Provide Your Metaphysics Here Age, If You Desire to be Understood

[Eodnhoj7]

Once again, for the very slow of learners, here, or for those who have not yet read 'my words' where I have already stated, I am not, here, in this forum, to be necessarily understood by you posters, here.

I am, here, to learn how to communicate better, with you human beings.

So being understood is not necessary and yet you desire to communicate better with this communication on your part not being necessary to understand for others?

Once again, your sentence and claim does not make sense, to me, as well you have put a question mark at the end of your statement, here.

Further, I am, here, wanting to learn how to communicate better, with you human beings, but, again, not necessarily so within this forum. I am, again, using you posters, here, so as to learn how to communicate better, with you human beings, eventually. And, how I want to do this is, for example, when a human being like "yourself" "eodnhoj7" says and writes the word, 'metaphysical', and I then just ask you to clarify what do you mean by the word, 'metaphysical, then when, and if, you provide a clarifying answer, then I am and thus will learn how to communicate better 'with you'.

So, until you provide me with a clarifying answer I am not learning how to communicate better, 'with you'. Did you understand 'this'?

What do you mean by "clarifying"?

Your terminology is ambiguous and yet you seek to communicate with others.

[Eodnhoj7]

So many threads in honour of the odious little creep. More attention than he's ever had in his life. No wonder he hangs around like a foul stench.

Nonsense. If he wants attention then he will have it.

[Age]

Once again, for the very slow of learners, here, or for those who have not yet read 'my words' where I have already stated, I am not, here, in this forum, to be necessarily understood by you posters, here.

I am, here, to learn how to communicate better, with you human beings.

So being understood is not necessary and yet you desire to communicate better with this communication on your part not being necessary to understand for others?

Communication is a language tool that connects individuals and facilitates the exchange of ideas, it is the depth of understanding that truly enriches these interactions. Communication is good, it can be deep or shallow,but understanding is everything.

Yes, once understanding 'understanding', itself, is obtained, then this is when human beings really 'take off', in evolutionary terms, and really move forward and progress in fulfilling 'the One unified dream' of every human being's want and desire.

And, once 'i' learn how to communicate, better, how 'all of this' can be achieved, and reached, and in its most Truly simple and easy way, with 'you', human beings, then 'you' all can really begin creating, and thus begin living, in peace and harmony with one another together, as a Unified One.

You either understand what’s being communicated by others or you don’t. You can’t force people to understand your communication techniques. Similarly, you can’t expect people to understand your communication either, they will or they won’t.

What I have found is that it is only through asking questions, from a Truly open perspective, for clarification sake, to the best and most efficient way of communication to Truly understand what another is really meaning.

However, as can be seen and proved throughout this forum getting 'others' to just 'open up' and being 'forth coming' in just providing actual clarification in what they mean is not some thing that 'these people' will readily do. However, because I already fully understand how and why 'they' are 'the way' that 'they are', then it is just a process of 'waiting patiently' until 'they' want to communicate with 'me' better.

Again, 'I' am, here, just wanting to learn how to communicate better. I am just waiting until I present words in the 'Right way' in which people feel totally comfortable to be open and honest when they respond to me and when they just answer 'my questions' to clarify 'their views and positions. in other words I am just 'waiting', here, until I find the 'Right words', and until I find the 'Right way' to present 'those words.

If one has already made their mind up that Age is not worth talking to then all communication is blocked and made impossible. Only if you really want to communicate with someone will understanding come, or it won’t. Better communication is when people are willing to work together in communication, and not be against the other, or with each other.

Very True. However, and very sadly, through a very ill-gotten 'education system' you people were 'taught' to pick "sides" and 'fight' for and/or against "sides". you were all also 'taught' that 'not yet knowing' things was wrong, bad, and punishable, you were all 'taught' to judge, ridicule, and to humiliate 'those' who were 'different', 'not as good/smart', and who did not 'fit in'. So, you all have a tendency to just not admit when you do not, yet, know some thing, and so you all pretend to 'know' more than you really do, and you all tend to never 'stray away' from what you were 'taught' to believe is true. And, so you all have some level of desire to 'fit in' by 'trying to' form 'groups', creating a 'us' versus 'them' attitude and to just keep believing the 'same words' that you were 'taught' to believe is absolutely true. For example, 'look at' how long it took 'that one' to just communicate, better, the Fact that, actually, the sun did not revolve around the sun, and it was, in fact, the other way around.

