You need to point out a contradiction, i.e. an internal inconsistency in a particular system of beliefs. So, you need an example ("witness") for that.Dubious wrote: ↑Wed Jul 02, 2025 5:42 pmA corrupted perverse logic, which can rationalize every absurdity under the sun, has been the instrument of truth for theists and theism since day one. There are no other means for that type to rely on in validating their beliefs beyond mere assumptions. Such absurdities can only be acknowledged by the absurd arguments made in its defense.
The fact that religion is foundationalist, i.e. ultimately rests on basic beliefs, is perfectly fine, given the fact that logic itself is foundationalist.
There is nothing wrong with foundationalism.