1. The "Te" of Taoism is the "Actuality" of Aristotle.
2. The "Tao" of Taoism is the "Potentiality" of Aristotle.
1a. The "Te/Actuality" distinctions are the "Forms" of Plato.
2a. The "Tao/Potentiality" distinctions are the "Ineffable" of Plato.
1b. The "Te/Actuality/Form" distinctions are the "Emmanations" of Monism.
2b. The "Tao/Potentiality/Ineffable" distinctions are the "One" of Monism.
1c. The "Te/Actuality/Form/Emmanation" distinctions are "Osiris" of Egyptian Myth.
2c. The "Tao/Potentiality/Ineffable/One" distinctions are "Isis" of Egyptian Myth.
1d. The "Te/Actuality/Form/Emmanation/Osiris" distinctions are the "gods" of Socrates.
2d. The "Tao/Potentiality/Ineffable/One/Isis" distinctions are the "Formless" of Socrates.
1e. The "Te/Actuality/Form/Emmanation/Osiris/Gods" distinctions are the "1" of binary code.
2e. The "Tao/Potentiality/Ineffable/One/Isis/Formless" distinctions are the "0" of binary code.
3. 1-1e are effectively recursive process by which distinction occurs.
4. 2-2e are effectively the point that occurs recursively
I not entirely sold on it....something seems off.
Thoughts?
****Where East and West Meet: A Universal Metaphysical Foundation
****Where East and West Meet: A Universal Metaphysical Foundation
Last edited by Eodnhoj7 on Sat Sep 27, 2025 2:01 am, edited 7 times in total.
-
Impenitent
- Posts: 5774
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2010 2:04 pm
Re: Where East and West Meet
prime meridian
-Imp
-Imp
Re: Where East and West Meet
Nothing is off.Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 26, 2025 4:46 am The "Te" of Taoism is the "Actuality" of Aristotle.
The "Tao" of Taoism is the "Potentiality" of Aristotle.
The "Te/Actuality" distinctions are the "Forms" of Plato.
The "Tao/Potentiality" distinctions are the "Ineffable" of Plato.
The "Te/Actuality/Form" distinctions are the "Emmanations" of Monism.
The "Tao/Potentiality/Ineffable" distinctions are the "One" of Monism.
The "Te/Actuality/Form/Emmanation" distinctions are "Osiris" of Egyptian Myth.
The "Tao/Potentiality/Ineffable/One" distinctions are "Isis" of Egyptian Myth.
I not entirely sold on it....something seems off.
Thoughts?
Something seems on.
Re: Where East and West Meet
It is not clear enough, the assertion I presented. Something is missing. ****It's updated.Fairy wrote: ↑Fri Sep 26, 2025 1:36 pmNothing is off.Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 26, 2025 4:46 am The "Te" of Taoism is the "Actuality" of Aristotle.
The "Tao" of Taoism is the "Potentiality" of Aristotle.
The "Te/Actuality" distinctions are the "Forms" of Plato.
The "Tao/Potentiality" distinctions are the "Ineffable" of Plato.
The "Te/Actuality/Form" distinctions are the "Emmanations" of Monism.
The "Tao/Potentiality/Ineffable" distinctions are the "One" of Monism.
The "Te/Actuality/Form/Emmanation" distinctions are "Osiris" of Egyptian Myth.
The "Tao/Potentiality/Ineffable/One" distinctions are "Isis" of Egyptian Myth.
I not entirely sold on it....something seems off.
Thoughts?
Something seems on.