Even though 'that one' was just trying to communicate, better, an actual Truth, it was because of people's prior ill-gotten 'teachings', and of being 'taught' to believe some things to be 'absolutely true', why it took so, so long for 'those human beings' to 'catch up' and 'learn' what the actual Truth of things, were/are.

When two people are only really wanting and willing to work together, only then will understanding come, and it’ll come naturally of it’s own accord.

Again, very, very True.

Understanding is not something you can teach another until they are ready to understand. It’s something that automatically happens spontaneously, actually.

Once you people, and human beings, learn, and 'understand', who and what 'you' are, exactly, and, how and why 'you' all do exactly what 'you do', then an understanding of 'understanding', itself, is revealed, and from this 'understanding', itself, actual 'wisdom' for everything else also is revealed, and understood, as well.

So, once 'understanding', itself, is fully and Truly understood, then you human beings move out of the 'human being' stage, in Life, and up to the next evolutionary stage, and level, of Life, and living, Itself.

That’s if you’re open enough to allow others to communicate with you in the first place, instead of just shutting them down, or writing them off as pointless, as many of you do with Age in this forum.

I have noticed you all do it with 'each other' as well, not just with "age", itself.

Understanding is everything. When one thing is known, everything is known.

It could be said, and argued, that one 'understanding', of "one's" 'Self', Itself, is known, then everything else can and does become known, and much simpler and much easier I will add.

[Age]

Effective communication is essential for building strong relationships. Communication is about 'give and take', i.e. understanding others and sharing our own thoughts and feelings clearly. Being able to do both fosters empathy, trust and mutual understanding in our relationships.

Sharing philosophy with others that are personal, is bound to attract opposition because not everyone thinks alike.

And, it is 'that' what is not of the 'thinking alike', or in other words, it is 'that', which could not be agreed upon and accepted, is what is best just disregarded, as it is 'that', which every one could agree with and accept, what actually leads every one to begin living in peace and harmony with one another, as One.

Understanding each other’s differences is what makes for better communication. And make for better relationships.

And, 'understanding' each other's 'differences' is done in just understanding that absolutely every thought comes from every 'bodies' individually, uniquely 'different' experiences. It is solely, and only, from each individual 'different' 'body's individual 'different' past experiences how and why every body has 'different thoughts', and thus 'differences', within.

Understanding that every one is 'different' solely because of every body's 'different' 'past experiences' brings with it 'the understanding' that leads to the automatic natural 'forgiveness' for absolutely every one. Which obviously ends 'judging' and 'judgement' of others, and even of "oneself". Which obviously helps absolutely in the transition of living in peace and harmony together, as One, or as some might say, in to the 'Golden Age'.

But relationships take two to tango, takes two to align. When or if we are willing to align are we then in the perfect position for understanding to come naturally.

Which is just part of the natural progression of unifying back together, as One. As it has been the One, which has been the One Truth, all along, anyway.

If there’s already friction between two people then understanding will be blocked.

It was because human beings had not yet learned, and gained, 'understanding', itself, how and why 'conflict', and thus 'friction', actually existed.

'Friction' is only caused by and only exists when 'two' are working 'against' and not 'with' 'each other'. And, 'conflict' is only caused by and only exists when 'two' are wanting their own beliefs and assumptions to be agree with and to be accepted by 'the an/other'.

That’s why it’s important to stay fully open and accepting of any differences as being illusions.

No one has to 'accept' 'differences', but 'understanding' how and why 'every difference' came into existence, provides the 'forgiveness' needed to not 'stop and judge', and to just 'keep moving forward', and also providing the 'understanding' of 'now knowing' what is 'best to do' to keep 'looking and moving forward'.

Understanding how illusion works comes when we realise or recognise we are all truly the same conscious awareness behind all our differences.

