Fairy wrote: ↑Fri Sep 05, 2025 11:47 am
Age wrote: ↑Thu Sep 04, 2025 11:01 pm
Fairy wrote: ↑Thu Sep 04, 2025 2:52 pm
Now you’re just denying what you definitely said.
To see a building requires a seer. So where is the seer?
Lol come on "fairy" absolutely any one can look back, here, and see that I never said those words.
However, even if I did say and use 'those words' 'I' have already explained to 'you', exactly where not just the so-called 'seer' is, exactly, but also where the 'Seer' is, exactly, as well.
And, those two things are aligned with where 'consciousness', and, 'Consciousness' also exist, exactly.
The seer is.
The you cannot see it because you are it.
I’ve explained this to you Age, multiple times, and you still ask for clarification of what I’ve said.
Once again "fairy" what you subjectively and personally believe is true is not necessarily True at all. When will you understand this undeniable Fact?
'you' and 'I' can be 'see/understand' who and what 'you' and 'I' are, exactly. 'I' have informed 'you' of this also irrefutable Fact on many, many occasions. That you do not want to believe this irrefutable Fact and Truth is on 'you', alone.
Now, 'I' have already informed 'you' that, of course, the human body can not 'see' what is invisible to the human eyes. Which, again, is exactly what 'you' and 'I' am, exactly. Once more, 'you' and 'I' are invisible things.
Therefore, 'you', the invisible person, can not see 'you', the invisible human being part within a human body, with the physical eyes, of the human body. But, 'you', the invisible person can 'see', or understand, who and what 'you' are, exactly. And, it does not matter one iota that 'you' are actually 'it'. 'you' have the ability to learn, and understand, things, including who and what 'you' people and human beings are, exactly. So, it does not matter that 'you' are just another 'it', that is, a human being, and will never ever be able to physically 'see' the invisible 'you', or the invisible 'being' part of the human body, 'you' will always be able to 'understand', and thus 'see', "your" 'self' in a particular light, or from a particular perspective.
So, even though 'you' are 'it', 'it' has the ability to learn and see, and thus understand, things, including what 'it' is, exactly.
'you' are 'it' so just be 'it', and just stop believing and claiming things that are completely untrue, like, for example, that 'it' can not see and understand "its" 'self'.
Fairy wrote: ↑Fri Sep 05, 2025 11:47 am
You’re literally like a broken record at this juncture.
'you' "fairy" are 'the one' who keeps claiming that 'it' can not do, the 'very thing' that others have done.
See, if others can do some thing, then 'you' also have the ability to do the exact same thing. Even though 'you' keep telling "your" 'self' that 'you' can not.
Please do not forget that 'you' human beings also have the ability to trick, lie, deceive, and fool "yourselves" completely and absolutely.
Fairy wrote: ↑Fri Sep 05, 2025 11:47 am
I’m not interested in your semantic style of communication with others, it’s just tedious. Listening to you is like pulling teeth.
Yet, here you are continually responding, to me. Have you ever thought if you do not like 'listening to some one', then just stop 'talking to them'?
Fairy wrote: ↑Fri Sep 05, 2025 11:47 am
Bye the way there’s no such thing as a lower and higher consciousness as you seem to believe there is. Idiot.
So, you personally and subjectively believe, absolutely, that there are not different 'levels' of 'consciousness', itself, and so it is 'I' who is the 'idiot', here, correct?
Fairy wrote: ↑Fri Sep 05, 2025 11:47 am
There are many states embedded in consciousness which is all the same one infinite consciousness .
Really?
So, what is 'consciousness', itself, exactly? And, what are these so-claimed 'many states', which you also claim are 'embedded' in the one and only infinite 'consciousness', itself, exactly?
By the way, is there absolutely any possibility at all that 'you' could be wrong in any way at all, here?
Or, is this just a complete impossibility, here?