Social justice, levelling up to the average for the 80%, can only be obtained by conflict, struggle, jihad, but never be obtained by violence.Impenitent wrote: ↑Sat Sep 27, 2025 12:49 pm"justice" derived from conflictMartin Peter Clarke wrote: ↑Sat Sep 27, 2025 8:10 amRiiiight. Yeah. If you won't have social justice, you must have war and order.Impenitent wrote: ↑Sat Sep 27, 2025 12:35 am
you haven't heard of the war against drugs? the war on crime?
what precedent? be careful who you try to kill with drugs, they may kill you back...
-Imp
-Imp
US military against cartels based in Mexico
-
Martin Peter Clarke
- Posts: 1617
- Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2025 9:54 pm
Re: US military against cartels based in Mexico
-
Impenitent
- Posts: 5774
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2010 2:04 pm
Re: US military against cartels based in Mexico
one man's conflict, struggle and jihad is another man's violenceMartin Peter Clarke wrote: ↑Sat Sep 27, 2025 2:40 pmSocial justice, levelling up to the average for the 80%, can only be obtained by conflict, struggle, jihad, but never be obtained by violence.Impenitent wrote: ↑Sat Sep 27, 2025 12:49 pm"justice" derived from conflictMartin Peter Clarke wrote: ↑Sat Sep 27, 2025 8:10 am
Riiiight. Yeah. If you won't have social justice, you must have war and order.
-Imp
-Imp
-
Martin Peter Clarke
- Posts: 1617
- Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2025 9:54 pm
Re: US military against cartels based in Mexico
That which begets violence is institutionalised violence. End that without violence.Impenitent wrote: ↑Sat Sep 27, 2025 2:53 pmone man's conflict, struggle and jihad is another man's violenceMartin Peter Clarke wrote: ↑Sat Sep 27, 2025 2:40 pmSocial justice, levelling up to the average for the 80%, can only be obtained by conflict, struggle, jihad, but never be obtained by violence.
-Imp
-
Martin Peter Clarke
- Posts: 1617
- Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2025 9:54 pm
Re: US military against cartels based in Mexico
11 in the last boat, 17 in the last 3. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c5y5q173053oFlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Fri Sep 26, 2025 1:07 pmHow full? The thing about actual drug running is that you don't put very many people in the boat, there's a driver and somebody to unload and that's usually about it.Martin Peter Clarke wrote: ↑Fri Sep 26, 2025 7:33 am They've extra-judiciously executed another boatload of Colombian-Venezuelan fentanyl drug runners.
Impunity rules the waves, and waives the rules. Understandably. It probably dents supply by 20%.
-
Gary Childress
- Posts: 11744
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 3:08 pm
- Location: It's my fault
Re: US military against cartels based in Mexico
Sounds more like a refugee boat than a drug running boat.Martin Peter Clarke wrote: ↑Sun Sep 28, 2025 4:36 pm11 in the last boat, 17 in the last 3. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c5y5q173053oFlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Fri Sep 26, 2025 1:07 pmHow full? The thing about actual drug running is that you don't put very many people in the boat, there's a driver and somebody to unload and that's usually about it.Martin Peter Clarke wrote: ↑Fri Sep 26, 2025 7:33 am They've extra-judiciously executed another boatload of Colombian-Venezuelan fentanyl drug runners.
Impunity rules the waves, and waives the rules. Understandably. It probably dents supply by 20%.
- FlashDangerpants
- Posts: 8815
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:54 pm
Re: US military against cartels based in Mexico
Everybody in a drug smuggling boat is well paid and trusted to remain silent. If you are smuggling drugs you don't take extra people, it is too expensive and somebody will talk if captured. That wasn't a drugs boat.Martin Peter Clarke wrote: ↑Sun Sep 28, 2025 4:36 pm11 in the last boat, 17 in the last 3. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c5y5q173053oFlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Fri Sep 26, 2025 1:07 pmHow full? The thing about actual drug running is that you don't put very many people in the boat, there's a driver and somebody to unload and that's usually about it.Martin Peter Clarke wrote: ↑Fri Sep 26, 2025 7:33 am They've extra-judiciously executed another boatload of Colombian-Venezuelan fentanyl drug runners.
Impunity rules the waves, and waives the rules. Understandably. It probably dents supply by 20%.
-
Gary Childress
- Posts: 11744
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 3:08 pm
- Location: It's my fault
Re: US military against cartels based in Mexico
Either that or drug runners were using a sightseeing boat to smuggle drugs into the country. Many innocent, but 'noble' tourists died that day in the name of Trump's "war on drugs"!FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Sep 28, 2025 5:16 pmEverybody in a drug smuggling boat is well paid and trusted to remain silent. If you are smuggling drugs you don't take extra people, it is too expensive and somebody will talk if captured. That wasn't a drugs boat.Martin Peter Clarke wrote: ↑Sun Sep 28, 2025 4:36 pm11 in the last boat, 17 in the last 3. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c5y5q173053oFlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Fri Sep 26, 2025 1:07 pm
How full? The thing about actual drug running is that you don't put very many people in the boat, there's a driver and somebody to unload and that's usually about it.
Impunity rules the waves, and waives the rules. Understandably. It probably dents supply by 20%.
-
Martin Peter Clarke
- Posts: 1617
- Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2025 9:54 pm
Re: US military against cartels based in Mexico
And nobody's missed them.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Sun Sep 28, 2025 5:27 pmEither that or drug runners were using a sightseeing boat to smuggle drugs into the country. Many innocent, but 'noble' tourists died that day in the name of Trump's "war on drugs"!FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Sep 28, 2025 5:16 pmEverybody in a drug smuggling boat is well paid and trusted to remain silent. If you are smuggling drugs you don't take extra people, it is too expensive and somebody will talk if captured. That wasn't a drugs boat.Martin Peter Clarke wrote: ↑Sun Sep 28, 2025 4:36 pm
11 in the last boat, 17 in the last 3. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c5y5q173053o
Impunity rules the waves, and waives the rules. Understandably. It probably dents supply by 20%.