Although 'you' are on the 'Right path', here, there is still a bit more to learn, and understand, about the 'we', here, and about who and what 'we' are, exactly,, and about how and why 'we' 'work' and/or 'do' what 'we' do.

True love has no opposite.

Except for 'True abuse'. And, all abuse is just 'misuse'. And, obviously, you can only know when you are misusing some thing, when you know and understand its 'actual purpose'. So, you adult human beings will not really understand and know when you are abusing children and "yourselves" until you learn and fully understand what the 'actual purpose' of you human beings is, in Life.

And, as always, if any one would like to have a Truly open and honest peaceful discussion about 'this', or absolutely anything else, then let 'us' begin.

If your “love” has an opposite, then it is not love but a strong ego-need for a more complete and deeper sense of self.

And, it is in the learning, and understanding, of the 'self', fully, where the actual knowing, and understanding, fully, of thy 'Self' arises and comes from.

In essence true or unconditional love is a fundamental energy or state of being that transcends duality, making it impossible for an opposite to exist. Instead of hate, fear is often proposed as a more fitting counter to love, as it represents the blockage or withdrawal from love's expansive energy.

Love is truth, and truth is infinite.

I like to use the word, 'Truth', to just separate 'that irrefutable Truth', from just the 'truth', which is refutable, and which you human beings just have or hold, individually.

To me anyway, 'the Truth' is irrefutable, and thus infinite, whereas, 'the truth' is just people's own individual truths that not every one could agree with and accept.

'Truth' is 'that' what every one could agree with and accept, and thus irrefutable and infinite. 'truth' is 'that' what not every one could agree with and accept.

[Age]

Once again, for the very slow of learners, here, or for those who have not yet read 'my words' where I have already stated, I am not, here, in this forum, to be necessarily understood by you posters, here.

I am, here, to learn how to communicate better, with you human beings.

You're here to learn how to communicate better but not to be understood better?

LOL Here 'we' have 'another one' who says and states just about the exact same thing as another, here, and who also adds a question mark onto the end of their claim and statement.

Also, and by the way, you have managed, once again, to misinterpret and to misconstrue what I actually said, wrote, and meant. But, then again, this is a very common theme of yours, anyway.

[Eodnhoj7]

Once again, for the very slow of learners, here, or for those who have not yet read 'my words' where I have already stated, I am not, here, in this forum, to be necessarily understood by you posters, here.

I am, here, to learn how to communicate better, with you human beings.

You're here to learn how to communicate better but not to be understood better?

LOL Here 'we' have 'another one' who says and states just about the exact same thing as another, here, and who also adds a question mark onto the end of their claim and statement.

Also, and by the way, you have managed, once again, to misinterpret and to misconstrue what I actually said, wrote, and meant. But, then again, this is a very common theme of yours, anyway.

And what did I misconstrue?

Can you point to this theme and clarify what you mean?

[Age]

Effective communication is essential for building strong relationships. Communication is about 'give and take', i.e. understanding others and sharing our own thoughts and feelings clearly. Being able to do both fosters empathy, trust and mutual understanding in our relationships.

Sharing philosophy with others that are personal, is bound to attract opposition because not everyone thinks alike.
Understanding each other’s differences is what makes for better communication. And make for better relationships.
But relationships take two to tango, takes two to align. When or if we are willing to align are we then in the perfect position for understanding to come naturally.

If there’s already friction between two people then understanding will be blocked. That’s why it’s important to stay fully open and accepting of any differences as being illusions. Understanding how illusion works comes when we realise or recognise we are all truly the same conscious awareness behind all our differences.

True love has no opposite. If your “love” has an opposite, then it is not love but a strong ego-need for a more complete and deeper sense of self.


In essence true or unconditional love is a fundamental energy or state of being that transcends duality, making it impossible for an opposite to exist. Instead of hate, fear is often proposed as a more fitting counter to love, as it represents the blockage or withdrawal from love's expansive energy.

Love is truth, and truth is infinite.

So asking him a question, providing him a whole thread to specifically "clarify" what his words "mean", opening dialogue with him...is not a give and take?

How can I know 'which words', exactly, to 'clarify', if you do not inform me of 'which words' that 'you', personally, would like 'clarified'?

