, the more detail and specificity one provides, the more rigid the philosophy becomes. It’s interesting how such lengthy manuscripts from earlier philosophers often convey rather rigid systems.

[Fairy]

2.) To further illustrate the infinitude of existence I offer the following challenge:

Locate nothing or nonexistence.

Inability to do so is further evidence of the infinitude of existence. Not only is existence not limited to any particular, existence is not limited by nonexistence as nonexistence is not and cannot be.

Existence is infinite, existence is unlimited. Only nothing or nonexistence could actually limit existence however nothing or nonexistence is not and cannot be.

The framework has two strong, functional supports. Existence cannot be restricted to any particular indicating no internal restriction, and nonexistence cannot be substantiated indicating no external restriction.

How about locating “emptiness” rather than “nonexistence” ?

Emptiness is the space between two things. So emptiness is easily located by association to things.
This infinite existence is absolute only because there is no other existence.

So birth and death cannot be. Infinite existence has to mean the absolute existence of emptiness in which all physical forms are constantly appearing and dissolving into. In other words, emptiness exists, emptiness is not non-existence.


Infinite existence is just another word for Death which is just another word for Consciousness

Which is just another word for God who is nothing being everything, or, emptiness being full.

[Fairy]

Placing the word (Non) before what is without doubt or error, is the error, simply because there’s no such thing as a thing that doesn’t exist.

Existence, cannot not exist, as in Nonexistent- likewise there’s no such existence as Nonduality, because duality exists.

Absolutely, there’s no such thing as a (non thing) whatsoever in language.

Outside of language is silent unknowing. Both language/ knowledge…and silent unknowing are the same absolute infinite existence. Both are death, unborn reality.

Putting infinity into words, you might as well call infinity death, because it’s unborn.

[Fairy]

Actually 'i' have said some thing like,

'Emotions are signs, signals, and/or signposts' in regards to what is going on 'around us', and to help direct 'us' in 'which way' is the Right direction, for 'us', in Life. And,

'Absolutely every thing is relative to the observer'.

But, when 'we' are 'in agreement and voluntary accepting' the 'exact same words', then these are the 'Right words' that can, and do, lead 'us' to the Right T.R.A.C.K., in Life. Which is just 'the path' that holds the True, Right, Accurate, and Correct Knowledge, in Life, which is what actually guides 'us' to where 'we' all want to be.

That is, when 'we' really do want to follow our One United Goal, in Life, which is to just live in peace and harmony with every one, as One, then 'we' can, and will, when 'we' find and are ON T.R.A.C.K., or in other words, when 'we' are on, and following, the Right T.R.A.C.K., in Life. Which, again, is found in, and with, the Right words.

This is beautifully explained. I like how you have written this.

It sings to my soul. Thank you Age.

The logic basically is "if everyone agrees" which can be applied to any and everything.

That's a really dumb thing to say to another.

That's a complete mirror image of what you are projecting onto Age. It's as if you had said everyone should agree with what Eodnhoj7 is saying, because Eodnhoj7 is saying the absolute truth about any and everything because what Eodnhoj7 says is a truth everyone should agree with, so it is impossible to be a relative truth, a truth that others have formulated, rather, it can only be an absolute truth that Eodnhoj7 has formulated, only.

You see, two can play at your sneaky little mind game.

On the other hand, IF you ever finally reach absolute truth, no human being will be able to validate it for you.

[daniel j lavender]

2.) To further illustrate the infinitude of existence I offer the following challenge:

Locate nothing or nonexistence.

Inability to do so is further evidence of the infinitude of existence. Not only is existence not limited to any particular, existence is not limited by nonexistence as nonexistence is not and cannot be.

Existence is infinite, existence is unlimited. Only nothing or nonexistence could actually limit existence however nothing or nonexistence is not and cannot be.

The framework has two strong, functional supports. Existence cannot be restricted to any particular indicating no internal restriction, and nonexistence cannot be substantiated indicating no external restriction.

How about locating “emptiness” rather than “nonexistence” ?

Emptiness is the space between two things. So emptiness is easily located by association to things.

You concede in your first sentence that emptiness is not nonexistence.

Emptiness refers to a thing, a part of existence; a quality, an area or volume.

Space is existence, by definition. Existence is defined as that which is perceived, at least in part; that which is interacted with, at least in part, in some way. Space is perceived. Thus space qualifies as existence. Emptiness, as it is perceived, also qualifies as existence.

Nonexistence has not been located.

Evidence of the infinitude of existence is maintained.

[Fairy]

2.) To further illustrate the infinitude of existence I offer the following challenge:

Locate nothing or nonexistence.

Inability to do so is further evidence of the infinitude of existence. Not only is existence not limited to any particular, existence is not limited by nonexistence as nonexistence is not and cannot be.

Existence is infinite, existence is unlimited. Only nothing or nonexistence could actually limit existence however nothing or nonexistence is not and cannot be.

The framework has two strong, functional supports. Existence cannot be restricted to any particular indicating no internal restriction, and nonexistence cannot be substantiated indicating no external restriction.

How about locating “emptiness” rather than “nonexistence” ?

Emptiness is the space between two things. So emptiness is easily located by association to things.

You concede in your first sentence that emptiness is not nonexistence.

Emptiness refers to a thing, a part of existence; a quality, an area or volume.

Space is existence, by definition. Existence is defined as that which is perceived, at least in part; that which is interacted with, at least in part, in some way. Space is perceived. Thus space qualifies as existence. Emptiness, as it is perceived, also qualifies as existence.

Nonexistence has not been located.

Evidence of the infinitude of existence is maintained.

I agree, that infinite existence is eternally self-maintaining. And that nonexistence is an impossibility.

So do you agree then that death is just another word for infinity, insomuch as nothing is everything infinitely for eternity?

[Fairy]

Infinity is death.

Infinity is infinity. Infinite is infinite. Infinite is not limited to death.

Then death is infinite. Everyone who is born, will eventually die, and dissolve into the Total Infinity that's infinite. There is no choice in the matter. That's what "death" is.

Do you agree?

How can the infinite be limited by itself? as you are suggesting?

How can death be a limitation of the infinite?