Good and Evil
Re: Good and Evil
“In the context of 'the question' 'I' asked 'you' I meant 'kill' in 'the way' you adult human beings, in the days when this is being written, use 'that word'. That is when 'the body' of 'the one' who you are, here, calling 'your child' is under to breath nor pump blood anymore.”
Do you mean to kill is to make some body dead?
Do you mean to kill is to make some body dead?
Re: Good and Evil
Interpretation is the expression of the will by means of how reality is transformed by made distinctions.Fairy wrote: ↑Thu Sep 04, 2025 7:10 amIntention being the rider of the will.Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 04, 2025 2:33 amThan anything goes by way of contradiction and the old moral codes of good and evil are justified.Fairy wrote: ↑Wed Sep 03, 2025 10:07 am Killing is loving. Evil is goodness.It's all one thing, nothing is different from one another,no others, Only You
The whole universe is You only through eternity. Some people just hate looking at their mirror.
Our judgements of good and evil … presuppose God as the standard. If there’s no God, there’s neither good nor evil. There’s just nature doing what it does.
If there is no God, the labels ‘good’ and ‘evil’ are merely opinions. They are substitutes for ‘I like it’ and ‘I don’t like it.’ They are not objective realities.
It's all you and you and you and you add infinitum. We're not just observers of this reality, we are literally the creators of it.
What you can do , you will do, or not do. It’s a choice. A choice dictates the will to do something or not do something. That choice is always present for the you. How so, because you are aware of distinction between action and non action.
To say evil is good is a choice.
To say evil is evil and good is good is a choice.
Why? Because both occur as superpositioned within a realm of all possible distinctions by which they only appear distinct when projecting upon such infinite potential collapses all possible choices of distinction into one.
The effects flows upon what is chosen and to justify evil effectively is to justify the very suffering one is trying to overcome or traverse thus leaving a choice of evil as good being futile.
Re: Good and Evil
Will you provide any examples?
Some also claim that it is an observational fact that the Universe, Itself, is expanding, although it is an already proved Fact that It is not expanding. So, what some observe is not necessarily True at all.
And, what you claimed can be just proved True, or not, by what, still, exists in my writings.
Re: Good and Evil
No.Fairy wrote: ↑Thu Sep 04, 2025 2:42 pm “In the context of 'the question' 'I' asked 'you' I meant 'kill' in 'the way' you adult human beings, in the days when this is being written, use 'that word'. That is when 'the body' of 'the one' who you are, here, calling 'your child' is under to breath nor pump blood anymore.”
Do you mean to kill is to make some body dead?
Re: Good and Evil
“Unless you make yourself equal to God, you cannot understand God: for the like is not intelligible save to the like. Make yourself grow to a greatness beyond measure, by a bound free yourself from the body; raise yourself above all time, become Eternity; then you will understand God. Believe that nothing is impossible for you, think yourself immortal and capable of understanding all, all arts, all sciences, the nature of every living being. Mount higher than the highest height; descend lower than the lowest depth. Draw into yourself all sensations of everything created, fire and water, dry and moist, imagining that you are everywhere, on earth, in the sea, in the sky, that you are not yet born, in the maternal womb, adolescent, old, dead, beyond death. If you embrace in your thought all things at once, times, places, substances, qualities, quantities, you may understand God.” ― Giordano Bruno
Only God.

Only God.
Re: Good and Evil
You don’t see it because you are it.Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 04, 2025 6:04 pmInterpretation is the expression of the will by means of how reality is transformed by made distinctions.Fairy wrote: ↑Thu Sep 04, 2025 7:10 amIntention being the rider of the will.
What you can do , you will do, or not do. It’s a choice. A choice dictates the will to do something or not do something. That choice is always present for the you. How so, because you are aware of distinction between action and non action.
To say evil is good is a choice.
To say evil is evil and good is good is a choice.
Why? Because both occur as superpositioned within a realm of all possible distinctions by which they only appear distinct when projecting upon such infinite potential collapses all possible choices of distinction into one.
The effects flows upon what is chosen and to justify evil effectively is to justify the very suffering one is trying to overcome or traverse thus leaving a choice of evil as good being futile.
Like Icarus he flew so close to the Sun.
The closer you get to the singularity is to lose the fear of death. It is to dissolve into Gods infinite Love.
Re: Good and Evil
Consequences exist in this material domain of reality and sometimes they may be seen as punishments.
But in fact they are universes’s way to teach us that we get back what we give. And this teaching is a form of Love.
You cannot just do what you want without consequences.
But in fact they are universes’s way to teach us that we get back what we give. And this teaching is a form of Love.
You cannot just do what you want without consequences.
Re: Good and Evil
Isaiah 45:7, "I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the Lord do all these things". While some interpretations suggest this means God created moral evil, the verse is better understood in its context to mean that God controls all circumstances, both good and bad, including prosperity and calamity. The Hebrew word for "evil" here can also mean "calamity," "disaster," or "hard times," referring to hardship and distress rather than moral evil.