The question I ask is legitimate.

Stop pushing the words love and peace, you openly you admit you hate people, contradiction yourself, and are incoherent.

Let the man, or woman, clarify his views and whar they mean.

This is a philosophy forum.

Which means 'what', exactly, to you?

Also, and by the way in the thread, which triggered 'this thread', you claimed.

1. you had decided to not speak 'with me'.

2. you would create 'this thread' and would 'only speak with me'.

However, you are not just speaking 'with me' but are speaking 'with others', here, in 'this thread'.

[Age]

So many threads in honour of the odious little creep. More attention than he's ever had in his life. No wonder he hangs around like a foul stench.

And, thank you for attending and hanging around, and to adding more, here, in 'this thread'.

Could 'we' also be sure that 'you' will be hanging around even more and also adding more of 'your views and beliefs', here?

[Age]

Not only is God not intelligent enough to automatically know how to communicate with us human beings,

'This one', still, could not comprehend and understand things, here, Correctly.

'This one', literally, can 'not see' the actual words that I actually use and write, here. And, again, 'this' is because of its 'confirmation biases', which come from its pre-existing absolute beliefs, here.

God can't even learn it through years and years of concentrated effort. Meanwhile, human children can easily learn it. Today we learned something about God (amen).

What was 'it', exactly, "atla" that 'you' and 'others' have, supposedly, learned, 'today'?

[Eodnhoj7]

Effective communication is essential for building strong relationships. Communication is about 'give and take', i.e. understanding others and sharing our own thoughts and feelings clearly. Being able to do both fosters empathy, trust and mutual understanding in our relationships.

Sharing philosophy with others that are personal, is bound to attract opposition because not everyone thinks alike.
Understanding each other’s differences is what makes for better communication. And make for better relationships.
But relationships take two to tango, takes two to align. When or if we are willing to align are we then in the perfect position for understanding to come naturally.

If there’s already friction between two people then understanding will be blocked. That’s why it’s important to stay fully open and accepting of any differences as being illusions. Understanding how illusion works comes when we realise or recognise we are all truly the same conscious awareness behind all our differences.

True love has no opposite. If your “love” has an opposite, then it is not love but a strong ego-need for a more complete and deeper sense of self.


In essence true or unconditional love is a fundamental energy or state of being that transcends duality, making it impossible for an opposite to exist. Instead of hate, fear is often proposed as a more fitting counter to love, as it represents the blockage or withdrawal from love's expansive energy.

Love is truth, and truth is infinite.

So asking him a question, providing him a whole thread to specifically "clarify" what his words "mean", opening dialogue with him...is not a give and take?

How can I know 'which words', exactly, to 'clarify', if you do not inform me of 'which words' that 'you', personally, would like 'clarified'?

The question I ask is legitimate.

Stop pushing the words love and peace, you openly you admit you hate people, contradiction yourself, and are incoherent.

Let the man, or woman, clarify his views and whar they mean.

This is a philosophy forum.

Which means 'what', exactly, to you?

Also, and by the way in the thread, which triggered 'this thread', you claimed.

1. you had decided to not speak 'with me'.

2. you would create 'this thread' and would 'only speak with me'.

However, you are not just speaking 'with me' but are speaking 'with others', here, in 'this thread'.

And what do these questions mean to you, could you please clarify?

[Age]

So being understood is not necessary and yet you desire to communicate better with this communication on your part not being necessary to understand for others?

Once again, your sentence and claim does not make sense, to me, as well you have put a question mark at the end of your statement, here.

Further, I am, here, wanting to learn how to communicate better, with you human beings, but, again, not necessarily so within this forum. I am, again, using you posters, here, so as to learn how to communicate better, with you human beings, eventually. And, how I want to do this is, for example, when a human being like "yourself" "eodnhoj7" says and writes the word, 'metaphysical', and I then just ask you to clarify what do you mean by the word, 'metaphysical, then when, and if, you provide a clarifying answer, then I am and thus will learn how to communicate better 'with you'.

So, until you provide me with a clarifying answer I am not learning how to communicate better, 'with you'. Did you understand 'this'?

What do you mean by "clarifying"?

