ONE ACT TO BREATH NEW LIFE INTO SEXUAL MORALITY

[popeye1945]

If someone puts a coin in a vending machine and the vending machine releases a Pepsi then the person who put the coin in owns the Pepsi.

DUH!

[Age]

"The ability to speak does not make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn, Star Wars.
See also, the Rectification of Names by Confucius.

If a mind has one and only one job to do, and one and only one means of doing its own work, where does gender, race, nationality, etc., define anyone? Factually, the definition of Man, makes everyone equal. So what is that definition, and do you comply with it, or do you fall far short of it? Or as a wise man said, Let he among you who has not sinned, cast the first stone.

Who the fuck is casting stones? I believe an individual is entitled to know who is responsible for bringing them into the world; they really did have a vote in the matter, did they! I think you have a powerful emotional investment in this topic, and you are reading things into my posts that are not there. If you're finished name-calling, perhaps we can discuss the topic.

And exactly where does your Highness, get your entitlement from? When I see a self flattering p****, I say so. Fuck the censorship on this site.

What censorship on this site, are you referring to, here, exactly?

[Age]

Of course, women must not be allowed to have control over ANY aspect of their lives and bodies because that's 'exclusionary' of men and that's not acceptable. Even the word 'woman' is unacceptable because it 'excludes' men like popeye, and 'women' are apparently just a thought in a man's head and only exist there as whatever that thought happens to be-- hence the delightful new names they have for those creatures who give birth eg. cervix-havers, menstruaters, pregnant people... Poor men. All these thousands of years of being excluded from womanhood when we were all the same sex all along and it was just a matter of 'bending the fluid' a little bit...

This is seriously what fucking AI American-programmed bullshit comes up with. There is no hope for humanity now, unless the internet ends and humans regain the ability to think--and that's not going to happen any time soon:

''A menstruator is an individual who menstruates, regardless of their gender identity, encompassing transgender and non-binary people who have periods. The term "menstruator" is used in academic, medical, and activist contexts to provide a gender-neutral and inclusive alternative to "woman" when referring to people who menstruate, recognizing that not all women menstruate and not all people who menstruate identify as women.''



Human stupidity has become overwhelming. And there you all are, asking AI to 'think' for you.

I though 'this thread' was intended to be about 'children', and, if they have 'rights', or not, in knowing who both were, in regards to 'their' creation.

[Age]

If someone puts a coin in a vending machine and the vending machine releases a Pepsi then the person who put the coin in owns the Pepsi.

Are you, here, suggesting that 'that person' can then do whatever 'it' wants with, or to, that can or bottle?

[Eodnhoj7]

If someone puts a coin in a vending machine and the vending machine releases a Pepsi then the person who put the coin in owns the Pepsi.

DUH!

I know...and yet many people fail to see the obviousness of it.

[Age]

If someone puts a coin in a vending machine and the vending machine releases a Pepsi then the person who put the coin in owns the Pepsi.

DUH!

I know...and yet many people fail to see the obviousness of it.

So, is this thread about some so-called and so-classed 'owner' or about any 'rights', if any, in regards to 'children', instead?

[popeye1945]

The crux of the matter is that the burden of accountability would fall upon the women, which would be a true burden. This way, with automatic paternity testing in every hospital in which a child is born, the male would know for certain it's his child or not, and the child would have a better chance of coming to know who, in fact, was their father and perhaps what kind of genetic inheritance was to govern their lives. That women do not want this, I get. It would, however, restrict women's sexual behaviours to a more moderate, focused practice, which would, of course, limit the access that the male have to feed their sexual drive. Next, we get them tents to live in-----lol! Black tents! with peek holes! If not, does society continue to look like a breeding pen, and much of it left to guesswork? Come on, ladies, you're not going to sit on your hands for this one, are you?