Re: Good and Evil
Key Aspects of Isaiah 45:7
God's Sovereignty:
The passage emphasizes God's absolute power and sovereignty over creation and all events, including light and darkness, and peace and disaster.
Contextual Meaning:
The context of the passage concerns God's use of King Cyrus to bring about the restoration of the people of Israel. God is asserting His authority to bring about both blessing and hardship as part of His plan.
Meaning of "Evil":
The Hebrew word translated as "evil" in this verse (רָע, ra) can mean moral evil but also encompasses concepts like calamity, suffering, distress, or bad times.
Parallelism:
God pairs opposites (light and darkness, peace and disaster) to demonstrate that He is in control of all aspects of existence.
Interpretations and Nuances
Not Moral Evil:
The verse does not imply God is the author of moral evil or sin, but rather that He permits, allows, and directs hardship and disaster in the world for specific purposes.
Alternative Translations:
Many translations offer alternative renderings of the verse that reflect this understanding, such as "calamity" (ESV), "disaster" (NIV), or "happiness and sorrow".
God as the Ultimate Cause:
Even for events of disaster, God is the ultimate cause, as He ultimately controls everything that happens in the world.
God's Sovereignty:
The passage emphasizes God's absolute power and sovereignty over creation and all events, including light and darkness, and peace and disaster.
Contextual Meaning:
The context of the passage concerns God's use of King Cyrus to bring about the restoration of the people of Israel. God is asserting His authority to bring about both blessing and hardship as part of His plan.
Meaning of "Evil":
The Hebrew word translated as "evil" in this verse (רָע, ra) can mean moral evil but also encompasses concepts like calamity, suffering, distress, or bad times.
Parallelism:
God pairs opposites (light and darkness, peace and disaster) to demonstrate that He is in control of all aspects of existence.
Interpretations and Nuances
Not Moral Evil:
The verse does not imply God is the author of moral evil or sin, but rather that He permits, allows, and directs hardship and disaster in the world for specific purposes.
Alternative Translations:
Many translations offer alternative renderings of the verse that reflect this understanding, such as "calamity" (ESV), "disaster" (NIV), or "happiness and sorrow".
God as the Ultimate Cause:
Even for events of disaster, God is the ultimate cause, as He ultimately controls everything that happens in the world.
Re: Good and Evil
Do not see what? The effects of choice by means of interpretation?Fairy wrote: ↑Fri Sep 05, 2025 7:32 amYou don’t see it because you are it.Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 04, 2025 6:04 pmInterpretation is the expression of the will by means of how reality is transformed by made distinctions.Fairy wrote: ↑Thu Sep 04, 2025 7:10 am
Intention being the rider of the will.
What you can do , you will do, or not do. It’s a choice. A choice dictates the will to do something or not do something. That choice is always present for the you. How so, because you are aware of distinction between action and non action.
To say evil is good is a choice.
To say evil is evil and good is good is a choice.
Why? Because both occur as superpositioned within a realm of all possible distinctions by which they only appear distinct when projecting upon such infinite potential collapses all possible choices of distinction into one.
The effects flows upon what is chosen and to justify evil effectively is to justify the very suffering one is trying to overcome or traverse thus leaving a choice of evil as good being futile.
Like Icarus he flew so close to the Sun.
The closer you get to the singularity is to lose the fear of death. It is to dissolve into Gods infinite Love.
Re: Good and Evil
Do not see the seer/ seeing.Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 05, 2025 6:01 pmDo not see what? The effects of choice by means of interpretation?Fairy wrote: ↑Fri Sep 05, 2025 7:32 amYou don’t see it because you are it.Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 04, 2025 6:04 pm
Interpretation is the expression of the will by means of how reality is transformed by made distinctions.
To say evil is good is a choice.
To say evil is evil and good is good is a choice.
Why? Because both occur as superpositioned within a realm of all possible distinctions by which they only appear distinct when projecting upon such infinite potential collapses all possible choices of distinction into one.
The effects flows upon what is chosen and to justify evil effectively is to justify the very suffering one is trying to overcome or traverse thus leaving a choice of evil as good being futile.
Like Icarus he flew so close to the Sun.
The closer you get to the singularity is to lose the fear of death. It is to dissolve into Gods infinite Love.
You don’t see it, because you are it.
All these concepts of it are projections superimposed upon it. Like a secondary reality.
You cannot know the infinite because you are the infinite.
The Infinite has no preferences, It kisses both the darkness and the light equally.
But don’t just take my word for it, test it out for yourself.
Re: Good and Evil
Even the demonization of literal demons is an epistemic error. It must be, since if God created everything, God created demons. And who are you to judge God's Creation?
Humans didn’t create anything humans are the created in this conception. God's dream, God’s mind.
Humans didn’t create anything humans are the created in this conception. God's dream, God’s mind.
Re: Good and Evil
There is no how. How is the one question to all our answers.