Your terminology is ambiguous and yet you seek to communicate with others.

Why is the word, 'clarifying', ambiguous, to you?

If you clarify 'this', then I am in a better situation to communicate, better, to you, what I mean by 'clarifying'. Until 'then' I await your clarification.

Also, is the terminology, clarifying, ambiguous to absolutely anyone else, here?

If yes, then how and why, exactly?

[Eodnhoj7]

Once again, your sentence and claim does not make sense, to me, as well you have put a question mark at the end of your statement, here.

Further, I am, here, wanting to learn how to communicate better, with you human beings, but, again, not necessarily so within this forum. I am, again, using you posters, here, so as to learn how to communicate better, with you human beings, eventually. And, how I want to do this is, for example, when a human being like "yourself" "eodnhoj7" says and writes the word, 'metaphysical', and I then just ask you to clarify what do you mean by the word, 'metaphysical, then when, and if, you provide a clarifying answer, then I am and thus will learn how to communicate better 'with you'.

So, until you provide me with a clarifying answer I am not learning how to communicate better, 'with you'. Did you understand 'this'?

What do you mean by "clarifying"?

Your terminology is ambiguous and yet you seek to communicate with others.

Why is the word, 'clarifying', ambiguous, to you?

If you clarify 'this', then I am in a better situation to communicate, better, to you, what I mean by 'clarifying'. Until 'then' I await your clarification.

Also, is the terminology, clarifying, ambiguous to absolutely anyone else, here?

If yes, then how and why, exactly?

What do you mean by "clarifying", from your point of view that only you mean?

[Age]

You're here to learn how to communicate better but not to be understood better?

LOL Here 'we' have 'another one' who says and states just about the exact same thing as another, here, and who also adds a question mark onto the end of their claim and statement.

Also, and by the way, you have managed, once again, to misinterpret and to misconstrue what I actually said, wrote, and meant. But, then again, this is a very common theme of yours, anyway.

And what did I misconstrue?

Can you point to this theme and clarify what you mean?

you appear to not yet be aware that 'I' was responding to someone else, and not 'you' at all, here.

So, 'this' could be an example of what 'you' have misconstrued. Which is 'the theme' that I was 'pointing to'. And, this 'another example', which you have presented so quickly, again, clarifies what I meant.

[Eodnhoj7]

LOL Here 'we' have 'another one' who says and states just about the exact same thing as another, here, and who also adds a question mark onto the end of their claim and statement.

Also, and by the way, you have managed, once again, to misinterpret and to misconstrue what I actually said, wrote, and meant. But, then again, this is a very common theme of yours, anyway.

And what did I misconstrue?

Can you point to this theme and clarify what you mean?

you appear to not yet be aware that 'I' was responding to someone else, and not 'you' at all, here.

So, 'this' could be an example of what 'you' have misconstrued. Which is 'the theme' that I was 'pointing to'. And, this 'another example', which you have presented so quickly, again, clarifies what I meant.

Can you clarify what you mean by misconstrue?

[Eodnhoj7]

Once again, your sentence and claim does not make sense, to me, as well you have put a question mark at the end of your statement, here.

Further, I am, here, wanting to learn how to communicate better, with you human beings, but, again, not necessarily so within this forum. I am, again, using you posters, here, so as to learn how to communicate better, with you human beings, eventually. And, how I want to do this is, for example, when a human being like "yourself" "eodnhoj7" says and writes the word, 'metaphysical', and I then just ask you to clarify what do you mean by the word, 'metaphysical, then when, and if, you provide a clarifying answer, then I am and thus will learn how to communicate better 'with you'.

So, until you provide me with a clarifying answer I am not learning how to communicate better, 'with you'. Did you understand 'this'?

What do you mean by "clarifying"?

Your terminology is ambiguous and yet you seek to communicate with others.

Why is the word, 'clarifying', ambiguous, to you?

If you clarify 'this', then I am in a better situation to communicate, better, to you, what I mean by 'clarifying'. Until 'then' I await your clarification.

Also, is the terminology, clarifying, ambiguous to absolutely anyone else, here?

If yes, then how and why, exactly?

What do you mean by ambiguity?