Age wrote: ↑Sun Sep 21, 2025 1:40 am
Yet, although 'you' believe, absolutely that both of them are 'Absolutely Positively True', (with capital letters), here you are, still, communicating 'with me', and, specifically, communicating, with me, in regards to the actual answers 'I' provided to 'your questions'.
Oh, 'the irony', some would be very clearly recognizing and noticing.
So you want me to stop talking to a socially inept child?
Why are 'you' telling 'me' what 'you' are imagining 'i' want 'you' to do, but then 'you' have put a question mark at the end of 'your claim'?
Magnus Anderson wrote: ↑Sun Sep 21, 2025 2:22 am
I shouldn't bother trying to help it?
Are 'you' talking to any one particular, here? Also, you, again, put a question mark at the end of 'your belief', here.
But, 'evil', or just Wrong/abusive doing, is actually 'outside' of God, and absolutely nothing that God wants, nor even created.
Sure, you adult human beings who have the 'freedom' to choose to do absolutely whatever you want to do, are created by the very Thing that is said to have created every thing, but 'your own Wrong doing' is not God, Itself. God wants nothing, and has nothing at all, to do with the Wrong that you adult humans completely freely choose to do. If you adults want to keep doing the Wrong that you all do, then you are completely free to do so. But, God is, always, guiding you other-wise. Although you, obviously, are not always 'listening', and 'hearing'.
God is dreaming every concept of right and wrong, good and evil..etc..etc…God is dreaming cause and effect experiences as and through direct consciousness.
There’s something aware it is aware. That something is not an object.
My question to you Age, is what is that something that is aware it is aware, and knows it’s not an object?
If it’s not an object, then what is it exactly? Will you answer this?
You have nothing to bring to the philosophical table.
I could be wrong though, I have noted a few times that your philosophy seems to be about bashing on most of the men on planet earth, some women, transgender people, and some philosophy now posters.
You have nothing to bring to the philosophical table.
I could be wrong though, I have noted a few times that your philosophy seems to be about bashing on most of the men on planet earth, some women, transgender people, and some philosophy now posters.
Your posts are 100 percent gibberish. That doesn't even seem possible but at least they can be used as case studies for psychiatry students.
You have nothing to bring to the philosophical table.
I could be wrong though, I have noted a few times that your philosophy seems to be about bashing on most of the men on planet earth, some women, transgender people, and some philosophy now posters.
Why am I not surprised you defend thunking men in frocks who want to lurk in women's loos and molest hapless M & S bra fitters? Misogynistic traitorous trollop.
You have nothing to bring to the philosophical table.
I could be wrong though, I have noted a few times that your philosophy seems to be about bashing on most of the men on planet earth, some women, transgender people, and some philosophy now posters.
Your posts are 100 percent gibberish. That doesn't even seem possible but at least they can be used as case studies for psychiatry students.
Well you’re not wrong there. After all, I have always been my own psychiatrist living rent free inside my own head.